headerphoto


Showing posts with label Islamic Subversion in Europe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic Subversion in Europe. Show all posts

Italy: Islam denied income tax revenue

At least one country in Europe has some stones left. Great job and way to go, Italy. From Adnkronos and Atlas Shrugs.

Italy: Islam denied income tax revenue

Rome, 27 August (AKI) - Mosques in Italy will not receive a share of income tax revenue the Italian government allocates to religious faiths each year. Hindu and Buddhist temples, Greek Orthodox churches and Jehovah's Witnesses will be eligible for the funds, according to a bill approved by the Italian cabinet in May and still must be approved by parliament.


Until now, the government had earmarked 8 percent of income tax revenue for Italy's established churches. The great majority of these funds go to the Catholic Church, although if they wish, individual tax payers may elect to give the money to charities and cultural projects instead.


The head of COREIS, one of Italy's largest Muslim groups, Yahya Pallavicini, said he was bitter that Islam had been denied the revenue from Italian income tax.


"Work should be begun on legally recognising those moderate Muslims who have for years shown themselves to be reliable interlocutors who are free of and fundamentalist ideology," he said.


Islam is not an established religion in Italy and there is only one official mosque in the country, Rome's Grand Mosque (photo). Politicians from the ruling coalition cite radical imams, polygamy and failure to uphold women's rights by Muslims immigrants as obstacles to recognising Islam as an official religion in Italy.


Until now, only the Catholic Church, Judaism and other established churches including Lutherans, Evangelists, Waldensians and 7th-day Adventists have received the income tax revenue from the Itallain government.


There are between one million and 1.5 million Muslims in Italy and 130 mosques linked the Muslim umbrella organisation UCOII across the country.


Link to the original article from Adnkronos.


----------------------------------------------------


From Atlas Shrugs

Denied tax status in Italy

Italy has denied religious status to Islam. Politicians cited extremist (fundamentalist) imams, polygamy and failure to uphold women's rights by Muslim immigrants as obstacles to recognizing Islam as an official religion in Italy.

And here in the US we are paying for extremist imams (like Rauf) and their wives to go on Middle Eastern junkets to raise money for Islamic supremacist Ground Zero mosques. Sick.


Mosques in Italy will not receive a share of income tax revenue the Italian government allocates to religious faiths each year. Hindu and Buddhist temples, Greek Orthodox churches and Jehovah's Witnesses will be eligible for the funds, according to a bill approved by the Italian cabinet in May and still must be approved by parliament.


Until now, the government had earmarked 8 percent of income tax revenue for Italy's established churches. The great majority of these funds go to the Catholic Church, although if they wish, individual tax payers may elect to give the money to charities and cultural projects instead.


The head of COREIS, one of Italy's largest Muslim groups, Yahya Pallavicini, said he was bitter that Islam had been denied the revenue from Italian income tax.


"Work should be begun on legally recognising those moderate Muslims who have for years shown themselves to be reliable interlocutors who are free of and fundamentalist ideology," he said.


Islam is not an established religion in Italy and there is only one official mosque in the country, Rome's Grand Mosque. Politicians from the ruling coalition cite radical imams, polygamy and failure to uphold women's rights by Muslims immigrants as obstacles to recognising Islam as an official religion in Italy.


Until now, only the Catholic Church, Judaism and other established churches including Lutherans, Evangelists, Waldensians and 7th-day Adventists have received the income tax revenue from the Itallain government.

Link to original article at Atlas Shrugs is here

France moves to ban the burqua while allowing a super mosque to be built

If there is any example of Europe under seige from Islam and Muslim immigration, then this mega-mosque story is it. France has taken steps to ban the burqua while allowing a gigantic mosque to be built. This is the absolute cave in that Islam seeks to obtain. They will gladly excahnge a ban on the burqua for allowance of this mosque to be built. The Muslims may riot, complain they are the victims of horrible discrimination and persecution as they always do but a mosque such as this one is a victory for Islam. Europe can brag about how tolerate it is by allowing such a wide diversity of cultures, religions, being open to diversity, multiculturalism and political correctness. Native Europeans are in danger of being overrun by Islam. In fact, it may already be too late. The highest birth rate in many European countries is Muslims at a ratio of 8-1. Native European birth rates are well below the rate necessary to sustain the population they have today. As more mosques conaminate Europe, and more Muslims flood the continent, problems with Islam will continue to escalate. Either Europe will fall to Islam or
leaders like the heroic Geert Wilders, Anders Gravers and others will lead Europe back from the brink of returning to the stone age of the 7th century of Islam.





France makes way for Grand Mosque

AFP: MARSEILLE, France — French Muslims celebrated Thursday when work began to build the country's biggest mosque in the southern port city of Marseille, a potent symbol of Islam's place in modern France.

Moves by President Nicolas Sarkozy's government to ban the full-face veil have raised tensions between France's political class and its five million strong Islamic minority, with many Muslims feeling stigmatised.

But Muslim and government leaders alike hope that work on the Grande Mosque will serve to bind the city together and serve as a community anchor.

Marseille is France's second city and home to 250,000 Muslims, many of whom are currently obliged to perform their rites in makeshift prayer houses in basements, rented rooms and dingy garages to worship.

With a minaret soaring 25 metres (82 feet) high, the Grand Mosque will hold up to 7,000 people in its prayer room and the complex will also boast a Koranic school, library, restaurant and tea room when it opens in 2012.

Muslims in Marseille have long campaigned for a mega-mosque as a prominent gathering place that would bring Islam out of the basements and allow it to thrive under the Mediterranean sun.

The turning point came in 2001 when Mayor Jean-Claude Gaudin, a member of Sarkozy's right-wing party, threw his weight behind the project, overriding objections from the far-right.

Like Sarkozy, Gaudin sees the new mosque as a way to help French Muslims integrate into the mainstream and foster a form of moderate, modern Islam that shuns symbols of exclusion like the full-face burqa and niqab veils.

"The construction of this Grand Mosque will serve as a showcase for Marseille's Muslims to promote the true face of Islam, an enlightened Islam," said Mohamed Moussaoui, president of the French Council of the Muslim faith.

After years of delays, the project still faces hurdles to raise the full 22 million euros (27 million dollars) needed to finance it.

Nourredine Cheikh, an Algerian-born businessman and president of the association leading the campaign for the mosque, said his group is hoping for big donations from north African countries, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia.

Among the dozen diplomats who attended the ceremony, Algerian Ambassador Missoum Sbih said Muslims in Marseille "could not do without a dignified place of worship" in France, "Europe's number one Muslim country."

Algeria will sit with other donor countries to work out financing, he said.

The grand mosque will be built in the Saint-Louis area of Marseille, an ethnically mixed neighbourhood that suffers high unemployment and poverty.

Home to Europe's biggest Muslim minority, France has for years been debating how far it is willing to go to accommodate the practice of Islam, now the country's second religion, into every day secular life.

Soon after Switzerland voted to ban minaret construction last year, Sarkozy warned French Muslims to "avoid ostentation" in the practice of their religion and he has declared the face-covering veil "not welcome" in France.

With parliament now set to debate a bill that would bar women from wearing the full Islamic veil, Muslim leaders worry about a surge of Islamophobia.

Last month, gunmen sprayed bullets across the facade of the Arrahma mosque in Istres, a town a few dozen kilometres from Marseille, raising alarm among Muslims.

Nadia Houte, a 31-year-old teacher, said the mosque would bring Muslims together and promote a positive image of Islam.

"We are Muslims, not fundamentalists," she said. "The burqa doesn't interest me. This has nothing to do with me."

There will be no blaring call to prayer from the Grand Mosque's minaret to disturb non-Muslim neighbours, but simply a blue light that will flash five times a day to summon the Marseille faithful to prayer.

Link to the original article

Geert Wilders goes on trial today. Read on for some outstanding commentary.

I am reposting this from the International Free Press Society.
Bat Ye’or, Clare Lopez, Daniel Pipes, David Harris, David Yerushalmi,
Diana West, Mark Steyn, and Nidra Poller all comment on the trial of
Geert Wilders. I have often commented on Geert Wilders and that I
believe he is a true hero, a man of extreme courage and wisdom.
His trial is sham and whether the people of Europe realize it or not,
they are all on trial. If Geert Wilders is convicted, then all of Europe
will be surely trampled under the bloody sword of Islam.


The Trial of Geert Wilders: A Symposium
By James Cohen on January 19, 2010


Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders goes on trial in Amsterdam on Wednesday, January 20, on charges related to his political campaign to stop and reverse the Islamization of the Netherlands. The International Free Press Society has asked an array of legal experts, authors and journalists to reflect on this momentous event, and we present their comments below.

Politic and freedom
Bat Ye’or


Muslims might feel insulted by Geert Wilders’ opinions on Islam. However, Geert Wilders and non-Muslims feel insulted – threatened — by the hostile and negative opinions on them enshrined in Muslim holy books, laws and customs. These are not hidden or dismissed as outdated, but continuously and proudly published, taught and publicly expounded throughout the world — without being opposed by Muslim leaders.

Westerners have been conditioned by their governments, their media, the Palestinisation of their culture and societies, to be the culprit and to accept without a murmur the continuous harassment of the permanent terrorist threat. Such terrorism has taken already many innocent lives and wounded countless others since it started, in the 1960s, in Europe with the collaboration of Palestinians and Nazi groups murdering Jews and Israelis.

In view of an aggressive indigenous and foreign terrorism within the Netherlands itself, it is clear that Geert Wilders is answering a provocation against him that obliges him to live under permanent security controls. How is it possible that in the XXIe century, in a democratic and peaceful Europe, some people, politicians, intellectuals, cartoonists or others, need 24-hour security when they have done nothing but lawfully express themselves ? Will self-censorship define our culture?

For most Europeans, Geert Wilders appears to be the hero and defender of their lost freedoms and dignity; a conviction would reinforce his aura and weaken his political enemies. Public opinion would see those enemies as the stooges of the Organization of the Islamic Conference who continuously and by every means pressure European governments to punish severely what it consider blasphemy according to shariah law. For instance, in March 2006, the Executive Committee of the OIC held its first Ministerial Meeting in Jeddah.1 They decided that the OIC Member States and its Secretary-General ought to pursue efforts to realize the following objectives: 1) adoption of a resolution at the 61st session of the UN General Assembly to proscribe defamation of religions and religious symbols, blasphemy, denigration of all prophets, and the prevention in the future of other defamatory actions; and 2) planning a global strategy to prevent the defamation of religions with the implementation of effective and appropriate measures.

Western governments must decide whether they judge by Western or shariah laws. Wilders has defied shariah law, and, as a consequence, his life is in constant danger. It seems to me that the threats against him are the real crimes the Netherlands should address. If Wilders is convicted, Europeans will see in such a verdict the suppression of their own freedom to defend themselves and their submission to dhimmitude.

Wilders’ prosecution reveals a real and profound social and political malaise. Punishments and insults will not help, it will worsen it. Through him, governments must listen to the discontent of their own people whom they have consistently ignored or despised. This is Wilders’ message. It is also Flemming Rose’s revolt and Kurt Westergaard’s ordeal – to name a few other prominent revolutionaries against the imposition of shariah in Europe, without forgetting the Muslim apostates.
The Free World is watching and listening. Buying Europe’s security by appeasement, political correctness, self-censorship and the Palestinisation of society, will lead only to civil wars.
Humans have short memories. But history will record that Wilder’s trial will either condemn freedom of speech, or support this most precious right of Mankind against intellectual terror and cultural totalitarianism.


His Free Speech is Our Free Speech
By Clare M. Lopez


When Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders goes on trial this week in the Netherlands, he will stand alone before a Dutch court. But make no mistake: it is the very principle of free speech which hangs in the balance there. Brought up on charges of inciting hatred, Wilders is one of the few leaders anywhere in the Western world who dares to denounce a supremacist Islamic doctrine that commands its faithful to jihad and terror against non-believers. As he showed so honestly in his courageous film, ‘Fitna,’ a system of pluralist, tolerant, liberal democracy is fundamentally incompatible with literal, textual Islam as presented on the pages of the Qur’an.

Increasingly, Wilders’ fellow countrymen and lovers of individual liberty under rule of man-made law across Europe are responding to his call to confront those who would follow the way of Islamic jihad. We all are beginning to understand that Geert Wilders is Everyman—every man and woman who believes in the freedom to speak one’s mind, to express truth as he sees it without fear of repression or prosecution. Free speech means nothing if it does not include the right to offend, and no belief system, not Islam and not any other, can be exempt. To speak the truth is no crime—but to rise up in gratuitous violence at the sound of truth, however offensive, ought to be.
The American Founding Fathers declared that our rights derive not from any government or religion but from the Creator Himself and the natural state of human beings. As such, no government may or ought try to alienate such rights from its people. Nor may Islam or any faith. Geert Wilders knows this and to ensure that inalienable rights remain the hallmark of human dignity, he stands in the dock for all of us.

Netherlands: the world is watching. Do not lead Europe into a long black night where the light of freedom flickers but fitfully as it does in every place where Shari’a is law. Stand with your forebears who, like William of Orange, fought to keep Dutchmen free, and do not fear the violence of assassins and mobs. Your liberty is our liberty and Wilders’ free speech is our free speech.

Standing Shoulder-to-Shoulder
By Daniel Pipes


Who is the most important European alive today? I nominate the Dutch politician Geert Wilders. I do so because he is best placed to deal with the Islamic challenge facing the continent. He has the potential to emerge as a world-historical figure.

The Islamic challenge consists of two components: on the one hand, an indigenous population’s withering Christian faith, inadequate birthrate, and cultural diffidence, and on the other an influx of devout, prolific, and culturally assertive Muslim immigrants. This fast-moving situation raises questions about Europe retaining its historic civilization; it become a majority-Muslim continent living under Islamic law (the Shari‘a).

Wilders, 46, founder and head of the Party for Freedom (PVV), is the unrivaled leader of those Europeans who wish to retain their historic identity. That’s because he and the PVV differ from most of Europe’s other nationalist, anti-immigrant parties.

The PVV is politically mainstream, with its roots lying not in neo-Fascism, nativism, conspiricism, antisemitism, or other forms of extremism, but in libertarianism and mainstream conservatism. (Wilders publicly emulates Ronald Reagan.) In addition, Wilders is a charismatic, savvy, principled, and outspoken leader who has rapidly become the most dynamic political force in the Netherlands. Finally, the PVV benefits from the fact that, uniquely in Europe, the Dutch are receptive to a non-nativist rejection of Islam. It has done well electorally; polls now generally show the PVV winning a plurality of votes and becoming the country’s largest party. Thus, Were Wilders to become prime minister, he could fulfill a leadership role for all Europe.

But he faces daunting challenges, including his opponents’ dirty tactics. Most notably, they have finally, after 2½ years of preliminary skirmishes, succeeded in dragging him to court on charges of hate speech and incitement to hatred.

Although I disagree with Wilders about Islam (I respect the religion but fight Islamists with all I have), we stand shoulder-to-shoulder against this lawsuit. I reject the criminalization of political differences and the attempted thwarting of a political movement through the courts. Accordingly, the Middle East Forum’s Legal Project has worked on Wilders’ behalf, raising substantial funds for his defense and helping in other ways.

Wilders today represents all those Westerners who cherish their civilization. The outcome of his trial has implications for us all.


Continue reading at IFPS

Hat tip: Gates of Vienna

Islamobama and his own Stealth Jihad. It can and will get worse.

I am posting this from China Confidential. There is not much
I could add to this and will let it speak for itself. Every
word is true and Obama is rightly raked over the coals. He is
an Islamosympathizer in the worst way we could have imagined.





On 9/12, who could have imagined Barack Hussein Obama's ascent to the White House?


Since taking office, America's first Muslim-born (according to Islamic law) Third World-American (his Muslim father was a Kenyan socialist) President has made engagement (appeasement and accommodation) of Islamist nations and groups the central feature of his foreign policy. BHO has given Islamist Iran an additional year to develop nuclear weapons, while warning Israel against attacking Iran and relentlessly pressuring the Jewish State to withdraw to indefensible borders in order to make possible the formation of an Islamist-ruled terror state with East Jerusalem as its capital; embraced the Islamist idea of a so-called Muslim world, transcending political boundaries, race, and ethnicity, united by belief in "the holy Koran," which he delights in quoting; bowed to the Saudi King, deeply and submissively, like a Muslim servant; apologized for alleged American sins against Muslim and other Third World nations; reached out to Islamist terrorist and front groups at home and abroad, including the Foreign Terrorist Organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, which initially welcomed his election, and allegedly "reconcilable" elements of the resurgent Taliban; and downgraded the War on Terror to a law enforcement battle with Al Qaeda--the only Islamist group that is for the time being still beyond the pale of engagement--by (a) deciding to bring 9/11 mastermind KSM and other alien enemy combatant war criminals to New York City for a civilian court trial, and (b) referring to terrorists as "extremists" and "suspects" and to Islamist terrorist acts as "manmade disasters."

Obama has also wildly exaggerated the size of the U.S. Muslim population in order to increase its importance; falsely claimed that Islam helped "shape" the nation; crawled to Turkey's crypto-Islamist, Iran-backing government and supported its bid for EU membership, and backed burqa-wearing in France and a menacing European-Mediterranean pact that promises to flood the Continent with 50 million additional Muslims from North Africa.

Most recently, Obama has refused to "connect the dots" between the Fort Hood massacre, the slaughter of CIA employees in Afghanistan, and the attempted Christmas Day bombing of a U.S. airliner bound for (Islamist-friendly) Detroit, and between his administration's insane insistence on differentiating between visa-eligible, alien Islamist "extremists" and visa-ineligible--no-fly--"terrorists" and the equally insane decision to treat the aforementioned airline attacker--a Nigerian Islamist--as a criminal "suspect," entitled to a civilian court trial, a public defender, and a plea arrangement.



It is time for U.S. voters to connect the dots ... between a perfidious, possible plea bargain with an Islamist terrorist and an even more perfidious Grand Bargain that Obama desperately sought with nuclear-arming Iran ... to pacify Pakistan (which Obama pronounces like a Pakistani) and Afghanistan (which he strangely still pronounces like a Midwesterner) ... and face up to the fact that the U.S. has a President who is ideologically, philosophically ... and perhaps also mentally and emotionally ... incapable of defending the world's greatest democracy and last, best hope for civilization.


Thanks to China Confidential

Islamic Tet offensive like the Vc pulled in 1968?

Think the policy of appeasing Islam and Muslims
worldwide, fueled by Obama's speech in Cairo
on June 4th, 2009 has anything to do with the
big increase in attacks around the world? Notice
how silent the White House has been on all of
this. We would not want to offend any Muslims
or Islam by rightfully defending ourselves first,
now would we?


Islamic Tet - Atlas Shrugs
"He who fights that Islam should be superior fights in Allah's cause" Muhammad, prophet of Islam

A series of well coordinated, seemingly random Muslim attacks worldwide around the time of Western holidays - straight out of the 1968 Viet Cong Tet Offensive playbook....

Are We Under an Islamist ‘Tet Offensive’? AIM Hat tip Hal

And prepare against them what force you can and horses tied at the frontier, to frighten thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them, whom you do not know (but) Allah knows them; and whatever thing you will spend in Allah's way, it will be paid back to you fully and you shall not be dealt with unjustly." - Koran, Sura 8, verse 60

With the latest incident of an attempted terrorist attack on Christmas Day, coming so soon after the Fort Hood massacre, Americans should be asking if we are indeed under an Islamist "Tet Offensive." (read the whole thing)

Muslim shot in Foiled Assassination Attempt on Danish Cartoonist, Kurt Westergaard, in His Home

Muslim "Youth" Burn Over a Thousand Cars in France

Muslims Bar B Que over 1100 cars in France. There were no major incidents reported?

















Police: Suicide bombing kills 75 in NW Pakistan

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace :

2010.01.01 (Shah Hason Khel, Pakistan) - Children are amply represented among over eighty spectators massacred at a volleyball tournament by a Fedayeen suicide bomber.

2009.12.31 (Yala, Thailand) - Two civilians riding a motorbike are shot to death by Islamic militants.

2009.12.31 (Kalat, Pakistan) - Two oil truck drivers are shot to death by Muslim radicals.

2009.12.31 (Uruzgan, Afghanistan) - Six civilians are beheaded by Islamic hardliners.

2009.12.30 (Bajaur, Pakistan) - A tribal elder is brutally murdered by the Taliban and dropped by the roadside.

2009.12.30 (Baramulla, India) - Hizb-ul-Mujahideen gunmen open up on four Indian cops at point-blank range, leaving all four dead.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/01/islamic-tet.html

The fall of Europe and the rise of Islamopistan. We better be paying strict attention becuase our socialist president is not.

Europe is on the edge of a knife with little margin for error. There are so many Muslims in Europe now, from socialist driven immigration policies, that Muslims are taking over in many countries.

The demand is always the same; Convert to Islam and accept Shariah law or we will kill you. Accept our stone age ways of death and perverison or we will kill you. Want your daughter, wife to be subjected to Female Genital Mutilation? Let the Muslims in and see what comes with them, NOTHING good or beneficial.

Read "America Alone" by Mark Steyn. I would suggest reading it very soon. With passage of the Lisbon treaty and the Euro-Med pact, things in Europe are now bleaker than ever. And Geert Wilders is in jail because of the cowards in the government in the Netherland. Who is pushing this? Muslim politicians and islamosympathizers.

It can happen, and it already is.

Dooming Europe, by Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs:
Photo:Islamic equality for their women. Don't worry, they are only getting caned, not stoned, yet.

"The Europe as you know it from visiting, from your parents, or friends is on the verge of collapsing." Geert Wilders said this in a speech he made in the U.S. last year. He went on: "We are now witnessing profound changes that will forever alter Europe's destiny and might send the continent in what Ronald Reagan called 'a thousand years of darkness.'" This applies not just to Europe, but to America as well.

Been to Europe lately? Thought it was bad? You ain't seen nothing yet. The passage of the Lisbon Treaty, hailed by Barack Obama, nailed the coffin shut on national sovereignty in Europe. The people of Europe fought it, but they were overwhelmed by their political elites and the lack of American leadership in this age of our Marxist U.S. president.

Come January 1, 2010, a disastrous and suicidal pact called the Euro-Med Partnership (referring to Europe and the Mediterranean region) goes into effect with little fanfare or examination. It boggles the mind that such a consequential and seismic cultural shift could be mandated and put into play without so much as a murmur from the mainstream media.

Why should Americans care about this? The reason is that this global gobbledygook is coming to America, thanks to our globalist president.


They are very fond of Hitler. Surprised?
Don't be.

The European human rights group called Stop the Islamisation of Europe (SIOE) has been working tirelessly to expose the mass Muslim immigration plan of the Euro-Med Partnership. A statement on the SIOE website criticizes the secrecy of the process: "It was shocking to hear about the plans and at the same time knowing that Danish politicians and a [cowardly] Danish press -- who is otherwise proud to be critical -- has told nothing to the Danish people about this project which begins already in January next year. This also showed clearly at the conference. Only very few politicians showed up and no media. Those politicians who showed up had obviously never heard about the Euro-Mediterranean project.

The goal of the Euro-Mediterranean cooperation is to create a new Greater European Union encompassing both Europe and North Africa, with the Mediterranean Sea becoming a domestic Eurabian sea. The goal is to establish a "comprehensive political partnership," including a "free trade area and economic integration"; "considerably more money for the partners" (that is, more European money flowing into North Africa); and "cultural partnership" -- that is, importation of Islamic culture into post-Christian Europe. According to the SIOE, in the Euro-Med plan, "Europe is to be islamized. Democracy, Christianity, European culture and Europeans are to be driven out of Europe. 50 million North Africans from Moslem countries are to be imported into the EU."

Skeptical? It's already happening. The British Daily Express reported in October 2008 on "a controversial taxpayer-funded 'job centre'" that opened in Mali as "just the first step towards promoting 'free movement of people in Africa and the EU'. Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will 'need' 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the 'demographic decline' due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe." To offset this decline, a "blue card" system is to be created that will allow cardholders to travel freely within the European Union with full rights to work -- as well as the full right to collect welfare benefits.

A Muslim population from Africa moving freely into Europe threatens America. On Christmas Day, a Nigerian Muslim flew from Amsterdam to Detroit and tried to explode a bomb on the plane -- after he was allowed to board without a passport. The Euro-Med Partnership will make jihad attacks like this one all the easier.

And once in Europe, Muslims have already begun demanding special privileges and accommodations. IslamOnline reported on December 21 that "Muslims activists from 26 European countries have come together to launch the first rights council to enlighten European Muslims about their rights, monitor rising Islamophobia and defend Muslim rights in European courts of law." Ali Abu Shwaima, a Muslim leader in Italy, explained: "We think European human rights groups are not doing enough to defend the rights of Muslims. Therefore we thought that we need this new council, especially that all laws and constitutions in Europe respect freedom of religion and oppose all forms of discrimination and racism."



Ft Hood.
Do we want to be at greater risk from
Islamic attacks like this one or 9/11?

"Islamophobia," "discrimination," and "racism" are all terms that Muslims in Europe and America use to confuse people into thinking that the perpetrators of Islamic terrorism are the real victims. And it is working: Geert Wilders is going on trial in the Netherlands instead of all the Islamic hate sponsors he is fighting. It has to be this way to increase harmony between the Muslim and non-Muslim member-states of the Euro-Med Partnership.

This internationalism is already destroying what has made Europe free and great. And now Barack Obama wants to do the same thing to America.

I hope the Swiss get this vote right. Ban the minaret now, Islam later!

There is an important vote taking
place today in Switzerland. They
are voting on whether to ban the
one of Islam's symbols of oppression,
the minaret. Here is to hoping this
passes by a large majority. The next
step would be to ban Islam altogether.
It is common when Muslims build mosques
and minarets, they are to tower over any
and all nearby buildings or other houses
of worship.




Would YOU want this this minaret right
outisde your window?




A poster in favor of the minaret ban.



Swiss voters do not be conned. Vote to ban the minaret today
From Vlad Tepes

Swiss voters do not be conned. Vote to ban the minaret today

By Eeyore
November 29, 2009

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Today the decision to ban the construction of minarets is before the Swiss people. Of course there are massive guilt ridden well funded campaigns claiming that to ban the minaret is racist.

Lets be clear and rational here please just for a moment then we can all go back to being creatures driven by hyperbole and rhetoric.

A building is not a race. Banning a building and in this case only part of a building cannot possibly be considered racist. Now if you decided to ban say, bricks as a building material for no reason at all except you had a pathological hatred of bricks you could be accused of being ‘brickest’ I suppose and you may have some unions come down hard on you. But a minaret is not a building, a building is not a race and of course the central point that everyone misses each and every time this comes up is, Islam is not a race.

Now I don’t actually think banning minarets is the right solution. I think banning Islam is. There is no reason to allow Islam to continue its steady march towards supremacy in western nations unopposed that I can see. Mosques indeed are not an equivalent of a temple, church, or synagogue. They are indeed a beach-head from which supremacy is taught and greater and greater separation of Muslims from the host population until you have two solitudes and eventually the most intolerant system, Islam with it’s sharia law, will win. Just ask a Kosovar or an Egyptian Copt.

So recognizing that banning the minaret is merely a totem for what ultimately will have to be done if Swiss and indeed Western civilization has any intention of continuing its fine heritage of freedoms (leftist continual introduction of irrational crypto-environmental regulations and behavioural restrictions not withstanding) then at least making sure that Swiss mosques are not able to dominate the landscape, the actual purpose of the minaret, is a fine start. So please dear people of Switzerland; you utterly failed to assist the people of Europe from saving themselves from the Nazis, and in fact, acted out of self interest to work with them by managing stolen wealth. Let’s see if you have at least a healthy amount of that self-preservation instinct left in you. This time, you can lead Europe to self determination and save civilization.

Vote to ban the minaret. Then later, you can ban Islam altogether.

Eeyore for Vladtepesblog




http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=16074

Islamic Terrorists cause Russian train wreck?



Russian Train Wreck Tied to Terrorist Bomb
New York Times

 BYCLIFFORD J. LEVY and ELLEN BARRY

Published: November 28, 2009
MOSCOW — The cause of the crash of one of Russia’s most illustrious trains was identified on Saturday as a homemade bomb that went off on the tracks between Moscow and St. Petersburg, killing more than 25 people, wounding scores of others and raising fears of a new era of terrorism here.




How long until this happens in the United States?


Another gift to the world from radical Islamists
who think nothing of killing innocent people.




Officials called the explosion on Friday night the worst terrorist attack in Russia in years, outside volatile Muslim parts of the North Caucasus region, which includes Chechnya. There were no immediate credible claims of responsibility.

The force of the crash crumpled parts of the luxury train, propelling several of its 14 cars off the tracks, trapping passengers in smashed compartments and scattering luggage in the nearby woods.

People on the train described a scene of panic and devastation in a rural area that was difficult for rescuers to reach.

The train, the Nevsky Express, is a preferred means of travel for the Russian elite between the country’s two most important cities. Among the dead were a former senator and a senior official in the federal economics ministry.

At the attack site, 200 miles northwest of Moscow, investigators reported Saturday that they had found remnants of a homemade bomb, equivalent to 15 pounds of TNT, that left a crater five feet deep. The bomb was apparently planted on the tracks and detonated while the second half of the train was passing.

Vladimir I. Yakunin, president of Russian Railways, said: “The basic version that is being investigated by the lead investigators is that it was an unknown device, by unknown persons. Simply put, a terrorist act.”

Mr. Yakunin said a second, less powerful explosive went off Saturday at the site of the crash. No one was hurt.

On Saturday night, federal investigators were going house to house in the area around the crash, asking residents whether they had noticed anyone or anything suspicious recently.

Russia suffered a wave of attacks in the early part of the decade as Muslim separatists from Chechnya struck trains and public places in Moscow and elsewhere, but there have been no such deadly assaults in recent years.

However, another Nevsky Express train was derailed in 2007 by an explosion, wounding more than two dozen people. While two people were later arrested, their motive remains unclear.

On Saturday, all rail service between Moscow and St. Petersburg, 450 miles away, was temporarily suspended, and there were widespread reports that Russians were canceling trips out of concern over possible attacks.

In nationally televised remarks, President Dmitri A. Medvedev called for calm. “We need there to be no chaos, because the situation is tense as it is,” the president said.

Victims spoke of disarray soon after the crash, with rescuers delayed in arriving and then lacking equipment to extract people from the railway cars, according to interviews on Russian television. They said it was several hours before proper equipment arrived.

At a hospital in St. Petersburg, a passenger, Igor Pushkaryov, 32, who suffered minor injuries, said in an interview that he had been in the second car on the train.

“It felt like we hit something, something hard,” Mr. Pushkaryov said. “Then everything began to shake because the wheel was rolling on the railroad ties. The car fell on its side and turned over. When we fell, the lights went out. We slid for a time, then suddenly stopped.”

A passenger named Igor Pechnikov told the Channel One television network, “I was riding in one of the cars that derailed. There was a jolt, and the car started sliding sharply to the left. I was thrown from my seat and flew halfway down the car.”

Another passenger, Tatyana Yeryomina, said: “Three of us went into the corridor to chat, when suddenly the lights went out and we fell to the floor. We were able to group together, which saved us. There was a huge hole in our car and we realized that something catastrophic had happened.”

When a frantic dispatcher reached the train after the derailment, the engineer described confusion.

“There is smoke everywhere,” the engineer said, according to a recording played on television. “The locomotive is damaged. Everything is torn apart in my cabin.”

The train was carrying more than 650 passengers and 20 railway personnel during its regular run to St. Petersburg, which takes four and a half hours.

On Saturday, Yekaterina Ivanova, one of the wounded passengers, told the NTV network that the evacuation was frustratingly slow.

“In the hospital, the doctors are better, the medical teams are working in harmony,” she said. “The young people from the Ministry of Emergency Situations carried us out on stretchers, but other people in uniform were just standing there and staring, and no one was even helping to carry out the wounded.”






How well prepared is Amtrak to respond to a disaster like this?


Russian Train Derailment Ms. Ivanova said rescue personnel did not manage to extract her from the train until 1:30 a.m., nearly four hours after the derailment.

Medical workers reported that reaching the scene was complicated because it was far from major highways.

Nadezhda Milyukova, the lead emergency doctor, told NTV: “There are only country roads, with huge ditches and puddles. You need all-terrain vehicles for those roads.”

Victims’ relatives told television networks that government hot lines did not function well, and that when they got through, there was little information.

“When we asked for some contact phone numbers, the lady told us that it didn’t fall within her job description,” a relative said.

Hundreds of passengers who survived the crash were moved onto a high-speed train and taken to St. Petersburg, arriving at 3:30 a.m. on Saturday. Several were in shock, and nearly all refused to speak about what had happened.

Police officers surrounded the platform, and ambulances pulled up to the train cars. Oleg Salov, a senior emergency situations official, said psychologists were meeting with relatives of the dead and wounded.

One of the train’s cafe cars was turned into a center for first aid and psychological assistance, and many passengers went there instead of home.

For Russians, the attack on Friday night may have been reminiscent of terrorist acts that stirred unease across the country earlier in the decade, when Muslim separatists from Chechnya made passenger trains, subways and other public places targets.

A 2003 suicide bomb attack on a commuter train near Chechnya killed 44. At least 12 people were wounded in 2005 when a bomb derailed a train headed from Chechnya to Moscow. And in 2002, more than 100 hostages died in a rescue attempt after Chechen terrorists seized a theater in the heart of Moscow.

In interviews at railway stations on Saturday night, some travelers expressed concern about future attacks, while others shrugged off possible danger.



Is the Obama administration ready for something like this?
They have handled the Flu Pandemic so well, it gives many of us
zero confidence in the Obama admisnistration.


“Am I scared of traveling to St. Petersburg tonight? Yes, very much!” said a middle-aged woman named Valentina, who declined to give her last name while waiting at a Moscow station. “I purchased my tickets yesterday afternoon, before the catastrophe happened. If it weren’t for the health of my relative, I wouldn’t have come here.”

She started crying. “This problem is not easily solved,” she said. “And this train bombing might be a first terror attack in a chain.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/world/europe/29russia.html?ref=world

A letter from the English Defence League on Islam in Europe, and beyond

The passagae of the Lisbon Treaty does not
bode well for Europe and England. More
control will now be coming out of Brussels
and Berlin. The other countries will be
inundated with millions of Muslim immigrants
and the results will not be good, for ANY
country in Europe. I posted this letter so
you can see what Europe is up against now.
Here in the USA, we are not too far behind.
Esepecially with Obama in the White House.

The game takes a new twist…


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/6496336/Lisbon-Treaty-more-of-Britains-powers-surrendered-to-Brussels.html

I ask all commited patriots to think hard about what will happen next.

Now that Lisbon has been signed and comes into force within two weeks the next stage of the EU destruction of Free Europe will be to push for Turkish entry into the EU. We must fight against this. Allowing SEVENTY FOUR MILLION Moslems into the EU, with no borders in Europe, we will be allowing them freedom to move about at will, come and go anywhere; this is frankly suicide for this country and our other European brothers such as France, German, The Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland and Denmark. Numerically we will see an influx similar to that of January 2005 when tens of thousands of Poles came to the UK.

Think of the problems we have with the 3m Moslems we have now……..

The traitor government of the day, which will probably be a Tory one by the time this happens, will give us false figures of the amount coming in. We must stay vigilant; some of you may argue that Turkey is a secular society, that they are in fact less Islamised than parts of our own country and it may in fact be “Ok” to let these rather more friendly Moslems into our country, perhaps you say they may tame the radicals. But as anyone who has studied the issue will confess, it is the radical Muslims that sets the tone for the others to follow.

However friendly Moslem Turkey is, do not believe this is anything other than a clever front to make their entry into the EU more “palatable” to the rest of Europe. We all know as soon as they are in they will relax the rules at home, and the ones that come here will of course be invited to be less secular and in fact embrace their “faith” in the UK.

Turkey is dangerous, period. Not as a military or economic threat by her 74m Moslems. All “secular” means is that they do not have an official state religion, unlike this country which might not seem as such but is in fact a Protestant Christian one. A fact our so called “leaders” would do well to remember once in a while…

Look at how the Turkish are being pushed on our French friends, a country whose people voted in a majority AGAINST the Lisbon treaty.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=eiffel-tower-lits-up-to-celebrate-turkish-season–2009-09-15

Remember several things. Turkey, as the Ottoman empire, was the last Islamic caliphate, and that Turkey as part of the EU will put Europe’s gates far to the East with countries such as Iraq and terrorist sponsors such as Syria and Iran, the latter of which already wages a low intensity war against the west and Israel via Hamas and other Islamic Jihadi fighter groups.

Does anybody really think Turkey will keep a safe and secure border? They have been fighting a border war with Iraqi Kurds for decades. The Kurds cross into Turkey with little or no opposition and have staged major attacks on Turkish military and civilian installations, If they cannot keep them out (of Turkey) how will they keep out Al Qaeda?

Given the previous events in Eastern Europe, when the borders opened to the workers to come to the West countries such as Poland experienced an influx from their own east of people to replace the workers they had lost. If this happens with Turkey it will bring even more Moslems into Europe, many of whom will certainly cross into the western areas.

In closing I believe the fight to keep Turkey well and truly out of Europe is an integral part of this country’s fight against militant Islam, and Islamisation

in general. The mass arrival of Turkish Moslems could be the endgame, and we as committed patriots should do all we can to make sure this does not happen.

As always the good people of the St George division will be at the very tip of the ideological spear. We must take this campaign on. In two weeks Lisbon will be in effect and you will see how the EU starts to push for the entry of the Turks will begin.

Stand fast my brothers and sisters European, Australian/NZ, American, Canadian and Israeli solidarity against the Islamist threat

Shalom and God bless

Your friends,

EDL: St George Division

English Defence League
http://sioanetwork.com/?p=455

A tribute to Theo Van Gogh 1957-2004: Submission.

Theo Van Gogh Paid with his life after
he cooperated in making the movie
"Submission" with a member of the
dutch parliment, Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
What was his crime? He had insulted
the prophet helped expose Islam for
what it truly is. A cult of persecution
and death.What later broke out after
the danish cartoons about islam, and
the prophet has yet to settle down.

Islam must be exposed for what it is;
oppressive, subversive and filled with
calls for death to the Jews and other
"people of the book." So for Theo Van
Gogh, in his memory, here is "Submission."
May his life not have been lost in
vain along with the millions of other
who have been murdered at the hands
of Islam.

Tingbjerg: one neighborhood’s nightmare - A look at our future here in the United States??

Tingbjerg: one neighborhood’s nightmare - Rights.no, Human Rights Service

There are many Tingbjerg's across
Europe. The real one here is in
Denmark.What is happening here
is taking place throughout Europe and
England. This is what happens when
immigration is left wide open by
politicians and those who scream for
diversity and multiculturalism. Is
this what we want for America?
Is this what we want our children
to have to live and through? Our
current administration would most
likley think this is just great. This
is NOT what I want for my children.

http://www.rights.no/publisher/publisher.asp?id=59&tekstid=2891

Hope and Change European Union style:Any criticism of Islam will be a hate crime. I think Islam is hate crime. Don't like that? I make no apologies.

European Union set to outlaw objections to Islamic practices - Jihad Watch

"On April 2, the European Parliament passed the
"directive on implementing the principle of equal
treatment between persons irrespective of religion
or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation," 363 votes
 to 226. The directive applies to social protection and
health care, social benefits, education and access to goods
 and services, including housing. American citizens and
companies doing business in Europe are also required
 to adhere to it."


I am sure Muslism extremists
would never think to use this 
law, if passed against anyone
who might level any criticism
against Islam or Muslims. This
is the next step in the death of
free speech. After this is passed
everyone will drink more kool-aid
and live in peace and harmony.
Muslim, Islamic history is watered
by the blood of millions of innocent
victims that died, trying to peacefully
co-exist with Islam. How can you
have peace with an ideology that thinks
everyone, everything is inferior to Islam?
Peace with Islam? Is is just not possible.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/10/european-union-set-to-outlaw-objections-to-islamic-practices.html