headerphoto


Showing posts with label Taqiya(using deception and lies to spread Islam). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taqiya(using deception and lies to spread Islam). Show all posts

Was mohammed a miracle man?

It is taught in some schools in the Middle East that the qur'an was mohammed's only 'miracle.' So, if that is the case then what a rotten miracle. But is this even true? Most muslims in the islamic world read the qur'an out of a sense of duty to earn points, or ‘hasanat’. This suppossedly helps them earn their frequent flyer miles to help them get into paradise. I know alot of Christians who were led to believe that good deeds and reading the Bible was their ticket to heaven.


Sam Hindu helps sort out this nonsense about mohammed being such a wonderous miracle man. After reading this one can see and understand that mohammed was nothing more than a perverted pedophile and a violent individual. This is fairly long and please read through the entire article. It should help clear up that this man was nothing more than a thug with a lot of power who found human life very cheap and easy to dispose of.




SOME TIMES BY SAM HINDU

Allah: Mohammed had no miracles
By Sam Hindu

Allah made it clear in the Quran that he sent no miracles with Mohammed, neither in his Quran nor in his hadith. Would this stop Muslims from claiming that there are miracles in the Quran and sunna? I doubt it!


The Quran is the Muslims’ most read book yet it is the least understood. Muslims read the Quran to earn ‘hasanat’, which are the Islamic good deeds that help the Muslim go to paradise. It is the process of reading the Quran that counts whereas the process of understanding is just a bonus. This reward system is fair and should be considered a sign of Allah’s generosity because understanding the Quran is not an easy task; fourteen centuries on and Muslims still do not agree on its understanding! This is hardly surprising since the proper understanding of the Quran is only known to Allah and may be a handful of Arabs (1), which makes you wonder why bother writing it at all.


In my time, schools in the Middle East used to teach that Mohammed’s only miracle was the Quran. It was the language of the Quran which was in mind; the claims about the scientific miracles were nonexistent. That remained to be the standard education in schools throughout the Middle East until about the 1970s. Of course, nobody ever gave a convincing explanation why the language of the Quran was considered a miracle but it doesn’t take much to brainwash the children to believe such claims,
after all, the Quran does look like a weird book to learn or read.


After the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and their alliance with Saudi Arabia, Muslims now attribute thousands of miracles to Mohammed. There are numerous organizations, all generously funded, with very aggressive programs for the purpose of spreading the concept of miracles associated with Mohammed. This massive multibillion dollar project is the Islamic world’s contribution to science, spreading ignorance through lies and pseudo research. By making their claims, the Muslim scholars deliver a pre emptive strike against any criticism to Islam. Their strategy is to cover up the areas where Islam is clearly vulnerable and present them to the ordinary reader as miracles in disguise.


This article highlights some unmistakeable assertions from Islam’s highest authority, Allah, that Mohammed had no miracles at all. To the Muslims, this should be the ultimate answer to those untiring groups who go around spreading the myths that Islam has miracles.


The Arabs demanded a miracle from Mohammed


Mohammed’s twenty three years career as a prophet is usually divided into two distinct phases: The Meccan phase and the Medina phase. It was in Mecca where the Arabs felt free to debate Mohammed and ask him whatever questions they had in mind about his claims. Mohammed was stunned by the many questions put to him by intellectuals like Omar Ibn Hisham (2) and Al Nadr Ibn Al Harith. Those men exposed the real clueless and speechless Mohammed who received no divine support. Abandoned by Allah, Mohammed became depressed (3) as he frequently failed to give answers. He used to go home and spend days or weeks thinking of those questions only to come up with odd answers that earned him the title ‘the madman’ (4). The typical example was when they asked him about the spirit; the Arabs expected an answer of some kind from a man who claims to communicate directly with God. Mohammed was speechless and no divine inspirations came to his help when it was most needed. It took him days or weeks of deep thinking to say this: “the spirit is something Allah knows about” which is hardly an answer worth waiting for.

017:85 they ask you concerning the Spirit. Say: “The spirit is something for my god; you are given only a little knowledge”.


Myths and stories of the past were part of the Arabs’ culture; Mohammed was particularly obsessed with the stories of the prophets sent by Allah in ancient times and used to tell those stories to the Arabs of Mecca with the hope they believe his claims of being a prophet himself. The Arabs were not impressed and rejected his claims. They even reminded him that Allah was keen to equip all his past prophets with miracles as signs of authenticity, a pattern that was never broken in the past. They insisted that Mohammed must show them a miracle in order for them to believe his claims. Of course, Mohammed didn’t.


The Arabs were so eager to see a miracle that when Mohammed revealed verse 34:9 (5) threatening them with a list of punishments, they asked him to go for it and ask his Allah and execute those threats (6) or at least perform some of those spectacular acts that lie beyond humans’ reach. Of course, Allah didn’t.


After his migration to Medina in 622 AD, Mohammed seized power and had no interest or time for debates; the sword did it all for him. It is ironic that after thirteen years of preaching in Mecca, Mohammed recruited only a handful of followers while the Medina Arabs converted to Islam overnight, no debates and no questions asked!


Mohammed’s failure to show a miracle was reported extensively in the Quran along with some of the most absurd excuses that defy common sense. Let us have a look at only some of those verses that the Muslims read every day but never understand.


1) Verse 17:59


“And We refrain from sending the signs, only because the men of former generations treated them as false: We sent the she-camel to the Thamud to open their eyes, but they treated her wrongfully: We only send the Signs by way of terror.”


In this verse17:59, Allah declares that He decided to depart from his old practice of sending miracles with prophets because the former generations did not believe in them. Now (that is in the seventh century), He only uses miracles to terrify people (how kind!). This assertion, on its own, is clear enough to prove the point- Allah did not send miracles to Mohammed.


Just in case the Muslims do not get the point, Allah repeated the above message in many other verses. Please read on:


2) Verse 20:133

“They say: “Why does he not bring us a sign from his Lord?” Has not a Clear Sign come to them of all that was in the former Books of revelation?”


In this verse, Allah reminds the Arabs of what is reported in the holy books about the previous nations who received miracles but did not believe. In other words, Allah had enough and considers his past experience with the unbelievers as an excuse for not sending any more miracles in case the same thing happens again.


The Arabs of Mecca were understandably discontented about the above bizzare conclusion, which is repeated in many verses, that they would not believe because some former generations didn’t. This supposition is not only wrong but also contradicts some other Quranic claims made in other verses. Didn’t the Quran say that the magicians believed (7) Moses immediately? Therefore, Miracles worked in the past and produced some results.


More to the point, the prediction that the Arabs would not believe were completely wide of the mark. It didn’t take more than a few years for this verse, and many others like it, to be proved wrong. When Mohammed returned to Mecca as a conqueror, all those Arabs, whom Allah claimed would not believe, converted to Islam overnight, no miracles needed, just the might of the sword!


3) Verse 13:27


“The Unbelievers say: “Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?” Say: “Truly Allah leaves to go stray, whom He will and guides to Himself those who turn to Him in penitence”


In this verse, Allah gives a very strange, but honest, excuse. He says what is the point of sending a miracle? After all, it is up to Him to decide which people will go astray and which people will believe!


4) Verse 6:109


“They swear their strongest oaths by Allah, that if a sign came to them they would believe. Say: “the signs are in the power of Allah: but what will make you (Muslims) realise that if signs came, they will not believe.”?


This verse (6:109) reports that the Arabs swear by Allah’s name that if they see a miracle they would believe. This is a clear confirmation that the Arabs already believed in Allah, otherwise how do they swear by His name? Mohammed called the Arabs ‘the unbelievers’ because they did not believe in his claims. It appears from this verse that the Arabs were sincere and straight in their promise to believe if they see a miracle, so why not just send them a miracle?


The verse also states that Allah keeps those signs for himself, which is a very strange thing to do; what is the use of the signs if they were kept with Allah and never utilized?


After proudly reminding us that all miracles are with Him, Allah turns to the Muslims and asks them a question: “what makes you feel that the infidels would not believe if they see a miracle” We do not see the point behind that question or the difference would the answer make to Allah or to the readers of the Quran.


5) Verse 29:50


They say: “Why are not Signs sent down to him from his Lord?” Say: “The signs are indeed with Allah and I am indeed a clear Warner.”


The Quran repeats the claims that all the miracles are with Allah and confirms that He decided not to send any of them because, according to Ibn Katheer, he knew it would not make the unbelievers believe. The verse is basically another confirmation that Mohammed had no miracles (signs). The same logic is repeated in verses 6:37 and 13:7


6) Verse 6:37


“They say: “Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?” Say: “(Allah) hath certainly power to send down a sign: but most of them understand not”


The verse reports that the Arabs were suspicious of Mohammed’s authenticity because he had no signs. As an answer to the Arabs’ questions, the verse says that Allah is capable of sending signs if He wishes, which indicates that Allah did not wish to send one to Mohammed.


7) Verse 13: 7.


“And the Unbelievers say: “Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?” But thou art truly a warner, and to every people a guide”


In the above verse, Mohammed accepts the fact that he had no miracles and tries to justify such an odd position. He came up with the excuse that was only a guide, which was not a plausible excuse to the Arabs because they believed that all the past prophets were also guides to their nations but they all had miracles.


8) Verse 17: 93

“Or thou have a house adorned with gold, or thou mount a ladder right into the skies. No, we shall not even believe in thy mounting until thou send down to us a book that we could read.” Say: “Glory to my Lord! Am I aught but a man,- an apostle?”


In this verse 17:93, Mohammed makes an unequivocal admission that he had no miracles. It happened when the Arabs asked him to demonstrate for them one of a list of miracles they listed for him in this and the three preceding verses. His answer was clear and indisputable: I don’t have a miracle; I am only a human.


What about the Quranic Challenge?


Allah challenged all humans (Verses 2:23, 17:88) to produce a chapter that matches the Quran but nobody did. According to Muslims, this is an indication that the Quran is a miracle. This piece of information is known to all Muslims and would undoubtedly come to the minds of those who may read this article, hence the following comment:


The majority of Muslims do not know that the Internet is bursting with literature that mimics the Quran. Normally, no sane Arab could openly compose a work that mimics the Quran for the fear of death. However, the Internet provided a safe haven to those authors who are willing to take the challenge. Nevertheless, it is worth highlighting that the two greatest Arab poets, Al Maari and Al Mutanabbi, both composed their own Qurans albeit they were forced to withdraw their works and repent. Their Qurans have completely disappeared from history.


In the past, a renowned Islamic group called Al Mutazilla believed that although the Quran was the word of Allah but there was nothing spectacular about its style. The Meccan Arabs did not like the Quran and thought it was a poor kind of literature, which is why they thought Mohammed was mad. It was not unexpected for Mohammed to react by claiming that his work was the best in the world.


Mohammed was an Arab and the Arabs still react in a similar manner when in similar circumstances. It is still common in the Arabs’ culture for a person who produces a poor work to defend his product by saying “I challenge you and all your relatives to produce something similar”. Or even to swear in the name of Allah that his product is “the best product in the world”. On the other hand, people who produce works of high quality let it be literature or any form of art, do not makes such challenges. If the challenge verses mean anything they mean that the Arabs did not like the Quran. They are signs of weakness rather than signs of strength.


References:


1. Verse 3:7


“He it is Who has sent down to you the Book: In it are verses of established meanings; they are the foundation of the Book: others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord, and searching for its meanings, but no one knows its meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: “We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord:” and none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.”


2. Omar Ibn Hisham was renowned of his encyclopaedic knowledge (father of knowledge) and recognised Mohammed was a liar. When Mohammed seized power, he reversed his nickname to ‘father of ignorance’ and tracked him, together with Al nadr Ibn Al Harith, and killed thim in the battle of Badr.


3. Verse 18:6 “Perhaps, you, would kill yourself (O Muhammad ) in grief, over their footsteps (for their turning away from you), because they do not believe this narration (the Quran)”


4. Verse 37:36 “And they said: “Are we going to abandon our gods for the sake of a mad poet?” and verse 44:14 “Then they had turned away from him ( Muhammad ) and said: “One taught (by a human being), a madman!”


5. Verse 34:9 See they not what is before them and what is behind them, of the heaven and the earth? If We will, We shall sink the earth with them, or cause a piece of the sky to fall upon them. Verily, in this is a sign for every faithful believer that turns to Allah.


6.Verses:


17:90 And they say: “We shall not believe in you, until you cause a spring to gush forth from the earth for us;


17:91 “Or you have a garden of date-palms and grapes, and cause rivers to gush forth in their midst abundantly;


17:92″Or you cause the heaven to fall upon us in pieces, as you have pretended, or you bring Allah and the angels before (us) face to face;


17:93 “Or you have a house of adornable materials (like silver and pure gold, etc.), or you ascend up into the sky, and even then we will put no faith in your ascension until you bring down for us a Book that we would read.” Say (O Muhammad ): “Glorified be my Lord (Allah) above all that evil they (polytheists) associate with Him! Am I anything but a man, a Messenger?”


7. Verses 7:120 And the magicians fell down in prostration, 20:70, So the magicians fell down in prostration. They said, “We have believed in the Lord of Aaron and Moses.” 26:46 So the magicians fell down in prostration


8. Verse 2:23 “And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah , if you should be truthful”, and verse 17:88 “Say, “If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Qur’an, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants”

Original article is here.

A warning to America about Islam and the mosque at Ground Zero



It says a lot about the people behind this scheme that they had the bad taste even to propose building a mosque in such a place but to describe it, as they have, as a tribute to the victims is beyond bad taste and shows a profound contempt for those who died.

It would be hard to imagine a more provocative gesture short of standing on their graves and burning the American flag. Yet, how typical of Islam, with its own hair-trigger sensitivity to the slightest imagined insult, to do something so arrogant and so insensitive.

Any religion that endorses violence is incapable of delivering spiritual enlightenment. How obvious does that have to be? And it has no right even to call itself a religion. Without the shield of religion to hide behind Islam would be banned in the civilized world as a political ideology of hate and we have no obligation to make allowances for it any more than we do for Nazism.

It’s a bigger threat to our freedom than Nazism ever was. Yes, both are totalitarian and both divide the world unnecessarily into “us” and “them”, the pure and the impure, and both make no secret of their desire to exterminate the Jews. But we were all more of less on the same side against the Nazis whereas the Islamo-Nazis have got plenty of friends among people in the West who ought to know better.

Need a reminder:

Mike Huckabee and Pamela Geller on the mosque at Ground Zero

These two nail it down and to the wall. The proposed mosque is an insult to all who died on 9/11, and to every American who can see through the lies and deceptions that are a daily aprt of Islam. Taqiyya and Stealth Jihad at it's worst is on stage right here. Both Huckabee and Geller are 100% correct.




Islamic Taqiya in Texas: playing the victim in race for Governor

Taqiya is a practice that Muslims use all the time to hide their true intentions, to make Islam seem peaceful and benevolent. It is used to confuse and make the infidels think otherwise. Farouk Shami is a candidate for the Democratic nomination for Governor of Texas. Read the following from Jihad watch and see if you can figure out what he is saying about his religion, and where he stands with his religion. As mentioned in the article these tactics are quite common when Muslims use Taqiya and race to play the victim. CAIR, MSA, MPAC, and other Islamic groups are quite adept at this and you will find this alot when you really become a student of Islam. As I say "deception runs deep within Islam."


Robert Spencer is one the foremost experts on Islam and shariah law. If you are not familiar with him or Jihad Watch it will be well worth it for you to spend some time there. He is the author of several books and I highly recommend all of them.




Farouk Shami



________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Texas: Muslim or ex-Muslim gubernatorial candidate demonstrates mastery of the art of claiming victim status

Jihad watch

Robert Spencer


"I want to clarify what has been reported in the press concerning my religion. I was born in the land of Abraham, believing in Moses, Jesus and Mohammad, and believing in one God.

While this statement may appear to the ignorant and unwary to be one of religious pluralism and open-mindedness, actually it is a straightforward statement of Islamic faith. For in the Qur'an, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad are all Muslim prophets who taught the same message, the message of Islam. Judaism and Christianity, in this understanding, arose later, out of corruptions of the teachings of Moses and Jesus. So for Farouk Shami to say that he believed in Moses, Jesus and Muhammad is simply to say that he was an ordinary, mainstream Muslim -- although the statement is clearly presented here in an attempt to give readers (and Texas voters) the impression that he was some kind of "all religions are one" multiculturalist or broad-minded ecumenist.

I grew up with members of my family and friends practicing multiple faiths: Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. I was also educated at a Quaker school. All of these things contributes to my relationship with God. To say simply 'I'm a Muslim' or 'I'm a Quaker' is to ignore major parts of my faith. I know it seems complicated that I do not have a pat answer to questions about what religion I am, but without my exposure to many different cultures and religious beliefs I wouldn't be the person I am today. Continue reading

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/02/texas-muslim-or-ex-muslim-gubernatorial-candidate-demonstrates-mastery-of-the-art-of-claiming-victim.html

The poison of Political Correctness. It can and will kill unless we stop it now.

The mainstream media is Islam's best friend. No matter how bad Islamists
attack us, how many of us they kill, how terrible an attack it is, Islam and
Islamofacism always gets the easy way out, excused by our MSM. We, the
American public have been lied to and white washed for years. Enter this
excellent column by Herb Deneberg. He has been written some excellent
columns but this one may be his best.

How To Kill Political Correctness Before It Kills Us

Herb Deneberg


"If you analyze the bias of the dishonest and fraudulent mainstream media, you will find it is consistently on the wrong side of history, and runs contrary to America’s values. It is, in fact, anti-American, anti-conservative, anti-family-values, anti-law-enforcement, and anti-military. The mainstream media is also politically correct, and one consequence of that is the mainstream media’s downplaying or ignoring the threat of radical Islam. It is now politically incorrect to point out the dangers of the threat of radical Islam. So, the American Congress for Truth (ACT) has just published a Citizen Media Monitoring Guide, designed – in the words of Brigette Gabriel, president of ACT and a leading authority on radical Islam — “for citizens concerned about politically-correct driven media bias as it relates to radical Islam. As the Ft. Hood jihadist attack painfully demonstrated, political correctness can be more than annoying and frustrating — it can be deadly.”

Continue reading

Action Alert: Geert Wilders needs our support. Free Geert Wilders!

If you have never heard the name
Geert Wilders, and you are worried
about the spread of Islamofascism
then please read on. Geert Wilders
is a true hero who is risking it all to
combat the march of Islam in the
Netherlands and all of Europe. His
popularity has soared at home and
old guard in Europe that has allowed
fatal immigration policies favoring
Muslims, does not want Geert Wilders
to prevail at this kangaroo court.




I encourage any and all to copy and
send this post to any friends, family
anyone who has a blog and cares about
stopping the spread of Islam and
Shariah law. Geert Wilders is innocent
and those persecuting him know it.
Please help out. Europe is our window
into the future with Islam. Geert
Wilders should be sacrificed to Islam
and the Islamoapologists who are
helping to bring Mr. Wilders down.

Tip of the mug to Gates of Vienna.

Gates of Vienna: Support Geert Wilders With a SITA Action








In just one month Geert Wilders will go on trial in Amsterdam
for inciting hatred against Islam.


International Action SITA is making a final push to help
Mr. Wilders in his struggle on behalf of freedom of speech.
 Here’s what SITA is planning:

Geert Wilders’ trial is coming soon (January 20, 2010).
Last step to support him with a SITA action.

The international establishment, subverted by a variety of
Islamic organizations including the OIC (Organization of the
Islamic Conference) will undoubtedly apply a great deal of
pressure on the Dutch establishment to ensure that Geert
Wilders is convicted on the charges that have been mischievously
brought against him. It is likely that his party will win the next election
 in 2011 with the possibility of Mr Wilders becoming Prime Minister.
The global establishment undoubtedly does not want Mr Wilders in
such a position of influence, even if the people of the Netherlands do.

An international SITA action in support of Geert Wilders was
established in late January 2009. It has received over 6,000 visits
and generated hundreds of letters designed to educate and inform
decision makers in the Netherlands. The Dutch Ministry of Justice
 visited our SITA websites.

This SITA action will now be reactivated in order to highlight this
apparently politically motivated prosecution. If Geert Wilders falls,
then Freedom of  speech is dead in Europe.

There are three ways that you can participate:

1) By mail — two possible texts; one comparing Wilders
to Winston Churchill and another comparing him to Charlie Chaplin
(what to print and put into the envelope and the recipients are indicated).

Winston

Charlie

2) By putting a message in comments to articles talking about
the trial of Geert Wilders  in blogs.This message appears at the
bottom of this page in four languages: FR, ENG, SP, D.

To support Geert Wilders and our dearly acquired freedoms please
participate to the 2 suggested actions and transmit this message
to your friends who have websites so that they can spread the word.

3) By giving some money. To donate, go here.


G of V
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/12/support-geert-wilders-with-sita-action.html

Stealth Jihad at work: Inside the Pentagon.

Stealth Jihad at work. Even at the highest
levels of our military and government, Muslims
are hard at work helping to topple our country
from the inside out. The ties to many Islamic
organizations is exposed beyond any doubt.
This is an excellent report.





Investors.com - Penetration Even At The Pentagon: Muslim Spies Setting Muslim Policy

Penetration Even At The Pentagon: Muslim Spies Setting Muslim Policy


By PAUL SPERRY
IBD Special Series:

Jihadist 5th Column: Part 1  Part 2 
 Part 3


The internal threat from Muslim extremists in the military extends to high-level Defense Department aides who have undermined military policy. In fact, one top Muslim adviser pushed out an intelligence analyst who warned of the sudden jihad syndrome that led to the Fort Hood terrorist attack.

An honored guest of the Ramadan dinner at the Pentagon this September was Hesham Islam, who infiltrated the highest echelons of the Ring despite proven ties to U.S. terror front groups and a shady past in his native Egypt.

As senior adviser for international affairs to former deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, Islam ran interference for the Islamic Society of North America and other radical fronts for the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood, the subject of my new book "Muslim Mafia."

For example, Islam persuaded brass to sack a Pentagon analyst, Stephen Coughlin, after he advised cutting off outreach to ISNA, which he accurately ID'd as part of a covert terror-support network in the U.S. — something the Justice Department recently confirmed in a major terror finance trial.

Islam invited ISNA officials to lunch with the avuncular England, known by insiders as Gullible Gordon, who in turn spoke at ISNA confabs. Islam also helped set up a Pentagon job booth at one recent ISNA convention to recruit Muslim chaplains and linguists.

Most disturbing, Islam met regularly with Saudi and other embassy officials lobbying for the release and repatriation of their citizens held at Gitmo. He in turn advised England, who authorized the release of dozens of Gitmo detainees. Some have resumed terrorist activities.

No one really knew who Islam was when he was promoted — in fact, the Pentagon removed his bio from its Web site after reporters noted major inconsistencies in it — yet he was allowed to get inside the office of the Pentagon's No. 2 official.

"In effect," a senior U.S. Army intelligence official told me, "we've got terrorist supporters calling the shots on our policies toward Muslims from the highest levels."

Meanwhile, politically incorrect prophets like Coughlin have been frozen out. After the betrayal at Fort Hood, the military could use his analysis of Islamic doctrine more than ever.

I attended a private briefing by Coughlin in February. In a PowerPoint presentation, he detailed how jihadists use the Quran to justify their actions. Some of his slides matched almost word-for-word Hasan's own PowerPoint slides extolling the virtues of jihad and martyrdom. Both, for instance, quoted from the same Quranic passage known as the "Verse of the Sword."




Emblem of the Muslim Brotherhood


Read the rest here:
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=515712
Investors.com

Flight 93 father denounces civilian trial for 9/11 terrorists: From Alec Rawls' Error Theory blog

Error Theory: Flight 93 father denounces civilian trial for 9/11 terrorists


Flight 93 father denounces civilian trial for 9/11 terrorists




Blogburst logo, petition



Tom Burnett Sr:
A military trial will do the same thing--give them justice, give them a chance to talk--but not out, you know, in the public.
Nicely framed and edited by KSTP Minneapolis:







Second Burnett interview here. If only our government, with all its resources, could make 1/100th the sense of this honest patriot, but honesty and patriotism seem to be completely absent from the Obama/Holder makeup. Mr. Burnett says he will fight.


Mr. Burnett is also trying to stop the Park Service from planting a giant Mecca-oriented crescent atop his son's grave


Video expose of what was originally called the Crescent of Embrace design, contains footage of Mr. Burnett and Alec Rawls (author of this blogburst post) at last year's Memorial Project meeting:






This is just disgusting that this sacred
ground is being used by Islam and
Islamosympathizers alike.

The white washing of America by Islam and Shariah Law.

American Thinker: It Isn't Political Correctness, It's Shariah
By Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs.


"This is a call to action. You are
either with us or against us."

I have mentioned numerous times.
The white washing job by the MSM,
politicians, the military and as Pamela
Geller mentions; all the way up to the
White House. Here is her complete
article from American Thinker.

"Above the Law"
From Bosch Fawstin
http://fawstin.blogspot.com/






It Isn't Political Correctness, It's Shariah


By Pamela Geller

In surveying the cultural carnage in the wake of the worst terrorist attack on a military installation in US history, it bears noting that there have been seismic shifts in America. When America was free of the shackles of Islam, say, fifty years ago, the current response to such an attack by an enemy faction would have been unthinkable.

I have watched in abject horror the stunning reaction of elites in this country to this act of war. The denial, the submission, the excuses, the dodging, the self-flagellation, the shame, the deceiving of the American people by the media, the military, society, law enforcement, authorities and politicians, all the way up to and including the White House, amounts to the enforcement of Shariah law.

Shariah law forbids criticism of Islam. And here we are.

We are witnessing an Islamized America. This is well beyond political correctness. We are enforcing Shariah law. We will not insult Islam. That is Shariah law. We self censor. That is Shariah law. We disrespect ourselves, our nation, so that we might respect Islam. This is dhimmitude. We should be raging. We should be outraged. We should be strategizing for this worldwide conflict. We should be debating about which leader will best handle Islam's war on the West. And yet we have not one leader who begins to understand the conflict -- that's how feared the subject matter is. Not one leader.

Recently there was an interesting debate at National Review Online between soft conservatives who soft-pedal Islam and those who stand for reality of Islamic doctrine, conservative principles and the essential truth. By and large, the conservatives have dropped the ball on Islamic jihad. This has been made painfully clear by the lack of a leader (any leader) on the right who speaks to and takes up the fight against the sweeping Islamization of America. America has no Geert Wilders.

The conservatives are not really as bad as the Left is on Islam, but they only get real when there is jihadi "intervention" that invades and destroys the delusion of their narrative.

It is interesting to me that the hierarchy of the conservative movement (take CPAC, for example) stays far away from the counter-jihad forces (i.e., Robert Spencer, Andrew Bostom, myself) except at moments like these. Last year there was not one speaker, one event at CPAC that spoke to the greatest threat this nation faces -- which is why I staged the Geert Wilders event at the Omni Hotel, during CPAC (but not a CPAC event) last year.

When the reality of war, Islamic doctrine and bloodshed lays bare the nature of the enemy and the battle we are in, the door creaks open and Robert Spencer starts getting invited to appear on radio shows, and NRO finally runs pieces by Bostom and Spencer that show up the soft conservative narrative on Islam, which is soft and fuzzy and stupid (i.e., "Islamist" vs "Islamic"). Of course, we bad boys will be put back in our boxes until the next terrible time the jihad comes calling.

It pains me to say it, but expect to see us more frequently in the coming months and years. For the giant con job on the American psyche continues apace: He was a crazy! It was "vicarious" Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder! It was "Pre-Traumatic" Stress Disorder! It was radical extremism! It was part of a tiny fringe! It doesn't represent Islam!

All lies. He was devout. He was a jihadist. Period. And many Muslims admire what he did. The Left worries about Muslim backlash. How about Muslim backlash against the infidels? Every "Soldier of Allah" who goes jihad is an enemy combatant. Every devout Muslim who believes in the word of the Quran has his or her duty to Islam, his call to jihad. Hence this terrible act of war, the 14,363 Islamic attacks across the world since 911, and all of the relentless plots, plans and to take down America in the past month alone. Devout Muslims should be prohibited from military service. Would Patton have recruited Nazis into his army?

I am writing this on Veterans Day. I call upon all Americans to step back, consider the unfathomable loss at Fort Hood, the ensuing apologia, and the tragic consequences of such behavior. This is a call to action. You're either with us or against us.

Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs Web site and is former associate publisher of the New York Observer.


http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/it_isnt_political_correctness.html

Islam and Muslims are the real victims.More white washing of the truth.

This is an incredible video. Not in
a good way by any stretch of one's
knowledge. Especially concerning
the truth about Islam. Not surprising
this aired on ABC 'World News.' Are
there alot of hate crimes against
Muslims? This video is 'Taqiya' at
its best, or worst. You decide.


Mourned and criticized today by some African-American Muslims in metro Detroit and across the U.S.

African-American Muslims question leader's death freep.com Detroit Free Press

Here is an update from the Detroit
Free Press on the raid and subsequent
death of Luqman Ameen Abdullah.
I mentioned that I would withold any
comment until more facts started
coming out on this case. Well, they have
and here is the first criticism from the
American muslim community about what
happened to Abdullah. Of course he was a
"good humanitarian" and there is an outcry
to the reference of "“reference to the ‘Ummah’
as a ‘nation-wide radical fundamentalist
Sunni group consisting primarily of
African-Americans’ is an offensive
mischaracterization.” No, it is not.
Simply because most of the members of this
'Ummah' are black African Americans. They
are playing the race card. I would not be
surprised at all to see this rapidly escalate
into an all out attack on the F.B.I. from
numerous American Islamic groups. I
will be watching this closely and post any
updates when they come out.

http://www.freep.com/article/20091029/NEWS01/91029049/1322/African-American-Muslims-question-leader-s-death

Madeline Brooks:Reforming Islam from the inside out? It is possible but not likely.

American Thinker: Can Islam reform from within?

This is a very interesting opinion
from Ms. Brooks. "Can Islam be reformed
from within?" While this would be great,
I think it is highly unlikely to happen for
quite some time. Radical Islam continues
to grow around the globe.Here in
the USA, as in many countries, Islam is
installing itself by using our laws and
policies against us. "Stealth Jihad" is a
term I mention frequently here. This is
when Islam attacks the very foundations
of the host country through lawsuits at
the local, county, state and federal
levels. It starts with small issues where
one will really not notice freedom is being
stripped away in name of diversity and being
multicultural. One Islam succeeds there, it
goes a bit farther with next issue, and so on
and so on. England is a perfect example. The
majority of Muslims would like to see the law
of the land become Shariah Law. Once and if
that happens, then real intolerance of all
other ideologies, religions and cultures will
be allowed and demanded under Shariah
Law. I would love to Shoaib Choudhury
be successful, and his movement spread like
radical Islam has. Be destroyed from within.
I just cannot see it happening, yet. Not until
those Muslims around the world who truly
want to have it like Mr Choundhury are
willing to take the risk of speaking out and
standing up in large numbers. They are just
not there, yet.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/can_islam_reform_from_within.html

Now an apostate prisoner back in Ohio: Rifqa Bary is being cut off from her own life. She may end up paying with her very life.

Rifqa Bary returns to Ohio, judge restricts her phone and Internet use
From Jihad Watch

So Rifqa is now back in Ohio.
Her life is in even more danger.
Those in charge of her well being
and safety are just playing into the
hands of Islam and Shariah Law.
I would call her a prisoner of Shariah law.
Her phone and internet use will be
monitored by Franklin County
Children Services Division. I am
sure they are well educated in
Islam, Shariah Law and honor
killings. They will know what
warning signs to look for.CAIR,
the ISNA will right there to help
Franklin County out. Rifqa Bary
may die at the hands of Islam.
If so, will the blame be laid where
it needs to be? What do you think?


http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/10/rifqa-bary-returns-to-ohio-judge-restricts-her-phone-and-internet-use.html

No safety for Rifqa Bary. She is likely to become a victim of an Islamic Honor Killing.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/


I am honored to post a feed
here by Dymphna, from Gates
of Vienna. Honor Killings: a
touchy subject among Muslims in
North America. They have every
right to be sensitive about this
nasty bit of Honor Killings that happens
around the globe, no matter where
Islam is. Note the number of confirmed
honor killing in North America from
Phyllis Chesler's most recent post. Many
of these are  misscovered as domestic
disputes. Seldom is the real truth told
about such Honor Killing attacks. They are
smoothed over, white washed by numerous Islamic/Muslim organizations so that these
horrendous family murders are made to
seem innocuous at best. Then it us westerners
who do not understand how this works with
Islam and Shariah law. Read through this article
and when you get to the study by
John D. Guandol notice the tie in with so many
vile, and violent Muslim organizations. Also,
Honor Killings are one of the ways that Islam
spreads 'Taqiya' or using deception and
lies to spread Islam. The socials services have
dropped the ball and now Rifqa is in
grave danger once again.


Please pray for her safety and life!



“No Reason to Believe Rifqa Wouldn’t Be Safe with Her Parents”

by Dymphna: Gates of Vienna


Phyllis Chesler’s most recent post lays bare the MSM’s refusal to accept the reality of honor killings in North America. She gives a partial list of incidents by city and date:

Toronto (07)

Dallas (08)

Atlanta (08)

Oak Forest, Illinois (08)

Alexandria (08)

Buffalo (09)

Kingston, Canada (09)

and then moves on the most recent outrage in Phoenix.

Iraqi-born Faleh Hassan Almaleki is a foul killer on the lam. Just last week, he ran over his 20-year-old daughter, Noor, with a car because she was “too western.”

There is also the double killing in Dallas (in 2008, above) by Yaser Said. He’s still missing, too, and it may be that both murderers are being protected by Islamists in the U.S.

Ms. Chesler’s complaint is not only that the news coverage is spotty, it is also wrong. These are not domestic disputes:

When it comes to Islam and honor killings, political, anthropological, historical, and psychological information is rarely brought to bear on the single story. Suddenly, completely out of context, one lone individual or one lone family just up and murders their daughter or their sister. No rhyme or reason to it. Case closed.

A good case in point is the most recent one:

The local Arizona media have certainly covered this attempted honor killing and they’ve quoted experts who’ve said things as strange as the local Dallas media experts did in the Said case (It was not an honor killing, honor killings have nothing to do with Islam or with Muslims); as strange as the Florida media experts did in the case of Rifqa Bary, the teenage apostate runaway whom a Florida judge has just sent back to Ohio (She is an unbalanced, rebellious teenager who only imagines that she has been abused; she is in no danger at all).

Yes, that brings us to Rifqa Bary. She is indeed being sent back to Ohio. Ms Chesler notes:

Although the Bary case was decided narrowly, as a strictly jurisdictional decision, the local Florida media downplayed the danger that former Muslims face when they leave Islam-and the specific danger that young immigrant, often Muslim daughters face when they refuse to obey cultural and religious expectations. Hopefully, the Ohio judge will keep all this in mind.

And by the way: In custody cases (and Bary’s case is just that), judges have the discretion to listen to the wishes of minor children as young as 12. Bary is 17 years old-certainly old enough to know where danger lies.

Her mention of the case reminded me to go looking for the latest news. What I found did not reassure me.
- - - - - - - - -
From the Columbia Dispatch:

Authorities aren’t saying exactly how or when Fathima Rifqa Bary is returning to Ohio.

But as of yesterday, it’s official: The 17-year-old religious runaway is to be transferred into the care of Franklin County Children Services. She will live with a foster family on her return.

It’s unclear whether the girl, who goes by Rifqa, will be at a hearing Tuesday in Franklin County Juvenile Court. The court is handling a case that will determine where she will live in Columbus.

Rifqa’s immigration status also remains unknown to the public. She is a native of Sri Lanka, and an attorney in the Florida case raised questions about whether she’s in the country legally.

Rifqa said her father threatened to kill her for her conversion from Islam to Christianity, prompting her to run away to Orlando in July.

Mohamed Bary has denied the allegations, and a Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation found no credible threat to her safety.

Which only goes to prove that the media is not the only one with blinders on. The FDLE investigation was a farce.

The Center for Security Policy consulted with John D. Guandol, asking him to examine the investigator’s report. Guandol has more than twelve years with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and in his estimation, the FDLE rated an F.

The New English Review’s Jerry Gordon, who has been following the Bary case, has a good summary of Guandol’s findings:

This is a statement of facts regarding this matter:

There are requirements in Islamic Law regarding someone who deserts Islam.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s objective is the implementation of Islamic Law in the United States.

Rifqa Bary has left Islam and become a Christian.

Rifqa Bary has made statements to FDLE officials and others that her parents have threatened to kill her because she has left Islam.

The Barys appear to be adherent to Islamic Law.

The Barys appear at an interview with two Muslim Brotherhood representatives doing business as CAIR, a group known to be hostile towards the United States which is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history.

The Muslim Brotherhood supports the killing of Muslims who publicly leave Islam.

It is my professional opinion that sufficient Probable Cause exists to believe that Ms Bary’s concerns for her personal safety are based in a realistic and factual understanding of her situation, and, therefore, a further criminal investigation is warranted.

The MSM continued to wear blinders about this case. I was surprised at the time, when I read Newsweek’s naive statement in their coverage of the case:

Muslim scholars say that “in Islam, there’s no such thing as an honor killing for apostasy.”

Anyone familiar with the methods of taqiyya could see right through the careful wording. Honor killings are carried out by families against members who shame them. But the killing of an apostate by others has nothing to do with restoring “honor”. It is simply what devout Islamists do to those who leave. Thus those “Muslim scholars” could lie with a straight face.

Newsweek, blind and deaf, carried on its own anti-Rifqa Bary campaign in that story. Extremist Christians bad, poor Muslims picked on by evil fundamentalists.

Ms. Chesler made this point previously in an interview in September, when she pointed out the equation of honor killings with domestic violence:

“When a husband murders a wife or daughter in the United States and Canada, too often law enforcement chalks the matter up to domestic violence,” Chesler says.

But domestic violence cases bear little resemblance to Muslim honor killings, which tend to be premeditated and involve several family members of the victim, usually a young girl or woman.

Young Muslim women are murdered by family members for a variety of reasons, Chesler explains in a recent essay in the Middle East Quarterly - anything from having a non-Muslim boyfriend to leaving Islam.

The frequent argument made by Muslim advocacy organizations that honor killings have nothing to do with Islam and that it is discriminatory to differentiate between honor killings and domestic violence is wrong,” Chesler says.

It’s bad enough when they don’t differentiate, but what is to be done when those in charge endanger the lives they are supposed to protect? Judge Dawson has sent Rifqa back to Ohio. The Columbus Dispatch says she will be in foster care. But the head of the Ohio county's Children's Services seems to say the opposite:

The Florida Department of Children and Families, which has had custody of Rifqa since August, would not release details about her trip back to Ohio for safety reasons. The state of Florida will pay for the trip.

Eric Fenner, executive director of Franklin County Children Services, would not comment because of a gag order. He has said he has no reason to believe Rifqa wouldn’t be safe with her parents.

As a former foster care supervisor, I don’t understand why Mr. Fenner hasn’t been slapped with a contempt of court citation for breaking the gag order to begin with. Just in giving his opinion that he has “no reason to believe Rifqa wouldn’t be safe with her parents” he violated the judge’s order.

What is even more alarming is that he believes this. No young woman of her age, having alleged the abuse she claims, should ever be returned to her home. She is too old not to have her word carry equal weight with that of her family. Any competent social worker would place her in a group home to start catching up on her school work and beginning an intensive program of Life Skills Training to prepare her for being on her own when she turns eighteen.

In Rifqa’s case, that’s about ten months away. It is the worst kind of case work practice to return a young woman at her stage of life to her home in these questionable circumstances.

My guess is that Ohio doesn’t want the expense of her care, either. I sure do hope the Judge and guardian ad litem are looking out for her. It’s obvious that Social Services isn’t.
 

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/10/no-reason-to-believe-rifqa-wouldnt-be.html#readfurther

Hope and Change European Union style:Any criticism of Islam will be a hate crime. I think Islam is hate crime. Don't like that? I make no apologies.

European Union set to outlaw objections to Islamic practices - Jihad Watch

"On April 2, the European Parliament passed the
"directive on implementing the principle of equal
treatment between persons irrespective of religion
or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation," 363 votes
 to 226. The directive applies to social protection and
health care, social benefits, education and access to goods
 and services, including housing. American citizens and
companies doing business in Europe are also required
 to adhere to it."


I am sure Muslism extremists
would never think to use this 
law, if passed against anyone
who might level any criticism
against Islam or Muslims. This
is the next step in the death of
free speech. After this is passed
everyone will drink more kool-aid
and live in peace and harmony.
Muslim, Islamic history is watered
by the blood of millions of innocent
victims that died, trying to peacefully
co-exist with Islam. How can you
have peace with an ideology that thinks
everyone, everything is inferior to Islam?
Peace with Islam? Is is just not possible.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/10/european-union-set-to-outlaw-objections-to-islamic-practices.html

Of course they do. This is how Islam works, from the inside out. Disgusting.

Daily Express UK News :: Now Muslims demand full Sharia law


Islam will work to undermine
any country where it is allowed
to grow and fester. This ideology
will never be at peace or be compatible
with the the West, religions or other
cultures. It demands to reign supreme
over all. It is is the Koran. Shariah Law
is an oppressive, persecution fueled
part of Islam that kills all freedom of
thought and individualism. Convert or
die is what this comes down to after
all is stripped away.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/134080/Now-Muslims-demand-Give-us-full-Shariah-law#

J Street: A most vile and disgusting organization.

I have posted this entire article about J Street
Thanks to Bare Naked Islam!

Link is below the feed.

‘J STREET’ JEWS TO THE OVENS

Imagine another Jew making a statement like that. Well, I just did and here’s why.

J STREET JEWS PROTECTING THE QUARTERBACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE

J Street seems to pop up in all the right places lately, buoyed and immunized by indulgent, adoring anduncritical journalists. The upstart lobby was invited to join other Jewish organizations in a July meeting with US President Barack Obama; a month later it attended a meeting with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

The New York Times magazine published the latest paean to J Street, portraying it as brash and brave, representative of 92 percent of American Jewry (Totally untrue). Frankly, the Times article is missing so many components and questions about the “pro-Israel” organization that it cannot be viewed as anything other than J Street puffery.

For instance, the writer, James Traub, devotes considerable effort to show how J Street is in touch with American Jewish opinion on issues such as Israeli settlements and American engagement in the peace process. J Street commissioned “an extensive poll of Jewish opinion on Middle East issues,” Traub wrote.

But Traub failed to report the recent and shocking exposé, written in Commentary by Noah Pollak, that J Street’s poll was conducted by J Street’s own former vice president, Jim Gerstein. “J Street not only commissions polls,” Pollak wrote, “it writes the questions, conducts them, analyzes the results and then carries out promotional campaigns with the findings. If you were wondering how it was possible that J Street could repeatedly produce ‘polling data’ that almost perfectly complements the group’s political agenda, now we have one important clue.”

THE TIMES‘S Traub failed to report on the identity of J Street’s broader leadership and decision-makers. Who are the organization’s funders? Traub reports on the 50-member finance committee, the existence of which was revealed in a Jerusalem Post article last month. The Post revealed names of some of the members: “The finance committee with a $10,000 contribution threshold,” the Post wrote, “includes Lebanese-American businessman Richard Abdoo, a current board member of Amideast and a former board member of the Arab American Institute (AAI), and Genevieve Lynch, who is also a member of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) board.“

J Street’s Web site presents its distinguished 170-member “advisory council,” a display case of wealthy progressive Jews and former US diplomats to the Middle East, including several who became foreign agents working the halls of Washington for Arab countries.

Traub should have asked what role George Soros plays in the organization.

J Street billionaire, George Soros, was a Nazi Collaborator

George Soros’ obsession with making Judea and Samaria Judenrein has its roots in his experience as a Nazi collaborator in Hungary. This is not a baseless accusation, but is admitted to by Soros himself, as seen in the following excerpt from Front Page Magazine.

While it might be understandable that Soros did what was necessary to survive, it is not understandable that he shows no remorse for his actions. Worse, he and his present-day J Street collaborators intend to redefine Jewish identity, removing the central importance of Eretz HaQodesh and reducing Judaism to nothing but another culture with no more value than any other culture.

[NB: Soros, like Obama, Rahm Emmanuel, Rev. Jerimiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, David Duke, and Shimon Peres thinks that Israel is a regime that needs to be opposed rather than accepted.] LINK

J Street’s disturbing alliance with the Iranian lobbying group, the National Iranian American Council, is also ignored by the Times’s tribute. J Street and NIAC directors coauthored a Huffington Post article earlier this year arguing against new sanctions on Iran.

One fact the Times magazine seems to get right: “J Street shares the Obama administration’s agenda.” But the Times should have gone on to ask the nature of J Street’s relationship with senior officials in the Obama administration. ” At the height of Israel’s Gaza operation in December 2008, J Street’s evenhanded statement on the fighting was very similar to that of David Axelrod, Obama’s senior adviser, who, speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, avoided endorsing Israel’s military action. JERUSALEM POST



Here is another post I included on J Street.

J STREET IS SELLING SNAKE OIL

What does it mean when one represents oneself as “pro-peace,” and how do we measure whether something really is? And what does it mean to represent oneself as “pro-Israel?” In order to qualify, one would at least have to support the existence of that state, and to disassociate with and defend against those who want to expunge it. On its website, in its literature, in the glossy mailings sent to government officials, universities, synagogues and individuals, J Street garbs itself as “pro-peace” and “pro-Israel.” But let’s peek underneath the costume to see whether J Street really is what it claims to be.

For years Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map, denied the Holocaust as a trick to justify the establishment of Israel, and has predicted the end of Israel and of the United States. President Barack Obama recently revealed that Iran has been lying for years about a secret underground nuclear plant. Iran is closer to its goal of nuclear weapons than officials previously thought. Obviously any entity so publicly and enduringly committed to death, destruction and deception is a major obstacle to global peace. Surely any pro-peace organization would support every possible means of ensuring that this country, nominally headed by a highly volatile dictator (whose strings are pulled by fanatical mullahs waiting for the 12th Imam to come up out of a well on Judgment Day), would be prevented from completing its race towards nuclear weapons.

But even after Obama revealed Iran’s secret nuclear plant, J Street’s position remains unequivocal: it is “strongly opposed to any consideration at this time” of “further sanctions” against Iran, and it is of course categorically opposed to “the use of military force by Israel or the United States to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.” As the peace window is closing, J Street opposes swift, decisive action to prevent it from slamming shut.

Now let’s look at whether J Street’s positions concerning Israel are calculated to ensure a real and lasting peace between Israel and its enemy neighbors.

The raison d’etre of the terrorist group Hamas is the annihilation of Israel. In January, 2009, Israel deployed a military response intended to eliminate the continuation of years of violent attacks by Gazans against Israeli civilians. Surely the cessation of attacks on its people is a necessary part of ensuring a country’s existence. J Street claims that “it recognizes the unquestioned right of Israel to take action to answer acts of terror and violence.” But it came out strongly against Israel’s efforts at self-defense. Better, apparently, so far as J Street was concerned to let the rockets continue to fall, as they have for years, on Israeli towns.

In its hegemonic insistence on the immediate creation of a Palestinian state, J Street is President Obama’s self-described “blocking back” determined to impose a two-state solution on the Israelis and the Palestinians in the shortest possible timeframe.

JEWS FOR PALESTINE

The participants resist the creation of two states for different reasons —the Palestinian leadership, both Hamas and Fatah, will only be satisfied with one state: a Palestinian one — and no Jewish one, as they have acknowledged repeatedly, in public and in private, in Arabic and in English, and to continue its armed “resistance” in order to achieve that goal. The Israelis will not agree to a Palestinian State until they are assured it will recognize Israel as a legitimate Jewish State, and they insist on continuing to protect themselves from the Arabs’ armed “resistance,” which is itself another costume, beneath which is the use of weapons to attack all Israelis, including unarmed civilians.

Those are the reasons there has been no breakthrough in the “peace process,” not because Israel’s allies have applied insufficient pressure on Israel. This imperialist view ignores the vital essence of each participant. And J Street is pushing an approach that will guarantee a violent, bloody and long-term conflagration. Again, the contrary of working towards a lasting peace.

So why does J Street keep claiming it is pro-peace and pro-Israel? And, more importantly, what does that mean for people, especially politicians, who lend their names to such an organization precisely because being pro-peace and pro-Israel is being sold as the current miracle elixir?

Perhaps we need to turn to Jeremy Ben-Ami, the executive director of J Street, for an explanation. He publicly stated: “We’re trying to redefine what it means to be pro-Israel.” He neglected to tell us that J Street is also redefining what it means to be pro-peace. Let’s take Ben-Ami at his word. But let’s make sure everyone buying the J Street snake oil understands what they’re drinking.


http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/j-street-jews-to-the-ovens/