Dedicated prayer rooms at public schools in Canada and it gets worse..

“Someone’s faith is part of who they are. Accommodating them brings understanding and shows we respect them,” said public school trustee Cindy Watson.

Umm, no. Not even close. You are caving in to a political ideology that is hell bent on forcing the rest of us to bow to to their idea of 'religion' and demanding that we meet every one of their requests. If we do not they sue us at every turn. This is stealth jihad and with every attack on our freedom muslims become more bold and confident. So does this mean there will be special prayer rooms for ALL religions?

Will all religious requirements now be taken into account? No meat on Fridays, more kosher food, more halal food, and where does this stop?

"Under a provincewide policy, school boards must be more inclusive and accommodate different faiths during the school day. All faiths? Why any faiths and why does religion belong in or at school in the first place. Maybe at a private religious school.

This could mean a private place for Muslim students who pray five times a day and for students who are fasting, a modified gym class and a separate room for them so they don’t have to watch their peers eat lunch."

Read the rest below and this is from Creeping Sharia.

*********************************************************************************

atieh noori praying at school

Dedicated prayer rooms for Muslims at Canadian public schools

WATERLOO REGION — Walk through the wooden door into the secluded, carpeted room with holy books and prayer mats, and it’s hard to believe you’re in a school.

But this is the beginning of a new phase for public and Catholic schools where prayer rooms could become commonplace.

Under a provincewide policy, school boards must be more inclusive and accommodate different faiths during the school day.

This could mean a private place for Muslim students who pray five times a day and for students who are fasting, a modified gym class and a separate room for them so they don’t have to watch their peers eat lunch.

Atieh Noori, a 27-year-old Muslim student at St. Louis Adult Learning and Continuing Education Centre in downtown Kitchener, uses the prayer room each day at lunchtime to say her midday prayers.

After school, Noori doesn’t have time for prayer so she appreciates the space.

A 27-year old student? Who clearly isn’t as dedicated to Islam as she’d like some to think. If you don’t have time it obviously ain’t that important. But rather than making a personal sacrifice, Muslims like Noori want everyone else to accommodate their Islamic habits.

The newly adopted faith and accommodation policy states that each student has a right to follow his or her beliefs free from discrimination or harassment. Areas of reasonable accommodation include observance of major religious holy days and celebrations, prayers and rituals, dietary requirements and fasting, religious attire and participation in school curriculum and extracurricular activities.

“Someone’s faith is part of who they are. Accommodating them brings understanding and shows we respect them,” said public school trustee Cindy Watson.

…

 

“When you create a policy, it already reflects what you are doing,” he said.

Indeed. What you are doing is Islamizing by submitting to an intolerant ideology. Much more dhimmitude via TheRecord – Dedicated prayer rooms may be part of new approach by province’s schools….h/t @dhummi

Blazing Cat Fur highlights the severity of the problem in Canada noting the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Muslim Brotherhood are both adherents of the right of ”Hisbah” under Sharia law:

Hisbah: Allows a private citizen to prosecute any individual who commits an act he considers a breach of the Sharia even if the plaintiff himself has not been personally injured by such an act.

Original article is here.

Guest post by Steven Davis: Islam, jihad and the global islamic revolution

This is by Steven Davis who is one of my best friends. We go way back. All the way back to elementary school, as a matter of fact. Steven is by far, one of the most intelligent, loyal and deeply spiritual people I have the pleasure of knowing. Anyone who drops by PC on a regular basis knows that I am very spiritual and love the Lord. If you have a problem with that then perhaps you may want to skip this next post. Or maybe you don't. You have nothing to lose and eternity to gain.

Thanks to Steven for his permission to let me share this.

---

Islam, jihad and the global Ilamic revolution
By Steven Davis


We are watching one country after another in the Middle-East experience ‘popular’ uprisings. In some commentaries this phenomenon is being referred to as the “Jasmine Revolution” and is described as a reaction to years of poverty, corruption, and oppression. While some of the countries and their leaders are corrupt the question begs the asking, “Does not Islam favor authoritarian rule over participatory government as a matter of religious tenet?” Does not Dar-al Salaam mean the “The realm of the submitted,” and Salaam mean peace as a consequence of submission? If this is true, why shouldn’t all Islamic adherents favor authoritarian and even dictatorial rule over themselves as submission to those in charge brings Allah the greatest glory.


Let us look at the list of countries that are experiencing this populist turmoil. The uprising began in Algeria, a former French colony and a functional republic if you discount the attempted insurgencies. Next is Tunisia, also a republic but not very well governed. Next door to both is Egypt, a democratic republic largely in name only but not a dictatorship as Libya is. Across the Suez and the Sinai is Jordan, which is a constitutional monarchy. And up the coast from Egypt is Lebanon, once regarded as the Switzerland of the Middle-East, that is now given over to Islamic populism and governance by Hezbollah whilst the U>S. and the Marines watch from the 50-yard line in the Mediterranean Sea. My question is, if this is about democracy and human rights, why haven’t you seen these uprisings in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq or even Kuwait? Why are there stirrings in Indonesia?


The CIA and MI-5 have been watching this ‘movement’ very closely and their prognosis is that this is virtual jihad. Instead of a trumpet blast from the spire of the minaret it is a twitter, text, or writing on a facebook wall. The missives are being directed to the disaffected youth whose only possession is likely to be a cell-phone. Today (fill in the black for the country), tomorrow the world! seems to be the rallying cry. Who or what is instigating and organizing such movements? The answer that is emerging is that it is The Muslim Brotherhood and this is an ongoing effort on its part to wage jihad against the west, and anyone who disagrees with it for that matter. As all of the countries where this is occurring are Islamic countries where other religions are marginalized, it appears you must be of a fundamentalist mindset in order to join and remain a member. Thus, you do and believe what you are told. Hardly democratic, wouldn’t you say?


What has everyone’s attention, and mine as well, is the way these ‘popular’ uprisings are spreading after the same fashion as a deliberately set brushfire. I would be more inclined to believe the movement was one of disaffected and oppressed, impoverished youth if the same was occurring in Iran, or maybe it did and was brutally smashed. We know this much, Israel is encircled and out-numbered. Israel knows this and is not saying a word. The United States is being encircled and the response from the government is kowtowing to those who are organizing these uprisings. The head of the Muslim Brotherhood has been allowed entry into this country by Obama, after having entry denied by both Bushes and Clinton. Is the leader of the Brotherhood carrying a can of gas in his cell phone? The California Supreme Court has allowed the confiscation and search of a cell phone as part of the arrest procedure. Will the Leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and his Jasmine Revolution be used as a cause celebre to support the final invasion of our privacy?


If the earth is your home and this life is all you have, I would be very, very afraid. As for myself and my household, we serve the Living God. Heaven is our home and we are on the road back to where our inheritance is, our Lord sits enthroned, and our life is secured for eternity. We have read God’s Word, and have studied it diligently, and will do so until we are called home. We have been given the understanding by God’s Holy Spirit to know the strife that is spreading in the Middle-East has its source in hell. Satan and his minions know the time is short. Thus, they are doing everything they can to bring down anything that even remotely resembles Christianity and destroy it if not discredit it. The hour is indeed much nearer than when we first believed.


As for Jihad, if I lose my head for Christ, know that I already have. As for Islam, they have been judged, it is only their sentence that is waiting to be passed.

In Christ’s love, Steven Davis

Stealth Jihad alert: Look for halal products to spread across the USA

This is from Creeping Sharia and is another warning shot we must hear. halal products are spreading across the country as companies see a way to tap into the muslim population to make some big bucks. To me there are NO DOUBTS that these companies do not care that they are contributing to the islamization of the United States. Halal products are another facet of sharia law and islam. halal slaughter is an inhumane way of butchering animals, especially the way it is waged upon animals in muslim countries. What is there that is not sick and twisted about islam? Nothing. It is all bad.


Following this article is an article from the Atlanta Post bragging about the spread of halal products and how 'wonderful' this will be. Maybe if you are already a brain washed follower of islam that has been rendered into a clueless, mohambot that follows islam and sharia law or has duped from birth by islam. To me halal is one more part of islam, sharia law and is stealth jihad. Read some of the comments posted at the Atlanta Post article, notice that most of the comments are by muslims and possibly my comment IF they decide to publish it. If they do I look to be heavily attacked and that is fine with me. I will post some of the 'special comments' if I get some. Atlanta Post article is pretty long but stay with it and you will see what I mean. One 'special' comment is below in red.

Maple Leaf Farms submits to sharia
Creeping Sharia

Halal Whole Duck:


Maple Leaf Farms Halal Duck is a high quality USDA Grade A all-natural, farm-raised whole bird that has been certified by Islamic Services to comply with the principles and values of the Muslim community. Available frozen from our online store.


Maple Leaf Farms whole duck comes with giblets and a neck stuffed inside.


No head, like many victims whose last words heard were Allah Akbar. Those same principles and values consider non-Muslims as “infidels” and non-Muslim lands as a “house of war.”


An unrelated piece in the Atlanta Post goes on to push Islam and halal, but one of the comments there leaves little doubt that this is just the tip of the iceberg:


"We need to ask for more than just Halal food, by demanding the suppliers and manufacturers to extend it to non-food items such as medicine, health supplement even to the most basic things – water. The tap water and drinking water must be of a Halal source, specifically its traceability to ensure compliance. As well as medicine that we consume must also be Halal compliance, not from doubtful sources – swine or carrion."

No, we need to ban muslim immigration and islam, once and for all. We need to stop calling it, considering islam a religion. It is not even close and I do not care if over one billion people call it a religion. PatriotUSA

Original article is here.

---

I don't care about the law: from Vlad Tepes. Death threats in England

This is from Vlad Tepes with the commentary below by Baron Boddisey from Gates Of Vienna. The warning is clear enough for us here across the pond. Unless we stop any and all muslim immigration, this is what we can expect. We are already having problems all across the United States with a very small percentage of muslims that we already have here.


From Gates Of Vienna:


The Englishman who made this video was threatened with death for filming Muslims engaging in dawah on a public street.


Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for YouTubing this video. KGS helped Vlad construct a composite of the face of the fellow who made the threat. This image may be of use to the British police — if, that is, they ever take time off from arresting “Islamophobes” and actually look for the guy:



Hat tip: Gates Of Vienna and Vlad Tepes.

The Growing Number of Conversions to Islam in the US and Europe: What Does It Mean? D.L. Adams

This is the latest article by D.L. Adams who has been featured here before. D.L. and I are friends and go back a couple of years. I have found him to be extremely knowledgeable and he knows islam, sharia law and his research is impeccable. There are some not so surprising reasons why islam is the fastest growing religion, political ideology in the United States and the world. For those of us who have made islam, the qur'an, suna(from the ahadith)a life long subject of study and research, know what islam really is, and how it advances in many regions around the globe. Many who convert do so out of ignorance and are enamored by such a 'peaceful religion and way of life.' Many convert under the edge of the sword to save themselves or their families. The article that follows discusses this and many other concerns that we should have with islam, sharia law and muslims immigration.


"Since 9/11, the growth of Islam in the United States has increased by immigration, high birth rate, and conversions. It is almost counter-intuitive that Americans would convert to a religion/political ideology whose adherents committed the atrocities of 9/11 (specifically because they were adherents of that ideology) – the largest atrocity of mass murder in American history. We can look to Mohammed’s biography (Suna) and our own embrace of post-modernism for an answer.


The adherent of Islam who told his brother that he would decapitate him if commanded to do so by Mohammed impressed his brother so deeply with his zeal and surety that the horrified brother immediately converted to Islam. This is the very same scenario to explain the wave of post-9/11 conversions to Islam in the West.


Some people were apparently so impressed at the absolute zeal and surety of the 19 Muslim hijacker killers (rather than revolted by their cruelty, brutality, and hatred), they adopted the ideological path of the killers rather than the path of compassion for their victims."


This is a long article but it is really worth your time.

---

The Growing Number of Conversions to Islam in the US and Europe: What Does It Mean?
By D.L. Adams


Observers and interested parties have expressed amazement, confusion and concern at the growth of Islam in the West since 9/11. Apparently, no acts of mass murder, familial barbarism and cruelty, jihad violence against non-Muslims, and threat of (nuclear) war from leaders of Islamic states are sufficient to dissuade some “searchers”.

After the 9/11 Islamic atrocities, conversions to Islam in the United States increased markedly – and have kept a steady pace of growth. It did not take long for this startling increase in conversions in the US to be widely noticed. According to the New York Times (October, 2001), “some clerics say they have seen conversion rates quadruple since Sept. 11.”




Favorable reactions (no response could be more “favorable” than conversion) to the 9/11 attacks in Europe were also widely noticed there. A Times of London article that appeared not long after the attacks included the following:


There is compelling anecdotal evidence of a surge in conversions to Islam since September 11, not just in Britain, but across Europe and America. One Dutch Islamic centre claims a tenfold increase, while the New Muslims Project, based in Leicester and run by a former Irish Roman Catholic housewife, reports a steady stream of new converts. (Times of London, 01/07/2002 as referenced in Joel Richardson’s “Islamic Anti-Christ.”)


For most thoughtful Americans only profound shock and confusion (and dismay) can result when faced with these growing trends of approval (through conversion – the highest form of “approval”) in the society for the perpetrators of the 9/11 barbarities and their draconian, supremacist ideology.


Many say the events of Sept. 11 only confirmed their commitment. …Upon hearing of the hijackings [one “searcher”] immediately grabbed a book from her backpack and recited the Arabic declaration of belief; she made the conversion official 12 days later.
New York Times, October 22, 2001


Certainly psychologists, religious and political leaders, and anyone concerned about our societal health andsurvival would wish to understand the foundations of a decision that propels someone to identify with the 9/11 killers (and their ideology) rather than with their innocent kafir/non-Muslim victims.


Things have not improved in the ten years since the 9/11 mass murders. According to the UK Daily Mail of January 5, 2011:


The number of Muslim converts in Britain has passed 100,000, fuelled by a surge in young white women adopting the Islamic faith.


The figure has almost doubled in ten years – with the average convert now a 27-year-old white woman fed up with British consumerism and immorality.


The investigation as to comparative morality whereby Islam requires jihad against non-Muslims, considers women second class citizens (including religious and legal sanction for wife beating), and an undying ancient enmity against Jews and Christians (and all non-Muslims) that continues to fuel atrocities across the world versus the perceived moral failings of UK society in which the horrors of Islam are often viewed as more attractive by some British “searchers” elicited this:


The survey …asked converts for their views on the negative aspects of British culture. They identified alcohol and drunkenness, a ‘lack of morality and sexual permissiveness’, and ‘unrestrained consumerism’. Daily Mail, 01/05/2011


Why some British non-Muslim “searchers” find their answers within a reactionary, absolutist worldview from Arabia rather than make a personal decision to not partake in such activities – or convert even to some more localized absolutist approach to existence like, say, Puritanism – if avoidance of sexual permissiveness, drunkenness, unrestrained consumerism, etc., is the goal of those who convert to Islam, is not particularly clear. Though the very public conversion of Lauren Booth, former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s sister-in-law, and Prince Charles numerous favorable comments on Islam have greatly benefited Islam in the UK in recent years they cannot explain the attraction the people in an open society have towards totalitarian, absolutist ideologies such as Islam.


Certainly, many have a deep need for surety and definitiveness. What could be the source of more certitude than an absolutist ideology to which one submits in entirety? After all, the word “Islam” translates to “Submission”, and “Muslim” to “one who submits.” Islam is about nothing else if not “Islam” – it’s an all-encompassing submission to an all-encompassing self-referential view of existence. Rising numbers of conversions to Islam seem to show that Islam’s brutal absolutism has found a fertile soil in the apparently morally confused and falling cultures of the west.


Many people need answers, but haven’t any idea as to how to ask the right questions. There are such “searchers” in every generation; those who know that “something is wrong” but haven’t any clear idea as to what.


Absolutist ideologies, religions, worldviews, political and legal systems (Islam includes all of those) are a welcome haven for such people from the challenges and confusions of daily life in open democratic societies. For too many, submission is by far easier than the frustrations and difficulties of the search for meaning itself.


Suna is the “Way of Mohammed.” It originates from the Hadith (Traditions), and the Sira (the biography of Mohammed). According to Islamic doctrine Mohammed is the greatest human being whose life is the perfect model for all Muslims to follow forever. Obeying Mohammed is commanded in the Koran. Devout followers of Islam follow the path of Suna – whatever Mohammed ordered others to do or did himself are the finest things that any human could do. We should not underestimate the power of examples.


The apostle said, ‘Kill any Jew that falls into your power.’ Thereupon Muhayyisa b. Mas`ud leapt upon Ibn Sunayna, a Jewish merchant with whom they had social and business relations, and killed him. Huwayyisa was not a Muslim at the time though he was the elder brother. When Muhayyisa killed him Huwayyisa began to beat him, saying, ‘You enemy of God, did you kill him when much of the fat on your belly comes from his wealth?’ Muhayyisa answered, ‘Had the one who ordered me to kill him ordered me to kill you I would have cut your head off.’ He said that this was the beginning of Huwayyisa’s acceptance of Islam. The other replied, ‘By God, if Muhammad had ordered you to kill me would you have killed me?’ He said, ‘Yes, by God, had he ordered me to cut off your head I would have done so.’ He exclaimed, ‘By God, a religion which can bring you to this is marvellous!’ and he became a Muslim. -Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah as translated by A. Guillaume, The Life of Muhammad, page 369

Note:Supporting Hadith from Sunan Abu-Dawd (19:2996), can be seen here


There is no doubt that absolutism appeals to many and always has, but there is cause for hope in that Islam’s supremacism, definitiveness, and cruel legal system (Sharia law) while attractive for some, is not at all for others. (More on Sharia Law here, and here, and here, and here.)


The day after the UK newspaper published its report that “100,000 Britons have chosen to become Muslim… and (the) average convert is (a) 27-year-old white woman” poll results were reported in the same newspaper (Daily Mail) that showed “Islam (is) now considered ‘a threat’ to national identity by almost half of French and Germans.” (Le Monde poll as cited in UK Daily Mail, 01/06/2011.)


German Chancellor Angela Merkel set the most high profile public tone of open criticism some months ago when she stated that multiculturalism (i.e., integration of immigrant groups) had “utterly failed” in Germany. In Britain, some public discussion starting in 2009 that massive immigration was a purposeful effort to forever alter the cultural makeup of the United Kingdom (that is, make it more “multicultural”) seems to show that the influx of Muslim immigrants into the UK is a component of a post-modernist, multicultural social engineering project that has utterly failed with disastrous consequences.


Rising awareness of Islamic doctrine, history, and its draconian, misogynist legal system (Sharia) in the United States is providing Americans with the foundational knowledge from which insightful questions about Islam can be formulated. The answers to these questions, more often than not, are – unpleasant, and show that the essential concepts of Islam, inclusive of submission and supremacism, to be incompatible with the US Constitution.


According to the Le Monde poll (comments on the article suggest that results would be duplicated in the UK) rising numbers of French and Germans now view Islam as a challenge to their national identities. The poll “…also found a majority in both countries believe Muslims have ‘not integrated properly.’”


If the history of jihad and Islamic expansionism are to be guides, non-Muslim citizens of France and Germany have cause for concern.


Ironically, the same day the Le Monde poll results appeared in a British newspaper the United States Constitution was read for the first time from the floor of the Senate.


The reading of the Constitution was recommended by Republican Representative Bob Goodlatte of Virginia with the following by way of explanation (as if such explanation is required for the first public reading on the Senate floor of the central document of American history):


One of the resounding themes I have heard from my constituents is that Congress should adhere to the Constitution and the finite list of powers it granted to the federal government.
Kansas City Star, 01/03/2011


The limitations of federal powers and the enforcement of checks and balances are favorite themes of conservatives during this 2nd year of the Obama administration. It is correct, laudable, and understandable in our highly charged national political environment that the proper extent of federal power according to the Constitution should be so seriously considered.


While German and French poll respondents have reasonably identified Islam as a threat to their respective national identities, there appears to be little need for discussion to determine what a Frenchman or a German means when he/she talks about their “national identity.” This question: “what does it mean to be an American?” is now a central issue in the United States.


It was once widely understood that the concepts and freedoms delineated in the Constitution were the foundations upon which the country were constructed. With the post-war (WW2) advent of post-modernism and multiculturalism and a corresponding rise in national self-doubt and guilt, the proud idea of “American” now has become for too many one of confusion, dismay, self-doubt/self-disgust.


Some political observers have suggested that the reading of the Constitution on the Senate floor was a Republican right-wing “stunt.” Some members of the minority party chose to express their opinion about “the Constitution-reading stunt” by not attending the session. There has yet to be any definitive explanation provided by opposition voices as to what it is that is partisan about reading the foundational document of American politics from the Senate floor.


There are larger and more important themes than the silly “political theater” accusation (and thus dismissal of the reading). It seems a bizarre oversight on the part of all former Congresses that the Constitution had never been read aloud on the Senate floor – it ought to be read at the opening of each new Congressional session.


Charles Krauthammer in his article “Constitutionalism” rightly notes the event as the beginning of a new way of looking at ourselves as Americans – the old way.


Krauthammer suggests that a renewed focus on the central document of American political/public life by Republicans likely indicates a new national political focus on core values based around those guaranteed to the people under the Constitution. This focus on the Constitution should always be the core of conservatism.


Some liberals are already disdaining the new constitutionalism, denigrating the document’s relevance and sneering at its public recitation. They do so at their political peril. In choosing to focus on a majestic document that bears both study and recitation, the reformed conservatism of the Obama era has found itself not just a symbol but an anchor.
National Review – January 7, 2010


Until recently the Constitution was commonly understood (and appreciated) as the foundation of the concept of “American” as well as the literal core of our concepts of freedom, and government. (Since we are in the midst of the sesquicentennial of the Civil War, it should be noted that both Northerners and Confederates considered themselves Constitutionalists). Until recently the answer to “what does it mean to be an American” almost always included some or all of the following components:


•our Constitution
•our Founders
•the “melting pot”
•our individual freedoms
•our special consideration from Providence
•and the sacrifices our heroes have made throughout our history to preserve our country and protect the Constitution.
It is good that we are returning to the core concepts of what it means “to be American” especially during this time of economic, ideological, cultural, and international crises.


If our understanding, appreciation of, and linkage with the US Constitution is re-established; and we can again see ourselves (without post-modernist false doubts/guilt) within a context of historical development over time and compare our foundations and core beliefs to most any other culture and country on the planet we will know once again our own value, and the contributions we have made to the world.


Since 9/11, the growth of Islam in the United States has increased by immigration, high birth rate, and conversions. It is almost counter-intuitive that Americans would convert to a religion/political ideology whose adherents committed the atrocities of 9/11 (specifically because they were adherents of that ideology) – the largest atrocity of mass murder in American history. We can look to Mohammed’s biography (Suna) and our own embrace of post-modernism for an answer.


The adherent of Islam who told his brother that he would decapitate him if commanded to do so by Mohammed impressed his brother so deeply with his zeal and surety that the horrified brother immediately converted to Islam. This is the very same scenario to explain the wave of post-9/11 conversions to Islam in the West.


Some people were apparently so impressed at the absolute zeal and surety of the 19 Muslim hijacker killers (rather than revolted by their cruelty, brutality, and hatred), they adopted the ideological path of the killers rather than the path of compassion for their victims.


The popular post-911 suggestion (now falling from favor) that the Muslim killers of that day had somehow “hijacked” the “religion of peace” and were not representative of it (an approach that would minimize the moral horror and inversion of converting to Islam) is not borne out by any reading of Islamic doctrine. Nor does such a view take into account the statements of those jihadists and those who followed them (both as individuals and as members of organizations/states) as they justified then and now their barbaric cruelties within an Islamic doctrinal context.


Searching for answers is a great tradition for people lucky to live in open societies, and one of our greatest freedoms. The great danger of searching is that some will find their “answers” on the wrong path.


It is good and right to look to our foundations, to the great people and ideas that created our country. If we put our national political and cultural life back on a Constitutional path – understanding that these core ideals are alive and belong to all of us and are not reserved for any particular party but for all Americans – and if we compare other ideologies and systems against our own, founded upon the standard of our Constitution, we will not find ourselves wanting.

Original article can be found here.

‘Christmas is evil’: Muslim group launches poster campaign against festive period

A nasty campiagn against Christmas and when one gets right down to it, Christians.

I have made the image of the poster a bit larger in the post below. If muslims think this will bring converts to islam the they have another thing coming.

"Fanatics from a banned Islamic hate group have launched a nationwide poster campaign denouncing Christmas as evil.

Organizers plan to put up thousands of placards around the UK claiming the season of goodwill is responsible for rape, teenage pregnancies, abortion, promiscuity, crime and pedophilia.

They hope the campaign will help ‘destroy Christmas’ in this country and lead to Britons converting to Islam instead."

---

Trolling for converts to islam

By Daily Mail Reporter

Fanatics from a banned Islamic hate group have launched a nationwide poster campaign denouncing Christmas as evil.

Organisers plan to put up thousands of placards around the UK claiming the season of goodwill is responsible for rape, teenage pregnancies, abortion, promiscuity, crime and paedophilia.

The poster that has appeared in the Tower Hamlets area hitting out at the festive period

Labour MP and anti racist campaigner Jim Fitzpatrick branded the posters ‘extremely offensive’ and demanded they were immediately ripped down.

The placards, which have already appeared in parts of London, feature an apparently festive scene with an image of the Star of Bethlehem over a Christmas tree.

But under a banner announcing ‘the evils of Christmas’ it features a message mocking the song the 12 Days of Christmas.

It reads: ‘On the first day of Christmas my true love gave to me an STD (sexually transmitted disease).

‘On the second day debt, on the third rape, the fourth teenage pregnancies and then there was abortion.’

According to the posters, Christmas is also to responsible for paganism, domestic violence, homelessness, vandalism, alcohol and drugs.

Another offence of Christmas, it proclaims, is ‘claiming God has a son’.

The bottom of the poster declares: ‘In Islam we are protected from all of these evils. We have marriage, family, honour, dignity, security, rights for man, woman and child.’

The campaign’s organiser is 27-year-old Abu Rumaysah, who once called for Sharia Law in Britain at a press conference held by hate preacher leader Anjem Choudary, the leader of militant group Islam4UK.

Former Home Secretary Alan Johnson banned Islam4UK group earlier this year, making it a criminal offence to be a member, after it threatened to protest at Wootton Bassett, the town where Britain honours its war dead.

Mr Rumaysah told the Mail that he was unconcerned about offending Christians.

He said: ‘Christmas is a lie and as Muslims it is our duty to attack it.

‘But our main attack is on the fruits of Christmas, things like alcohol abuse and promiscuity that increase during Christmas and all the other evils these lead to such as abortion, domestic violence and crime.

‘We hope that out campaign will make people realise that Islam is the only way to avoid this and convert.’

Mr Rumaysah, who said his campaign was not linked to any group, boasted that the posters would be put up in cities around the country, including London, Birmingham and Cardiff.

The campaign was highlighted by volunteers from a charity which distributes food and presents to pensioners and the lonely at Christmas.

Sister Christine Frost, founder of the East London Neighbours in Poplar charity, said: ‘The more posters I saw, the more angry I got.

‘Someone is stirring hatred which leaves the road open to revenge attacks or petrol bombs through letter-boxes.

‘I told the Mayor we are all scared.

‘If we said such things about Muslims, we’d all be hanging from lamp-posts.

‘The posters appear to be professionally printed’.

Poplar and Limehouse MP Mr Fitzpatrick said: ‘These posters are extremely offensive and have upset a lot of people – that’s why we jumped on it and asked the council to remove them.

‘Sister Christine is rooted in the community and doesn’t take offence lightly.

‘But these hate posters really upset her. Christmas is close to her belief.’

A Met Police spokesman said they had received complaints and were investigating.

Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman said the posters had ‘upset and antagonised many residents’.

He added: ‘The messages on these posters are offensive and do not reflect the views of the Council or the vast majority of residents.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340794/Muslim-group-launches-poster-hate-campaign-festive-period.html#ixzz18uWQ7Tgs
This entry was posted in England, Islam in Europe, War on Christians.

They hope the campaign will help ‘destroy Christmas’ in this country and lead to Britons converting to Islam instead.

Hat tip: Vlad Tepes

Is this what you want in your neighborhood?

Many have called the muslim call to worship a beautiful thing. In fact, our first muslim potus, the first muslim in the White House called it one of the most beautiful sounds he has ever heard. Take a listen and watch this video of the call to prayer, the fajr. This takes place very early in the day, when it is still dark outside.

I think this is is most depressing horrible sound. Like that of a dying animal.

I commend Christopher Logan for braving the elements and going to this mosque to record the fajr, in all its horrendous noise. Please read the entire post about what he witnessed, heard and knows about the imam of this particular mosque.

From Loganswarning.

---

It’s 6 in the Morning….

By Christopher Logan

Do you know where your children are…err….do you know what country you are in? Where is this taking place? Is it in Saudi Arabia, or how about Egypt? Nope, this is in the good ole’ US of A. Where just about all is tolerated. Even a religion/ideology that is out to destroy America as we know it. What you are hearing is the adhan, or the Muslim call to prayer.

Although it was absolutely freezing out, early Thursday morning I headed over to the Masjid At-Taqwa. Which is located in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn. Fulton St and Bedford Ave, to be exact.

I arrived about a half an hour early because I did not want to chance missing the morning call to prayer (Fajr). So I walked around for awhile, waiting until 5:51 a.m. which according to the chart below was supposed to be the time of the days first call to prayer.

Brooklyn, NY 11216, USA Prayer Times

Prayer Schedule December / 2010

Date Day Fajr Sunrise Dhuhr Asr Maghrib Isha

1 Wed 5:40 7:00 11:45 2:11 4:30 5:50

2 Thu 5:40 7:00 11:45 2:11 4:30 5:50

3 Fri 5:42 7:02 11:46 2:11 4:29 5:50

4 Sat 5:43 7:03 11:47 2:11 4:29 5:50

5 Sun 5:44 7:04 11:47 2:11 4:29 5:50

6 Mon 5:45 7:05 11:47 2:11 4:29 5:50

7 Tue 5:45 7:06 11:48 2:11 4:29 5:50

8 Wed 5:46 7:07 11:48 2:11 4:29 5:50

9 Thu 5:46 7:07 11:48 2:11 4:29 5:50

10 Fri 5:47 7:07 11:49 2:11 4:29 5:50

11 Sat 5:48 7:09 11:50 2:11 4:29 5:51

12 Sun 5:49 7:10 11:50 2:11 4:29 5:51

13 Mon 5:50 7:11 11:51 2:11 4:29 5:51

14 Tue 5:51 7:11 11:51 2:12 4:30 5:51

15 Wed 5:51 7:12 11:52 2:12 4:30 5:52

16 Thu 5:51 7:12 11:52 2:12 4:30 5:52

17 Fri 5:52 7:13 11:52 2:12 4:30 5:52

18 Sat 5:53 7:14 11:53 2:13 4:31 5:53

19 Sun 5:54 7:15 11:53 2:14 4:31 5:53

20 Mon 5:54 7:15 11:54 2:14 4:32 5:54

21 Tue 5:55 7:16 11:54 2:15 4:32 5:54

22 Wed 5:55 7:16 11:55 2:15 4:33 5:55

23 Thu 5:56 7:17 11:55 2:16 4:33 5:55

24 Fri 5:56 7:17 11:55 2:16 4:33 5:55

25 Sat 5:56 7:18 11:56 2:17 4:34 5:57

26 Sun 5:57 7:18 11:57 2:17 4:35 5:57

27 Mon 5:57 7:18 11:57 2:18 4:36 5:58

28 Tue 5:57 7:18 11:58 2:19 4:36 5:58

29 Wed 5:58 7:19 11:58 2:19 4:37 5:59

30 Thu 5:58 7:19 11:59 2:20 4:38 6:00

31 Fri 5:58 7:19 11:59 2:20 4:38 6:00

Finally the time was 5:50 a.m., so I took out my camcorder in anticipation of what was supposed to come out of the two loudspeakers stationed on the roof. But nothing happened, so I waited around several minutes and after awhile decided to head home. Then as soon as I put my camcorder away and turned the corner, there it came. Like an enemy pounding on the drums of war. At that point I took the camera out of the bag, and filmed the Mosque and call to prayer. Seconds after the call started a cab driver jumped out of his car and quickly walked towards the Mosque’s side entrance. Considering his car was parked only a few feet away from me, I was not sure if he had seen me filming and was going in there to alert them. I continued to film and saw another man facing my direction on near the corner of the Mosque, although I could not tell if he had just left the side entrance or not. Seconds later he turned back to the side entrance, so at that point I decided to pay more attention to my surroundings, than the filming. But I was not going to leave until I got the entire sound bite, which I did.

In English here is what it translate to.

Allah is most great. Allah is most great.

Allah is most great. Allah is most great.

I testify that there is no God but Allah.

I testify that there is no God but Allah.

I testify that Mohammad is the messenger of God.

I testify that Mohammad is the messenger of God.

Come to prayer! Come to prayer!

Come to success. Come to success.

God is most great. God is most great.

There is no God but Allah.

Christians and Jews in the neighbourhood should be outraged by this blatant disrepet of their beliefs. Besides the unnecessary call to prayer, there is much more to this Mosque. I had known in the past that the Mosque was lead by Imam Siraj Wahhaj, originally known as Jeffrey Kearse.

To see if he was still the man in charge, I called the Mosque on Friday and was told that he is still there, but he travels a lot. In other words, he is spreading hate elsewhere. This is from a past speech of his.

“…And [Allah] declared ‘Whoever is at war with my friends, I declare war on them.’ … Your true friend is Allah, the messenger, and those who believe…. Hear what I’m telling you well. The Americans are not your friends … The Canadians are not your friends … The Europeans are not your friends. Your friend is Allah, the Messenger and those who believe. These people will never be satisfied with you until you follow their religion …”

Please keep in mind that this Imam is not the only Muslim spreading hate against non-Muslims in Brooklyn. The Al Noor Islamic school, is spreading the history of Islamic war and conquest.

After listening to the adhan, is that what you want to hear coming from Mosques across America? If not, you need to stay active in this war.

Original article is here.

Thanks to Christopher Logan!

Dangerous for the Feds to become involved in hajj lawsuit against school district

I recently posted an article about the DOJ suing school district over NOT allowing a muslim teacher to go on hajj, the pilgrimage every muslim must make to mecca within their lifetime, if they are able to. Here is a legal expert's opinion about this

travesty of injustice by the DOJ and the obama administration.

If this law suit succeeds then we will have opened our country up to sharia law. Personally, I think the obama administration is well aware of this and is doing all it can to islamize America. obama and his ilk are wrecking the United States from every direction possible. We have a muslim in the White House and none of this should be a surprise to anyone who can see the reality of obama's actions.

From OneNewsNow.com

---

'Dangerous' for feds to get involved in Muslim's lawsuit

By Bill Bumpus

A legal expert says it's a "dangerous" precedent for the federal government to sue a suburban Chicago school district for denying a Muslim middle-school teacher unpaid leave to make a pilgrimage to Mecca.

According to an Associated Press report, the U.S. Department of Justice accuses the school district in Berkeley, Illinois, of violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate Safoorah Khan's religious practices. According to Islamic teaching, every adult Muslim is supposed to make at least one pilgrimage -- the "Hajj" -- to Mecca in Saudi Arabia in their lifetime if they are physically and financially able to do so. Khan had requested almost three weeks of unpaid leave.

Matt Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, tells OneNewsNow the government's action is unprecedented. "This is an absolute bully club being used by the federal government in this lawsuit against the school to literally force this school to go out of their way to make unreasonable accommodations for a Mecca pilgrimage," he says.

The attorney argues this is a "dangerous path for the government to plow" because it blazes a trail for similar requests.

Matt Staver"...Once you then say that you can take a three-week pilgrimage to Mecca, then there really is no stopping -- you can take five sections of the workday out to go pray; you can have a certain kind of ritual washing built into the school or to the workplace to be able to do your ritual cleansing," he suggests. "It just literally opens up Pandora's Box -- and the federal laws were not designed for that kind of accommodation."

The AP report says Khan began teaching for Berkeley School District 87 in 2007 -- and in 2008 requested the unpaid leave for the pilgrimage. The district argued her request was unrelated to her professional duties and was not set forth in the contract between the district and the teachers union. After the district twice denied her request, Khan resigned.

Staver says while his group advocates for religious freedom, this particular case "literally distorts religious freedom." Liberty Counsel, he adds, would be willing to help defend this school district.

Original article is here.

Hat tip: Creeping Sharia

Honoring diversity and caving to islam: One unifrom at a time in Canada

Stupidity from our northern neighbor; honoring diversity, multiculturalism and political correctness. The three toxic stews of the West raise their ugly heads again. So this brave, trail blazing muslim woman wants to be a corrections officer? Well bully for her and she should have NO special uniform or accommodations, period. End of story, right? No, we know how this one goes.


The Correctional Services of Canada is designing ONE special uniform to make sure this muslim woman does not touch the skin of the male prisoners she is going to be working with. How dumb is this, how PC and libtardedly progressive is this moronic move by the CSC? I have no problem with a woman wanting to be in this field but I really think women should be relegated to being with only female prisoners and men should be relegated to working with male prisoners. Call me a sexist, male pig and lets get that out of the way, OK? She is playing the cards that we have let muslims play so well here in the West. If anything goes wrong or one wrong word is said to her she will be screaming discrimination and islamophobia.


What will happen when she DOES come in contact with a male prisoner? It will happen, protective uniform or not. Then she will sue Canada for failing to 'protect' her and you can bet every islamic organization will be tripping over each other to assist this 'trail blazer' in her mission to pave the way for more islamic infiltration, to wage stealth jihad upon the fools of the West who allow this to happen in the first place. There is nothing positive that can come out of this.


"Wherever possible, you want to see diversity in the workplace and to have a broad range of perspectives represented," he said. "Within the correctional service, that can often be an important part of rehabilitation when you have different people working in prison who will understand different cultural and religious backgrounds. That absolutely can provide great benefit in dealing with different situations that might arise within those prison walls."


Holland said the employee is blazing a new path, and hopes employees in all facets of the public service understand the benefits of a diverse work force.


Nermine Barbouch, executive director of the Canadian Muslim Forum, called the employee "courageous" to accept the job of a correctional officer. From cnews.canoe.ca.

---

Canada designs special hijab for token Muslim prison guard

Criticism, applause for prison guard accommodations
By Kathleen Harris

OTTAWA — Correctional Service of Canada is drawing both criticism and applause for taking steps to accommodate the religious and cultural practices of a female Muslim prison guard — the first ever hired in the country.


The Muslim Canadian Congress called it “apologist” and “politically correct” that CSC is designing a special hijab for wearing inside the men’s federal penitentiary where the recruit will be posted after completing a nine-week training program. MCC vice-president Salma Siddiqui declared it "nonsense" that the employee is permitted to wear long sleeves and gloves to avoid skin-to-skin contact with males and worked out prayer times with the employer.


Siddiqui insisted religious faith should not be a factor on-the-job for any employee who chooses the profession of a correctional officer.


"I don't think there should be any emphasis on Muslim or not," she told QMI Agency. "They are being Canadian and politically correct. We do not have to live with that guilt."


The recruit will wear a hijab designed to come off easily if grabbed by an inmate to gain physical control. Siddiqui said there is no religious requirement to cover one's head - that it is the "uniform" of the Muslim brotherhood and international Islamist movement - and worries it may fuel rising concerns about the "penetration" of Islamist ideology into society.


But Liberal MP Mark Holland sees no problem making certain allowances to accommodate cultural and religious practices as long as institutional security and quality of work are not compromised.


"Wherever possible, you want to see diversity in the workplace and to have a broad range of perspectives represented," he said. "Within the correctional service, that can often be an important part of rehabilitation when you have different people working in prison who will understand different cultural and religious backgrounds. That absolutely can provide great benefit in dealing with different situations that might arise within those prison walls."


Holland said the employee is blazing a new path, and hopes employees in all facets of the public service understand the benefits of a diverse work force.


Nermine Barbouch, executive director of the Canadian Muslim Forum, called the employee "courageous" to accept the job of a correctional officer.


"If both sides are OK and they have reached an agreement, there should not be a problem. She is capable of doing what any other person is doing," she said. "I don't like to look at it as reasonable accommodation or any other accommodation."


CSC formed a working group to figure out ways to ensure the employee's religious and cultural needs were accommodated within the parameters of the overarching requirements for safety and security of institution, staff and inmates, said national spokesman Graham Andrews.


In past, CSC has worked with Sikh employees to develop special turbans suitable for the prison setting. Special allowances have also been made to wear replica kirpans.

Original article is here.

Restaurant in Canada seats women in separate section according to sharia law

 

This image is from the window of an islamic restaurant in Toronto, Canada.

They have no problem enforcing sharia law even though in Canada sharia law is illegal. The comments below are from Vlad Tepes site.

"This story first came to light when posted on Small Dead Animals, one of Canada’s more influential blogs, thanks to a reader who sent in the photograph. It appears the owners and operators of Juba Restaurant feel perfectly comfortable applying sharia standards in a public establishment. Canadian values do not support gender segregation; men and women are considered equal in all aspects of life, with legal statutes firmly in place reflecting this societal value. Sharia law considers gender mixing unIslamic, so it stands to reason that the good Muslims over at Juba’s sharia shack would defy both the value of gender equality and the laws supporting it.

Purdah, the separation of men and women, is based upon the central theme of Namus (honour) and is expected in public in many Islamic countries. Religious Saudis believe it is forbidden for a woman to eat in public as part of her veil would have to be removed to do so, revealing her face which would compromise purdah. For this reason, segregation is especially strict in restaurants and it is common for establishments to have defined areas for women only often marked as “family” and “women section only”. It is common to see western restaurant chains with both separate entrances and seating sections as they too, must abide by sharia standards. McDonald’s in Riyhad comes complete with a segregated section where women must sit in the “family” section.

Sharia law is not legal in Canada. and this is not Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan or any other country where sharia is the standard. This is Canada where Islamic law finds little, if any respect.

I might add, restaurants in Canada have been declared public property, and that was the entire basis for the now nation wide smoking bans. If a restaurant is considered public property, even though I do not believe it is, for the purpose of social engineering, then surely the kind of gender apartheid, (using the word correctly for once) being applied in this restaurant must be illegal and certainly should be stopped. This will only encourage Muslim men who are trying to make certain that women from Muslim nations will not and cannot integrate into Western society, and make it that much easier to force them to standards here in Canada, that should not apply even in the Islamic Magreb."

Original post from Vlad Tepes is here.

Hat tip: Five feet of fury and Vlad Tepes.

Getting Fiqhed: Bill Warner of Political Islam

One of the most sad acts in islam is the use of taqiyya. When a muslim lies to a kafir it is regarded as a sacred, holy and highly regarded act. One could call it a form of scared jihad. Where are the peaceful, good muslims condemning and trying to stop that small majority of 'radical or terrorist muslims'? Bill Warner of Political Islam will take on this subject with this next post; "Getting Fiqhed" and if you have never heard this term then you will learn something new today about islam. Something that is deceitful and involves treachery.


"If you know the doctrine of Islam, the entire fatwa condemning terrorism is pure deception. Why be surprised? Mohammed repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive if it would advance the Islamic cause, and the fiqh council follows the Sunna of Mohammed to the letter.


The reason that this deception works is the average Kafir politician, reporter, pastor, priest or rabbi is deliberately and willfully ignorant. It is not that Islam is so skillful; but that Kafir leaders are such ignorant, politically correct cowards who refuse to educate themselves to the detriment of their own religious faith and their own country."

Getting Fiqhed
By Bill Warner


A common complaint against Islam is that the "good" Muslims don't condemn the Muslims who are terrorists.


Lately, an old declaration by a fiqh council has been popping up. [A fiqh council is made of Islamic jurists who are experts in Sharia law and it applications.] Dozens of imams and Islamic groups condemn terrorism by signing a fatwa [judgment]. It sounds great, but how does it look under closer examination? Take this sentence:


"Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of violence against innocent lives."


What could be possibly wrong with this strict condemnation? The possible splinter in the banister is what specific words mean. Take "extremism" for example. The average Kafir (non-believer) thinks of terror. Terror is extreme, by definition, but what we are actually talking about is religious extremism, in particular, Islam. What is extreme Islam? Surely Islamic terrorism is extreme Islam.


Before we can examine "extreme Islam", we must define Islam. Islam is the political/religious doctrine found the Koran and the Sunna (Mohammed's perfect life-example.) The Sunna is found in the Sira (Mohammed's biography) and the Hadith (the Traditions, small Mohammed stories). The Koran, the Sira and the Hadith compose the Trilogy. The Trilogy defines Islam. If it is in the Trilogy, it is Islam. If it is in the Trilogy it is normal Islam.


What is the content of the Trilogy? Murder, plots against the enemies of Islam, assassinations, mass executions, sneak attacks, torture, Jew-hatred, theft, kidnappings, open warfare, and more. Since they are in the Trilogy, these actions are normal, not extreme. September 11 attack on the World Trade Center was not extremism.


So far as terror goes, terror is as Islamic as a call-to-prayer.


Koran 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!"


Bukhari 1,7,331 Mohammed:
I have been given five things, which were not given to any one else before me:
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, by His frightening my enemies for a distance of one month's journey.


The fiqh council's fatwa includes a quote from the Koran:


Koran 5:32 whoever killed a human being, unjustly, shall be regarded as having killed all mankind.


The problem is that this quote from the Islamic scholars is taqiyya (sacred deception). Look at what they left out:


Koran 5:32 That was why We laid it down for the Jews that whoever killed a human being, unjustly, shall be regarded as having killed all mankind


That advice was for the Jews--the Jews, not the Muslims. Let's examine the next two verses that advise the Muslims:


Koran 5:33 Those that make war against Allah and His apostle and spread disorder in the land shall be slain or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the land. They shall be held up to shame in this world and sternly punished in the hereafter: except those that repent before you reduce them. For you must know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.


Koran 5:35 Believers, have fear of Allah and seek the right path to Him. Fight valiantly for His cause, so that you may triumph.


When Muslims kill a Kafir, it is regarded as a sacred act, jihad.


Now look at the word, "innocent". Mohammed sent out his jihadists on seven raids before they were successful on their eighth attempt to destroy the Kafirs' caravan. It is significant that they used deception to accomplish this task. The jihadists disguised themselves as "religious" pilgrims to approach the caravan drivers. They murdered one, captured those who did not escape and stole their merchandise.


What was the guilt of the caravan drivers? They were Meccan Kafirs. That was their only guilt. We might say that they were innocent, but they were part of a group that denied the fact that Mohammed was the prophet of the only god, Allah. That is guilt enough to be murdered. No one who denies that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah is innocent.


If you know the doctrine of Islam, the entire fatwa condemning terrorism is pure deception. Why be surprised? Mohammed repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive if it would advance the Islamic cause, and the fiqh council follows the Sunna of Mohammed to the letter.


The reason that this deception works is the average Kafir politician, reporter, pastor, priest or rabbi is deliberately and willfully ignorant. It is not that Islam is so skillful; but that Kafir leaders are such ignorant, politically correct cowards who refuse to educate themselves to the detriment of their own religious faith and their own country.


Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, www.politicalislam.com

Please visit Political Islam if you have done so. It is one the BEST sites where one can educate
oneself about all islam and sharia law.

---