Santa Barbara City College targeted by latino Student Movement of Aztlan

Here we have a latino group making demands, not asking politely, demanding that the items noted below become policy at Santa Barbara City College. Seriously, who do these ding dongs think they are. MECHA and Aztlan are calling us the invaders and they want to reclaim the American Southwest? These two groups are nasty, anti-Semitic and extremely prone to violence. "We are demanding bilingual classes for Latinos, translation of textbooks into Spanish and demanding special treatment regardless of legal status. She states: Institutions in our community which do not serve Latinos have no place in the community. We will soon be the majority and we will control and we deserve full respect and education now, not later." That was stated by Maria Garcia. Read on for a perfect example of what happens when the three toxic stews of western society are allowed to grow unchecked; Multiculturalism, Diversity and Political Correctness. This is from Right Side News.

Santa Barbara City College Board of Trustees Targeted by Latino Student Movement of Aztlan
By Rick Haymow

We came across an interesting article written by Maria Garcia demanding bilingual classes for Latinos, translation of textbooks into Spanish and demanding special treatment regardless of legal status. She states: Institutions in our community which do not serve Latinos have no place in the community. We will soon be the majority and we will control and we deserve full respect and education now, not later

It is abundantly clear her view is to take over our territories and not to assimilate and become English speaking Americans, but quite the opposite. She wants Latinos to be "served" and goes on to say they will be in the majority soon. This organization has targeted the Santa Barbara City College (SBCC) Board of Trustees and will layout the demands listed below.

She writes about the New SBCC Continuing Ed Association tied to MEChA, an anti-American Hispanic separatist organization MEChA is an Hispanic separatist organization that encourages anti-American activities and civil disobedience.

The radical members of MEChA who refer to themselves as "Mechistas," romanticize Mexican claims to the "lost Territories" of the Southwestern United States -- a Chicano country called Aztlan. In its national constitution, MEChA calls for self-determination by its members to liberate Aztlan, which is the Southwestern United States...read more here

Here is her statement on this new association, which has turned their demands on the SBCC Board of Trustees

A new SBCC Continuing Education Association to focus on Latinos and the Aztla
Movement has been formed.

The first SBCC Continuing Education Association to focus on Latinos and the Aztla Movement has been formed as neither the SBCC Continuing Education Division Latino Student Council (Consejo de Estudiantes para la Educacion de Adultos) or Associated Continuing Education Students (ACES) represent the interests of all students in the Continuing Education program. This new organization, which is called Movimiento Estudiantil Latino de Aztla (Latino Student Movement of Aztlan) is affiliate with MEChA which stands forMovimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan).

She demands special treatment regardless of their legal status, which lines up with the MEChA mission and philosophy, as they believe Aztlan was taken from them and that they are the true citizens while the Americans are the invaders.

Our Mission is to ensure that Latinos who attend the SBCC Continuing Education program have equal access to same classes all citizens and English speakers do, that Certificate Programs for Spanish speakers are offered, and that SBCC Continuing Education does not exploit students, immigrants, first generation college students, or workers regardless of their legal status.

Here is the list of demands to be presented to the SBCC Board of Trustees:

• Provide all Agendas and Board Meeting Minutes in Spanish, have Interpreters at all Board Meetings and provide isolated audio feeds to any Latino not proficient in English immediately.

• Translate the SBCC Continuing Education website and catalog into Spanish immediately.

• Increase the number of ESL and Citizenship classes offered each semester.

• Offer the following classes in Spanish: Entrepreneur Training Program, Computers: Spreadsheets ; Bookkeeping, Financial Seminars, Ceramics and Art Education by Winter of 2011.

• Increase the percentage of bilingual classes for Latinos who seek to enroll in the Continuing Education Programs to 60% by Spring of 2011 and 100% by Winter of 2012.

• Provide Certificate programs in Spanish for: Home Health Aids, Personal Care Assistances, Nurse Aide Training Program, Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Counseling, Global Sustainability ; Business Strategy, Plumbing Systems and HVAC Design,  Maintenance by Winter of 2011.

She ends her statement with this, and her email address to recruit others in their quest to retake Aztlan:

Institutions in our community which do not serve Latinos have no place in the community. We will soon be the majority and we will control and we deserve full respect and education now, not later. If you or anyone you know is interested in participating in our organization please contact us for further details and updates: sbcclsma@gmail.com.

Read her article here:

Original article is here.

Environmental tyranny: Enviro-nazis strike again

The enviro-nazis are at it again. Not caring one whit for the people, communities and livelyhoods these eco-terrorists march on. They are the darlings of the far left progressives and will stop at nothing to try and lock up every square inch of this country that they can. Of course, the government has to join in tolock up the beach and land.  Eminent domain is generally used for such nefarious purposes as what you will watch and listen to here on the video below. This is from Wizbang and Brutally Honest. Please share and make this well exposed for what it is.

Environmental tyranny
By Rick

A week ago I vacationed in the area covered in the following piece... I saw the signs and didn't understand them all, didn't understand the driving forces behind them... I do now... and I'm enraged... you will be enraged... you need to watch the whole damned thing... you need to watch those impacted by environmental thuggery... then you need to pass this on... this needs to go viral... do your part:

Piping Mad: Fair People at the Mercy of a Government Gone Fowl from Kevin Hicks on Vimeo.

Hat tip: Andrea Shea King from Radio Patriot

Understanding Liberal Disillusionment – Part 1

I hope you will read this by D.L. Adams. I find little fault with this article and look fowrad to part 2 tomorrow. That this country has lost its way is quite obvious to all except those on the left who detest what our country was built upon and how; a Judeo-Christian foundation, strong morals and ethics. We have really fallen off the train. I will limit my commentary and let you get on with reading this excellent article. From Big Peace.

Understanding Liberal Disillusionment – Part 1
By D.L. Adams

The idea that Judeo-Christian religious morality is the basis of a just society is a foundational concept in the creation of the United States. This once pervasive concept has now fallen from favor within certain loud segments of society regardless of the high esteem in which it was held by the universality of our Founders. Rejection of the religion-based worldview of the Founders is the core around which liberal anger is constructed.

Where matters of morality, religion, history, and ethics are concerned in the United States today, there is now no “middle.” Among people of good will and reasonable intellect there is a fundamental disagreement not about the nature of morality and ethics, but rather about their value and provenance. One side defends the importance of morality and its origins in religion; the other takes an evangelical, rejectionist position.

Our Founders credited the future success of the United States on God’s guidance, adherence to Judeo-Christian religion, and to Christian religion-based morality. The historical record of our foundational documents and the private papers of our Revolutionary leaders show this to be true.

It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue.


[W]e have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. . . . Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. (source)

John Adams’ cousin, Samuel Adams, patriot and signer of the Declaration of Independence, founding member of the Committees of Correspondence, and one of the leading independence agitators responsible for the radicalization of the Massachusetts Colony against British rule went much further.

For Samuel Adams the Revolution was not only about “independency” – he had even loftier goals. Adams hoped for the return of Puritanism and the creation of a nation founded on Christian principles.

In Sam Adams’s eyes, the American Revolution was to do far more than establish an independent state; it was to purify society, revolutionize manners and morals, and pave the way for another Puritan age.
(Miller, Sam Adams, pp. 359-360; as quoted in John Eidmore, Christianity and the Constitution: The Faith of Our Founding Fathers, p. 255.)

There are few now who know much of Samuel Adams but what they see on a beer label.

There are fewer still who would suggest that the return of Puritanism is now a desirable outcome.

Far fewer suggest (as many Progressives do) that religion, and a desire to fulfill/implement God’s concept of justice and goodness on earth (as they were understood by the Founders and their generation and delineated in Jewish and Christian doctrine), were not fundamental to those who created the United States. Such an overtly inaccurate position surpasses simple denial, though without the usual blather of convolutions and bloviating – it’s merely a lie.

While this revisionist position is difficult to defend – mainly because it is false – there are many who promulgate this counter-historical view.

Even Jefferson, the noted populist and “Deist”, credited God for the wisdom that guided the Founders during the American Revolution. Jefferson concluded his first inaugural address with the following request to the American people and to God.

Relying then on the patronage of your good will (ed. the people), I advance with obedience to the work, ready to retire from it whenever you become sensible how much better choices it is in your power to make: and may that infinite power which rules the destinies of the universe, lead our councils to what is best, & give them a favorable issue for your peace and prosperity. (Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, 1801)

Jefferson concluded his second inaugural address with similar themes:

shall need, too, the favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our forefathers, as Israel of old, from their native land, and planted them in a country flowing with all the necessaries and comforts of life; who has covered our infancy with his providence, and our riper years with his wisdom and power; and to whose goodness I ask you to join with me in supplications, that he will so enlighten the minds of your servants, guide their councils, and prosper their measures, that whatsoever they do, shall result in your good, and shall secure to you the peace, friendship, and approbation of all nations. (Thomas Jefferson, Second Inaugural Address, March 5, 1805)

A cursory review of the lives of the Founders, their public utterances, and personal and private papers shows a deep link between them, their belief in God and the divine source of morality and its derivation from Judeo-Christian religious principles, doctrine, and tradition. Few public officials today outside of the religious sphere (almost all on the right) discuss morality, its roots in religion, and the importance of Christian and Jewish thought to the foundations of the country. When they do speak in public of such things, they are excoriated for doing so by those on the Progressive Left and also by many others who ought to know better.

A case in point is the vitriol directed at former Governor Sarah Palin and Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell. Both are conservative politicians who speak about morality and link Bible-based morality with public policy.

The rejection of morality in politics by the American Left is nothing less than an ongoing denial of the religious origins of our country and our national character. Many on the Progressive Left have embraced a post-modernist worldview.

Post-modernism posits a radical equivalence that views all religions and all cultures as equal. This concept of radical equivalence is also the foundation of multiculturalism. The deconstruction then of the Founders’ faith, its importance in the development of the country and of its continued value is necessary to support post-modernism and multiculturalism’s worldview and utopian goals.

A central problem to the advancement of the post-modernist view is the origin of American law and morality in Judeo-Christian religion, and our understanding of the central dichotomies around which such laws are built: good/evil, right/wrong, just/unjust, etc. The rejection of the morality of the Founders and the support today for Islam (our Founders did not at all support it ) among American leftists is illustrative.

Islam does not view these essential dichotomies upon which our laws are based in the same way that Americans do. Regardless, the Left views Islam as a fellow-traveler in the deconstruction of American institutions and has therefore allied itself with Islam and Islamists.

The same approach was taken by Iranian leftists prior to the 1979 Islamist Revolution. After the Shah was overthrown leftists there unpleasantly discovered that their views were not at all compatible with totalitarian Islam.

It is difficult to comprehend the cooperative relationship between far left (American Progressives) and extremist totalitarian forces (Islamists) especially when history shows that such relationships can only be temporary. Alliances of convenience between political opposites are usually short-lived and end …poorly. The Iranian leftists learned this lesson. American Progressives seem determined to repeat this costly mistake. (Please see Persepolis.)

Original article is here

Ayodhya Temple decision is being watched by Hindus and muslims

This is an extremely hot issue in India. The high court there is going to be ruling on whether a sacred temple site belongs to the Hindus or muslims.The Hindus should get this temple and the muslims should leave India as far as I am concerned. Either way this goes down, violence will be the result at the end of the day. The Hindus have been persecuted for hundreds of years by the muslims. The spread of islam is never peaceful. From the Telegraph.co.uk.

India braced for violence over Muslim v Hindu temple decision

Thousands of paramilitary and riot police have been deployed in India as the country braces for violence over a High Court ruling on whether an ancient religious site belongs to Muslims or Hindus.

The ruling will bring a legal settlement to the property dispute which spans more than 60 years of Indian independence and caused riots throughout India in 1992 when extremists destroyed the site's 16th Century Babri Mosque to build a temple to the Hindu God Ram. More than 2,000 were killed in the violence which spread throughout India.

The government banned bulk text message sending to stop militant groups spreading false information and inciting violence amid fears the clashes could be repeated following today's (THURS) High Court decision ahead of the opening of the Commonwealth Games on Sunday.

The Supreme Court rejected an appeal by a former senior official on Tuesday to delay the verdict until after the Commonwealth Games.

Manmohan Singh, the Indian prime minister, yesterday published a direct appeal in all popular newspapers, pleading with Hindus and Muslims to respect the court's verdict and challenge it through legal channels if they cannot accept it.

"It goes without saying that the judgment needs to be treated with the utmost respect. At the same time, we must remember the fact that the judgment, at this stage, is just one step in the judicial process. The determination of the issues need not necessarily end with this judgement unless it is accepted by all parties," he said.

"It is necessary for all sections of the people of India to maintain equanimity and tranquillity in the aftermath of the judgment. There should be no attempt by any section of the people to provoke any other section or to indulge in any expression of emotion that would hurt the feelings of other people."

Mr Singh pleaded for Indian tradition of respect for all religions be observed and warned that any could harm the country's rapid economic growth.

His appeal however heightened anxiety over the possibility of violence along with firm security measures. In Ayodya itself, in the heart of India's most populous state, police were issued with riot gear, including rubber bullets and tear gas, to quell any violence. Helicopters have been put on standby.

Twenty companies of the paramilitary Central Reserve Police Force have been drafted to protect the site itself, while 44 districts in the state have been declared as either sensitive or 'hypersensitive.'

The dispute focuses on who owns the site in Ayodhya - 83 miles from the state capital Lucknow - Muslims who have worshipped at the Babri Masjid since its construction in the 16th Century, or Hindus who believe it is the site of an ancient temple to their God, Ram. The property title has been held by the Sunni Central Waqf Board, which protects historic Muslim buildings and land.

In 1992, an estimated 150,000 Hindu fundamentalists, led by leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party, including L.K Advani, converged on the Babri Masjid site where many destroyed the mosque. In the riots which followed in Delhi, Mumbai and Hyderabad more than 2000 were killed. Ten years later, the dispute claimed fresh victims when Muslims attacked and killed 58 Hindu passengers on a train rumoured to be returning from Ayodhya. The massacre sparked riots throughout Gujarat ion which an estimated 1000 are believed to have died.

Leading commentator M.J Akbar, who reported the riots at the time, said he believed Indians had matured since 1992 and would not allow communal feelings threaten the country's growth.

"I think we're going to surprise everyone and shock ourselves by actually keeping the peace. This time around, after 18 years, we're going to show we can handle it through the Supreme Court. Not because we've become Gandhians but because people have realised violence is suicide. Whatever people want, it's not violence," he said.

Original article is here

The U.N. wants to ban our guns.

Here is a link to sign the petition to stop this from happening and for the video:

No posts for tonight. With a friend who has taken a turn for the worse.

I am just now leaving to spend the rest of tonight and the early A.M. with a friend who has taken a severe turn for the worse from ALS. Not a surprise but his wife just called me and he has asked to see me. This is what really good friends do, through good and bad, be there. Keep us in your prayers. I should be back sometime tomorrow and hate to not be blogging but I know you all do understand. This is one of three friends that I have battling something terminal, and well it is just tough sledding.

Soldier Killed for Refusal to Accept Islam Now Set in Bronze

Talk about standing by your savior and standing up for your beliefs!

Evgeny Rodionov
Soldier Killed for Refusal to Accept Islam Now Set in Bronze

Monument to Evgeny Rodionov, a soldier who perished in Chechen Republic in the 1990s has been set up in his native town of Kuznetsk in Penza Region.

Private Rodionov was killed by Chechen militants, when kept a prisoner in Chechnya, on May, 23rd, 1996. He was decapitated for refusal to take off the underwear cross he was wearing and accept Islam.

"The monument depicts a bronze candle with its flame embracing a soldier who is holding a cross", - the report reads. The monument will be unveiled near the school, where Evgeny Rodionov studied.

The author of the monument is the Ukrainian sculptor Sergey Mardar.


Source: interfax.ru

Teenager's bomb went unreported to the D.A.'s office, until now

In Portland, Maine a muslim teenager who built a bomb, a chemical bomb and set it off in a parking lot, may not have any charges filed against him. Another kid back in 2007 is possibly being prosecuted for setting a Ham sandwich down on a table where some muslim students were sitting. This happened in Lewiston, Maine and was referred to as a hate crime. I remember the sandwich event but had heard NOTHING of this most recent event about which Gadi Adelman is writing about here. Chemical bomb that explodes by a muslim or a Ham sandwich that actually does not do anything nor does it have the potential to injure anyone? Insulting to some, perhaps? Calling this the result of the dumbing down of America from the three toxic stews to the West; Political correctness, Diversity and excessive multiculturalism.

When is a sandwich a bomb?
 Portland, Maine: DA’s Office Not Told of Teenager’s Bomb
By Gadi Adelman

Last Tuesday evening at approximately 8:00pm an Islamic 13 year old detonated a bomb near the parking lot of the Islamic Society of Portland, Maine. Why was the DA’s office unaware this had happened?

Talk about things being ‘swept under the prayer rug’.

A fellow radio host of mine emailed me a story on Thursday night that I thought was a bit interesting, interesting because I had not seen or heard about it anywhere.

WCSH NBC Channel 6 out of Portland, Maine had posted the following story on their website Wednesday, September 22:

PORTLAND, ME (NEWS CENTER) -- Police say there were no injuries or damage caused by a chemical bomb that went off in a parking lot near the Islamic Society of Portland. The bomb went off in the lot between the Islamic Society and Back Bay Grill around 8:00 PM Tuesday night. Portland Police say Islamic elders came forward to tell them that a 13 year old from the Society was experimenting and was responsible for the bomb. Another bomb was also found undetonated.

Police say it's unclear if charges will be filed against the teenagers.

That’s it? That was the whole story? A 13 year old sets off a bomb, police even state “another bomb was found undetonated.” It happened near the Islamic Society, the Islamic elders admitted the 13 year old was from the society and “it's unclear if charges will be filed against the teenager?”

I’m sorry but I for one don’t want some ‘Junior Jihadi’ running around making chemical bombs anywhere and getting away with it by saying it was some “experiment” gone wrong.

I needed to find out what had happened to this ‘Junior Jihadi’ so I contacted the District Attorney’s office in Portland, Maine and what I found out scared me more than a teacher with a twitch in a suicide bomber class.

Friday morning I spoke to the head of the Juvenile Justice Division, Prosecution Team Leader, Assistant District Attorney, Christine Thibeault.

I asked Asst. D.A. Thibeault what was happening with the case of the bomb that went off outside the Islamic Society of Portland. Her answer was “what bomb?” My reaction, of course, was to repeat the question and her answer was “I have not even heard about it.”

What? Could this be real? How has the District Attorney’s office not yet even heard about it? So, I read the story to her right off the WCHS website. I asked her if it didn’t concern her that an Islamic teenager had set off a bomb and told her that the police even found a second bomb. She replied that “it concerns me anytime anyone sets off a bomb regardless of their ethnicity.”

Okay, good answer. I followed up with “given the current situation with the Ground Zero mosque and homegrown terror in this country does is not concern you that a teenager who is Muslim set off a bomb outside the Islamic Society and you have yet to hear about it?” Asst. D.A. Thibeault answered that question directly, “Yes it does and soon as we get off the phone I am calling the Portland Police Department to find out about it.”

That still didn’t sit well with me so I asked the Asst. D.A. what the procedure was for cases involving juveniles in Maine. She explained that “if it was the person’s first offense the police could choose to handle it informally with in their own community”. She promised to call me back after contacting the Portland PD and a few hours later she did.

When Thibeault called me back she informed me that she was now aware of the incident, but that the Detective in charge of the case was off until Monday, so she really could not give me any further information. She did explain to me that she now had the name of the ‘Junior Jihadi’ in question and that she had never heard of him. She also confirmed that it was only one individual that was involved and not “teenagers” as reported in the last line of the WCHS story.

Given the explanation that I received during our first conversation I asked “where do you draw the line of the ‘first offense’? Isn’t it a bit more serious when that first offense involves a bomb that can kill or damage property?” She did agree with that and said that she would contact me as soon as she had spoken with the detective in charge.

This is by no means the fault of Asst. D.A. Christine Thibeault. She sounded as concerned as I was and was as helpful as she could be, given that she was totally unaware of the incident. This all falls directly on the Portland P.D. for not notifying the D.A.’s office to begin with.

This incident took place on Tuesday September 21 and I spoke with the D.A.’s office on Friday the 24th, the Detective in charge is off until Monday the 27th and the D.A. was still unaware of it until my telephone call.

I don’t want to hear the Portland PD say that they were investigating and were planning on telling the D.A.’s office later, blah, blah, blah. Bull! This is something that should the Juvenile Justice Division of the D.A.’s office should have at the very least, been made aware of on Wednesday the 22nd even if an investigation were on going.

Now here’s where I am a bit lost, back in April of 2007 a student was suspended from the Lewiston Maine Middle School for putting a ham sandwich down on a table where a Muslim student was also sitting. It was referred to as a “hate crime”. Part of the story from the Renew America website stated:

The latest incident of "Muslim outrage" involves a middle-school student purportedly placing a ham sandwich wrapped in a baggie on a lunch table where Somali Muslim students sit. One 14 year-old unnamed Somali student is reported to have said: "At the school the next day, I didn't feel safe. I felt like everybody was against me. Before I felt like I fit in, and everything was normal." The ham-placing "offending student" has been suspended, the Maine middle school is calling the placing of the ham sandwich a "hate crime" and the local police are investigating the child. More charges against the child may be forthcoming. School Superintendent Leon Levesque said: "The school incident is being treated seriously as a hate incident!"

So, a ham sandwich is considered “a ‘hate Crime’ and the local police are investigating the child. More charges against the child may be forthcoming”, but an Islamic teenager sets off a bomb and “Police say it's unclear if charges will be filed against the teenager”. Was the sandwich an exploding sandwich?

This is where we have come to in this country people. I am tired of screaming about it week after week. Allah forbid we insult the Muslims in any way, shape or form, but charge the non-Muslim with a hate crime.

There is no telling what will happen with this ‘Junior Jihadi’, whether any charges will be filed and if so, if he will even be found guilty is anyone’s guess. But one thing is for sure here, had I not contacted the District Attorney’s office they would not have heard about it.

You can bet your Sharia Compliant local politicians that if that had been a non-Muslim 13 year old setting off a chemical bomb he would have been in cuffs and on every major network that night at 11pm. Oh, and of course, it would have been because his parents were Tea Partiers.

Original article is here.

Thanks to Gadi Adelman!

Taliban stoning a woman to death

The FBI and islam. Cozying up with the enemy.

From Sam Hindu and I had to leave a couple of images out as I seem to be having trouble adding them to the posts. Why are these guided tours of our security agencies to these enemies taking place? What  has obama done that we DO NOT know about? That is a very scary thought! This makes aboslutely zero sense and I can only come to the conclusion that the first muslim potus wants to give isalm every edge he can while he remains in office. Everything this poser of a potus, this traitor has done to facilitate the islamization of the United States makes me very angry and extremely nervous. It will take years to undo the damages wrought against our country by this traitor. obama is nothing more than an enemmy of the United States. Please, correct me if I am wrong here. I had to rebuild this before posting, so if it is a bit ratty, sorry about that, Chief!

Why is the FBI giving guided tours of its top-secret facilities to terror-linked Muslims?


A known Hamas operative in the largest terrorist financing trial in U.S. history – Kifah Mustapha – was recently escorted into the top-secret National Counterterrorism Center and other secure government facilities, including the FBI’s training center at Quantico, during a six-week “Citizen’s Academy” hosted by the FBI as part of its “outreach” to the Muslim Community.

Thhe group was accompanied by reporter Ben Bradley of WLS-Chicago (ABC), who filed a report on the trip to Washington D.C. on Sunday, who observed:

Sheik Kifah Mustapha, who runs the Mosque Foundation in Bridgeview, asked some of the most pointed questions during the six week FBI Citizens’ Academy and trip to Washington.

He pushed agents to fully explain everything from the bureau’s use of deadly force policy to racial and ethnic profiling. “I saw a very interesting side of what the FBI does and I wanted to know more,” Sheik Mustapha explained after returning from D.C. He hopes the FBI’s outreach will result in a better relationship with the muslim community.

Yes, I bet he wanted to know everything about the FBI’s policies.

Curiously, Bradley’s report on the Citizen’s Academy fails to make note Mustapha’s extensive terrorist ties and support for Hamas, including his former employment with the Holy Land Foundation, which was listed as a specially designated terrorist group by the U.S. government in December 2001, and whose executives were convicted of terrorism support in 2008 and sentenced to lengthy prison terms.

Mustapha was personally named unindicted co-conspirator (#31) in the case and employment records submitted by federal prosecutors during the trial showed that he received more than $154,000 for his work for the Holy Land Foundation between 1996 and 2000.

During the trial, FBI Special Agent Lara Burns testified that Mustapha also regularly sang in a band sponsored by the Holy Land Foundation that regularly featured songs dedicated to killing Jews and glorifying Hamas.

In a deposition he gave in a civil trial concerned with the murder of a Chicago teenager killed by Hamas while waiting for a bus in Israel, Mustapha admitted that he was the registered agent for the Holy Land Foundation in Illinois, and also to his involvement with other Hamas front groups, including the Islamic Association for Palestine. He was later hired as an imam by the Mosque Foundation in Bridgeview, which the Chicago Tribune reported in 2004 has long been a hotbed of Hamas support.

Bradley’s omission of this information about Kifah Mustapha in his report on Sunday is all the more curious since his own station aired an extensive investigative report of Mustapha’s terrorist ties earlier this year.

The WLS investigation into Mustapha’s terrorist ties was prompted by a report published by the FBI, which had cut all ties with CAIR until the Obama Regime took over.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism in January, had noted that Mustapha had been selected and trained as a chaplain by the Illinois State Police despite his documented terrorist support. The State Police eventually withdrew Mustapha’s appointment as chaplain and just last month he filed a lawsuit against the agency claiming discrimination aided by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, another FBI-identified Hamas front group.

There are several obvious problems with this episode, the first being the FBI’s “outreach” to a known Hamas operative (identified as such by federal prosecutors) and walking him through some of our country’s most sensitive counter-terrorism facilities.

Why should terrorist operatives have to covertly case potential targets when the FBI will happily escort them and taken them into areas they would never be able to reach on their own? Who’s next on the FBI’s “outreach” calendar, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow GITMO detainees?

This ongoing “outreach” to terror-linked individuals and leaders of known terrorist front groups by senior leaders of our national security, homeland security and law enforcement agencies is the kind of behavior criticized by my colleagues and I in the Team B II’s report released earlier this month, “Shariah: The Threat to America“.

As I observed last week here at Big Peace, Matt Duss of the Center for America Progress and ThinkProgress.org demands that we continue this insane national policy of embracing the same individuals and organizations who have been caught openly cheerleading for Islamic terrorists and have called for the destruction of the U.S. and Western Civilization.

The other glaring problem is that a reporter working in one of the largest media markets in the country can travel to such an event and be unaware of or unwilling to mention his own station’s reporting on his travel partner’s terrorist support activities. Such is the state of the establishment media today.

Related Articles:

Mulism Cleric Sues Illinois State Police (chicagoist.com)
Muslim Chaplain Flap: Illinois State Police Sued By Advocacy Group (huffingtonpost.com)
Ill. state police sued over Muslim chaplain flap (sfgate.com)

Original article with images is here.

Obama's Illegal Aunt: Declares "You Have The Obligation to Make Me a Citizen"

I am posting this right from Blog For Borders. Absolutely sickening and the sense of expected entitlement that this person has is just vile.

StandWithAZ Comments on CBS Special Report - Video: Zeituni Onyango's comments about America is breathtaking. She came illegally, lived in public housing for years, collected welfare, even got $51k in disability. And still she is angry at America. This case is beyond depressing. And it underlines what many people see today: that in the old days, immigrants came to America to lend a hand to our growing nation. But far too many today merely come for a handout. And their arrogance and sense of entitlement is a symptom of the broken borders and lawlessness we have permitted, which lets anybody in, asks nothing of them, and gives charity to the lazy while so many deserving citizens are forgotten. And where is the multi-millionaire Obama in all this? His Aunt, whom he spoke lovingly about in his book, STILL does not work, STILL receives disability, still claims to have "no money".

Hat tip: Blog For Borders

Tags: broken system, deportation, scammers, squatters, Illegal Aliens, entitlement, privilege To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Death threats from islamic extremists. It is now time for this.....

An idea whose time has come. I do not see this happening with this president, this administration or with all the Islamists that are now in positions of power, thanks to Obama, the first Muslim POTUS. This can all changed on November 2nd, later this year. It is time for America to wake up. Do not think for one second that we cannot have a murder like what happened to Theo van Gogh, here in the States
From the LA Times.

It's time to fight back against death threats by Islamic extremists
By Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Daniel Huff

A federal law is needed to cover threats against free-speech rights. Across media and geographies, Islamic extremists are increasingly using intimidation to stifle free expression.

A federal law is needed to cover threats against free-speech rights. Across media and geographies, Islamic extremists are increasingly using intimidation to stifle free expression.

Earlier this year, after Comedy Central altered an episode of "South Park" that had prompted threats because of the way it depicted Islam's prophet Muhammad, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris proposed an "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day." The idea was, as she put it, to stand up for the 1st Amendment and "water down the pool of targets" for extremists.

The proposal got Norris targeted for assassination by radical Yemeni American cleric Anwar Awlaki, who has been linked to the attempted Christmas Day bombing of a Northwest Airlines flight and also to several of the 9/11 hijackers. This month, after warnings from the FBI, Norris went into hiding. The Seattle Weekly said that Norris was "moving, changing her name, and essentially wiping away her identity."

It's time for free-speech advocates to take a page from the abortion rights movement's playbook. In the 1990s, abortion providers faced the same sort of intimidation tactics and did not succumb. Instead, they lobbied for a federal law making it a crime to threaten people exercising reproductive rights and permitting victims to sue for damages. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or FACE, passed in 1994 by solid bipartisan margins. A similar act is needed to cover threats against free-speech rights.

A federal law would do two things. First, it would deter violent tactics, by focusing national attention on the problem and invoking the formidable enforcement apparatus of the federal government. Second, its civil damages provision would empower victims of intimidation to act as private attorneys general to defend their rights.

Such an act is overdue. Across media and geographies, Islamic extremists are increasingly using intimidation to stifle free expression.

In 2004, Theo van Gogh was butchered on an Amsterdam street in broad daylight for his film criticizing Islam's treatment of women. By 2006, it was reported that "dozens of people" across Europe were "in hiding or under police protection because of threats from Muslim extremists."

Some targets, including the coauthor of this Op-Ed, fled to the United States, where it seemed safer -- and so it is, for now. However, the stark truth is the United States was never immune and the situation is deteriorating.

In 1989, two American bookstores carrying Salman Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses" were firebombed. Spooked major chains took it off display. And there have been many more threats that received less publicity. Few have heard, for example, about Oklahoma atheist Sabri Husibi, who received death threats after writing a 2009 article critical of his former faith. His aged mother in Syria was warned she would never see him again. "Clearly shaken," he requested the paper that published his article clarify that he is critical of all faiths.

These kinds of threats have had a formidable chilling effect. Mindful of the retaliation others faced, Yale University Press, the Met, the director of the disaster epic "2012" and countless others have decided to preemptively censor themselves.

The kind of legislation we propose is essential if we are to win the war of ideas against extremists, who use threats to drive the moderate message out of public discourse.

Existing state laws prohibiting intimidation are inadequate. On the criminal side, the heightened standard of proof deters prosecutors from investing scarce resources. Explicit grounds for a civil action do not always exist, and damages can be difficult to quantify. By contrast, the FACE Act, which provides the model for the proposed legislation, lets victims opt for preset damages.

The "South Park" incident neatly illustrates the benefits. On April 15, following the first of a two-part episode mocking Jesus, Buddha and Muhammad, RevolutionMuslim.com announced that "[w]e have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh." The "warning" included the names, photos and work address of "South Park's" creators, a graphic image of Van Gogh's mutilated body and pictures of other targets of Muslim extremists. Overlaying this was audio of Awlaki preaching about assassinating anyone who defamed the prophet. Panicked, Comedy Central heavily censored the episode.

This rather obvious threat could not be prosecuted. New York Police Department officials explained it did not rise to a crime. Were the FACE Act applicable here, a civil suit would have been available, and precedent suggests it would have been successful.

In 2002, on very similar facts, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a civil award to abortion doctors who sued using the FACE Act. A fringe antiabortion group, ACLA, had in various public venues displayed "Wanted"-style posters bearing the names, photos and addresses of doctors who performed abortions. Their names were also posted on the Internet alongside a list of wounded and murdered doctors whose names were struck through. The 9th Circuit held that ACLA's activities constituted true threats unprotected by the 1st Amendment.

If we leave our artists, activists and thinkers alone to weather the assault, they will succumb and we will all suffer the consequences.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former member of the Dutch parliament, is a resident scholar with the American Enterprise Institute and the author of "Nomad: From Islam to America." Daniel Huff is director of the Middle East Forum's Legal Project.

Original article is here.

It's time to fight back against death threats by Islamic extremists

Man arrested at Alaska State Fair for Impeach obama sign

May have watched this one already but I just did. This is still freedom of speech!

Hat tip: Bumps Stumps and Seaspook's Rants

A snapshot of what is wrong with Oregon public schools, the OEA for starters.

This is from the local paper, the Bend Bulletin. I find it amusing that our local demosocialistacrats rail on the BB as it is sooo conservative and far right. Not even close but they do get it right on many issues, as evidenced here.

No substitute for real K-12 reform

Published: September 27. 2010 4:00AM PST

 Seven Oregon school districts, including some in Central Oregon, learned last week that they’ll receive more than $13 million in federal grant money to design new ways to evaluate and pay teachers. That’s the good news.

The bad news is that the Oregon City teachers union is threatening to withdraw from the Chalkboard Project’s CLASS program, which received the grant. If any of that district’s money is used to provide “teacher incentives,” or merit pay, the union’s out, according to an article in The Oregonian.

Cooler heads may prevail, of course, and the Oregon City teachers may stay put. It no doubt would be difficult to explain to district taxpayers why factoring student performance into teacher evaluations is so problematic that the district can afford to turn its back on badly needed money.

But the union’s response to the conditions of the grant makes one thing clear. As good as the Chalkboard Project is, it’s no substitute for legislative action where education reform is concerned.

The Chalkboard Project does great things, to be sure. The creation of six of Oregon’s leading private foundations, it has worked to come up with reform ideas based on research and on broad discussions across the state. It currently is focusing attention on pilot programs, including the ones being set up in Bend, Redmond and Crook County, that seek to find new ways to evaluate teachers and to reward those who are effective. Its efforts are starting to pay off, too, though only a handful of districts around the state are involved.

For outsiders, the Chalkboard Project’s CLASS program includes two notable components. Teacher evaluation is one, and, to that end, participating school districts are using various criteria to determine who’s a good teacher and who is not. One such measurement is student performance. Union members have, generally, opposed any evaluation program that actually sought to see how well kids did with a given teacher at the front of the room. The CLASS project’s second notable component, rewarding teachers whose evaluations mark them as better than average, is equally unacceptable to the state’s largest teachers union, the Oregon Education Association.

The OEA’s refusal to support meaningful reform measures, in fact, helped sink Oregon’s application for federal Race to the Top funding.

Unfortunately, too many lawmakers appear to be prepared to look at Chalkboard and its successes, and cite them as proof that education reform is moving ahead briskly in Oregon. So it is, but on a very small scale. It’s no substitute for the kind of fundamental reform Gov. Kulongoski promised to support when he pulled the state out of the Race to the Top competition.

Original editorial is here

Mourning in America: Please watch and share

Joy of slavery for women of islam

Another good article from Sam Hindu. Women suffer horribly under the oppressive nature of islam. Through sharia law, women become nothing more than property and often times are reduced to sex slaves under the guise of marriage. Women have have few rights to begin with and they lose what little they have when they get married. You will find this a common topic here as I feel VERY strongly about this. It makes me ill to think that this goes on all the time in most islamic countries and our government is mostly silent on this matter of being an outspoken champion for women's rights throughout the islamic world. I leave you again with this though:; Where are the feminists, the code pinkos, the members of NOW? Why has Hillary Clinton not addressed this at the useless United Nations, now that this administration has become so much more involved in the United Nations? I did clean this up a bit so it was easier to read.

Muslim Women’s Joy Of Slavery…
By Sam Hindu

When I see Muslim women with in the Hijab and Burkha I have to question my myself. Are Muslim women really Dumb and ignorant of the facts or are they Brain washed from child hood to believe all the nonsense taught and programmed into their Brains about Islam and the female body?

Are they not aware that Islam treats the female body as just a vagina and marriage is a contract to use their vaginas however 'Master'(husband) wants to use them and enter any way he prefers? In Pakistan, women are called awra, or Aurat means Vagina.(via Sam Hindu’s Blog)

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1-year-old and have sexual intimacy with this child as soon as the girl reaches nine, consummating the marriage.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman(who becomes his slave and property)and for the purchase of her body, the woman, and to use her as a toy.

Even when a woman is abused or raped she can not obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives ‘at will’ and he does not have to explain why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have(4 wives)and a temporary wife for an hour. A prostitute at HIS discretion.

Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman and commands the man how he will 'treat' his property, the woman.

In the Western World(America and Canada)Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce or have any rights, and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.

If you are a Muslim woman or plan to become a Muslim woman for sake of someone’s love, think twice before you jump into Hell or continue to live in Hell.

By passing this on, we can enlighten, educate American, Jewish, Chinese, European, Hindu, Buddhist, or any female kaffirs. Muslim women can hopefully wake up and avoid becoming a slave under Shariah and Islamic Law.

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before emigrating to America in 1978, When she was eight years old, her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer. His family was stationed in Gaza.

When he died, he was considered a “shahid,” a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position inside Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping Sharia law – what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose Sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization as we have known it, will be destroyed.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to possibly turn the outcome of the election of the President! I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on. So please do so!

This is how Muslims think..Wake up, America!

Original article can be found here

Why voters are disconnected and a way back home? Guest commentary

This was written by my very good friend, Steven Davis. I have posted a bit by Steven before and thought some of you might enjoy this. It is not very long and is pretty much spot on. Steven is by far, one of the most intelligent and honest people I have had the pleasure of knowing. This guy walks with integrity at all times.

Voter disconnection and a way back home
By Steven Davis.

Here is a little thought that may help to explain the apparent disconnect between the sentiments of millions of voters and the present powers that be:

It is known that Bill Clinton was elected on the back of voter dissatisfaction with Bush Senior. The American People woke up in early 1990 to the realization that the Reagan Revolution had been co-opted by the Down-East Establishment of New England Patricians. Nothing had really been allowed to change, at least in the substantial manner promised by Reagan and hoped for by America. Bill Clinton capitalized on this sentiment with a folksy twang and a manner that evoked Elvis.

What we didn’t know, or realize until later was the extent that Clinton had been “Kennedy’ed” by the media. Everything that was favorable was trumpeted and everything that showed the real and rather dark nature of Mr. and Ms. Clinton was squelched, black-faced or repudiated as hate-mongering. We were than treated to probably the most corrupt presidency in American history. It is a wonder that we survived as a nation. What we didn’t know and only aware of now is that the dogs of social engineering that had been kenneled during the Carter years had been unleashed.

Because George Junior was never really a part of the Down-East Establishment as his father still is, the dogs of social agenda were allowed to run free and ‘hound’ Junior all the days of his presidency. He was never allowed a break or a free breath. Bush Junior was probably the last freely elected president, at least the second term. He may have been allowed as a stopgap in the tug-of-war between the Mid-West Mob centered in Chicago and the Down-East Establishment centered around Boston.

The Chicago mob is back in power as it was in Clinton’s days. In fact, Obama is no different than Clinton or Carter. They all were stooges or front-men for the social engineers who believe they know what is best, as long as they don’t live their own medicine. The Chicago mob never went quietly nor will it ever truly cede control of the levers of power. It will grab the camera and the spotlight and anything else to denigrate those who don’t agree with it. Their Gospel is Plantation Economics and their agenda is radical socialism where anyone in business is an open target for extortion, legislated or otherwise. They truly believe in their mission.

The Obama Administration is their payback for having waited not so patiently all these years since Carter. But just as their agenda unraveled with carter, it is unraveling with Obama. Clinton at least had the good sense to back away from the edge and cover his tracks after the China connection was discovered. Clinton didn’t need to worry about the China connection as Wall Street was all for the emasculation of American Manufacturing and the demise of the Middle Class. Obama isn’t that smart and he believes in himself to such an extent he didn’t see the chance he had to co-opt business in October 2009 when he met with the Wall Street oligarchs. Now the social engineers have realized that they let their dog too far out on the leash and he can’t be reeled back in without exposing their influence and their game. Instead of moving the Overton Window towards more socialism and government control as they had intended, they are now jumping out of it as rats that are leaving the sinking ship that is the Obama Administration. I have no doubts that the birth Certificate will be ‘found’ and it will be the forgery everyone knows it to be. Thus is life behind the velvet ropes.

The prayer isn’t so much for Obama though he is certainly in need of it having been deluded throughout all his life. The prayer is for this country and its safety from all of those who have left behind in the government bureaucracy who are true believers and disciples of the social gospel of people existing to serve the government and the government being the font of rights, liberties and the permission to pursue what fulfills a person. Ultimately, we need God, in Jesus’ name, to take the broom, hyssop and fire hose to Washington D.C. and clean out all the corruption. So let us march forward on our knees in Jesus’ Holy Name to storm the battlements and strongholds that have been erected while we have been asleep.