headerphoto


Showing posts with label demosocialistacrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label demosocialistacrats. Show all posts

Ideological subversion and the danger from liberalism: Guest post

This is from a friend and I asked his permission to re-post here on Patriot's Corner. I have been really good about my broken hand and have a fair number of posts that I would like to get up. I must be careful and not do too much, but not posting much is driving me crazier than I already am. There is too much at stake to be silent and still. No commentary from me is required as this is excellent and can stand on it's own. The Muslim Brotherhood has been discussed here many times in the past and they must be exposed for what they are and truly want. Complete,total domination by islam and they will settle for nothing less than a total global caliphate, ruled by ruthless and bloody sharia law. Thank you to Answer's Questions for granting me permission to re-post this here.




Ideological subversion - How liberalism got started and how Islam intends to kill us.
By Answer's Questions

The term "ideological subversion" is nothing more than a complex way of saying "change what people believe". The basic theory is that if a group of people are spoon fed misinformation over an extended period of time, they can be convinced to question the very principles on which their nation is constructed and foster desire for a replacement.


The purpose of this process is to cause the entire ideological structure of a nation to be undermined and eventually cause a total collapse in the society. Most notably Marxist/Communist and other forms of socialist rule have used this tactic as an weapon to implement the tyrannical ideology in other countries.


Liberalism (as we know it today) is a very direct result of the Soviet's attempt (I'd say success) at subverting the American ideology in an effort to push Communism/Marxism/Leninism (or whatever title you like best) .


Below is a link to some videos of a former KGB operative from the 1980's. What you will find on this page "should" open the eyes of some half-crazed and emotional progressives/liberals and will even likely educate many conservatives.

Ideological Subversion (Soviet style)


Liberalism Born.

If consider yourself liberal/progressive, I hope you understand, that while you see yourself as the more advanced and enlightened species, exceedingly superior to the cavemen conservatives, you are literally living in a dream world and adhere to a mythical ideology that was constructed solely to harvest your emotions for the specific purpose of taking down America.

Depending on your age, you are either a direct result of intentional manipulation, the spawn of those directly subject to the manipulation, or perhaps even a little further down the line (you might be a third generation anti-logic lunatic and beast of pure emotion, for example). Whatever your age and however far removed you are from the initial infiltration and subversion attempt, if you are a liberal/progressive, you have bought into a repackaged version of Communism. Some libs know this, while lots of middle of the road Democrats do not. It is true and please snap out of it middle of the road dems.


The turmoil and insanity in America caused by this incursion is not limited to the socialist problem anymore. The very same techniques used by the Communists to inject America with a Marxist ideology and subvert real American values, are being employed by Jihadists in an effort to implement Sharia and make us all Allah addicts through our political, academic, and other societal institutions.


The Muslim Brotherhood drafted a 25 point strategy for the destruction of the West decades ago. The very concepts of attacking via the media, popular opinion (by making shit up and calling it true), and victim fabrication used by Communism, are outlined in this strategy, but with an Islamic flavor. The strategy even calls for joining forces with the "progressive" movements. The reason for that is very simple, the progressives are soft-headed people, and they are the ones who can be lead around by emotion without any questions asked about the merits.

The Muslim Brotherhood Project: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Infidel-Heights/Muslim-Brotherhood-The-Mo-Bros-Project/169799493032656 
The doctrine is very specific on using our institutions and our soft-heads against us. They have succeeded in huge measure and have 54 Congressman "serving" in our government. They intend to force on us the Sharia or murder us if we refuse to go along with Allah's demands. Their weapons are government, law, and soft-heads. They have made great strides in all areas and are a very clear and present danger.


I beg the soft-heads to wake the hell up, figure out your thought process and reasoning facilities have been totally compromised, and start forcibly modifying the way in which you consider the world around you. You are evaluating reality in light of a fairy-tale, a purposeful ruse, and you cannot come to understand the level of danger you are in until you fully grasp that reality.



.

The party of death from down under..The greens

Just as we have the demosocialistacrats here in the United States who champion the right of women to murder their unborn babies, Australia has the same party and problem. Only they call themselves the 'Green party.' They should change the name to the 'Red party.' Stained red from the blood of millions of aborted babies that is upheld through disgusting and evil laws. Laws that say the quality of life is more imporatnt that the sanctity of life.

Bill Muehlenberg has done a superb job in this next post. He is taking the Green party of Australia to task for their support of the culture of death. This is an article that gets the point across about how liberals and those who are on the far left support death before they will stand for the right to life for all people. Those born and the unborn who cannot protect themselves from this insidious culture of death.




Eight months
Christians and the Party of Death
By Bill Muehlenberg


In 2006 Ramesh Ponnuru wrote a book entitled The Party of Death. It was primarily about the US Democratic Party, and the courts and mainstream media who side with the culture of death. They see the right to abortion as almost a religious obligation.


And it is not just abortion, but a general disregard for human life that is expressed in plenty of other policy positions. The culture of death is ever on the move, and it is not just the unborn who are at risk. As Ponnuru put it in the opening page of his book:


“The party of death started with abortion, but its sickle has gone from threatening the unborn, to the elderly, to the disabled; it has swept from the maternity ward to the cloning laboratory to a generalized disregard for ‘inconvenient’ life.”


He says the phrase is not just pejorative, but descriptive: “The party’s core members are those who explicitly deny that all human beings are equal in having a right to life and who propose the creation of a category of ‘human non-persons’ who can be treated as expendable.”


The story is the same here in Australia. We clearly have a party of death here: they are known as the Greens. They are quite open about how they embrace the culture of death. This could not be clearer than in today’s headlines: “Greens fight for euthanasia”.


The new Labor/Green government has not even been in power for two weeks yet, and already the Greens are telling us what they consider to be the most pressing issue of the day – their key priority: the right to kill off the elderly, the infirm, the suffering. And of course they will push this agenda in the name of compassion.


But it is a horrific type of compassion which says to help relieve suffering we should kill the sufferer. This has nothing to do with compassion, but everything to do with a diabolical view of human life. The Greens have bought into the mistaken notion that somehow the ‘quality’ of life is superior to the sanctity of life.


And it is always a minority of elites and technocrats who decide for the rest of mankind who should live and who should die. They tell us that the unborn are not persons, that the terminally ill are not persons, and soon that a depressed teenager is not really a person.


But what do we expect from a party which was begun with someone like Peter Singer? He and Bob Brown co-authored the book The Greens back in 1996, laying out the core beliefs, values and philosophies of the Greens. And Singer ran as a Greens’ candidate for the Senate in the same year.


Singer of course is the animal rights activist who is pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia and pro-infanticide. Yes he actually believes the newborn do not have a right to life, because they are not ‘persons’. As he and Helga Kuhse said back in 1985, “We do not think new-born infants have an inherent right to life”.


And back in 1983 he wrote, “Species membership in Homo-sapiens is not morally relevant. If we compare a dog or a pig to a severely defective infant, we often find the non-human to have superior capacities.” With a guy like this helping to set up the Greens, why should we be surprised at their consistent and insistent pro-death agenda?


Yet some might argue that Singer is a bit extreme, and does not really represent the Greens, and he is not with the Greens now. But the reason he is no longer with the Greens is of course because he left Australia in 1999 to lecture at Princeton University in the US.


And how can it be argued that he is not representative of the Greens? He ran as their Senate candidate and co-authored their manifesto! Of course his views are right in line with that of the Greens. And spare us trying to make a distinction between the two.


If some neo-Nazi managed to run for a conservative party here, it would be attacked by these very same people. “See, this is what these conservatives are really all about – they are all a bunch of closet Nazis.” Sorry, but you can’t have it both ways. If they take this line on the conservatives, then they must consistently take it with the Greens as well. Trying to disassociate Singer from the Greens will just not work.


Christians and the Party of Death


Sadly at the recent Federal election many Christians actually voted for the Greens. Some even ran as candidates for the Greens! Why this is so is unclear. Were they ignorant about the pro-death nature of this party? Did they know about it, but voted for them anyway? Do they even care?


The Bible of course is full of warnings about those who are pro-death. Indeed, the very enemy of God himself , Satan, is described as being at heart pro-death. Jesus contrasted the life-affirming nature of God with the death-affirming nature of Satan: “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly” (John 10:10).


Jesus comes to bring life, while the enemy seeks to destroy it. We are told quite clearly in the Old Testament that those who reject God are pro-death: “All who hate me [God] love death” (Proverbs 8:36). And the protection of the innocent and those being led to death is everywhere championed:


Psalm 82: 2-4: Defend the cause of the weak and fatherless; maintain the rights of the poor and oppressed. Rescue the weak and needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.


Proverbs 24:11: Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.


Proverbs 31: 8-9: Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.


Prov. 31:8: Open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction.


Yet incredibly some Christians thought it was a great idea to vote for the pro-death Greens. How they can reconcile their biblical faith with voting for the most pro-death party in Australia is beyond me. Sure, many will mouth off about the need to save the trees or protect the whales.


Are these things important? Yes, but even more important is the plight of the unborn and the elderly. Why are some believers more concerned about the well-being of dolphins than they are about unborn babies? Why is a tree of more value in their eyes than someone made in the image of God?


Still, some will appeal to the tired mantra of “social justice”. They seem to think that something like affordable housing is the most important issue of the day. But can I remind these believers that if you are dead, affordable housing doesn’t mean a hill of beans.


And who gives a rip about job opportunities or sustainable living if you are not allowed to even be born? When we slaughter 100,000 unborn babies in their mothers’ wombs every year, and some believers say and do nothing about it, and in fact support it, then I for one need to call their bluff. They blabber on about social justice, yet they deny the most basic social justice: the very right to life.


In my books this is hypocrisy and double standards of the highest order. These people will chain themselves to some stupid tree, thinking they are doing God a favour, while they don’t care at all about the death of God’s precious infants.


Sorry, but I call these believers phoneys and fakes. They refuse to recognise the most fundamental of truths, that social justice must begin in the womb. If it does not begin there, then all their rhetoric about social justice in my books is just that – so much empty and contemptuous rhetoric.


One day every believer will stand before their maker and give an account of themselves. That will include the way they voted. All their intellectually vacuous and morally empty rhetoric will be stripped away, and they will have to give an account for why they did not stand up for the unborn and did not defend the most biblical principle of all – the sanctity of human life.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/greens-move-to-legalise-euthanasia/story-e6frf7l6-1225926177527

Are we that close to becoming a totalitarian state?

One can think that if Republicans/Conservatives take back both houses or at least erase the demosocialistacrat majorities that now exist, all will be on track to re-righting the ship the Founding Fathers so wisely built. That is wishful thinking unless Conservatives can be very careful about how they go about dismantling and trying to undo the damages wrought upon our country by the mullah obamaham and his wrecking crew of liberal idiots. After NOvember 2010, the election for a new POTUS will be before us. Don't look for things of the past like Acorn to be removed from the scene. I look for the left to page from islam and indulge in the left's version of Taqiyya. This is from Totus by Ron Russell.




The 2010 Election and Totalitarianism
By Ron Russell

EVERY STEP OBAMA TAKES IS ANOTHER STEP TOWARD BIG GOVERNMENT AND A CONSOLIDATION OF POWER NOT JUST IN WASHINGTON, BUT SPECIFICALLY IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND THE DEMOCRATIC FOOLS IN CONGRESS ARE JUST GIVING HIM MORE AND MORE POWER WITH EACH LAW THAT ENACT. THEY MUST THINK THAT A REPUBLICAN WILL NEVER AGAIN SIT IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND EXERCISE THE POWER THEY ARE PLACING THERE. AN ALREADY TOO POWERFUL EXECUTIVE IN QUICKLY TIPPING THE SCALES OF CHECKS AND BALANCES THE FOUNDERS ESTABLISHED. LEFT UNCHECKED, AT THE PRESENT RATE, THE REPUBLIC AS WE KNOW IT WILL CEASE TO EXIST SHOULD OBAMA BE ABLE TO FOOL ENOUGH VOTERS AND GAIN A SECOND TERM. REPUBLICANS MAY GAIN SOME CONTROL IN THIS FALLS ELECTIONS, BUT THAT ALONE WILL NOT STOP OBAMA IN 2012, FOR THE MAN IS A MASTER SNAKE-OIL SALESMAN AND MANY ARE STILL WANTING HIS MAGIC ELIXIR! ONE CAN EXPECT THE ELECTION OF 2012 TO BE A LANDMARK EVENT, MUCH AS THE ELECTION OF LINCOLN IN 1860, WITH OBAMA AND HIS MINIONS PULLING OUT ALL THE STOPS---RAMPANT VOTER FRAUD ON A GRAND SCALE, CRIES OF RACISM AND A MASS BLOCK OF BLACK AND OTHER MINORITY VOTERS, AND FINALLY A HUGE PUSH FROM THE YOUNG MORE IMPRESSIONABLE VOTERS OF THIS NATION. SHOULD THEY SUCCEED THE AMERICA OF OUR FATHERS WILL NO LONGER EXIST. THE BIG GOVERNMENT OF TODAY WILL GIVE WAY TO TOTALITARIANISM!

Link to the original article

Which side of the Fence?

This is so very well written and expressed by TexasFred. The first part is one that many of us have read before. What Fred has written after is what is really special. I know what side of the fence I am on. Please join us to save our country!




Which side of the fence?
By TexasFred

Which side of the fence?

Have you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on? This isn’t just a re-post of an email we’ve all seen many times. Read past that part. I was sent this again today and for some reason I was inspired to write the post below the email. I hope you enjoy it!

If a Republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If a Democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Republican is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a Democrat is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Republican doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Democrats demand that those they don’t like be shut down.

If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.
A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a Republican reads this, he’ll forward it so his friends know how to vote in November!
A Democrat will close it because he’s “offended”.

We’ve all seen this come around in an email before, it’s been out there for a while.

I’m not a fence sitter, I’m not a middle of the road kind of guy. I have long felt that standing in the middle of the road only got you one thing, RUN OVER! I stand firmly planted on the RIGHT and I make no apology for doing so.

I am NOT a Republican. I have made that clear on many occasions, but I can agree with this original email because the Republican that is used in the above narrative is a real Republican, not some PC wannabe, or a reach across the aisle appeaser or, the most dreaded of all, a damned RINO.

Re-read the above and replace the word Republican with the word Conservative. Then you have me and MY stand on life in America.

One thing the above narrative doesn’t mention is ILLEGAL immigration.

Conservatives aren’t against immigration, they simply want to see the law of the land enforced.

Democrats welcome, and want to give amnesty to the law breakers.

I have stated many times, I am the grandson of an immigrant. I hold nothing against immigrants as long as they come to this nation LEGALLY, strive to become Americans, work, pay taxes, go about their lives like other Americans, raise their families to BE Americans, in every sense of the word, and make some sort of positive contribution to this nation.

The Democrats, on the other hand, welcome ALL to this land, no matter HOW they got here or to what purpose they came.

They are welcomed with promises of amnesty, a Social Security card, welfare, healthcare, food stamps, free education, (free to them) and myriad other government and social programs that are unavailable to the average American citizen.

Conservatives have respect for the laws of this land. We respect the Constitution and we KNOW that it was written by men far wiser than ourselves.

Democrats want to usurp the laws of the land and either rewrite or destroy the Constitution, the very fabric of America.

My family was not politically involved as I was growing up. I don’t think my mother or father ever voted. They were the type that felt that their vote didn’t count, didn’t matter and by God, they weren’t going to take the time to go out and waste a vote.

They were, of course, very wrong.

As a youngster, I wasn’t a political activist but I was politically motivated. I was what could best be described as a Dixiecrat, and although Truman had come and gone before I was old enough to become politically aware, I retained those same beliefs until Ronald Reagan came on the scene, and like most Dixiecrats, I became a Reagan Conservative.

After Mr. Reagan left office, the Reagan Conservatives were pretty much taken over by the GOP and their BIG TENT ideology and way of doing things. The GOP took a left turn in the eyes of many that had been Reagan Conservatives, and thus, the Conservative movement of today came to be. We didn’t leave the Democratic party or the GOP, they left US!

Conservative Americans must get their act together, and I mean NOW! Elections are rapidly approaching and the battle lines for the Senate and several Gubernatorial races have been drawn. There has yet to be a bonafide candidate emerge from the herd of RINOs expected to throw their hat in the 2012 presidential race, and yes, I DID say RINOs. ALL of the ones making noise right now are NOT Conservatives, no matter what they say, no matter how they say it and no matter how many moose they can skin and cook.

America either gets back on an even keel, kicks out the Dems and RINOs and returns to a true Conservative posture, or America is doomed.

Come sit on THIS side of the fence my friends. We CAN save this nation, it’s not too late, but we either start RIGHT NOW, or soon there will be nothing left to save.

I close by asking God to PLEASE, bless America once again!

Original article can be found here

William Gheen's speech at the Houston Tea Party April 15th.

Here is William Gheen's speech at the Houston Tea Party event held on April 15, 2010. William received two standing ovations and the crowd, estimated near 15,000, booed Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, as well as Pelosi, Reid, and Napolitano. Please help to spread our message. Please watch the entire video and then comment and share it with others, if you feel that other Americans, politicians or people in the media need to hear this message.





Hat tip: ALIPAC