Elisabeth's Voice: Help Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff in her fight against jiahd

I have reported on this courageous woman before. She has been accused of hate crimes in her home country of Austria as she was brave enough to speak out against the qur'an and islam. She is one of the cornerstones of the anti-jihad movement, a canary in the coal mine, especially in Austria. Along with Geert Wilders, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff is being prosecuted for speaking out against Islam and shariah law. She is one of the most courageous people in the battle against Islam, shariah law, and jihad.

Elisabeth's Voice is a new consortium of blogs, European, Canadian and American who have written this post jointly as a public call for our American colleagues to take up the cause of the Austrian feminist and anti-jihad activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. This is from Gates Of Vienna which is one of the best blogs you can read.

---

Elisabeth’s Voice: An Appeal

A Call to Mobilize the American Blogosphere in Support of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

We, the undersigned — consisting of four European blogs, one Canadian blog, and one American blog — have written this post jointly as a public call for our American colleagues to take up the cause of the Austrian feminist and anti-jihad activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff.

Geert Wilders is well-known to most American conservative and libertarian bloggers, but Elisabeth’s case is not so prominent. Like Mr. Wilders, she faces trial for reporting factual information about Islam. Her “crime” was to conduct public seminars in which she described Islamic doctrine, quoted from the Koran, and explained to her listeners what she considers the dangers of Islam.


Like Mr. Wilders, Elisabeth has been charged with “hate speech” for her words. Unlike Mr. Wilders, however, Elisabeth is a private citizen, a wife, and the mother of a small child. She lacks the major resources necessary to defend herself against the well-funded organs of the state which seek to persecute her.


Elisabeth will go on trial in Vienna on November 23rd, in what is clearly a political action intended to silence anyone who dissents against the prevailing multicultural orthodoxy.


We, her European and North American supporters, have formed Elisabeth’s Voice to ensure that she is not silenced. By appealing for financial aid, we hope to ensure that her defense is well-funded. By appealing for publicity, we hope to ensure that her case is well-known, not just in Austria and the rest of Europe, but across the entire Western world.


Americans may think that Elisabeth’s is a uniquely European plight, and has nothing to do with them. But make no mistake about it: the same repression is on its way to the United States of America. As the recent cases of Molly Norris, Juan Williams, and Derek Fenton demonstrate, free speech may already be taken away by non-juridical means. Dissent is even now being silenced in schools and on college campuses, and politically incorrect expression is cause for dismissal from both public and private employment.


The same types of “hate speech” laws that were used against Elisabeth in Austria are being prepared for the United States through the work of the United Nations. At the initiative of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, the UN is on the verge of requiring all member states to pass laws criminalizing “the defamation of religions, including Islam.”


Your president, Barack Hussein Obama, has indicated his support for the UN’s proposed resolution. Time is running out for all of us. If we don’t stand up now for people like Geert Wilders, Ezra Levant, Mark Steyn, and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, there will be no one to stand up for us later, when our turn comes.


Links to detailed information about Elisabeth’s case may be found at the bottom of this post, along with a link to her legal defense website where you may donate to her cause.




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Elisabeth’s Voice calls on the American blogosphere to support Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff in her fight for the right to speak freely.


Of the hundreds of American blogs who have not yet spoken out on behalf of Elisabeth, we appeal to a dozen of the most prominent and influential American voices:


First and foremost is Jihad Watch, which is the single most authoritative source on the web for accurate and scholarly information about the dangers posed by Islam. Its founder, Robert Spencer, has helped Elisabeth in the past through his Freedom Defense Initiative last February. We appeal to Mr. Spencer to step forward and renew his support for Elisabeth.


Atlas Shrugs has been in the forefront of publicizing and raising citizens’ awareness of the ongoing Islamization of America. Pamela Geller’s work in opposing the Ground Zero mosque is unsurpassed. With Robert Spencer, she was also a partner in the Freedom Defense Initiative last winter. We appeal to Ms. Geller to renew her efforts on behalf of Elisabeth.


National Review’s The Corner is one of the most popular political blogs in the American blogosphere. Its contributors include Jonah Goldberg, John Derbyshire, Andrew McCarthy, Jay Nordlinger, and other prominent conservative writers. We appeal to The Corner to come to the aid of Elisabeth and her right to speak freely.


Gateway Pundit is the best single non-MSM source of news and commentary in the United States. Jim Hoft is tireless and committed in his service to conservative principles and traditional values. We appeal to Mr. Hoft to add his voice to ours in support of Elisabeth.


Hot Air specializes in video reporting and political commentary, and follows the most controversial American issues with close attention. We appeal to Hot Air to extend its coverage to include the videos, images, and articles about Elisabeth’s case.


Ace of Spades HQ offers unfettered and no-holds-barred commentary on major American political issues. Ace concentrates on election politics, but also focuses on civil-liberties issues. We appeal to Ace to decry the suppression of Elisabeth’s civil liberties.


Hugh Hewitt is better known as a radio host than a blogger, but his blog was prominent during the 2004 election season. His book Blog inspired the formation of many small political American blogs. We appeal to Mr. Hewitt to inspire us again by taking up Elisabeth’s cause in the name of liberty.


Daily Pundit is one of the longest-established American blogs. Its founder, Bill Quick, has the distinction of being the man who coined the term “blogosphere”. We appeal to Mr. Quick to help bring Elisabeth’s case to prominence in the blogosphere which he so aptly named.


Instapundit is the the oldest and most famous politically-incorrect blog in America. Glenn Reynolds has enriched the new media with his wide-ranging coverage of social, technological, and political issues. We appeal to Mr. Reynolds to enrich us with his support for Elisabeth’s freedom.


Michelle Malkin concentrates on political and social issues, with a particular focus on the damage done to the United States by President Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic Party. We appeal to Ms. Malkin to publicize the damage being done to all our freedoms by the case against Elisabeth.


Power Line, like Instapundit and Michelle Malkin, was one of the major blogs that helped expose the forged “Killian memo” during the 2004 election campaign. Two of its contributors are lawyers, and the blog often focuses on legal issues. We appeal to Power Line to focus its valuable energies on the legal travesty that is the case against Elisabeth.


TigerHawk is a New Jersey blogger who covers political issues and national security. He stands in occasionally for Wretchard at the Belmont Club, and is an expert on the intricacies of behind-the-scenes machinations in American political affairs. We appeal to TigerHawk to expose the machinations of the corrupt political elites who are bringing Elisabeth to trial.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


The European Union, which includes Austria, is a corrupt and undemocratic superstate with totalitarian aspirations. The oligarchy running it has determined that the millions of Muslim immigrants now living in Europe — and the millions more the EU plans to bring in — are necessary to secure the power base for the unaccountable bureaucrats who now oversee what passes for European governance.


Hence their need to silence people like Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff who speak out against mass immigration and the dangers of Islamization. To help maintain the population in a state of sheep-like passivity, Elisabeth must be silenced.


But Elisabeth will not be silenced.


The Austrian court may take away Elisabeth’s voice, but while we yet have our own, we will speak for her.


We are Elisabeth’s Voice.


We are:


Tundra Tabloids
Europe News
Politically Incorrect
The International Civil Liberties Alliance
Vlad Tepes
Gates of Vienna
1389
Mark Steyn
Lawrence Auster
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
18ograder
Diana West


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Those who wish to contribute to Elisabeth’s defense fund — which is not under her control, and may only be used to pay her lawyers — should visit the Save Free Speech legal defense website.


Previous posts about the hate speech case against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff:


2009
Dec
5 Fighting a Hate Speech Charge in Austria
11 Heckling the Counterjihad
14 Whose Law?
17 Defaming the Muslims of Pinkafeld


2010
March
11 A Mother and an Activist
20 An Austrian “Hate School”
22 Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at the Freedom Defense Initiative
29 Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff and the Wiener Akademikerbund

September
 9 “Islam is a Political Ideology Disguised as a Religion”
16 “Justice Must Not Be Made the Handmaiden of Sharia”
17 The Truth Does Not Matter

October
11 Interview With Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff
16 Is the Truth Illegal in Austria?
20 A Court Date for Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff
21 BPE Press Release on Elisabeth-Wolff  Sabaditsch

Mmm Mmm Mmm Bad. Campbell's no longer welcome here

Here is a great video you need to watch on Campbell's soup and it's halal products.
Cambell's soups now banned in our house. All cans donated to a food bank. Could
not bear to throw them away. Too many people going hungry.




Hat tip: Atlas Shrugs

Are your children wearing pro-jihadist clothing?

Another excellent example of stealth jihad by the simple action of getting dressed. Many kids today have no clue what the images on their clothes are about. What events, causes, organizations, religion or ideology are the clothes your child wears supporting without them knowing it? Or maybe they are aware of what the clothing is supporting with your parental blessing? I truly hope and pray not. Take a look at these two t-shirt examples and you will see what I mean. Would you want your kids to wear this pro-jihadist garbage? From Loganswarning.

---

Paying Attention to Your Kids? US Company Targets Kids With Pro-Jihad Shirts!
By Christopher Logan


I just wanted to alert you guys that the fashion company Revolutionary Me, is targeting kids with pro-jihad shirts. Here are two of them.


Alive But Dead T-Shirt
$24.95

 The struggle is alive and people die from it and in it. The women’s zombie face represents the phrase alive but dead. The blood hand prints represent a person that must get their hands dirty or even bloody to fight their way through the struggle. She is wearing a bullet ring representing that she is married to the cause.

Freedom Slingshoter T-Shirt
$24.95
 

Fight for what you believe in. Even if the stakes are against you. We must achieve freedom of expression and soul to live a well balanced happy life. Childhood memories of the past should never be forgotten but should be relived.


It is amazing they would encourage kids to fight for such causes. I wonder if they would have had pro-Nazis shirts during WWII? Probably. Talk about being an irresponsible company.


Please contact Revolutionary Me, and give them a dose of “Logan Love”. Their contact information can be found HERE.


Original article is here.

New EPA regulation may kill biomass plant before it can start up in Oregon

Another big thanks and middle finger raised to obama, environazi's and the EPA. In his rush to push the United States into the green age of clean, alternative energy, a new EPA regulation may kill this biomass plant in John Day, Oregon. John Day is in Eastern Oregon where the economy has been severely crippled by the recession that was 'over' in June, 2009.The unemployment rate in this area is running at about 17%, or higher.


The new EPA regulation is to control emissions from ALL solid-fuel boilers regardless of their size, application and location. The regulation applies to this almost ready to start plant as it does to the huge coal fired power plants all across the country. The domino effect of this plant not starting up would be large. Not only would jobs at the plant be lost but also the jobs in transportation and the logging/timber jobs lost. This biomass plant has been designed to burn the debris left over from logging, thinning, slash piling of the timber industry. Timber and wood that would normally be burned in slash piles can now be burned to produce very, very clean energy to power this plant, which produces Wood pellets and bricks.


So to all you environazi's out there who have never worked an honest day in your collective lives it is time to climb out of that tree you have been sitting in and celebrate another stupid moment in environmental history. There is much to party about here! The lost jobs, the lost reduction of  woody fuels that can and does contribute to forest fires, the loss of tax revenues to John day and the surrounding area, the loss of more homes and people forced out of their homes, the waste of tax payers money to build this plant, the loss of fuel to help heat schools, hospitals, colleges, and yes, even homes. This may be such a cause to celebrate that all you earth muffins, tree huggers and prairie fairies may even want to shave you legs, armpits and take a bath in the closest stream or river and come party with the locals at the Employment office in John day. I will even buy you bums the disposable razors and soap. More dependence of the nanny state and letting the government decide what is best for all of us, not!

This is the stupidity of the environmental movement. This is just one small event, place that will cause a much larger harm than you green idiots realize. Multiply this by one hundred places, plants, etc and this is what cap and trade type legislation will do for our country, NOTHING but cause the above. There is a chance that the EPA will modify the regulation but will they do it for just this one biomass plant or retool the regulation for the benefit of the entire country? Time will tell and if there is an update I will post it here. From the Bend Bulletin.

New plant threatened by EPA rule

Federal money helped build John Day plant to turn biomass into wood pellets.

By Ed Merriman / The Bulletin

 JOHN DAY —A $6 million biomass processing plant built with the help of a $4.8 million federal stimulus grant may be put out of business before the switch is turned on due to a new environmental regulation.


During a tour Wednesday of the biomass plant being built by Malheur Lumber Co. in John Day, company officials expressed concern that a new Environmental Protection Agency standard imposing dramatically stricter limits on emissions from solid-fuel boilers could kill the market for wood pellets and wood bricks produced by the plant.


“I agree with the concept of trying to reduce air pollution, but virtually no commercial boiler currently operating in the country would meet the new EPA rule as currently written,” said John Shelk, managing director of Ochoco Lumber in Prineville, parent company of Malheur Lumber.


“Here we are doing something that is very positive. We are taking wood biomass from forest health thinning projects and we’re using it to manufacture a renewable energy product that replaces fossil fuels, and the EPA rule could kill it before it gets off the ground,” Shelk said.


As published in the Federal Register on June 4, the EPA’s new boiler emission standards appear to run counter to President Barack Obama’s stated goal to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, he said.


The EPA rules are currently scheduled to take effect in January.


Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is charged with setting emission standards for hazardous pollutants based on the best performing, lowest-emitting technology available and in use. But Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., has submitted three letters to the EPA over the past six months, urging the agency to use its flexibly to adopt different standards for different types of boilers, rather than using a one-size fits all approach.


“If the EPA does not utilize its flexibility in this area, I am concerned about the potential impact such regulations could have on boilers utilized by thousands of small and mid-size businesses already hit hard by the recession,” Wyden wrote. “I am especially concerned with the impact on the wood products industry, which has been dramatically affected by the downturn in the housing and construction markets.”


Mike Billman, timber manager at Malheur Lumber, told media and others invited to tour the plant Wednesday that its construction has kept 15 to 30 workers employed since last spring.


The construction jobs pay prevailing union scale wages, which range from around $22 per hour to nearly $30 per hour, under the Davis Bacon Act, said Rick Minster, business development officer with the Oregon Business Development Department, which submitted the grant request for funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.


Helping forests, heating buildings

Doug Gochnour, supervisor of the Malheur National Forest, said there’s such a backlog of thinning needed to reduce fuel loading and thin overstocked forests at high risk of massive fires that he originally supported two stimulus grant applications, but there wasn’t enough stimulus funds awarded to fund the second plant planned for Burns in Harney County.


“We have a 10-year strategy for thinning projects to improve forest health and reduce fuel loading,” Gochnour said. “We are currently planning several projects ranging from 15,000 acres to 40,000 acres each where some pretty large-scale thinning and prescribed burning is needed.”


He said much of the 1.7-million acre Malheur National Forest are so overstocked that the trees can’t get enough nourishment to grow health and strong enough to resist disease.


“Our forests are too overcrowded to do prescribed burning. We need to thin them first before we can reintroduce fire to play its proper role,” Gochnour said. “If we tried to introduce prescribed burning with the current level of fuel loading, instead of creeping along the ground like in a natural healthy stand, we’d have massive spreading through the canopy and burning out of control.”


He said the type of forest health thinning projects that remove smaller trees ideal for supplying biomass is similar to the thinning that originally created most of the giant old growth forests prior to European settlement, when nomadic aboriginal tribes cut and utilized the smaller trees for firewood, building huts and teepees and other uses.


Under terms of the federal grant received for the John Day biomass plant, Billman said the plant is expected to create 10 to 12 long-term jobs, but that won’t be possible if the EPA rules kill the market for wood pellets and wood bricks.


Billman told tourgoers the plant is designed to grind up small logs from forest health and fire mitigation thinning projects and turn the sawdust into wood pellets and wood bricks for burning in wood stoves, pellet stoves and solid-fuel boilers used to heat schools, hospitals, airport terminals, prisons and government buildings.


He said the John Day airport has already installed one of the most efficient and cleanest boilers fired with wood pellets to support the biomass plant being built by Malheur Lumber, and the hospital in John Day is converting to a wood-pellet boiler as well.


“The boiler at the Burns hospital has already been converted to a pellet boiler, and we are working with the Prairie City School District to get pellet boilers in the schools,” Billman said.


About the boilers

Boyd Britton, a member of the Malheur County Board of Commissioners, said biomass projects like the plant under construction in John Day can bring back at least some of the thousands of timber sector jobs lost over the past 20 years in rural counties across the state.


“If we don’t do more things like this, we are never going to rebuild the rural economies,” Britton said.


Unfortunately, he said the EPA’s new boiler emission standards are dampening those hopes.


“We are familiar with the new EPA rule. I am just hoping it gets derailed, and most of the folks I know are hoping it gets derailed,” Britton said.


He said the government ought to support more innovative ideas like biomass plants that can help rebuild rural economies and help break the nation’s dependence on foreign oil.


Andrew Haden, vice president of A3 Energy Partners of Portland, who is a boiler expert and consultant on the Malheur Lumber biomass plant, said the German-made wood pellet-burning boilers installed at the Malheur airport and Burns hospital are the cleanest, most efficient boilers in the world.


“These boilers are 23 times cleaner than an EPA-certified wood stove,” Haden said. “These are very, very clean boilers, but the EPA standards they are proposing would mandate 50 times cleaner emissions than wood stoves.”


“These boilers burn so clean you can’t seen anything coming out of the smokestack. Compare that to the clouds of smoke that fill the sky when they burn slash piles, which is the alternative,” he added.


He said the problem with the EPA rules is that the agency has put small boilers that heat buildings like schools and hospitals under the same regulations targeting massive coal-fired power plants like the one in Boardman.


Haden said woody biomass industries are booming in other countries like Germany, Sweden, Australia and Finland because the governments are working with industry.


“(Governments) help them achieve the target together. It is not an adversarial situation like you have here, with the regulations going into effect in six months,” Haden said.


Appealing to the EPA

Earlier this month, Wyden and a number of other senators and representatives signed a letter urging the EPA to apply different standards to the smaller wood-fired boilers.


“We have heard positive signals that the EPA has gotten the message from all the senators who have spoken out on this,” Haden said.


Shelk said if the EPA rules are implemented as written, they would shut down most remaining lumber mills and disrupt the supply of kiln-dried lumber that is produced with steam heat from wood-fired boilers.


“You’d see a devastating ripple effect throughout the economy,” Shelk said. “The effect would be disproportionate in rural areas where most of the lumber mills and secondary wood products companies are that manufacture wood window frames, doors, paneling, wood cabinets, furniture and other products made with kiln-dried lumber,” Shelk said.


Original article is here.

---

So some are more equal than others under obamacare: muslims

Read this and get angry, very angry. Islam is not a religion but our government does not care and has recognized this perverted, stone age, persecution filled political ideology as a religion. So now all who follow islam are exempt from obamacare but still will reap the benefits of the what obamacare allows. Completely and totally disgusting.

---

Muslims exempt from paying for Obama care
By Larry Hart


From Examiner.com: Obama’s Orwellian healthcare bill passed by congress a few months back requires that all Americans must pay for health insurance or they will be fined a monthly amount that will almost match the forced healthcare payment.


Well, not all Americans are subject to this new bill. Certain religious groups are exempt, the Amish, Scientologists, Christian Scientists and Muslims.


The Amish “believe it is their church’s responsibility to care for the material needs of the members, not the government or insurance companies. When members of the Amish community have need of a doctor or a hospital, they get financial help from their church and neighbors and pay in cash for the services.”


That sounds noble enough for me. I wish everyone took that kind of private communal responsibility.


Scientologists, and Christian scientists lobbied to keep themselves exempt and they won it, probably because their new age philosophies fit in with the Left wing atheist/pagan mandate that is currently running the U.S. government.


Those that adhere to Islam, the only major religion included in the exemption, won’t have to pay health insurance but will still be entitled to benefits because Islam has “a tradition of barring conventional insurance products because they ‘involve an element of uncertainty, gambling and the charging of interest, which is prohibited by the Koran.’”


Of course, if you are white and Christian, Jewish, or if just make too much money for the Obamists, then you are going to be the ones who will pay the Muslim bill for healthcare.


All Americans are equal just some are more equal than others

Original article is here.

Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy in Minnesotastan goes after the ACLU!

TIZA has been up on PC before and this is the latest update. This islamic school has stonewalled any and all attempts to get behind it's tightly closed doors. What the heck are they hiding at these charter schools, and what do they want to keep in secret? Up to no good or all things islam and done by the book, the qura'an, ahadith and most likely sharia law is followed to the letter. So, what do you think they are hiding? Remember, this is a publically funded, taxpayer supported school or madrassa? From the Startribune.com.

---

TiZA vs. the search for truth
By Katherine Kersten

The school -- public, mind you -- tries to intimidate all who would challenge it.

The battle over the role of Islam in a Minnesota public school is heating up again in a federal courtroom in St. Paul. The conflict began in January 2009, when the ACLU of Minnesota sued Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy -- a K-8 charter school with campuses in Inver Grove Heights and Blaine -- for violating constitutional prohibitions against government endorsement of religion.


TiZA since has fought tooth and nail -- erecting procedural barriers to prevent the ACLU from investigating what goes on behind its doors. The school's tactics have gone far beyond the usual rough-and-tumble of lawyers in our adversary system. Its chief tool has been attempted intimidation of all who would draw back the curtain on its secrets.


One of TiZA's first targets was the ACLU itself. A few months after the suit began, the school filed a $100,000-plus defamation claim, citing ACLU executive director Chuck Samuelson's simple statement that "[TiZA is] a theocratic school ... as plain as the substantial nose on my face." The court dismissed the claim.


In January 2010, the ACLU was back in court to seek a protective order, on grounds that intimidation by TiZA was discouraging potential witnesses from appearing. The ACLU filed affidavits by a former TiZA parent and a former TiZA staff member, who described what they interpreted as threats of violence against them. In her affidavit, the female staff member said that Asad Zaman -- TiZA's executive director -- had suggested after she displeased him: "We could just kill you, yeah tell your husband we'll do his job for him." (Zaman has no recollection of making such a statement, he said in an affidavit.) The court barred witness harassment or intimidation by either party.


In June 2010, the ACLU returned to court to quash what it described as yet another TiZA attempt to intimidate current and former employees from speaking about what they had seen at the public school. TiZA's "Staff Handbooks include a secrecy clause, and related threat of legal action for violating it," according to the ACLU's court filings. TiZA "wields [these provisions] as a sledgehammer to keep former employees quiet about what they saw at the school." As a result, "former TiZA employees have expressed fear about speaking to the ACLU."


According to the ACLU, TiZA's refusal to agree not to enforce the secrecy clause "sends the ominous signal that current and former employees who talk to the ACLU may be forced to defend themselves against a baseless, expensive lawsuit."


On Oct. 1, Judge Donovan Frank agreed -- affirming an order the ACLU had earlier won barring TiZA from enforcing the confidentiality clause in the context of this litigation.


The court's order and memorandum spoke volumes: "It appears that information related to TiZA's business, finances, operations and office procedures is public data and cannot be kept secret." "The relevant question ... is why TiZA, a public charter school, does not want to allow its former and current employees to participate in the informal discovery process to ascertain the truth about how TiZA operates."


The court's strong language in response to TiZA's actions was unusual: "[I]ntimidation and threats will not sit well with a fact-finder such as a jury." As a result of the school's actions, "[T]he Court may be required to draw adverse inferences about how TiZA operates as a result of TiZA's efforts to keep information about its operations secret. ... [TiZA's] behavior during the discovery process thus far ... has not been consistent with a good faith search for the truth."


The ACLU has characterized TiZA's recent actions regarding the secrecy clause as "only the last in a long line of intimidation efforts." Not quite. Last month, an attack was launched from a different front.


Several organizations that are not even parties to the lawsuit went to court in an attempt to disqualify the ACLU's lawyers -- Dorsey & Whitney -- from representing the ACLU on grounds that Dorsey personnel had previously communicated with Zaman about entities involved in the litigation. The organizations include the Muslim American Society of Minnesota (MAS-MN), MAS-MN Property Holding Corporation and the Minnesota Education Trust (MET).


What might they fear? Perhaps that Dorsey lawyers are in a position to prove that the scandal thus far -- and Zaman's role in it -- is just the tip of the iceberg. Dorsey lawyers had this to say in a Sept. 10 letter filed with the court:


"The ACLU believes Mr. Zaman's testimony relating to control of virtually every significant event at TiZA, MAS-MN, MET and MET's subsidiaries, coupled with his efforts to hide such control, constitute powerful evidence against TiZA's denials that it is a Muslim school and that it funnels state and federal money to other Muslim organizations."


Every time we read about this lawsuit, we have to pinch ourselves and say: We're talking about a public, taxpayer-funded school.

Hat tip: ACT for America

Original article is here.

The Department Of Justice is with islam, not you or me.

The Department Of Justice has issued a warning that opposing a mosque, most likely ANY mosque could be a violation of muslim's civil rights and then be escalated to a Federal crime. So now the Feds have interjected themselves into another local issue in regard to islam and muslims. Do you want a mosque on the corner of YOUR block. Don' think it can where you live? Think again!
From Logan's Warning.

---

Obama: Opposing Mosques Could be a Federal Crime

In the past Tennessee Lt. Governor has stated that we need to face the threat of Sharia Law in America, and hundreds of non-Muslims have come out in protest against this proposed Mosque. But none of that matters to Obama and his gang, as here they come to save the day and help advance a religion/ideology that clearly goes against the freedoms of America. I thought you guys were supposed to help the country, not hurt it.

Feds: opposing Tennessee mosque could be a crime
Richard A. Serrano, Reporting from Washington
October 18, 2010

Washington….The Obama administration, for the second time in two months, interjected itself Monday into an angry local dispute over a proposed Islamic center, warning local officials that opposing the mosque could violate the civil rights of its members and become a federal crime.


The Department of Justice filed court papers Monday in support of construction of a Murfreesboro, Tennessee mosque, saying local Muslims were protected by the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion and disputing opponents claims that Islam is not a valid religion.


In August, President Obama drew fire from conservatives and many New Yorkers when he said people have the right to build a mosque on private properly. The statement so inflamed his detractors that the next day the president stressed he was not necessarily endorsing the proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero in New York.


In the Tennessee matter, the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro is attempting to build new facilities outside of town to accommodate its growing congregation. It purchased 15 acres for a new 10,000-square foot center, with a worship house, school, a gym and swimming pool. The surrounding area would include a pavilion and cemetery.


Link to Article


I would like to see if the complaint actually states why Islam should not be recognized as a religion. It is called Sharia Law.

Hat tip: Loganswarning

Saudi royalty murders gay servant

What, the morality police did not get to this royal loser in Saudia Arabia? What is up with that? This was brutal crime where the victim was beaten for a full minutes inside an elevator. The death penalty is too good for someone like this.


"Saud Abdulaziz dominated the victim who appeared submissive in his presence. During the trial, the prosecution also stated that they had a homosexual relationship and argued that there was a sexual element to the murder.


The defendant used his position of power over the victim to gratuitously inflict violence upon him over a long period of time," Detective Chief Inspector John McFarlane, who led the investigation, told British reporters.


"After the victim's body was discovered he made every effort to evade justice, including misleading police by alleging that the victim had been robbed and then trying to claim diplomatic immunity, which he was not entitled to in the UK," he stated. From Examiner.com.

---

Saudi Prince convicted of killing gay manservant
By Jim Kouri

A London jury delivered a guilty verdict to a member of the Saudi royal family on Tuesday, convicting him of killing his manservant in a London hotel room. The prosecution argued that the Saudi prince and the victim pursued a homosexual relationship.


Thirty-four year old Prince Saud Bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir Bin Abdulaziz al Saud was found guilty of the murder of his alleged lover, 32-year-old Bandar Abdullah Abdulaziz, at the Landmark Hotel on February 15, 2010. He was also found guilty of the charge of grievous bodily harm of his victim.


Saud Abdulaziz stayed at the luxury hotel with the victim, described to police officers as a friend with whom he traveled.


On February 15, hotel security telephoned the London Ambulance Service and stated that Bandar Abdulaziz appeared to be dead. Paramedics responded to the Saudi prince's room where they discovered the lifeless body of the victim in bed. They pronounced the servant DOA (dead on arrival) and then contacted the Metropolitan Police.


Police investigators on the scene spoke to Saud Abdulaziz, as well as hotel staff. Saud Abdulaziz told the investigating officers that he had been drinking with the victim in the hotel bar until the early hours and stated that when he awoke he was unable to awaken his servant at 3.30 p.m.


The defendant claimed he telephoned a man who worked as his chauffeur during his stay, and told him Bandar was unwell. The man advised him to call reception for assistance and made his way to the hotel.


When he arrived at 4.30 p.m., the chauffeur was told by Saud Abdulaziz that he had not contacted hotel staff. According to the London Times, the chauffeur stated he immediately contacted reception and checked Bandar Abdulaziz who appeared to be dead.


During the initial police interview, Saud Abdulaziz claimed that Bandar Abdulaziz had been attacked and robbed sometime between the 21st and 23rd of January in the Edgware Road area of London. He claimed his servant's death was due to injuries sustained during the alleged robbery that occurred more than three weeks earlier.


The medical examiner who visited the crime scene told officers that the victim appeared to have suffered from injuries within the last 24 hours, consistent with being punched and kicked. Meanwhile, investigators began viewing videotapes from the hotel security's CCTV system.


Video footage from about 4 a.m. on January 22 showed Saud Abdulaziz subjecting the victim to a beating for two minutes in a hotel elevator. The victim is seen in the video cowering while attempting prevent blows to his head and face, according to the London Times.


Further CCTV footage showed another assault by Saud Abdulaziz on the victim in the elevator on February 5.


Police arrested Saud Abdulaziz and he was taken to the police station that evening and he was interrogated the following day. During that interview, he continued to claim that the victim had been attacked during an earlier robbery, which had resulted in the injuries and a large quantity of cash being stolen.


Police records did not show any evidence of the Saud Abdulaziz alleged robbery. The police investigation revealed that the victim had been treated at St Mary's Hospital for an ear injury and was discharged on February 10. Police said they believed the injury was inflicted by the defendant, along with other injuries over a sustained period of abuse.


A thorough autopsy strongly suggested the cause of death as compression to the neck and head injury. A series of injuries were found. The medical examiner told the news media that the fatal injuries were recent and could not be attributed to any earlier robbery, as maintained by the Saudi prince.


Crime scene investigators reported that in the hotel suite there was evidence that attempts had been made to clean up blood evidence and that the victim's body had been dragged from the bathroom into the hallway, to the bedroom and on to the bed in an attempt to make it look as if the victim died in his sleep.


Investigators from the Metropolitan Police Service's Homicide Command also believe prince's and manservant's relationship was that of "master and servant."


Saud Abdulaziz dominated the victim who appeared submissive in his presence. During the trial, the prosecution also stated that they had a homosexual relationship and argued that there was a sexual element to the murder.


"The defendant used his position of power over the victim to gratuitously inflict violence upon him over a long period of time," Detective Chief Inspector John McFarlane, who led the investigation, told British reporters.


"After the victim's body was discovered he made every effort to evade justice, including misleading police by alleging that the victim had been robbed and then trying to claim diplomatic immunity, which he was not entitled to in the UK," he stated.


Saud initially believed he had diplomatic immunity but soon discovered he did not have it in Britain.



____________________________________________________


Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a columnist for The Examiner (examiner.com) and New Media Alliance (thenma.org). In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.
He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.

Original article is here.

Latest videos from Vladtepes, Please watch.

Here are the latest videos from Vladtepes and I encourage you to watch all of them if you have the time. Posting them all at once to save some time as I am way behind.

---

Here come the envirornazi's again!

Be more posts up later today. I spent most of yesterday with my very good friend who is dying. I am very worn out but have some posts almost done.



One problem with the above, we will be buying these more expensive items for 'the poor' with working people's tax dollars. So - those who provide for themselves will not be able to afford these items, and will be penalized for not having them, but will be indirectly paying for poor people to have them. It is called redistribution.....


That is what has happened here in Oregon with solar power subsidies offered
through our local utility. Only the wealthy can afford the up front $25,000 or MORE cost. Then the average joe like and you has to pay for this program through higher electric rates and fees for dam removal(ones that are producing clean, renewable hydroelectric power) and closing down those evil coal fired power plants(oops there goes 300 plus jobs NOT replaced by green energy jobs as promised by obama and our stupid green governor).

Hat tip:  ARRA News Service