headerphoto


Feminists: the most dangerous people to young islamic girls and women.

Female genital mutilation(FGM)is a horrible, barbaric procedure that is supposed to protect young girls and women from having sexual desires. That the western feminists stay silent about this stone age 'surgery' is disgusting and there is no excuse for feminists not to make this one of their main goals, the exposure and elimination of this horrific crime against the most helpless females that live under islam, the qur'an and hadith. This is from Dr. Thomas Ahmed.


The fact is that FGM is an Islamic religious obligation on every Muslim female and is based on the following authentic hadiths of the prophet Muhammad,


“Umm Atiyya al-Ansarite narrated that a woman used to circumcise in Medina, and the prophet said to her, ‘Do not overdo it, because this makes woman more favourable and it is more agreeable for the husband” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Libas 63, 64, Isti’dsan 51; Muslim, quoted in Tahara 49, Shaltut, Khitan al-untha, in Liwa’ al-Islam, 1951: 55).


“A’isha narrated another authentic hadith that the prophet Muhammad said: When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs of his wife) and the two circumcised parts meet, then ghusl is obligatory" (Sahih Muslim, hadith no. 349).


“The prophet Muhammad said, Circumcision is a sunna for men and a preservation of honour for women” (Hadith of Abu al-Malik and Abu Dawud).






How Female Genital Mutilation is done to Muslim Female Children!?
Dr. Thomas Ahmed


When she was in Canada Inaas learned about Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting. She knew it was a required religious obligation and backed by some authentic hadiths of the prophet Muhammad. “Umm Atiyya al-Ansarite narrated that a woman used to circumcise in Medina, and the prophet said to her, ‘Do not overdo it, because this makes woman more favourable and it is more agreeable for the husband” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Libas 63, 64, Isti’dsan 51; Muslim, quoted in Tahara 49, Shaltut, Khitan al-untha, in Liwa’ al-Islam, 1951: 55). “A’isha narrated another authentic hadith that the prophet Muhammad said: ‘When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs of his wife) and the two circumcised parts meet, then ghusl is obligatory" (Sahih Muslim, hadith no. 349). Yet, in another hadith, “The prophet Muhammad said, Circumcision is a sunna for men and a preservation of honour for women” (Hadith of Abu al-Malik and Abu Dawud).

Following the commandment of the prophet Muhammad, Muslims circumcise their girls so that they could preserve the honour of the family. Every Muslim girl would be circumcised at the age of four or five. “Female genital mutilation or cutting ‘involves the removal or the sealing of the labia majora and the labia minora together after the entire clitoris has been removed’ (Lois 1985: 115,).

When the Muslim girl under goes the female genital mutilation she would become abnormal. Her vagina would be so narrowed or so sealed that it would be reduced to a small hole that allows only the girl to urinate. The woman who performed the circumcision would use a reed that little bigger than a needle and smaller than a nail to measure the hole that should be left open after the circumcision. That hole would be a little bigger than an eye of a needle. Therefore, when the girl reached the age of adolescence she would not be able to practice sex even if she wanted to do so. The circumcised girl would experience unbearable pain as if she was being raped and that would prevent her from having sex before marriage. She would not be able even to practice masturbation. Therefore, female genital mutilation or circumcision was meant to control the sexuality of the woman and destroy her desire for the opposite sex. It is barbaric, painful, and harms the woman.

Nevertheless, what troubled Inaas was the primitive and cruel way that operation was performed by a woman who had nothing to do with medical knowledge and surgeon’s experience. As part of her field work Inaas forced herself to attend that barbaric practice. "The woman subjected the four years old girl to the most brutal operation I ever experienced in my life. The little girl was tied with ropes hands and legs. Then, her mother carried her and taken her to a dark room lighted with a dim local lamp. There was a woman who was known as the midwife whose duty was to help women deliver their babies. That woman had never been to school in all her life. The little girl did not know what they were going to do to her. Most probably she thought they wanted to squeeze a baby out of my stomach. After that her mother removed the ropes from her legs and forced her to lie on her back. The little child began to scream. Her fear was intensified when she saw the midwife holding a razor in her hand. Her mother closed her mouth to stop her screaming. The child was so terrified that she thought the woman was going to slice her throat with the razor. However, the neighbours Haja Sakinah and Salwa who happened to be there with us were asked by the mother to help. Each one of them held one leg of the child and spread it as far as she could. The child could not scream because her mother was putting her two hands on her mouth. Then, the midwife began to examine or fondle the private parts of the child. She used wet cloths to clean up the vagina of the child. Those clothes were soaked into normal hot water. She did not use any freezing or apply anything else except water. The midwife used a razor to carry out that cruel operation. Then, she began to cut off the child’s clitoris and slice her labia majora and labia minora. Although three grown up women were holding that child still the terrible pain made the child to struggle for relief and release from that unbearable pain. Then, the midwife used a reed to measure the hole that should be left open after the operation was over. The pain increased to an unbearable state when the woman began to seal the two sliced parts together. The blood was gushing out of the child’s privates like water. Both hands of the midwife were smeared with blood. Even the blood reached the clothes of the mother, Haja Sakinah, and Salwa. The child fainted before the stitching of her two labas was completed. Inaas always shuddered and got very terrified whenever she remembered that primitive, barbaric, and painful operation".

After witnessing that inhumane operation Inaas had decided to return to her country and forget about doing any further field work among those backward and primitive people. However, in a second thought she restrained her emotions and stayed behind. She knew that if she ran away and escaped from those horrifying experiences she would abandon those poor female children and those victimized women. She felt it was her duty and divine calling to witness those evil practices and later on expose them and let the entire world know about them. After witnessing that cruel and evil operation Inaas wondered why the feminists in the West do not speak or condemn such evil practices. Why the Muslim feminists always try to deny and hide those practices and claim falsely they have nothing to do with Islam? The Muslim feminists do not care about those practices because they are not done to them or to their female children as they live in the West and protect by the Western laws and because they don’t want to be accuse of following a religion that justifies and sanctions polygamy and female genital mutilation. They fool the people in the West by arguing that everything that is not mentioned in the Qur’an cannot be accepted as authentic teachings of Islam. However, this kind of fallacious argument perpetuates those evil practices which are always part and parcel of the authentic teachings of the prophet Muhammad. From the very beginning Islam had not and would never be only based on the teachings of the Qur‘an. As a matter of fact, the majority of the teachings of Islam on women are found in the hadiths rather than the Qur’an. Inaas understood that the feminists are the most dangerous people to those Muslim children and women who experience those evil practices in their Muslim countries.

Read more about the Abuse of Muslim Women,


http://www.publishamerica.net/product90819.html

http://www.publishamerica.net/product56703.html

13 year old muslim girl killed for not praying in Canada



From Vladtepes:


MONTREAL – A 13-year-old Longueuil girl died Saturday night as a result of injuries she sustained Wednesday when police say her 71-year-old father slapped her and she went into a coma.


Police said Mousaa Sidime, who was arrested for aggravated assault and has been detained since the incident, could now face a more serious charge when he appears in court Tuesday.


The girl, whom neighbours identified as Noutene Sidime, was found by emergency responders shortly after 6 p.m. Wednesday at her family dwelling on Chambly Rd. in Old Longueuil when the elderly father called police to say he had slapped his daughter, Longueuil police Constable Mark David said.


“When we got there the girl was bleeding around her nose and she has been in a coma ever since,” David said.

Shocked neighbours Monday described the girl as a “ray of light” who played happily with their children and used to give hugs to some of the other mothers when she came home from school.


But neighbour Linda Robert said Noutene had been quieter in the last two years. Her father was demanding, Robert said, and could be heard sometimes yelling at the children or his wife. On the evening that she was struck, neighbours said her father was calling in to recite her prayers, as he often did. She was reluctant to go, as she often was, neighbours said.


“Even when she was young, she hated going in for her prayers,” Robert said.
David said police were informed Monday that the girl died in hospital about 10 p.m. Saturday.


He said it will be up to a crown prosecutor to decide if the man will face a more serious charge. He was scheduled to be arraigned on the charge of aggravated assault at Longueuil courthouse Tuesday.


Original article is here.

New videos from Vladtepes on Geert Wilders trial

Here are two new videos on the trial of Geert Wilders. Wafa Sultan, another herof of the counter jihad movement is the main focus here. These videos are pretty new. I will not have much more up tonight as I have spent most of today with my friend who is really going downhill very fast from ALS. It is really sad as his children are in denial and rarely are willing to be there or help out. My friend's wife is so burnt out and now her health is suffering horribly, even with the extra help now coming in. From Vladtepes.

Part one



Part two

Go See "I Want Your Money" in Theaters On October 15

Bill Smith, Editor, ARRA News Service: A Movie You CAN'T Afford to Miss. This Friday October 15, I WANT YOUR MONEY – the highly anticipated, hilarious Obama exposé that everyone is talking about - will open in movie theaters nationwide.

If you’re tired of Obama’s big-government-tax-and-spend policies, YOU WILL LOVE THIS MOVIE! I WANT YOUR MONEY is a controversial new film about the competing economic visions championed by Presidents Reagan and Obama – a duel of speeches, wit, animation and narrative that leaves audiences laughing, cheering, yelling . . . and engages them in the national conversation about the mounting national debt, and why it matters. After all, IT’S YOUR MONEY THEY ARE SPENDING.

I screened this movie and then participated in two advanced showings of the film to two very different audiences. One in Washington, D.C and one in the Arkansas Ozark Mountains. The movie resonated with both audiences and it will resonate with a majority of people except for liberal elites. Although a documentary, the movie is interspersed with animated cartoons which allows the viewer time to absorb the material and to have a laugh while points are illustrated. Without these cartoons the movie would indeed be shorter, peoples blood pressure would be elevated, and their minds would have been overtaxed with the reality of the present situation.

There is also hope in this movie as the truth is shared about socialism which is destructive to individual freedoms and the well being of people. The words of Ronald Reagan share how capitalism, individual freedom and choice raises the economic well being of all people at all income levels. Audiences will find finds themselves cheering at the end movie when the "Gipper" takes on Barack Obama.

Take your family and friends to this movie. While the November elections are upon us, this movie will help prepare people for conversations with their elected officials after the elections. It is time to hold them accountable at all levels be it Federal, State, County or City. Remember, it is "your money," your family and friends' money and the money of future generations that the government is taking and wasting.

I Want Your Money includes insightful interviews with Newt Gingrich, Steve Forbes, Ed Meese, Mike Huckabee, John Stossel, Michael Reagan, Congressmen Tom McClintock, Thad McCotter and former California governor Pete Wilson, among many others, EXPLAINING CLEARLY WHY OBAMA’S PLAN HAS FAILED, AND WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO RECOVER.
Find A Theater Near You.
View the movie trailer.
Over 3.5 million people have watched the trailer so far!
WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING:
- "Don't procrastinate, go to this movie and share what you learn with others!" - Bill Smith, ARRA News Service
- “A must see for Americans!” - Stephen Moore Wall St. Journal
- "Hilarious, highly informative and inspiring!" - MovieGuide
- “A great film; entertaining and very clever!” - Former Attorney General Ed Meese
- “This is not your usual (boring) political documentary. It’s engaging and funny, even as it conveys a serious message about economics and politics.” - Hans A. von Spakovsky, National Review
- “This film will make all American taxpayers laugh, think and, I hope, act to save our jobs, our economy and our future.” - Grover G. Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
- “A Tea Party party!” - Kara Swisher, Wall Street Journal
- “Barack Obama meets Ronald Reagan, in the Oval Office!” - - Mark Tapscott, Washington Examiner
- "Ray Griggs' documentary I Want Your Money has achieved the impossible: making the federal government's insatiable appetite for the fruits of your labor both enlightening and entertaining." - U.S. Rep. Thad McCotter, Republican House Policy Committee Chairman
- “Why don’t politicians think like us when it comes to money? Watch I Want Your Money to find out -- and do it before the next election.” - Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women For America
- "I Want Your Money exposes the venality of the Obama economic plan, but does so in a playful, lighthearted way. The result is that its humor is as devastating as its factual revelations." - Colin Hanna, Let Freedom Ring
- “A sobering yet humorous look at the damage we are doing to our country by shirking our moral responsibility on fiscal discipline. - Tony Perkins, FRC Action President
- “Where's the lefty documentarian Michael Moore? A young conservative Moore wannabe is out with new movie, I WANT YOUR MONEY-pretty good, too!” - Michael Medved, radio talk show host
- "I WANT YOUR MONEY is brilliant, entertaining and very funny. Responsible citizens of voting age should view I WANT YOUR MONEY as required viewing. - Pete Wilson, former Governor of California, US Senator
- “Visually inspiring, spiritually uplifting, bravely accurate and at times hysterically funny.“ - Kerri Houston Toloczko, Institute for Liberty
- “A concise, viewable history of how America got into its economic mess and what policies will free our country's citizens to prosper once again.” - David A Keene, President, American Conservative Union
- “Educational yet fresh and entertaining.“ - Darla Dawald, National Director of ResistNet.com
Conservative friend and advocate for the movie Victor Vanden Oever provided promotional comments incorporated in this article.

Tags: movie, I Want Your Money, released, theaters, your money

Geert Wilders video from Vlad tepes. Just came out a few minutes ago

Interview with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff from Vladtepes

Here is a two part video from Vladtepes with an interview with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff.   I have reported on this courageous woman before. She has been accused of hate crimes in her home country of Austria as she was brave enough to speak out against the qur'an and islam. She is one of the cornerstones of the counter jihadist movement, a canary in the coal mine. If you type her name into the search box it will take you to several posts that will tell you more about Ms. Wolff.

Part one



Part Two

Dhimmi editor cowards refuse to publish "Find mohmmad" cartoon

Back on May 20th we had 'Draw mohammad day", then the South Park episode that stoked the rabid anger of muslims against any and all who dare to insult their prophet in any way, shape, word, drawing or form. Problem was that mohammad was not the target or topic, it was the editors that Wiley Miller, the author of Non
Sequitur was after. Miller was challenging the editors to look past the word 'mohammad' and show enough courage to publish his cartoon 'Where's mohammad?" Instead certain editors caved into the fear of offending muslims and islam, which in this case is completely ridiculous. One look at Miller's cartoon and one can see that there is NOTHING insulting about it. This is how far we have fallen. CAIR, the MSA, MSU, ISNA, U.N. and the OIC must be quite pleased at this outcome. This is exactly the result that islam and muslims want to end up with. The media, governments, educational systems, legal systems petrified to do anything that might insult islam. These editors, perhaps without realizing it are emboldening islam and muslims to take this to the next level. Well, many of us can take it to the next level and that is why I am publishing Miller's cartoon. I expect Non Sequitur to be on the edge and provocative at times. I hope you will share this from here or other sources. From Fox News. Pamela at Atlas Shrugs has an excellent post on this so you may want to drop in and read her post too.






Cartoonist Seeing Red After 'Muhammad' Cartoon Yanked
By Joshua Rhett Miller


An award-winning cartoonist is seeing red after editors at The Washington Post and other newspapers pulled a "very tame" cartoon that alluded to the Prophet Muhammad.

Wiley Miller, whose "Non Sequitur" comic strip has won several national awards and appears daily in roughly 800 newspapers, said he was not surprised by the decision to yank the single-panel, "Where's Muhammad?"cartoon because even the word itself is such a "dicey thing" nowadays.

"That's all they saw," Miller told FoxNews.com of the word Muhammad. "[Editors] didn't see the satire was on them, of being petrified to run anything related to him. But this whole thing has just gotten so silly over the years. It's something I can't lay off. It's my job as a satirist to point out the stupidity in the world. And the editors fell right in line with proving how stupid it is."

The cartoon, which was originally submitted in August and had been scheduled to appear in newspapers nationwide on Oct. 3, depicts a lively, seek-and-find-esque park scene complete with a giraffe, a skateboarder, a cyclist, frolicking children and a large hippopotamus. An accompanying caption reads: "Picture Book Title Voted Least Likely to Ever Find a Publisher … Where's Muhammad?"

Miller, 59, of Maine, said the cartoon was intended to be a satirical reference to the global furor that followed the 2006 decision by a Danish newspaper to solicit depictions of Muhammad. It also invoked "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day!," a free-speech-inspired call to action this year originally jump-started by a cartoonist now living in hiding after receiving death threats from Muslim extremists.

Miller said he frequently uses Biblical references in his work, citing "great metaphors" he can draw upon throughout his comic strip. But the decision not to run this drawing, Miller said, is an example of being overly sensitive due to the subject matter.

"They proved me wrong by not running it, by being afraid of running it," Miller said. "It was a tame cartoon. The satire was on media, not Islam."

Miller said he has yet to receive a single piece of correspondence from fans who were upset or offended by the drawing.

"Quite the contrary, they loved it," he said. "Who the hell knows what Muhammad looks like?!"

Meanwhile, Andrew Alexander, ombudsman for The Washington Post, wrote on Sunday that he thought editors at the newspaper were "wrong" to withhold the cartoon.

"Clearly, Miller has a right to draw the cartoon, and The Post has the right to run it," Alexander wrote. "But 'Non Sequitur' followers expect that. And there's a difference between provoking anger and provoking readers to think."

Ned Martel, the newspaper's Style editor, said he decided to yank the cartoon after conferring with others, including Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli, because it "seemed a deliberate provocation without a clear message."

The "point of the joke was not immediately clear," Brauchli added, according to Alexander.

For his part, Miller said he intends to lampoon a new target in the near future -- editors.

"The irony is rife," he told FoxNews.com. "How the editors mishandled it and only compounded it with their spin on it, it's a matter of sitting back and letting them hang themselves. They don't need any help from me."

A Chronology of Events at UC-Irvine

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk


Hat tip to Miggie and Scholars for Peace in the Middle East



My colleague, Leila Beckwith, Professor Emeritus at UCLA, has written an account of anti-Semitic activity at UC-Irvine for Scholars for Peace in the Middle East. It gives a fine account of the mess that has been going on at UC-Irvine the last few years.


http://www.spme.net/cgi-bin/articles.cgi?ID=7206


The recent suspension of the Muslim Student Union at UCI in no way means that this sad spectacle has reached an end. The suspension has been reduced to one quarter, and it appears that the MSU has now been re-organized (at least for this quarter) as Alkalima-Muslim Students at UC-Irvine.

What a great reputation for a university to have. What is really sad is that 99% of the students at UCI do not deserve this reputation. It is a classic example of how a few troublemakers ruin things for everyone.

This is the type of business we should be supporting and encouraging.

This is a nice story about a a couple of brothers who have tapped back into what was once popular, and successful. We here would sure as heck support a dairy like this if it was available here. I know this is a trend that is slowly coming back. This is how our milk was delivered when I was a kid. From Parade Magazine.




Our Towns:
Return of the Milkman!

by Drew Kerr
The Post-Star

Three times a week, in the dim light and cool air of a Saratoga County morning, Jan and Jeff King load 300 gallons of milk into a refrigerated truck. Winding their way through suburban culs-de-sac, down country roads, and along village streets, they bring glass-bottled, farm-fresh milk to more than 150 homes surrounding their family’s century-old dairy farm in upstate New York.

Their grandfather, Edgar, and father, Ed, traveled the same route for decades before stopping in 1961. Nearly 50 years later, Jan and Jeff, 42 and 39 respectively, are back on the road.

By mid-morning, the brothers will return to the farm with a slew of empty bottles ready to be cleaned and refilled. Piling the extra work on top of the daily demands of caring for 800 purebred Holstein cows isn’t easy. But reviving the home-delivery service, the brothers say, is a dream fulfilled.

Jeff and Jan grew up listening to tales from their granddad’s era—stories of people who would leave their doors open and ask him to put the milk in their refrigerators; of customers who would invite him inside for fresh blueberry muffins; of the woman who quickly mended his ripped pants one time as he stood, mortified, behind a closed door. Even the old bottles lying around the house seemed to be goading the two back onto the route.

After a lot of requests from neighbors for fresh milk—and some careful consideration—the Kings bought an old truck, plastered their name on the side, and began taking orders. Their first delivery took place this spring, exactly 49 years after their father took the dairy’s army-surplus truck out one last time.

“I remember putting that bottle down on the doorstep and just thinking how neat it was that we were doing this again,” says a baby-faced Jan, who has spent his entire life on the farm.

Customers, too, are glad to have the milkmen back.

In the 1940s, Laddie Zwijacz’s family took two quarts of milk a week from the King dairy. Each bottle cost 10 cents and had a three-inch layer of cream on top. “This is what real milk tastes like, not the water you get in stores,” Zwijacz, 78, says of the Kings’ current vintage. “ There’s a world of difference.”

Kathleen Quinn, whose grandfather was a milkman, gets four gallons each week. While she says she “can’t deny that nostalgia is part of the appeal,” Quinn also has practical matters to tend to: She makes her own yogurt and cheese and has three small children. “There’d better be some chocolate milk in there,” she jokes with Jeff when he arrives at the door, a wire container full of half-gallon bottles in each hand. “I’ll have a lot to answer for if there’s not.”

Comments like that make the King brothers smile. “We have people telling us they love our product,” says Jeff, a father of three. “We’ve never had that kind of feedback before.” Most dairy farmers see their milk carted away by tanker truck and mixed with other dairies’ milk—the Kings’ reaches many customers within 24 hours of milking.

“People really appreciate knowing where their food is coming from,” Jan notes. And he’s looking forward to making the rounds someday with his son, now 5. “It will be great when he can ride with me on my route,” he says, “just like my father did with his father.”

Drew Kerr is a reporter for The Post-Star , which serves the Lake George–Saratoga region of New York.

The Alan Parsons Project - Psychobabble



This is one more for today from the Alan Parsons Project: Psychobabble.


This is all we are hearing from the obama administration and it is 'all psychobabble rap to me."
Indeed it is. NOvember will be here soon.