This video clip is short and to the point. From CNN, and even though this is roughly nine months old, it is a great reminder of some of the injustices that this administration is guilty of. NOvember is getting closer with each passing day.
The threat from 'moderate muslims' and islam.
This is from my friend at China Confidential. Great site as I have mentioned before. These 'moderates'(no such thing in islam, sorry if you disagree)want the Useless Nations, I mean United Nations of 57 islamic states, umm, the united nations to force the West take a tougher stand against islamophobia. Islamophobia includes anything negative said, written or shown that makes islam to look bad. Not to hard to figure out why they want this. The truth hurts and millions of people are waking up to the very fact that islam is bad for an infidel's health. It can be down right fatal. From Timeslive.co.za.
West warned that Islam insults risk 'civilisation clash'
Oct 3, 2010 12:00 AM | By Sapa-AFP
Kings, emirs and presidents from Muslim nations have made pressing appeals at the United Nations for the West to clamp down on attacks on Islam which they warned is a growing threat to international security.
In speeches to the UN General Assembly, leaders said that "Islamophobia" was causing a growing Muslim-West divide and one top Arab minister put the international community on guard against a "civilisation clash".
A threat to burn the Koran by a fringe US church, controversy over a proposed mosque near the scene of the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and assaults on Islamic symbols in European countries have been a major talking point for Muslim nations.
Normally strong allies of the West have spoken out at the UN against the growing religious tensions in the past fortnight.
Many were embarrassed by comments by Iran's President Mahmud Ahmadinejad linking the US government to 9/11, diplomats said.
But Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the emir of Qatar, who has launched Western-backed diplomatic initiatives to settle wars ranging from Sudan to the Israel-Palestian conflict, condemned attempts to link Islam with terrorism. He partly blamed the US "War on Terror" declared after September 11.
"We disagree with the attribution of this so-called terrorism to the Islamic religion because this - in addition to being incorrect - is a historical injustice that is refuted by evidence from recent history." He said "gratuitous violent actions" in the US, Europe and Asia in the late 20th century were never labelled as being American, European or Asian terrorism.
"This violence was attributed to its underlying political, economic, social and even ideological causes, without attributing it to a particular religion, country or idea." Egypt's Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit condemned "regrettable and appalling incidents that have increasingly touched Muslims and Islam, repeatedly and sometimes systematically in certain cases." He added: "We find the West, in general, being drawn into a clash with the Muslim world. This clash will serve no one except extremists and those who hold perverted ideas on both sides. It will not be in the interest of security and stability in the world." Gheit called for Western governments to take action, including passing laws.
"We call upon all countries and especially governments, to assume their responsibility to confront the specter of a dreadful religious and civilisation clash."
King Abdullah II of Jordan said it is "essential to resist forces of division that spread misunderstanding."
Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak told the UN assembly that the world's 1.5 billion Muslims were offended by "attempts to demonise Islam." He added: "It intensifies the divide between the broad Muslim world and the West." Razak said the battle was one between moderates and extremists in all religions. "We must, and I repeat, we must urgently reclaim the centre and the moral high ground that has been usurped from us." -
Original article is here.
Hat tip: China Confidential
Oct 3, 2010 12:00 AM | By Sapa-AFP
Kings, emirs and presidents from Muslim nations have made pressing appeals at the United Nations for the West to clamp down on attacks on Islam which they warned is a growing threat to international security.
In speeches to the UN General Assembly, leaders said that "Islamophobia" was causing a growing Muslim-West divide and one top Arab minister put the international community on guard against a "civilisation clash".
A threat to burn the Koran by a fringe US church, controversy over a proposed mosque near the scene of the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and assaults on Islamic symbols in European countries have been a major talking point for Muslim nations.
Normally strong allies of the West have spoken out at the UN against the growing religious tensions in the past fortnight.
Many were embarrassed by comments by Iran's President Mahmud Ahmadinejad linking the US government to 9/11, diplomats said.
But Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the emir of Qatar, who has launched Western-backed diplomatic initiatives to settle wars ranging from Sudan to the Israel-Palestian conflict, condemned attempts to link Islam with terrorism. He partly blamed the US "War on Terror" declared after September 11.
"We disagree with the attribution of this so-called terrorism to the Islamic religion because this - in addition to being incorrect - is a historical injustice that is refuted by evidence from recent history." He said "gratuitous violent actions" in the US, Europe and Asia in the late 20th century were never labelled as being American, European or Asian terrorism.
"This violence was attributed to its underlying political, economic, social and even ideological causes, without attributing it to a particular religion, country or idea." Egypt's Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit condemned "regrettable and appalling incidents that have increasingly touched Muslims and Islam, repeatedly and sometimes systematically in certain cases." He added: "We find the West, in general, being drawn into a clash with the Muslim world. This clash will serve no one except extremists and those who hold perverted ideas on both sides. It will not be in the interest of security and stability in the world." Gheit called for Western governments to take action, including passing laws.
"We call upon all countries and especially governments, to assume their responsibility to confront the specter of a dreadful religious and civilisation clash."
King Abdullah II of Jordan said it is "essential to resist forces of division that spread misunderstanding."
Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak told the UN assembly that the world's 1.5 billion Muslims were offended by "attempts to demonise Islam." He added: "It intensifies the divide between the broad Muslim world and the West." Razak said the battle was one between moderates and extremists in all religions. "We must, and I repeat, we must urgently reclaim the centre and the moral high ground that has been usurped from us." -
Original article is here.
Hat tip: China Confidential
A review of America Alone. By Mark Steyn.
A review by Bill Muehlenberg on the book "America Alone" by Mark Steyn. I have mentioned this book as a must read numerous time here on Patriot's Corner. If you still have not read this book, please do so at your earliest convenience. This book is that impotant. It has been out for a few years now but the messages in this book are for our time. We are in a geo-political crisis and we are at war with islam. Get over your denial on this important fact. One thing I want to mention that Bill mentions; due to Steyn's wit and humor it is quite possible not to take this book on a very serious level. Do not be fooled as Steyn is quite serious about what he is saying in "America Alone."
A review of America Alone. By Mark Steyn.
By Bill Muelenberg Regnery, 2006
This is a very important book. Its analysis of geo-political conditions is top rate, and its assessment of the crisis we are in is as good as any.
But there is one minor problem with this book. Because Steyn is such a witty and engaging writer, there might be the tendency for some to not take the book’s message seriously. But Steyn is dead serious about what he discusses here. And we should be too. His message is that the West is rushing headlong down a suicidal path, radical Islam is on the move to fill the void, and the only country that looks capable of saving the day is America.
Yet with anti-Americanism rampant in much of the West, and plenty of home-grown America haters, the prospects do not look very good. Steyn rightly notes that the major threat to the free and democratic West is the rise and rise of Islamist fascism. And he recognises that demographic trends alone would indicate that their side is heading for victory.
Simply put, the West is dying by a population implosion, while Muslims are being very fruitful and multiplying big time. While most Muslims eschew violence, a sizable minority do not. They are young and restless, and are quite ready to book a direct flight to paradise via plastic explosives.
Most Western nations are so intent on being multiculti and tolerant, that they are unaware or indifferent to radical Muslims residing in their homelands, going to their schools, and recruiting in their societies. Moreover, most Westerners have for too long now been strung out on the narcotic of social welfarism, and cradle-to-grave statism, that they have nothing left to live for, or die for. As long as the state gives them the entitlements they have been dishing out their tax dollars for, they will not let a few mujahadeen in their capital cities get them too bent out of shape.
No wonder radical Muslims despise the decadence, apathy and weakness of the West. All we seem to want is our internet porn and 30-hour work week. All they want is to take over our lands and declare the universal Islamic caliphate. One side is bloated, blind and balding, while the other side is young, active and dedicated. Or as Steyn puts it, “Islam has youth and will, Europe has age and welfare”. Guess who’s going to prevail?
Indeed, the trend in every single nation in the West, except the US, is negative population growth. Muslims of course continue to have large families. So simply by force of numbers alone, many European nations will have a Muslim majority in a few short decades. Muslims really do not need to terrorise their way into hegemony, they are already achieving it by enjoying sex.
We on the other hand are aborting ourselves into extinction. Thus we are handing the house keys over to the radicals without even a whimper. There is one exception, of course: the United States. Not only is the US holding its own on the population stakes, but it still believes in the work ethic, self-reliance, national defence, and biblical absolutes.
However if Hillary or Obama get their say, that could all change. And if the US capitulates, then the West is doomed, pure and simple. The rest of the West is certainly not going to take up the fight. It has given up long ago. It couldn’t stand up to the menace of totalitarian communism, and it refuses to stand up to the menace of Islamic totalitarianism.
Spain is a classic case in point. One terrorist attack and the whole nation says, ‘yes please, we will be your servants, you be our master’. Again, nations emasculated by statism, secularism and socialism are not able to resist external threats. Indeed, the only reason that Europe could enjoy being a welfare Eutopia was because the US paid all the bills for its defense, so it could bathe in 24-7 child care and 4-day work weeks.
But such a lifestyle cannot long last, especially when the West is no longer bringing children into the world to pay the bills of its growing elderly population. High taxing nations may be sustainable for a while when there are tax-payers around. But when the West sees no reason to bring the next generation into the world, then the whole basis of the welfare state is undermined.
That is the problem we face today. Aging Western nations with a hole in their soul, no longer able to justify their existence, heading into deep demographic decline. ‘Without a vision, people perish,’ says the good book. Exactly so.
It seems the only ones with a vision today are young Muslim radicals who are working overtime to establish the universal dominion of sharia law. And all the West can do is roll over and say, ‘OK, take it, its yours’. The West simply doesn’t seem to care any more. In its anaemic, exhausted and secularised state, it is in no condition to offer any resistance.
America is one of the last nations on earth that still believes that freedom, faith, and democracy are worth fighting for, and that radical Islam is antithetical to everything the West stands for and should believe in. Yet with Europe largely siding with the jihadists against the US, the odds of survival are not looking too good.
American exceptionalism is something to take pride in, not be ashamed of. It is one of the few Western nations with both a growing economy and a growing population. Its people are filled with hope, committed to hard work, and common decency. Yet this is above all because America is still largely a nation of faith.
Secularism has ripped the soul out of Europe, into which radical Islam is rushing. But America still has a vibrant Christianity. This may not last long however. If America loses faith and loses heart, then there really does stand nothing between freedom, and the takeover of the West by radical jihadists.
Sure America has plenty of problems and it had done lots of stupid stuff. But compared to the madness engulfing much of the rest of the West, it seems to be a paragon of virtue. And at least is has things it believes in. Any nation that is not willing to die for something will not be willing to live for something either.
Much of the West has lost the will to exist, while plenty of young radicalised Muslims are more than happy to die for what they believe in. The real question is whether the US will take the lead and stand up for genuine values like freedom and democracy, or whether it will simply succumb like the much of the West has, and allow sharia law to become the law of the land, and the globe.
Steyn hopes it will make the right choice. But there are plenty of American defeatists and appeasers who are working overtime to see the American success story crumble, and welcome in the Islamo-fascists under the guise of multiculturalism, tolerance, diversity and interfaith dialogue.
As Steyn reminds us, while the other side has suicide bombers, we have a suicide culture. Who’s going to win in that kind of set up?
Original review can be found here.
By Bill Muelenberg Regnery, 2006
This is a very important book. Its analysis of geo-political conditions is top rate, and its assessment of the crisis we are in is as good as any.
But there is one minor problem with this book. Because Steyn is such a witty and engaging writer, there might be the tendency for some to not take the book’s message seriously. But Steyn is dead serious about what he discusses here. And we should be too. His message is that the West is rushing headlong down a suicidal path, radical Islam is on the move to fill the void, and the only country that looks capable of saving the day is America.
Yet with anti-Americanism rampant in much of the West, and plenty of home-grown America haters, the prospects do not look very good. Steyn rightly notes that the major threat to the free and democratic West is the rise and rise of Islamist fascism. And he recognises that demographic trends alone would indicate that their side is heading for victory.
Simply put, the West is dying by a population implosion, while Muslims are being very fruitful and multiplying big time. While most Muslims eschew violence, a sizable minority do not. They are young and restless, and are quite ready to book a direct flight to paradise via plastic explosives.
Most Western nations are so intent on being multiculti and tolerant, that they are unaware or indifferent to radical Muslims residing in their homelands, going to their schools, and recruiting in their societies. Moreover, most Westerners have for too long now been strung out on the narcotic of social welfarism, and cradle-to-grave statism, that they have nothing left to live for, or die for. As long as the state gives them the entitlements they have been dishing out their tax dollars for, they will not let a few mujahadeen in their capital cities get them too bent out of shape.
No wonder radical Muslims despise the decadence, apathy and weakness of the West. All we seem to want is our internet porn and 30-hour work week. All they want is to take over our lands and declare the universal Islamic caliphate. One side is bloated, blind and balding, while the other side is young, active and dedicated. Or as Steyn puts it, “Islam has youth and will, Europe has age and welfare”. Guess who’s going to prevail?
Indeed, the trend in every single nation in the West, except the US, is negative population growth. Muslims of course continue to have large families. So simply by force of numbers alone, many European nations will have a Muslim majority in a few short decades. Muslims really do not need to terrorise their way into hegemony, they are already achieving it by enjoying sex.
We on the other hand are aborting ourselves into extinction. Thus we are handing the house keys over to the radicals without even a whimper. There is one exception, of course: the United States. Not only is the US holding its own on the population stakes, but it still believes in the work ethic, self-reliance, national defence, and biblical absolutes.
However if Hillary or Obama get their say, that could all change. And if the US capitulates, then the West is doomed, pure and simple. The rest of the West is certainly not going to take up the fight. It has given up long ago. It couldn’t stand up to the menace of totalitarian communism, and it refuses to stand up to the menace of Islamic totalitarianism.
Spain is a classic case in point. One terrorist attack and the whole nation says, ‘yes please, we will be your servants, you be our master’. Again, nations emasculated by statism, secularism and socialism are not able to resist external threats. Indeed, the only reason that Europe could enjoy being a welfare Eutopia was because the US paid all the bills for its defense, so it could bathe in 24-7 child care and 4-day work weeks.
But such a lifestyle cannot long last, especially when the West is no longer bringing children into the world to pay the bills of its growing elderly population. High taxing nations may be sustainable for a while when there are tax-payers around. But when the West sees no reason to bring the next generation into the world, then the whole basis of the welfare state is undermined.
That is the problem we face today. Aging Western nations with a hole in their soul, no longer able to justify their existence, heading into deep demographic decline. ‘Without a vision, people perish,’ says the good book. Exactly so.
It seems the only ones with a vision today are young Muslim radicals who are working overtime to establish the universal dominion of sharia law. And all the West can do is roll over and say, ‘OK, take it, its yours’. The West simply doesn’t seem to care any more. In its anaemic, exhausted and secularised state, it is in no condition to offer any resistance.
America is one of the last nations on earth that still believes that freedom, faith, and democracy are worth fighting for, and that radical Islam is antithetical to everything the West stands for and should believe in. Yet with Europe largely siding with the jihadists against the US, the odds of survival are not looking too good.
American exceptionalism is something to take pride in, not be ashamed of. It is one of the few Western nations with both a growing economy and a growing population. Its people are filled with hope, committed to hard work, and common decency. Yet this is above all because America is still largely a nation of faith.
Secularism has ripped the soul out of Europe, into which radical Islam is rushing. But America still has a vibrant Christianity. This may not last long however. If America loses faith and loses heart, then there really does stand nothing between freedom, and the takeover of the West by radical jihadists.
Sure America has plenty of problems and it had done lots of stupid stuff. But compared to the madness engulfing much of the rest of the West, it seems to be a paragon of virtue. And at least is has things it believes in. Any nation that is not willing to die for something will not be willing to live for something either.
Much of the West has lost the will to exist, while plenty of young radicalised Muslims are more than happy to die for what they believe in. The real question is whether the US will take the lead and stand up for genuine values like freedom and democracy, or whether it will simply succumb like the much of the West has, and allow sharia law to become the law of the land, and the globe.
Steyn hopes it will make the right choice. But there are plenty of American defeatists and appeasers who are working overtime to see the American success story crumble, and welcome in the Islamo-fascists under the guise of multiculturalism, tolerance, diversity and interfaith dialogue.
As Steyn reminds us, while the other side has suicide bombers, we have a suicide culture. Who’s going to win in that kind of set up?
Original review can be found here.
Is obama's house built upon sinking sand?
This is an article I got from a friend on Facebook. Many of us would love to see the SCOTUS draw a 'line in the sand' against this administration. Below is a run down of the many reasons for this possibility. I am not sure if the current justices have the moxi and huevos to go after this administration of traitors, liars and cheats. We know Chief Justice John Roberts does.
Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.
Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on.
And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven.A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.
Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.
The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasianvoters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.
Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on.
And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven.A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.
Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.
The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasianvoters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
American boater murdered by Mexican pirates
Does this upset you? What do you think the obama administration will do about this. Invite the Mexican President to the rose garden for a Corona and a lime twist? Or maybe the the first muslim potus will take a vacation(overdue for one, isn't he?)to Mexico where he will bow and beg forgiveness for the nerve of that American boater being on a border lake that straddles both countries. How many dead, LEGAL American citizens will it take for this administration of cowards who love amnesty more than their own country, to wake up and do the right thing and put armed troops on our border with Mexico? Troops armed with our best weaponry and effective ROE. Not a word has been said about this from obama or his partner in crime, Janet Napolitano. Will this be another area of country that will become a no-go region? Just one more reason to get your concealed weapons permit, learn to use your weapon of choice and be ready for just about anything. Locked and loaded. From Examiner.com.
Mexican pirates killing of American boater creates outrage
By Jim Kouri
Law enforcement officials in Texas issued warnings Friday about Mexican pirates trolling the waters of a U.S.-Mexico border lake after a tourist was shot and killed while his wife escaped a hail of bullets and raced her Jet Ski back to American soil. The incident has renewed calls for federal action by border security advocates.
Search and rescue teams patrolled the U.S. side of Falcon Lake searching for Colorado tourist David Michael Hartley, 30, whose wife, Tiffany Hartley, told police he was shot in the back of the head Thursday after being ambushed by gunmen on boats.
The Texas Department of Public Safety announced during a press conference Friday that Hartley was believed to have been killed but his body had been found. The gunmen are suspected Mexican pirates who prowl Falcon Lake, a favorite spot for water-skiing and bass fishing. There have been five previously reported pirate attacks on that lake this year.
The shooting has led Texas officials to warn American boaters to use caution on the 60-mile lake, in addition to issuing its initial warning following three pirate attacks.
Although many Americans are outraged over this latest border incident, President Barack Obama and his Administration did not comment on the vicious attack on American citizens as well as the unbridled assault on Americans in general. During a press conference held by Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, there was not one word about this unprovoked attack on U.S. citizens.
President Obama says he wants lawmakers in both houses of Congress to make progress this year on reforming the immigration system. However, he's not talking about how his administration is failing to protect citizens from criminal aliens, according to border security advocates.
"It's old news that the Mexican government exports Mexico's poorest citizens into the United States for a number of reasons: It relieves them of the responsibility of providing social and healthcare services for them; it provides their country's economy with an influx of US cash when these illegal workers send money they earn in the US back home; and it defuses problems with far-left groups who are usually successful in using the poor to advance their political agenda," said former intelligence officer and police detective Sid Franes.
"So the Mexican despots give the poor the 'bum's rush' out of Mexico: Here's your sombrero, here's a map, here's a bottle of water, now get out! And American political leaders such as President Barack Obama are too busy fiddling with the U.S. economy to do anything to protect American citizens," said Franes.
According to Lt. Steve Rogers, a decorated cop and award-winning writer, there are tens of thousands of murderers, rapists, child predators, robbers and drug dealers who are illegally in the United States. One study shows over 200,000 criminal aliens are preying on US citizens.
Border Patrol agents in the Tucson, AZ Sector have apprehended 27,834 illegal aliens with criminal records, 74 of which were for homicide. Last fiscal year, the Tucson Sector apprehended 14,506 illegal aliens with criminal records. These figures do not include the thousands of criminal aliens apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents or those in other Border Patrol sectors in other states. And it doesn't include the tens of thousands of criminal aliens who are able to escape detection at the border.
Crime and violence related to drug trafficking in Mexico and Central America have increased in recent years and pose a threat not only to those areas but to the United States as well, particularly along the Southwest border.
The Merida Initiative, announced in 2007, provides about $1.6 billion in law enforcement support to Mexico and Central American countries. The U.S. Department of State manages the Initiative while other U.S. agencies play key roles in implementation.
The U.S. Congress recently examined the status of Merida program implementation; Department of State's strategy for implementation; and coordination mechanisms in place for Merida.
To address these objectives, GAO reviewed agency documents; interviewed officials at State, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of Defense, and other relevant agencies; and conducted fieldwork in Mexico and Central American nations.
The United States has delivered various equipment and training to Mexico under the Merida Initiative. While the pace of delivery has been slowed by a number of implementation challenges, it has increased recently.
As of March 31, 2010, 46 percent of Merida funds for fiscal years 2008 to 2010 had been obligated, and approximately 9 percent had been expended. In Mexico, U.S. agencies have delivered major equipment including five Bell helicopters, several X-ray inspection devices, law enforcement canines and training for their handlers, and training for over 4,000 police officers.
In Central America, U.S. agencies have delivered police vehicles and non-intrusive inspection equipment, and have provided various courses, including workshops on combating arms trafficking, and training on handling evidence from clandestine criminal laboratories. Deliveries of equipment and training have been delayed by challenges associated with an insufficient number of staff to administer the program, negotiations on interagency and bilateral agreements, procurement processes, changes in government, and funding availability.
The Embassy Narcotics Affairs Section in Mexico City has more than doubled its staff resources since Merida was launched. While State has developed some of the key elements of an implementation strategy for the Merida Initiative, including a mission, strategic goals, and a resource plan, its strategic documents lack certain key elements that would facilitate accountability and management.
Original article is here.
______________________________________________________
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a columnist for The Examiner (examiner.com) and New Media Alliance (thenma.org). In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.
Tags: 2nd amendment, Amnesty, illegal immigration, Illegal aliens killing American citizens, safety of U.S. citizens To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!
By Jim Kouri
Law enforcement officials in Texas issued warnings Friday about Mexican pirates trolling the waters of a U.S.-Mexico border lake after a tourist was shot and killed while his wife escaped a hail of bullets and raced her Jet Ski back to American soil. The incident has renewed calls for federal action by border security advocates.
Search and rescue teams patrolled the U.S. side of Falcon Lake searching for Colorado tourist David Michael Hartley, 30, whose wife, Tiffany Hartley, told police he was shot in the back of the head Thursday after being ambushed by gunmen on boats.
The Texas Department of Public Safety announced during a press conference Friday that Hartley was believed to have been killed but his body had been found. The gunmen are suspected Mexican pirates who prowl Falcon Lake, a favorite spot for water-skiing and bass fishing. There have been five previously reported pirate attacks on that lake this year.
The shooting has led Texas officials to warn American boaters to use caution on the 60-mile lake, in addition to issuing its initial warning following three pirate attacks.
Although many Americans are outraged over this latest border incident, President Barack Obama and his Administration did not comment on the vicious attack on American citizens as well as the unbridled assault on Americans in general. During a press conference held by Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, there was not one word about this unprovoked attack on U.S. citizens.
President Obama says he wants lawmakers in both houses of Congress to make progress this year on reforming the immigration system. However, he's not talking about how his administration is failing to protect citizens from criminal aliens, according to border security advocates.
"It's old news that the Mexican government exports Mexico's poorest citizens into the United States for a number of reasons: It relieves them of the responsibility of providing social and healthcare services for them; it provides their country's economy with an influx of US cash when these illegal workers send money they earn in the US back home; and it defuses problems with far-left groups who are usually successful in using the poor to advance their political agenda," said former intelligence officer and police detective Sid Franes.
According to Lt. Steve Rogers, a decorated cop and award-winning writer, there are tens of thousands of murderers, rapists, child predators, robbers and drug dealers who are illegally in the United States. One study shows over 200,000 criminal aliens are preying on US citizens.
Border Patrol agents in the Tucson, AZ Sector have apprehended 27,834 illegal aliens with criminal records, 74 of which were for homicide. Last fiscal year, the Tucson Sector apprehended 14,506 illegal aliens with criminal records. These figures do not include the thousands of criminal aliens apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents or those in other Border Patrol sectors in other states. And it doesn't include the tens of thousands of criminal aliens who are able to escape detection at the border.
Crime and violence related to drug trafficking in Mexico and Central America have increased in recent years and pose a threat not only to those areas but to the United States as well, particularly along the Southwest border.
The Merida Initiative, announced in 2007, provides about $1.6 billion in law enforcement support to Mexico and Central American countries. The U.S. Department of State manages the Initiative while other U.S. agencies play key roles in implementation.
The U.S. Congress recently examined the status of Merida program implementation; Department of State's strategy for implementation; and coordination mechanisms in place for Merida.
To address these objectives, GAO reviewed agency documents; interviewed officials at State, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of Defense, and other relevant agencies; and conducted fieldwork in Mexico and Central American nations.
The United States has delivered various equipment and training to Mexico under the Merida Initiative. While the pace of delivery has been slowed by a number of implementation challenges, it has increased recently.
As of March 31, 2010, 46 percent of Merida funds for fiscal years 2008 to 2010 had been obligated, and approximately 9 percent had been expended. In Mexico, U.S. agencies have delivered major equipment including five Bell helicopters, several X-ray inspection devices, law enforcement canines and training for their handlers, and training for over 4,000 police officers.
In Central America, U.S. agencies have delivered police vehicles and non-intrusive inspection equipment, and have provided various courses, including workshops on combating arms trafficking, and training on handling evidence from clandestine criminal laboratories. Deliveries of equipment and training have been delayed by challenges associated with an insufficient number of staff to administer the program, negotiations on interagency and bilateral agreements, procurement processes, changes in government, and funding availability.
The Embassy Narcotics Affairs Section in Mexico City has more than doubled its staff resources since Merida was launched. While State has developed some of the key elements of an implementation strategy for the Merida Initiative, including a mission, strategic goals, and a resource plan, its strategic documents lack certain key elements that would facilitate accountability and management.
Original article is here.
______________________________________________________
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a columnist for The Examiner (examiner.com) and New Media Alliance (thenma.org). In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.
Tags: 2nd amendment, Amnesty, illegal immigration, Illegal aliens killing American citizens, safety of U.S. citizens To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!
Two pictures, two rallies, two realities. Only one Right way to go.
Once upon a time there were two rallies. One on August 28th, 2010 and the other took place on October 2nd, 2010. Can you guess which rally is which? A gathering of concerned Conservatives who believe in the Constitution, God, family and defending their country? The other, a gaggle of those who embrace the NWO, bow to obama, European style socialism, the first muslim potus, progressive demosocialistacrats who have ridden the roads of diversity, political correctness, multiculturalism and approve of what has been forced upon the American people in the last two years? Not too difficult to see which rally was better attended. Do not believe the lies of the LSM.
Picture by Warren Roche.
Picture by Warren Roche.
Christian family murdered by muslims in Pakistan
I am just posting this as it is up at Jihad Watch. Marisol has done this more justice than I ever could. Please share with all you can. This is what our politicians are bowing down to.
Pakistan: Muslims murder entire Christian family, including five children
The kuffar stepped out of line. Their crime? Standing up to a Muslim who was charging Christians exorbitant interest.
Yes, interest is automatically riba, or usury, under Islamic law, but note the double standard the man was upholding: he was just doing his part to make sure the Christians "feel themselves subdued," as the Qur'an commands (9:29).
Acts like this against non-Muslims are direct consequences of the Qur'an's hateful rhetoric against unbelievers, and its open-ended commands to establish and maintain Islam's dominance by any means necessary: enterprising believers will oblige. "Muslim Extremists Murder Christian Family in Pakistan," from Compass Direct News, September 30 (thanks to Weavo).
Now here is the entire article from Compass Direct News:
Muslim Extremists Murder Christian Family in Pakistan
Lawyer, wife, five children shot to death after he tried to defend Christian.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, September 30 (CDN) — Islamic extremists killed a Christian lawyer, his wife and their five children in northwestern Pakistan this week for mounting a legal challenge against a Muslim who was charging a Christian exorbitant interest, local sources said.
Police found the bodies of attorney and evangelist Edwin Paul and his family on Tuesday morning (Sept. 28) at their home in Haripur, a small town near Abbotabad in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province (previously known as the North-West Frontier Province, or NWFP), according to Haripur Station House Officer (SHO) Maqbool Khan.
The victim and his wife Ruby Paul, along with their five children ages 6 to 17, had been shot to death.
“On Sept. 28 at around 8 a.m., we received a call from Sher Khan colony that people heard gunshots, and there was a group of people who ran from a house and drove away,” Khan said. “We went and found seven bodies in a house.”
Paul’s Muslim neighbor, Mushtaq Khan, told Compass that the previous day a group of armed men had threatened the lawyer.
“On Monday a group of armed men stopped Paul and took him by the collar and said, ‘Leave the town in 24 hours – we know how to throw out Christians, we will not allow even a single Christian to live here. We will hang them all in the streets, so that no Christian would ever dare to enter the Hazara land.”
The Hazara are settlers from northern Pakistan who are an ethnic mixture of Punjabi Jats and Pashtuns (also called Pathans). Drawing attention for demanding a separate province for themselves when the NWFP became Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the Hazara community financially supports area Islamic extremist groups and is known for charging up to 400 percent interest to Christians. Paul had moved with his family to the area in February.
He had taken up the case of Robin Mehboob, a Christian taxi driver in Haripur who had received a loan of 150,000 rupees (US$1,725) from Noor Khan, an influential Muslim whose lending network extends to some parts of Punjab Province, to buy a taxi. Originally Noor Khan agreed that Mehboob would pay back 224,000 rupees (US$2,580) after one year, Mehboob said.
“I gave my property papers as a guarantee,” Mehboob told Compass, “but then the amount of the interest was raised to 500 percent because I am a Christian – he was demanding back 1.12 million rupees [US$12,893]. They have forcefully taken over my property and have confiscated my taxi as well. I am a poor man, the taxi is the only source of income.”
Paul took Mehboob and the documents of the original loan agreement to the Haripur police station, Mehboob said.
“We talked to the SHO, who said, ‘You can file a complaint, but I can assure you that no one will testify against Noor Khan, as he is supported by extremist groups,’” Mehboob said. “We filed the complaint, and one of the police officers informed [Noor] Khan that we went to the police station.”
On their way back from the police station, three cars filled with Noor Khan’s associates stopped near his house, Mehboob said.
“They came out and said, ‘How dare you Christians go to the police, don’t you know we own the law here?’ They assaulted us, beating us with fists and clubs, and warned that if we try to seek any assistance, they will kill us.”
Mehboob left Haripur that night and went to his brother in Sialkot.
Paul wrote to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, Christian organizations and churches for help, explaining how Noor Khan and the extremist groups were driving Christians out of the area by taking over their property or threatening to kill them unless they sold their homes.
The Muslim extremist groups most active in the area are the banned Jamat ul Dawa, the Sunni Tahreek, and some groups linked with the Pakistani Taliban. The extremist groups were making fake documents to occupy properties owned by Christians, and Hazara investors were supporting the campaign, area Christians said.
The Muslim extremists have also threatened many Christians with death if they do not convert, they said.
Pastor Rehmat Naeem of St. Paul Church in Haripur told Compass that he had also received threats.
“Some extremists sent us threats through phone calls and letters, asking us to leave Haripur,” Pastor Naeem said. “Many Christians were forced to sell their property at very low rates and leave the area. Edwin Paul tried to help the Christians – he even talked to the higher authorities, but no one was ready to testify against the extremists.”
Pastor Naeem added that two months ago area extremists kidnapped eight missionaries; six have been released, and the two others are presumed dead.
A First Information Report has been filed in the murder of Paul and his family, and the District Coordination Officer and District Police Officer (DPO) have strongly condemned the crime and instructed the SHO to find those responsible, authorities said.
Chief Secretary of Hazara Division Ali Ahmed has released a statement ordering a police operation “under the Terrorist Act against the extremists and the Hazaras for forcefully driving away the Christians and killing seven innocent people. We will not allow anyone to threaten the religious minorities. It is the duty of the state to protect the life and property of its people. The DPO has been instructed to arrest the culprits in 72 hours and submit a report or he will be suspended.”
Hat tip: Jihad Watch
Pakistan: Muslims murder entire Christian family, including five children
The kuffar stepped out of line. Their crime? Standing up to a Muslim who was charging Christians exorbitant interest.
Yes, interest is automatically riba, or usury, under Islamic law, but note the double standard the man was upholding: he was just doing his part to make sure the Christians "feel themselves subdued," as the Qur'an commands (9:29).
Acts like this against non-Muslims are direct consequences of the Qur'an's hateful rhetoric against unbelievers, and its open-ended commands to establish and maintain Islam's dominance by any means necessary: enterprising believers will oblige. "Muslim Extremists Murder Christian Family in Pakistan," from Compass Direct News, September 30 (thanks to Weavo).
Now here is the entire article from Compass Direct News:
Muslim Extremists Murder Christian Family in Pakistan
Lawyer, wife, five children shot to death after he tried to defend Christian.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, September 30 (CDN) — Islamic extremists killed a Christian lawyer, his wife and their five children in northwestern Pakistan this week for mounting a legal challenge against a Muslim who was charging a Christian exorbitant interest, local sources said.
Police found the bodies of attorney and evangelist Edwin Paul and his family on Tuesday morning (Sept. 28) at their home in Haripur, a small town near Abbotabad in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province (previously known as the North-West Frontier Province, or NWFP), according to Haripur Station House Officer (SHO) Maqbool Khan.
The victim and his wife Ruby Paul, along with their five children ages 6 to 17, had been shot to death.
“On Sept. 28 at around 8 a.m., we received a call from Sher Khan colony that people heard gunshots, and there was a group of people who ran from a house and drove away,” Khan said. “We went and found seven bodies in a house.”
Paul’s Muslim neighbor, Mushtaq Khan, told Compass that the previous day a group of armed men had threatened the lawyer.
“On Monday a group of armed men stopped Paul and took him by the collar and said, ‘Leave the town in 24 hours – we know how to throw out Christians, we will not allow even a single Christian to live here. We will hang them all in the streets, so that no Christian would ever dare to enter the Hazara land.”
The Hazara are settlers from northern Pakistan who are an ethnic mixture of Punjabi Jats and Pashtuns (also called Pathans). Drawing attention for demanding a separate province for themselves when the NWFP became Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the Hazara community financially supports area Islamic extremist groups and is known for charging up to 400 percent interest to Christians. Paul had moved with his family to the area in February.
He had taken up the case of Robin Mehboob, a Christian taxi driver in Haripur who had received a loan of 150,000 rupees (US$1,725) from Noor Khan, an influential Muslim whose lending network extends to some parts of Punjab Province, to buy a taxi. Originally Noor Khan agreed that Mehboob would pay back 224,000 rupees (US$2,580) after one year, Mehboob said.
“I gave my property papers as a guarantee,” Mehboob told Compass, “but then the amount of the interest was raised to 500 percent because I am a Christian – he was demanding back 1.12 million rupees [US$12,893]. They have forcefully taken over my property and have confiscated my taxi as well. I am a poor man, the taxi is the only source of income.”
Paul took Mehboob and the documents of the original loan agreement to the Haripur police station, Mehboob said.
“We talked to the SHO, who said, ‘You can file a complaint, but I can assure you that no one will testify against Noor Khan, as he is supported by extremist groups,’” Mehboob said. “We filed the complaint, and one of the police officers informed [Noor] Khan that we went to the police station.”
On their way back from the police station, three cars filled with Noor Khan’s associates stopped near his house, Mehboob said.
“They came out and said, ‘How dare you Christians go to the police, don’t you know we own the law here?’ They assaulted us, beating us with fists and clubs, and warned that if we try to seek any assistance, they will kill us.”
Mehboob left Haripur that night and went to his brother in Sialkot.
Paul wrote to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, Christian organizations and churches for help, explaining how Noor Khan and the extremist groups were driving Christians out of the area by taking over their property or threatening to kill them unless they sold their homes.
The Muslim extremist groups most active in the area are the banned Jamat ul Dawa, the Sunni Tahreek, and some groups linked with the Pakistani Taliban. The extremist groups were making fake documents to occupy properties owned by Christians, and Hazara investors were supporting the campaign, area Christians said.
The Muslim extremists have also threatened many Christians with death if they do not convert, they said.
Pastor Rehmat Naeem of St. Paul Church in Haripur told Compass that he had also received threats.
“Some extremists sent us threats through phone calls and letters, asking us to leave Haripur,” Pastor Naeem said. “Many Christians were forced to sell their property at very low rates and leave the area. Edwin Paul tried to help the Christians – he even talked to the higher authorities, but no one was ready to testify against the extremists.”
Pastor Naeem added that two months ago area extremists kidnapped eight missionaries; six have been released, and the two others are presumed dead.
A First Information Report has been filed in the murder of Paul and his family, and the District Coordination Officer and District Police Officer (DPO) have strongly condemned the crime and instructed the SHO to find those responsible, authorities said.
Chief Secretary of Hazara Division Ali Ahmed has released a statement ordering a police operation “under the Terrorist Act against the extremists and the Hazaras for forcefully driving away the Christians and killing seven innocent people. We will not allow anyone to threaten the religious minorities. It is the duty of the state to protect the life and property of its people. The DPO has been instructed to arrest the culprits in 72 hours and submit a report or he will be suspended.”
Hat tip: Jihad Watch
The qur'an is a Manual of War
Labels:
Battling Islam and Jihad inside America.,
Global Islamic Subversion,
ideology of invasion,
Islamic Subversion in America,
Jihad and stealth jihad
If one has any doubts about islam's intentions for this country, and the entire free world then please read this next post. How much clearer does the picture of islam need to be for us? For me it is crystal clear. The water started clearing up in 1979 from the events in Iran and how 'Jimmy the dhimmi Carter' responded like milk toast to what was an attack on U.S. citizens. Had Carter reacted with some awesome firepower back in 1979 it might have set the playing field a little bit differently for the future war against islam that we are now involved in. Like it or not, we are at war with islam. islam will lie to us, make deals and break them(there are no peace deals with islam, ever), the best one can do is hudna or truce. Hudnas have a ten year limit on them and plenty of loopholes for islam to continue to wage jihad against those it makes a hudna with. That is just a side track of islam.
"Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused."
“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)
Convert or die. In the end there will be NO MIDDLE GROUND. From Right Side News.
Islam’s Invasion Ideology
By Martel Sobieskey
In the same way that a fake $100 bill is not legitimate currency, Islam is a counterfeit religion and therefore does not qualify for first amendment status. It is extremely incorrect to categorize Islam as a religion when its core literature and bloody track record prove a thousand times over that it is an -- Invasion ideology, a shrewd and cunning predator -- disguising itself as a religion.
Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused.
“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)
The Koran is a Manual of War
It is an error for anyone to call Islam a religion, but for those who insist, it’s best referred to as a “Religion of War” that has arrived on our shore as an enemy invader for the sole purpose of conquering our nation. This point cannot be overemphasized.
The Koran vows to vanquish all religions and nations worldwide. Allah himself is the protagonist who relishes the role of a “hit man” vowing to knock off every person who rejects Islam -- sending them to burn in everlasting hell. For Allah, there is nothing more heinous and loathsome than those infidels (non-believers) who refuse to convert, and there is nothing he will not do to eradicate them.
“I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off their fingers and toes.” (Koran 8:12)
“Allah wished to confirm the truth by his words: Wipe the infidels out to the last.” (Koran: 8:7)
Read the Koran for Yourself
Don’t take my word on it. Read the Koran. By so doing you will be outraged and ask, “Why in heavens name would any person with integrity and intellectual objectivity call such a blood thirsty and homicidally bigoted “tirade” -- a sacred and holy book?”
Below are two sources for authentic passages from the Koran. The first is entitled "Islamic Quotes" taken from prophetofdoom.net . It provides a few hundred quotes organized into 30 different categories and is very “digestible” giving immediate insight into the malevolence of the Koran and related Islamic texts. The second is an article by Citizen Warrior encouraging everyone to read the Koran, especially “An Abridged Koran” by CSPI. The advantage of the abridged version is that it eliminates monotonous repetition and provides commentary giving a comprehensive perspective and meaning to the text.
Neutralizing Islam
One does not need a crystal ball to foretell that Islam will turn America into a living hell if left unchecked. 9/11 was America’s initiation into the so called “religious rites” of Islam. Millions of Americans are outraged that the real culprit in this attack has been given a “free pass” to continue its rampage.
Since 9/11, the religion of peace website has documented 16,124 deadly attacks committed by Islam as mandated by the Koran. These prove that Islam does not deserve the status of a religion and that America has been hoodwinked by so doing. We need to face reality, and implement effective methods if we wish to protect our nation from this religious imposter.
One writer bringing clarity to the situation is Daniel Greenfield. In his article: “Can We Ban Islam? Legal Guidelines for the Criminalization of Islam in the United States” he states in the affirmative that America can legally ban Islam because:
“Organizations aimed at the overthrow of the United States can be banned and membership in them can even be criminalized.”
They key word here is “overthrow”. Any group that wishes to overthrow the United States can be banned. It is well past time for open debate and discussion upon this issue in regards to Islam.
To reiterate, Islam does not qualify for religion status in the USA because it an Invasion Ideology which absolutely mandates the conquest of the United States. Please see my related article entitled "Demoting Islam's Religion Status" it provides the basic elements for discussion and reflection. Also, a must see “you tube” video named "3 Things about Islam" provides a concise summary of the challenge we face. It is imperative for all Americans to learn the truth about Islam or it will eventually destroy us.
Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, and security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam – moderates included.
Original article is here
Here is the video "Three Things About Islam"
"Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused."
“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)
Convert or die. In the end there will be NO MIDDLE GROUND. From Right Side News.
By Martel Sobieskey
In the same way that a fake $100 bill is not legitimate currency, Islam is a counterfeit religion and therefore does not qualify for first amendment status. It is extremely incorrect to categorize Islam as a religion when its core literature and bloody track record prove a thousand times over that it is an -- Invasion ideology, a shrewd and cunning predator -- disguising itself as a religion.
Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused.
“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)
The Koran is a Manual of War
It is an error for anyone to call Islam a religion, but for those who insist, it’s best referred to as a “Religion of War” that has arrived on our shore as an enemy invader for the sole purpose of conquering our nation. This point cannot be overemphasized.
The Koran vows to vanquish all religions and nations worldwide. Allah himself is the protagonist who relishes the role of a “hit man” vowing to knock off every person who rejects Islam -- sending them to burn in everlasting hell. For Allah, there is nothing more heinous and loathsome than those infidels (non-believers) who refuse to convert, and there is nothing he will not do to eradicate them.
“I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off their fingers and toes.” (Koran 8:12)
“Allah wished to confirm the truth by his words: Wipe the infidels out to the last.” (Koran: 8:7)
Read the Koran for Yourself
Don’t take my word on it. Read the Koran. By so doing you will be outraged and ask, “Why in heavens name would any person with integrity and intellectual objectivity call such a blood thirsty and homicidally bigoted “tirade” -- a sacred and holy book?”
Below are two sources for authentic passages from the Koran. The first is entitled "Islamic Quotes" taken from prophetofdoom.net . It provides a few hundred quotes organized into 30 different categories and is very “digestible” giving immediate insight into the malevolence of the Koran and related Islamic texts. The second is an article by Citizen Warrior encouraging everyone to read the Koran, especially “An Abridged Koran” by CSPI. The advantage of the abridged version is that it eliminates monotonous repetition and provides commentary giving a comprehensive perspective and meaning to the text.
Neutralizing Islam
One does not need a crystal ball to foretell that Islam will turn America into a living hell if left unchecked. 9/11 was America’s initiation into the so called “religious rites” of Islam. Millions of Americans are outraged that the real culprit in this attack has been given a “free pass” to continue its rampage.
Since 9/11, the religion of peace website has documented 16,124 deadly attacks committed by Islam as mandated by the Koran. These prove that Islam does not deserve the status of a religion and that America has been hoodwinked by so doing. We need to face reality, and implement effective methods if we wish to protect our nation from this religious imposter.
One writer bringing clarity to the situation is Daniel Greenfield. In his article: “Can We Ban Islam? Legal Guidelines for the Criminalization of Islam in the United States” he states in the affirmative that America can legally ban Islam because:
“Organizations aimed at the overthrow of the United States can be banned and membership in them can even be criminalized.”
They key word here is “overthrow”. Any group that wishes to overthrow the United States can be banned. It is well past time for open debate and discussion upon this issue in regards to Islam.
To reiterate, Islam does not qualify for religion status in the USA because it an Invasion Ideology which absolutely mandates the conquest of the United States. Please see my related article entitled "Demoting Islam's Religion Status" it provides the basic elements for discussion and reflection. Also, a must see “you tube” video named "3 Things about Islam" provides a concise summary of the challenge we face. It is imperative for all Americans to learn the truth about Islam or it will eventually destroy us.
Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, and security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam – moderates included.
Original article is here
Here is the video "Three Things About Islam"
UC-Irvine "Is it true?" Department
Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
"One person's hate speech is another person's education"
Last week, the fall quarter began at the University of California-Irvine, and as anyone who follows this blog knows, the Muslim Student Union has begun serving a one-quarter suspension as a result of their disruption of the Israeli ambassador's speech at UCI on February 8, 2010. The original suspension was for one year, as decided by a UCI housing official, Lisa Cornish. Her decision was reduced to one quarter by retiring Vice Chancellor Manuel Gomez on his last day in office. Yet, eyebrows were raised recently by the fact that the MSU/UCI website was advertising an October 16 orientation event (since removed). What was that all about if they were suspended in October?
So guess what? Goodbye MSU-Hello Alkalima!
Yes, there is a new organization on campus this fall. Alkalima, which is also the name of the MSU's quarterly publication, is now on the UCI campus. Whether they will be there the following quarter is open to question. Last week, they had a booth on campus during the first week's orientation event. If you go to the MSU/UCI website and click the link to "Register here for College Day 2010", you will be transferred to Alkalima-Muslim Students at UCI-with lots of stuff being announced.
Here is the wording from Ms Cornish's letter to the MSU in May 2010 announcing the suspension decision (subject to appeal)
iii "No current executive officer listed on the Dean of Students registration application form will be allowed to act as an authorized signee for any other student organization at UC Irvine during the period of suspension."
The issue of starting another organization is not addressed in the final decision.
Now I would never insinuate that Alkalima is just a cover for the Muslim Student Union under another name until the suspension runs out in 10 weeks. However, I would like to ask a few questions.
Just questions.
Were there meetings and negotiations between the MSU attorney(s) and Mr Gomez during the appeal process between May and August 2010?
Just a question.
Did those meetings involve a settlement as to the final punishment of MSU whereby the MSU would not file a lawsuit against the university?
Just a question.
Has UCI, in effect, given a tacit "wink wink, nod nod" ok for the MSU to operate under a different name during the fall quarter?
Just a question.
Is Alkalima receiving UCI funding this quarter?
Just a question.
Of course, it is hard to deny a religious group permission to organize on campus for joint religious support and purposes. However, can we expect a political event to be held by Alkalima this quarter, say, for example, if the Viva Palestina convoy (currently in progress) ends in another violent incident in the Middle East?
Just a question.
Will there be a campus group named Alkalima during the winter quarter, when the MSU is back in operation?
Just a question.
Has the MSU made UCI look silly?
Just a question.
fousesquawk
"One person's hate speech is another person's education"
Last week, the fall quarter began at the University of California-Irvine, and as anyone who follows this blog knows, the Muslim Student Union has begun serving a one-quarter suspension as a result of their disruption of the Israeli ambassador's speech at UCI on February 8, 2010. The original suspension was for one year, as decided by a UCI housing official, Lisa Cornish. Her decision was reduced to one quarter by retiring Vice Chancellor Manuel Gomez on his last day in office. Yet, eyebrows were raised recently by the fact that the MSU/UCI website was advertising an October 16 orientation event (since removed). What was that all about if they were suspended in October?
So guess what? Goodbye MSU-Hello Alkalima!
Yes, there is a new organization on campus this fall. Alkalima, which is also the name of the MSU's quarterly publication, is now on the UCI campus. Whether they will be there the following quarter is open to question. Last week, they had a booth on campus during the first week's orientation event. If you go to the MSU/UCI website and click the link to "Register here for College Day 2010", you will be transferred to Alkalima-Muslim Students at UCI-with lots of stuff being announced.
Here is the wording from Ms Cornish's letter to the MSU in May 2010 announcing the suspension decision (subject to appeal)
iii "No current executive officer listed on the Dean of Students registration application form will be allowed to act as an authorized signee for any other student organization at UC Irvine during the period of suspension."
The issue of starting another organization is not addressed in the final decision.
Now I would never insinuate that Alkalima is just a cover for the Muslim Student Union under another name until the suspension runs out in 10 weeks. However, I would like to ask a few questions.
Just questions.
Were there meetings and negotiations between the MSU attorney(s) and Mr Gomez during the appeal process between May and August 2010?
Just a question.
Did those meetings involve a settlement as to the final punishment of MSU whereby the MSU would not file a lawsuit against the university?
Just a question.
Has UCI, in effect, given a tacit "wink wink, nod nod" ok for the MSU to operate under a different name during the fall quarter?
Just a question.
Is Alkalima receiving UCI funding this quarter?
Just a question.
Of course, it is hard to deny a religious group permission to organize on campus for joint religious support and purposes. However, can we expect a political event to be held by Alkalima this quarter, say, for example, if the Viva Palestina convoy (currently in progress) ends in another violent incident in the Middle East?
Just a question.
Will there be a campus group named Alkalima during the winter quarter, when the MSU is back in operation?
Just a question.
Has the MSU made UCI look silly?
Just a question.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
