headerphoto


ZOA Letter to UC President Yudof re- Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture and Inclusion

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk



"Yeah, we got it covered, boys. The Council on Campus Climate, Culture and Inclusion."

"That's right."


Cross-posted from the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) is a letter from the ZOA to University of California President Mark Yudof protesting the appointment of two individuals to the UC Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture and Inclusion, a fancy name for a group set up to deal with issues of racism or ethnic conflict on UC campuses. First the letter-then my comment.

http://www.zoa.org/media/user/images/letter-to-Yudof-7-26-10.pdf

First of all, I don't know who these two individuals are named by the ZOA. If the ZOA letter is accurate, I have no idea what they are doing on such a council.

The heart of the matter, however is this; if the University of California system has a problem in this area that it feels it must address, the most serious of the issues on UC campuses is the growing anti-Semitism that is fueled by the Middle East conflict and is being stoked by the enemies of Israel. In my view, other incidents of hate directed toward other groups don't even come close to the anti-Semitic expressions which have occurred on UC campuses. With all due respect to the disturbing (anti-black) incidents at UC San Diego, those incidents are still swathed in mystery. There is nothing mysterious about what is going on in the UC system when it comes to anti-Semitism.

So now, UC sets up this politically-correct council that lumps everything into one big pot and puts two individuals on the council who are (according to ZOA)part of the anti-Israel drive that is leading to anti-Semitism-whether they intend that as a by-product or not. I don't get it. No, on second thought, I do get it. This is another typical politically-correct university Potemkin Village to make it look like something is being done. It ignores the most serious problem in the UC system-anti-Semitism.

To be sure, UC President Yudof is a practicing Jew, who, by most accounts, cares about the subject of anti-Semitism. Yet, he continually stonewalls against those who dare to speak out and complain about the anti-Semitic atmosphere on UC campuses. The only conclusion I can draw is that Yudof is a prisoner to political correctness.

Whatever happened to S.I. Hayakawa?

Alan Grayson's Greatest Hits DVD-on Taxpayers' Dime

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk


Hat tip to Hot Air


"Who needs campaign funds?"


Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), the reigning Fousesquawk 2009 Jerk of the Year, is pushing hard to keep his Golden Penguin in 2010. According to the Orlando Sentinel, Grayson is using his congressional franking privileges to produce a DVD "highlighting" his first term and send copies to 100,000 households in his district at a cost (to the tax-payers) of some $73,000.

"Ah wunnerful, ah wunnerful, ah!"

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/os-grayson-sends-dvd-20100728,0,7129697.story

Here is Grayson's "blockbuster" DVD entitled; "Getting things done for you.":

 


I sure hope those 100,000 households in Grayson's district enjoy that DVD. They and the rest of us are paying for it.

Limited posts due to job applications and deadlines

Just a note to let those who visit here that I am trying to complete 7 applications for better employment. As I can only work part time due to being disabled(not mentally though my family would challenge that)it is very tough to find anyone who will hire me. My job now is all right, just really meager pay but it is a job and I like it and am appreciated. But as new opening do show up, I must go for some of them. I should be back on Friday or close to it. Thanks for understanding. The picture is pretty much how I feel right now.

Road Kill!

Discussing Islam - A losing battle? Gadi Adelman

This is Gadi Adelman's latest article and it is quite on target. It is getting quite late and I am about ready to pass out from pain and feeling burned out, for tonight, this morning whatever time it is! Just going to post the article and close with this; Gadi is one of the best minds we have when ot comes to fighting islam, terrorism and sharia law. Here is my comment that I sent in to Gadi:


"There you have the FACTS. I don’t care if you are a Liberal or a Conservative, average or intellectual, if you have not bothered to read any of the Quran then you do not know Islam. Don’t assume that because it is a “religion” let alone “the religion of peace” that this is something that won’t affect you."


Enough said and how much more evidence do some people need. Some people will never get it because they have been brainwashed from years of indoctrination through diversity, multiculturalism and political correctness. The three toxic stews of the west. islam is an ideology that controls one\'s life from the cradle to the grave. Individual thought is a cause for concern within this \'religion\'. One only has to read the qur\'an and study he hadiths to understand the evils built into islam. 1400 years of violence, persecution and death are more than enough to snap one out of a stupor. At least I would think so. islam will settle for NOTHING LESS than global domination under an islamic caliphate, controlled by the strangle hold of sharia law. We are at war and our \'leaders\' fail to understand this time and again, duped by the three toxic stews mentioned above. A few do get it but not enough. It is past time to return islam to the swamp from which it spawned and do it for good. It is the least we can do for our children.



Discussing Islam - A losing battle?
By Gadi Adelman

Islam, Sharia, jihad and terror. Daily, more things appear in the news about the truth of Islam from a multitude of venues. Why do people refuse to hear this truth?

“Perhaps these things that seem important to me are unimportant, but they are all a part of the great human tragedy that stands before us. And if I could do something, which I can’t, to make the world better, I would try to have it more tolerant, more kindly, more understanding; could I do that and nothing else, I would be glad.”

These were the words of Clarence Darrow during his closing argument in the case of People v. Henry Sweet on May 11, 1926 and as the saying goes, “the more things change, the more they stay the same”. The point that Darrow was making was just because some things seemed unimportant, it didn’t mean they were and if one would listen, not just hear, but listen, they too may come to realize the truth.

When I set out to learn about terrorism at a very early age I had no intention of learning anything about, let alone becoming what many have called an “expert” on Islam. I didn’t care about Islam, I didn’t really care about any religion other than my own, I wanted to learn about terrorism and that is what I did.

I started with the history of terrorism, what better way to study a subject than to start at the beginning? I started with the Zealots and the Sicarii in biblical times and learned about terrorism from its original roots all the way up through the 21st Century. Throughout my studies there was one defining factor that kept showing up and the more I learned the more it reared its ugly head, Islam.

I’ve been called an Islamophobe, a racist, a hater of Muslims - you name it, I’ve heard it. Funny thing though, other than Muslims, every person who has ever called me something along these lines knew nothing about Islam.

Most people have never read the Bible, so to ask them to read the Quran is like pulling teeth. Most people only expose themselves to information that matches their own opinions because it is easier and more comfortable; that’s just human nature. Most people think of Islam as a religion rather than a theocracy and therefore assume, “it’s a religion like Christianity or Judaism and cannot possibly call for death to other religions or war or violence because Christianity and Judaism doesn’t.”

Most people just don’t want to hear or know the truth if it goes against their own morals. It’s easier to say “you’re wrong, Muslims are no longer like that, that was in the 600’s, they are modernized now, and stonings no longer happen, they don’t want to dominate the world with Sharia, you’re nuts”. Yes, they would rather believe that, then to hear, learn or face the truth.

To paraphrase Walid Shoebat, the PLO terrorist who converted to Christianity and wrote the book “Why I left Jihad”; In order to understand Islam you must stop looking through Western eyes.

Most people are unaware that unlike the Old and New Testaments (numerous books written over hundreds of years by several people) that the Quran was one book, based upon the revelations and preachings of one illiterate man, compiled shortly after his death from oral and written records. The Quran is meant to be taken literally and again, unlike the Bible, it has few vague or symbolic analogies.

Many people are unaware that when the Quran contradicts itself, the passage written later supersedes the one written earlier. All the parts of the Quran that speak of peace and tolerance were written early on and according to the Islamic tradition, all those passages have been abrogated later by much more violent and less tolerant passages.

Surah 2:106 “And for whatever verse We abrogate or cast into oblivion, We bring a better or the like of it; knowest thou not that God is powerful over everything?”

Surah 16:101 “When We change one verse for another (God knows best what He reveals), they say: 'You are an imposter.' Indeed most of them have no knowledge.”

To make the issue confusing, the Quran is not arranged in chronological order. The first nine Surahs are at the start because they are the largest. Surah 2 is earlier than Surah 1 and earlier than Surahs 3 to 9.

A much-quoted early verse which is “peacecful”:

Surah 2: 256 There shall be no compulsion in religion: the right way is now distinct from the wrong way. Anyone who denounces the devil and believes in GOD has grasped the strongest bond; one that never breaks. GOD is Hearer, Omniscient.

Is abrogated later by several violent and intolerant verses such as this:

Surah 9: 5 Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

So, when most people hear Jihadists quoting violent passages from the Quran and then other Muslims quoting peaceful passages, they interpret it same way they would if someone was quoting the Bible or the Torah and they think to themselves “there are contradicting passages just like in other religions and Muslims can choose which one they want and justify whatever actions they want to take.”. The problem is that the Quran is nothing like that and makes it explicitly clear that you must never alter any part of its message or you will burn in a fiery torment forever.

The fact that Islam is more of a religious ideology than a religion is clear. Islam includes a mandatory and specific legal and political plan for the whole society known as Sharia. There is no separation between the political and the religious in Islam.

Fact: The Quran says that Sharia is the law of Allah and any other form of government is a sin.

Fact: The Quran says that man-made laws and governments (Democracy) and free speech (such as criticizing the Quran) are abominations and must be eliminated.

Fact: Striving to institute worldwide Sharia law until all governments have been converted is an Islamic religious obligation for all Muslims.

As I explained in my article “Call PETA, no one else is doing anything” some Sharia law facts are:


• Sharia law commands that drinkers and gamblers are to be whipped.
• Sharia law allows husbands to hit their wives.
• Sharia law allows a plaintiff to exact legal revenge, literally an eye for an eye.
• Sharia law commands that a thief must have a hand cut off.
• Sharia law commands that homosexuals be executed.
• Sharia law orders unmarried fornicators to be whipped and adulterers to be stoned to death.
• Sharia law allows obligatory female genital castration.
• Sharia law requires women to obtain permission from husbands for daily freedoms, such as leaving the house unescorted by a male family member.
• Sharia law instructs compulsory acceptance of polygamy and forced child marriages.
• Sharia law requires the testimony of four male witnesses to prove rape.
• Sharia law orders death for both Muslim and non-Muslim critics of the Quran, Mohammed and even Sharia itself.
• Sharia law orders apostates to be killed.
• Sharia law commands offensive, aggressive and unjust Jihad.
• The Quran instructs Muslims to lie to further and protect Islam. (Taqiyya).

There you have the FACTS. I don’t care if you are a Liberal or a Conservative, average or intellectual, if you have not bothered to read any of the Quran then you do not know Islam. Don’t assume that because it is a “religion” let alone “the religion of peace” that this is something that won’t affect you.

I have often ended many of my articles and speeches by saying “Tell someone. Educate someone. Whether it is your spouse, a friend or a co-worker, stand up and speak up for what you know is right.” This time I ask you to educate yourself, if you don’t have the desire to buy and read the Quran, go online and look up some of what I have stated here. If after your own research you decide that Islam is a “religion of peace” and most Muslims are “moderate”, then as Clarence Darrow said “it is unimportant, but they are all a part of the great human tragedy that stands before us”.

Additional News:

An update from my article last week “Freedom of (hate) speech?”

All but one of the Facebook pages, either individual pages or group pages that I mentioned or quoted in my article have since been pulled down by their owners or shut down by Facebook. Sometimes freedom of speech does work to our advantage.

Original article can be found here

A story of lost 'stimulus jobs' to 'foreigners' in 2010. It started long ago in Oregon

Oregon Clear Cuts: Aerial View
Before you get to the main article on jobs being given to 'foreigners', jobs that Americans will not do or work as hard at, let me tell you about the HoeDads. The HoeDads started in 1971 and I used to know quite a few of them.

They were an independent bunch who embraced environmentalism, feminism, and deeply believed in reforestation, conservation and loathed the logging practice known as 'clear cutting' which was very poplular throughout the Pacific Northwest. I worked in the woods for over 12 years, as a faller, setting chokers, knot bumper, driving a water or fuel truck, and fought wild fires. It was through clear cutting a 60 acre unit that I met 'Goatman and Goat woman.' So called because they had a herd of 40 or so Nubian goats they contracted out to clear land of undesirable vegetation like Poison Oak, Vine Maple, Blackberry etc. GM and GW had several kids(not little goats)Moonbeam, Sunrise, Moonshadow and Eclipse. I 'kid' you not. Their goats were grazing in meadow where we had a permit to clear cut. Being members of the Hoedads they were
not happy. A peaceful argument ensued and my entire crew was invited to their camp. GM and GW lived out of a conveted 1954 International school bus and the rest of this HoeDad crew in similar rigs, some in tepees, tents, you name it. There was around 50 HoeDads in this group, the size varying as they left for various work throughout Oregon and Washington. Here is a Hoedad, what was used to plant trees by hand.

This was in the late 1970's, early 1980's. Most of the Hoedads at that time were tree planters and they used a 'hoedad(see picture) to plant the trees after units had been logged, often times clear cut. I planted trees when I was not loggging or fighting fires and it is hard, back busting work. You are in all kinds of weather, very steep terrain, carrying a large pack of seedling trees and equipment with you. Planitng 4 to 8 trees a minute was not unusual. I got along really well with the Hoedads, especially GM, GW and their children. They often invaded our home to use as a camp when they came to town for supplies or a much needed shower. Yes, they smelled like goats, think about it. I admired their work ethics, convictions and love for the land and all critters that lived in the woods. They came to respect me and the guys I worked with as they realized we loved the same things, wanted to protect the same things, we just went about it in different ways. Trees like the one shown in the above picture were a rarity by the mid 1980's. I did help fall numerous trees this size before logging, clear cutting in the old growth stands of timber was mostly stopped by the late 1980's, early 1990's.

Sadly, The HoeDads were victims of their own fortune, environmentalism and the glut of illegal aliens taking their jobs for sometimes a third of what the Hoedads were paid. I lost track of Goat man and Goat Woman in 1987. The HoeDads as a cooperative died in 1994.

Now what does this have to do with 2010 and a bunch of jobs lost to 'foreigners.' Read on to the article below. What really got me hopping mad was the comments about Americans not working as hard or wanting these jobs as badly as these 'foreigners.' These jobs pay $12.00 to $22.00 an hour. I have plenty of friends who ahve been unable to find work. I asked them about this and they were furious. Each and every one of them are as hard working, dependable and trustworthy as you can find. They would gladly take these jobs in a heart beat. I will put my friends up against anyone as far as effort, speed and quality of work. I have known many legal and illegal workers who busted their butts hard all day and night, ran circles around the Americans, the locals who we were working with at the time. It can go both ways. In this economy, all jobs should go to LEGAL Americans first. Then they need to prove themselves on the job. if they cannot handle it, I know plenty more who can, and are willing and able to do these jobs. It is OUR tax dollars being used to fund these jobs. They should go to legal Americans first. A shame that this sytem is so screwed up.


Stimulus jobs go to foreign workers
Oregon contractors hiring for forest work, say qualified locals unavailable
By Keith Chu / The Bulletin

 July 25. 2010 WASHINGTON — Even as unemployment rates remain high across Central and Eastern Oregon, the state’s forest contractors are importing foreign workers — and using them on federal stimulus contracts that were designed to boost local economies.

The 2009 stimulus law — the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — allows federal agencies to award contracts to companies that use foreign labor on the jobs, even though the measure was largely intended to provide a short-term boost in U.S. employment. Just under $13 million in U.S. Forest Service contracts have been awarded to date to Oregon companies using seasonal foreign workers, according to an analysis by The Bulletin of federal visa and contract records. For their part, the companies importing workers say the foreigners work harder and faster than local applicants and are willing to do jobs the locals don’t want.

That’s cause for anger among many of those firms’ Central and Eastern Oregon competitors.

They argue that they’re being undercut by firms that use foreign labor and say the federal government isn’t doing enough to make sure their competitors are following all the rules.

Darst Atherly, owner of Atherly Contracting in Bend and Burns, said he was outbid by 50 percent on a recent federal contract by a firm using foreign labor.

“I can’t compete with that,” Atherly said.

American companies are allowed to recruit seasonal foreign workers for certain industries, such as seafood sorting and forest work, under the H-2B visa program. According to the Labor Department’s website, a company can recruit workers if it proves there aren’t unemployed U.S. citizens available to do the jobs and that bringing in workers won’t depress wages or worsen working conditions for U.S. workers. The program is separate from the H-2A temporary visas for farmworkers.

There’s nothing new about companies importing foreign workers for low-paying, labor-intensive jobs like forest and farm work. What makes this situation unique is that the federal stimulus bill requires contractors to pay higher wages — ranging from about $12 to $22 per hour for most forest work, what’s known as a “prevailing wage” under the Service Contract and Davis-Bacon acts. Those laws set higher minimum wages for workers on certain federal contracts.

Approval process
Even at those rates, however, at least eight Oregon forestry contractors this year asked to bring in foreign workers because they were unable to find U.S. labor.

U.S. Labor Department and Oregon Employment Department officials said corporations currently “self-attest,” or sign a form without providing other documentation, saying that they’ve been unable to find local workers willing or qualified for jobs. Several years ago, states had some oversight of H-2B workers, but today the U.S. Labor Department has sole responsibility, said Oregon Employment Department Legislative Manager Rebecca Nance.

“An H-2B employer doesn’t have to contact us like an (employer importing farmworkers) has to,” Nance said. “They can place their own job listing and self-attest to the outcome.”

Labor Department spokesman Michael Trupo wrote in an e-mail that the department audits some applications to ensure they’re meeting federal requirements. When The Bulletin asked to review the visa applications made by five companies that requested guest workers, Trupo wrote in an e-mail that the applications are available only by making a Freedom of Information Act request. The U.S. Forest Service was unable to determine whether complaints had been made against the four Oregon contractors with the most guest workers in a week’s time. Forest Service spokeswoman Valerie Baca did say that contractors must be in good standing when contracts are issued.

According to Labor Department records, the biggest importers of foreign labor were Central Point contractor G.E. Forestry, which received approval for 123 seasonal workers this year; Medford’s Cutting Edge Forestry, with 72; Ashland’s Summitt Forests Inc., with 66; and Ponderosa Reforestation, of Medford, with 39. Combined, the companies have received just more than $10 million in federal stimulus contracts for thinning and removing debris from Oregon forests.

G.E. Forestry office manager Victor Gomez said his company brings in visa workers because they do the job better than locals. A willingness to work quickly, especially, is what sets them apart, Gomez said. Although Gomez said he advertises jobs in local newspapers, few locals want the jobs after he explains the work required. The ones who do usually quit once they realize the amount of effort that G.E. demands, Gomez said.

“(Local workers) do it, but they can’t do it at the same pace; they can’t put out the same work as the other employees,” Gomez said. “They’re pushed to keep up with the other employees, and that’s when they don’t want to do it.”

Because foreign workers are here just to work, Gomez said, they’re often more motivated than U.S. employees.

“I think they’re more motivated for that money,” he said. “They don’t have unemployment to go on. If they don’t work, they go back to Mexico.”

High unemployment
Companies are requesting foreign workers at a time when the state has an unemployment rate above 10 percent; Crook County leads the state, at a seasonally adjusted 16 percent unemployment, and Deschutes is close behind at 14 percent, according to Oregon Employment Department statistics. The forest and construction industry in particular has a glut of unemployed workers, following the implosion of the region’s construction industry. Deschutes County lost 58 percent of its logging, mining and construction jobs between 2007 and this spring, according to the Employment Department.

Mike Wheelock, owner of Grayback Forestry in Merlin, said he used foreign workers in the middle part of the last decade, when the labor market was tight. But now he’s had no trouble finding willing workers.

“Right now, if I put an ad in, I could get anywhere from 200 to 400 applications from local workers,” Wheelock said.

Darst Atherly said he has so many inquiries from job seekers that he doesn’t need to advertise when a spot opens at his firm.

“I get three to five calls a week from people seeking employment, despite having no ads and despite telling people I’m not hiring,” Atherly said.

Overseeing H-2B visas
That has driven Atherly, Wheelock and other forest contractors to complain that their competitors might be skirting labor requirements that companies must advertise for jobs and accept American applicants before seeking foreign workers.

American University law professor Jayesh Rathod, who co-authored a recent report on abuses in the Maryland crab industry’s H-2B visa program, said critics have long questioned how closely the Department of Labor oversees the program.

“I think this is a general area of concern — how closely is the DOL looking at those attestations? Are they checking to see how thorough the recruitment process was, or are they accepting the claim on its face?” Rathod said.

Gomez dismissed complaints by other contractors as sour grapes. He said his company has to follow state and federal labor laws, just as other contractors must.

“I personally think it is just jealousy,” Gomez said.

It is NOT jealousy from these other contractors. I know for a fact that the laws and rules of the program from the DOL are often times skirted so the contractors can hire foreigners. With local unemployment rates as high as 16-18% in some counties in Oregon, give the jobs to those Americans who really want them. Not to the foreigners here on visas or illegaly. PatriotUSA

muhammad creates islam

A few ingredients are missing: Honor killings, beheadings,
Torture, Subjugation of women and other cultures, Persecution,
Dhimmi servitude, Pedophilia

The artist is unknown. if anyone knows please let me know.

Honor cabs now rolling in NYC

This is a picture that is up at Jihad Watch. SIOA is doing a great job with this.


Why socialism has failed. From RJ Moeller, Voice In The Wilderness

I have followed RJ Moeller's A Voice In The Wilderness for some time now. I think RJ has a unique insight and brings a fresh perspective into the field of politics, religion, economic and discussions about society. No, RJ is far from perfect and I do not always agree with him 100%. He is a Christian Conservative and he evn admits that the people he admires were not without their faults. In this next post RJ Moeller is writing about socialism and why it has failed, and will continue to fail. We have failed states of socialism all around us, especially in Europe. There is plenty of evidence. Is our system better than socialism? I think so but that was BEFORE massive government meddling and the burdens of excessive and stifling legislation. Socialism at it's roots was anti-religion and against God. There is no refuting that. If you have not read any of his previous articles please check them out here or go to his site. It may be best to start at the beginning and read Mere Conservatism Economics Parts 1 and 2. That way you will have a foundation and better understanding of where RJ Moeller is coming from. Hope you enjoy this.





Dostoevesky Was Right, And I Hate Socialism
By: R.J. Moeller

In the opening pages of his masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov Fyodor Dostoevsky gives a description of the key players the reader is to meet in his epic tale of generational sins and familial redemption. The third and virtuous Karamazov brother Alyosha is commended by the narrator not only for his devout and fervent faith in God, but the methodic patience and due diligence he exhibits in his pursuit of moral truth and wisdom. In contrast to the rudder-less passion that so many young people of that generation (1860's Russia) had for new and constantly-changing "causes," Alyosha is described as follows:

"The path he chose was a path going in the opposite direction of many his age, but he chose it with the same thirst for swift achievement. As soon as he reflected seriously on it, he was convinced and convicted of the existence of God and of the immortality of the soul, and at once he instinctively said to himself: 'I want to live for immortality with Him and I will accept no compromise.'


In the same way, if he had decided that God and immortality did not exist, he would at once have become an atheist and socialist. For socialism is not merely the labor question, but it is before all things the atheistic question, the question of the form taken by atheism today. It is the question of the tower of Babel built without God, not to mount to Heaven from earth but to set up Heaven on earth."

I couldn’t have said it better had I blogged it myself.

As much as I would love to write an entire column on the subtle genius of Dostoevsky’s analysis of the human condition in Brothers, let me focus like a laser-beam on the profound insight he made some 150 years ago regarding the “question” of socialism. Socialism, the economic and political theory that advocates for the state to control the means of production and oversee the distribution of resources, was relatively new back in Old Fyodor’s day and the assumption among intellectuals from Moscow to Mexico was that it would inevitably become the way all countries ran their government, society, and economy.

Now, with the winds of a century-and-a-half of unflattering evidence at our back, it ought to be much easier to identify the failings and false assumptions of countries that adopted Leftist (i.e. collectivist, Marxist, and socialist) creeds for the management of their nation. I say “ought to be easier” because it seems that each new generation in Western nations thinks that it will be the one to find that elusive utopian pot-of-gold at the end of their artificially-created, progressive rainbow. These dreamers have it set in their minds that the problems with socialist thought are all superficial ones.

If we only had the right leader. If people just knew the good intentions we have in trying to help them. If the citizenry could just be educated properly. If the right piece of legislation were to be passed. If bothersome things like the traditional family structure and local church were to disappear.

Equally frustrating are the responses (or lack thereof) from Americans who don’t believe in top-down socialism, yet remain unconvinced that those who do believe in it are supporting something that is a potential threat to their way of life.

We’re not going to turn into Cuba tomorrow, so why all the fuss? Progressive liberals aren’t really advocating socialism. The American system is too strong to be disrupted by a few rabble-rousers at Harvard and in the media. The Bible doesn’t say that much about “politics” so I don’t think we should even worry too much about it. Ever heard of “separation of church and state”, bro?

What the naïve on both sides of the political aisle in this country are missing is this: the problem with socialism is not simply this or that policy, this or that leader, this or that educational improvement. The problem with socialism (and any ideology using socialism as its proverbial North Star) is an inherent rejection of a Higher Power, mankind’s fallen state, and the immortality of the human soul.

Of course not every liberal, progressive, leftist, or out-right socialist is irreligious, but the ideas that have fueled the ideological Left’s engine for two centuries (about the same amount of time America’s Judeo-Christian, free-market value system has been in place) come from the minds of irreligious men and have almost exclusively produced irreligious results.

This matters, or should matter, to anyone who claims to believe in God. Almost any recent study puts that number at about 90% of Americans. In the 18th and 19th centuries, thinkers such as Robert Owen, Henri de Saint-Simon, and Friedrich Engels began to lay the intellectual groundwork for socialism’ move from a fringe idea to the most dominant socio-political force of the 20th century. They rejected private property. They loathed the excesses and exploits of industrialization. They believed in the supremacy of science and the ability of the enlightened human mind to coordinate the activities of millions of less-enlightened human beings.

Above all else they denied the existence of a personal, rational God and any moral code for living He might have.

This aversion to the divine wasn’t some peripheral, incidental motivation for the founders of modern socialism: it was as foundational to their ethos as “endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights” is to the American one. Committed socialists have always been either adamantly anti-religious, or at the very least, unrelenting critics of religion.

Belief in a Higher Power carries with it certain realities for our day-to-day lives, and even for the way we construct a society and government. For example, it requires humility to acknowledge “there is a God, and I’m not Him.” Such humility is a precursor for the acceptance that mankind is not inherently good, but actually inherently flawed (and in need of redemption). If I’m flawed, then we’re all flawed. If we’re all flawed, then the idea that we can centralize power in the hands of a few and trust their good will and judgment to organize the lives of 300 million people living in the most technologically-advanced, complex civilization in human history becomes untenable (and literally impossible).

Social engineering, an irreplaceable plank in the socialist platform, never works because of the complexities of even the simplest societies and so the socialist committed to science and logic is left floating in the wind with an idea that doesn’t produce the results their theories promised it would.

It is here that the secular collectivist and socialist, realizing that no matter how hard they try they can never fully eradicate man’s primal desire for higher truths and objective standards, begins to invoke language that is soaked in moral, religious connotations. Words like “justice”, “compassion”, and “fairness” are bandied about on the Left by everyone from Karl Marx to Bill Maher. To compound the confusing, contradictory positions they take, socialists seek out religious leaders sympathetic to their anti-capitalist, anti-establishment message.

As I wrote about last summer, Barack Obama moved to Chicago 25 years ago for this very reason. An atheist until his late 20’s, then Barry Obama responded to an ad in The New York Times looking for a young, articulate minority activist to come work in the South-side neighborhoods of the Windy City to help advance the secular-socialist dream of fundamentally changing America as envisioned by the grand puba of community organizing: Saul Alinsky. The people that recruited Obama were, like Alinsky before them, white secular socialists who thought that their inability to capture the hearts and minds of the black and Latino neighborhoods had to do more with the color of their own skin than their revolutionary message. What Barack Obama found out from a local pastor named Jeremiah Wright was that to be taken seriously in these predominantly religious communities, young Obama would have to be in church on Sundays.

Dostoevsky had something to say about this wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing tactic the secular-Left constantly employs as well. During a conversation later in Book One of Brothers Karamazov, a minor character named Peter Miusov recalls the words of a French police inspector put in charge of squashing the 1848 socialist uprising in France.

“We are not particularly afraid of all these socialists, anarchists, atheists, and revolutionists; we keep watch on them and follow all of their doings. But there are a few peculiar men among them who believe in God and are Christians, but are at the same time socialists. Those are the people we are most afraid of…The Christian who is a socialist is to be dreaded far more than the socialist who is an atheist.”

This unholy union between church and big-State proponents is as ironic as it is prevalent throughout the history of the last two centuries. While I can never know the heart or real motivation of someone who claims to believe in both the God of the bible and the tenets of socialism, I can know (and judge) their actions and the results of the things they publicly promote.

I want to be as clear as I possibly can: I hate socialism, in all its various forms and guises. I hate it like I hate the habitual, willful sins in my life that I struggle with on a daily basis. I hate it like I hate the thought of someone who has access to clean water refusing to drink it in favor of contaminated pond-water just because they dislike the person offering them the bottle of Aquifina.

It doesn’t matter if we’re talking about the political, economic, or historical aspects of socialism: it all stinks (and to high heavens).

Rejecting socialism and the notion that the centralization of power and redistribution of income are compatible with liberty and prosperity does not mean that one must instantly become a Ronald Reagan-loving capitalist. It also doesn’t mean that every opponent of socialism has to sign their name to a theologically uniform document, or even be a religious person themselves.

My concern today is two-fold: First that those of you reading this that do hold Judeo-Christian convictions would at least recognize the fundamental rejection of God that lay at the very heart of socialist (Leftist) thought. And second, whether you are a believer or not, that you would have had your intellect intrigued enough to set out to find out if I’m accurate in my appraisal (or at least my agreement with Dostoevsky’s appraisal) of socialism.

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” -Winston Churchill

Original article can be found here

Ever had a job? Comparing present and past administrations

I am going to post this just to toss it out here. I tried to find the source and so did my friend, Jon who sent it to me. Seems it originated out of Tyler, Texas from a Kindergarten teacher in the Tyler School District. You can already guess who the 'winner' will be.





Here is an interesting one.... Ever Had A Job ?

A chart that showed past presidents and the percentage of each president's cabinet appointees who had previously worked in the private sector - you know, a real life business, not a government job? Remember what that is? A private business?




*Roosevelt - 38%*
*Taft - 40%*
*Wilson - 52%*
*Harding - 49%*
*Coolidge - 48%*
*Hoover - 42%*
*FDR - 50%*
*Truman - 50%*
*Eisenhower - 57%*
*Kennedy - 30%*
*LBJ - 47%*
*Nixon - 53%*
*Ford - 42%*
*Carter - 32%*
*Reagan - 56%*
*GHWB - 51%*
* Clinton - 39%*
*GWB - 55%


*And the Chicken Dinner Winner is.........................*






*Obama - 8%* ----

This is the guy who wants to tell YOU how to run YOUR life !

ONLY ONE IN TWELVE in the Obama Cabinet HAS EVER HAD A JOB.

*YEP, EIGHT PERCENT !

And these are the guys holding a "job summit"; going to tell us how to
run our businesses, make our decisions for us? Do you want to trust them
with every aspect of your life?

Thanks to Jon Alva Murphy who sent this in.

Supporting a true patriot: U.S. citizen from Traction Control

I am posting several links here from U.S. Citizen who does Traction Control. USC is also a FFL dealer and has a commercial site where he sells guns and ammo. USC was up in Alaska to help out Joe Miller who is running against Lisa Murkowski. I have never liked Lisa Murkowski and what you see below will explain why. She does not really support gun ownership unless it plays to her advantage. She has had the support of the NRA in the past but to that I say big deal. The NRA sold itself out recently by throwing in with the democrats on some critical legislation that affected all us who strongly believe in the second amendment, and the Constitution as the law of the United States. Why would USC go north to Alaska from his home state of Texas to support the campaign of Joe Miller. Read on for the reasons. Even if you do not live in Alaska, support Joe Miller and help get the word out.




What About Guns? Alaska’s Sen. Murkowski Comes Up Short
By US Citizen/Traction Control

There was one thing I didn’t see at Joe Miller’s campaign site. So I asked, “What about guns?”

Joe Miller’s Research Director, Matt Johnson informed me that Joe is:

∙ A Lifetime member of the NRA (since his teen years)

∙ A former FFL Dealer

∙ A former member of the West Point Rifle Team

∙ A hunter

∙ A .50 BMG Long-Range shooter and

∙ A serious gun collector

Matt also pointed out that his opponent previously held a “D” rating with the NRA while in the Alaska State House, that is until she participated in a NRA fund raiser.

Ms Murkowski is still labeled a “pro-gun compromiser” by Gun Owners of America, who now rate her at just a “B”.

GOA also notes that Lisa Murkowski was one of the Rebublican votes in the confirmation of the rabidly anti-gun Eric Holder.

‘Nuf said. I’m with Joe!

—-

P.S. So is the taxi driver who took me to the campaign headquarters – he said, “Murkowski doesn’t have the stones to stand up for Alaska or to build the kind of coalitions needed to get things done in D.C.”

Wow!


------------------------------------


                                         Joe Miller campaign site

At the Joe Miller for Senate Campaign
By US Citizen/Traction Control

I had the opportunity to speak with Matt Johnson of the Joe Miller for Senate campaign today in Anchorage.


Joe is running against incumbent Republican Lisa Murkowski in the Alaska Republican Primary coming up on August 24th.

Comparison on the issues:

(Source: http://joemiller.us/live/compare/)

ISSUE:  MILLER     MURKOWSKI

WALL STREET BAILOUTS Tarp
Miller: Oppossed  Murkowski Voted in favor of (Read more)


OBAMACARE   
Miller: SUPPORTS REPEAL Mukowski OPPOSES REPEAL (Read more)

MUST SHOW PHOTO ID TO VOTE (TO COMBAT VOTER FRAUD)
Miller: Supports Murkowski: Voted Against (Read More)

AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
Miller: OPPOSES  MUkowski:VOTED IN FAVOR OF (Read More)

MEXICO CITY POLICY (PROHIBITING U.S. TAXPAYER FUNDING OF ABORTIONS OVERSEAS)
Miller: OPPOSED REPEALING  Murkowski: VOTED IN FAVOR OF REPEALING (read more)

RIGHT TO LIFE: Miller:  PRO-LIFE Murkowski: PRO-CHOICE (read more)

CAP AND TRADE TAX 
MIller: OPPOSES Murkowski: SUPPORTS (read more)

THE DESTRUCTION OF LIVING HUMAN EMBRYOS FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
Miller: OPPOSES Murkowski:VOTED IN FAVOR OF (read more)

SECURE THE BORDER (FUNDING THE BORDER FENCE)
Miller: SUPPORTS Murkowski: VOTED AGAINST (read more)

NEW ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS
Miller: OPPOSES  Murkowski: VOTED IN FAVOR OF (read more)

FEDERAL HATE CRIMES LAWS
Miller: OPPOSES MUrkowski: VOTED IN FAVOR OF (read more)

Even though Lisa Murkowski was endorsed by the NRA-ILA in 2004 with “A” Rating on Second Amendment support, she expressed concern over the NRA’s scoring of the Sotomeyer confirmation votes (August 2009 – National Journal article).

It seems to me that Ms. Murkowski enjoys the NRA’s support, but chafes under the obligations that come with it.

Joe Miller’s campaign is fighting an uphill battle – outmatched in funding 20 to 1 and currently trailing in the polls.

But with just less than on month before the Primary vote, the campaign has high hopes that recent endorsements like that of Erick Erickson (RedState), Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Lars Larson, Laura Ingraham and others (like your humble host at Traction Control) will give Joe Miller the visibility and support he needs to enable him to be the next Senator for the State of Alaska!

Tags: Abortion, national security, Illegal aliens, illegal immigration,national security, Islam, gun rights, Joe Miller, Alaska Senate, Lisa Murkowski To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!