Exposing the Myth of Moderate Islam

From the original article, by Ali Sina, a former Muslim:

• "I have always maintained that “moderate Muslim” is an oxymoron. We have two kinds of Muslims: Terrorist Muslims and ignorant Muslims. The former are those who know Islam well and live by its dictums. The latter have no clue about their religion and have an idealized image of Islam that has no basis in fact." (We had a commenter like that here recently)


• "If Fatah is astonished it is because he, like most Muslims, has not read the history of Islam. Few Muslims care to investigate their religion. The references to Muhammad’s raids, rapes and lootings can also be found in the Quran. Muslims chant the Quran for thawab (reward), but they don’t study it and often don’t understand what they read."


• "The hatred of the Jews is in the Quran. The first sura of this book is a prayer where Muslims supplicate to Allah, “Show us the straight path. The path of those whom Thou hast favored; not the (path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray.”
  Muslims agree that “those whom Allah has favored,” are Muslims, “those who earn Allah’s anger,” and “those who go astray” are Jews, and Christians, respectively.
  Jews are stereotyped as greedy in all Muslim countries. This is due to quranic verse that says Jews “cling to life more eagerly than any other people. …every one of them would love to live a thousand years,” but they will burn I hell. (2:96)
  Many verses of the Quran portray the Jews as evil doers, wicked, transgressors, prophet killers, and despised by God. Because Muhammad hated the Jews, Muslims will always hate the Jews. This hatred is inseparable from Islam."


• "Former Muslims hate Islam because we hate discrimination against women, violence against non-Muslims, dictatorship and imposition of faith that characterizes the true Islam, and because we know the damage that his overgrown cult has done to our people, our culture and our countries. We don’t shrug our shoulders when asked for the solution. Obviously this “hardened secular Muslim” was so traumatized that he could no longer hear what Wafa Sultan was saying.
  Former Muslims propose telling the truth as the solution. We believe that truth can set us free. Former Muslims do not advocate violence and hate against our own kin, brothers, sisters, parents, and loved ones. We strive for their freedom and their right to know the truth. We oppose censorship and political correctness that have enslaved the truth. Truth can hurt our feelings, but lies will kill us."


• "Islam is not tolerant because Muhammad was not tolerant. This does not mean all Muslims are intolerant. There have been many Islamic rulers who were tolerant, but they went against the canons of Islam, as many do today. That is why the jihadists who follow the true Islam are attacking these Muslim rulers."

---

The full article on faithfreedom.org: Exposing the Myth of Moderate Islam.

Youtube Muslim flagging campaigns, and user censorship

We must remember that the fight is everywhere, and that defending free speech, while at the same time raising awareness to the methods used by Islamists to suppress the rest of humanity, is something any humble person can do.
Now, unlike the woman who made this video, I am not so forgiving of Youtube's cop out choices. Apparently if you flag a video enough times, it doesn't go to a moderator, as should be, but is instantly suspended.
Since Youtube executives don't live in a dream world, where everybody tells the truth, we can safely assume this conscious business decision was made to save some bucks.
The result is censorship without any real cause, that forces video uploaders to fight the system along with the Islamic horde.

---

Some Thoughts on the Election

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk

Last night, I spent the evening flipping back and forth between Fox and MSNBC (aka DNC Hqs) to compare and contrast their election coverage. In my (biased) view, Fox handled it professionally. Their commentators were a mix of liberal and conservative. MSNBC, on the other hand, was MSNBC. The five commentators were Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and Eugene (Chuckles) Robinson, partisans all . Ed Schultz, the butter and egg man, was in Las Vegas covering the Reid campaign HQs. To put it mildly, the mood at MSNBC was gloomy-and angry.


During their coverage, they interviewed Republicans like Michelle Bachmann and Eric Cantor. The tone of the interviews was angry, aggressive and insulting. Matthews could barely contain his anger, while Olbermann proceeded to mock each of them.

"If you cut taxes, how's the government gonna get money?"

How about, "They aren't getting it."

You talk about unprofessional.


"Ya talk about chickensh--!"

Of course, they cheered up when Reid won. I thought they were going to pop the champagne corks when it was announced that the "white shining knight of the Democratic Party" had prevailed over Sharron Angle.

Also gloomy and angry was Florida congressman and 2010 Fousesquawk "Jerk of the Year", Alan Grayson, who made this "graceful" concession speech:




So the Republicans gained some 62 seats and swept into power in the House. They appear to have gained 5 Senate seats with a couple still being counted, and Lisa Murkowsky appears to have classlessly won Alaska-after she was beaten in the primary. The big disappointment for the Republicans was that Harry Reid and his "ground team" prevailed in Nevada. On the other hand, Nancy Pelosi is now the Spoker of the House.



Other less noted victories are the gain in governorships and the fact that 19 state legislatures changed from Democrat to Republican. That will have consequences with re-districting and the 2012 elections.

California on the other hand, continued its mad drive off the cliff by exhuming Jerry Brown and putting him back in the governor's office. They might as well have filled the hole with California and shoveled the dirt back over it. Barbara Boxer was re-elected based on her long record of partisan bickering and no legislative achievements. Proposition 23 went down insuring the implementation of California's Global Warming Final Solutions Act.

Indeed.

In addition, all the old Dems were re-elected; in other words, California sealed its doom. It is now clearer than ever before that the makers in the state are outnumbered by the takers-aided by the liberal elite. There is nothing left other than for sensible people to get out and leave the state to the illegal aliens and Hollywood set.

I just hope the Republicans don't do what they did in 1994 when they were swept into power and forgot why they were elected. I guarantee you that if the Republicans do not fulfill their promises this time, they will become America's third party (after the Tea Party, which will go from being a movement to a bonafide party). The Republicans on are probation. I hope they understand that. Their mission is to stop the Obama agenda.

Why Israel is a rogue state, in a good way

From Elder of Zion:
On October 21st, the Cambridge Union Society held a debate on the motion that "Israel is a rogue state".
In the end, the proposition was defeated, but the event didn't proceed without an unusual twist. It seems one of the members of the side in favor of the proposition, decided to argue the point from a decidedly pro-Israel perspective.

This student gave five great reasons why Israel is a rogue state, for which he was later banned from the union. Read all about them in the full article.

Why we should thank obama: Guest post

I received permission to post Amil's commentary here. Last post for today, I promise!!

"Why we should thank Mr. Obama:

Guest post by Amil.

I see many similarities between OBAMA and Ahmadinejad. Both are radicals and both are on the path of the destruction of the world. Maybe we in America should thank Mr. Obama after all as one 82-year-old lady puts it and says why she thanks God for him.


1. Obama destroyed the Clinton Political Machine, driving a stake through the heart of Hillary's presidential aspirations - something no Republican was ever able to do.


2. Obama killed off the Kennedy Dynasty - no more Kennedys trolling Washington looking for women wanting rides home.


3. Obama is destroying the Democratic Party before our eyes! Dennis Moore had never lost a race. Evan Bayh had never lost a race. Byron Dorgan had never lost a race. Harry Reid - soon to be GONE, and Nancy Pelosi, will lose her position of leader of the house! These are just a handful of the Democrats whose political careers Obama has destroyed. By the end of 2010, dozens more will be gone. Just think, in December of 2008 the Democrats were on the rise. In the last two election cycles, they had picked up 14 Senate seats and 52 House seats. The press was touting the death of the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party. However, in just one year, Obama put a stop to all of this and will probably give the House - if not the Senate - back to the Republicans.


4. Obama has completely exposed liberals and progressives for what they are. Sadly, every generation seems to need to re-learn the lesson on why they should never actually put liberals in charge. Obama is bringing home the lesson very well: Liberals tax, borrow and spend. Liberals won't bring themselves to protect America. Liberals want to take over the economy. Liberals think they know what is best for everyone. Liberals are not happy until they are running YOUR life.


5. Obama has brought more Americans back to conservatism than anyone since Reagan. In one year, he has rejuvenated the Conservative Movement and brought out to the streets millions of freedom loving Americans. Name one other time when you saw your friends and neighbors this interested in taking back America!


6. Obama, with his 'amazing leadership,' has sparked the greatest period of sales of firearms and ammunition this country has seen. Law abiding citizens have rallied and have provided a 'stimulus' to the sporting goods field while other industries have failed, faded, or moved off-shore.


7. In all honesty, one year ago I was more afraid than I have been in my life. Not afraid of the economy, but afraid of the direction our country was going. I thought,Americans have forgotten what this country is all about. My neighbors and friends, even strangers, have proved to me that my lack of confidence in the greatness and wisdom of the American people has been flat wrong.


8. When the American people wake up, no smooth talking teleprompter reader can fool them! Barack Obama has served to wake up these great Americans! Again, I want to say: 'Thank you, Barack Obama you who refuse to admit that you are a Muslim!' After all, this is exactly the kind of hope and change we desperately needed!!"

Of the non-people

Sam Hindu has provided a lengthy article detailing the history that has led to the creation of the province known as 'Palestine', as well as the people who inhabit it.
In his own words, "how did this myth of a non-existent people and non-existent land of “Filastin” became the talking point of every Moslim in the world."
I'm sure most of our readers would recognize the Philistines from the bible. As a coherent group, they have long stopped to exist before the Romans punished the rebellious Judeans by renaming their homeland.

---

For the rest of this fascinating story, please visit the link below:
Myth of a non-existent people

Paul Weston Speak at the Amsterdam Rally for Free Speech- pro-wilders 30th october

Everything Paul Weston states is true. Great video! I am posting what I can. I may have to stay off rest of today. Did too much yesterday. My fingers and thumb are very swollen and I am just too stubborn
but better back off a bit, sigh......




Hat tip: Gates Of Vienna and KitmanTV

Terrible pictures of starving Gazans

Yesterday, a friend shared with me an article from a mainstream (read: leftist) news site about the terrible condition of the abused Islamic hordes in Gaza.

Would you look at these poor guys? Their stuck out bellies... nothing but skin and bones. Word has it these unfortunate victims of Israeli genocidal policies eat only six protein filled meals a day, making the fat, piggish Jews in the holocaust look like hedonist kings in comparison. I'll repeat, in order to make it clear to you heartless, imperialist, capitalist conservatives...

This is a starving Gazan:

And this is a fat Jew:

Remember that the next time you think supporting Israel against a billion Muslims is ok. The horror knows no bounds!

---

Bodybuilding contest held in Gaza (the English version is much shorter than the Hebrew one, for reasons I can only speculate on).

Failed quadrangle of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia

This is an outstanding article that was sent to me by Sam Hindu. The article was originally found at Ali Sina's outstanding site: FaithFreedom.org. I have had this in the line up for a few days and just decided to get it posted without much commentary by me. Little if any is needed and a big thanks to Sam Hindu who does an outstanding job with his site!

---

USA: failed quadrangle of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia
By Lee Jay Walker

President Obama likes to talk about human dignity and human rights but clearly he, just like other leaders of America, irrespective if Democrat or Republican, can’t bypass the lure of major military contracts irrespective of the reality of modern day Saudi Arabia. It also appears that lessons learnt from Pakistan have been zero. Therefore, today you have two nations which are responsible for so much of global terrorism but ironically both these nations have been military armed and supported politically by America.


It is also abundantly clear that Pakistan is an unstable nuclear power and this nation state is threatened by its own internal policies towards radical　Sunni Islamic organizations and the threat posed by Islamists to the nation state. Just like Pakistan, the nation state of Saudi Arabia is also unstable in the long-term because the ruling monarchy rules via an “iron-fist” and clearly this nation is the most draconian in the modern world.


If Islamists overthrew the power mechanisms of both governments in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia then a strong and potent military will be bequeathed to radical Sunni Islamists and regional nations, for example India and Israel, will be threatened.


In both wars in Afghanistan and Iraq it is clear that Sunni Islamic organizations and terrorist organizations were (and continue to be) behind much of the mayhem that engulfed both nations after the tragic events of September 11th. Given this, it is abundantly clear that American troops and military forces from other nations who supported America, have been killed because of the policies of so-called allies and this applies to either tacit support, covert support, or by doing little to prevent Sunni Islamists from spreading their hatred in both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.


Vojin Joksimovich the author of The Revenge of the Prophet, states that “The long-term strategy is proselytism of Islam and Wahhabi Islam in particular. French scholar Giles Kepel used the term ‘petrodollar Islam’ for a vast infusion of proselytizing wealth from Saudi Arabia. Proselytism and the checkbook diplomacy long have been the Saudis’ principal foreign policy tools. The Saudis have built thousands of mosques worldwide. While the Islamist terrorism is being challenged the petrodollar Islam quest is yet to receive due attention.” (Page 11 – Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich)


Vojin Joksimovich continues by stating “At the core is the U.S.-Saudi bond starting with the 1945 Quincy Deal signed by President Roosevelt…….Part of the deal was American non-interference in Saudi domestic policies…..At the same time Saudi Arabia is the fortress of strict Wahhabism, its state religion, which represents the most radical branch of Sunni Islam determined to proselytize its version of Islam to the West. The House of Saud underwrote the religious schools that turn out jihadists, just as it administered charities that funded the jihadists. Addiction to cheap oil and Saudi petrodollars caused the U.S. to turn a blind eye to Saudi support of the fundamentalist groups linked to terrorism. A New Statesman report summarized: ‘Bin Laden and his gang are just the tentacles; the head lies safely in Saudi Arabia, protected by U.S. forces.’”


“There is substantive evidence of complicity on the part of prominent Saudi and Pakistani citizens in 9/11. Nonetheless, the 9/11 Commission and the White House gave the Saudi and Pakistanis a free pass because Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are treated as historic U.S. allies.” (Page 12 – The Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich)


Turning back to the proposed military deal with Saudi Arabia and continuing support for Pakistan via enormous economic support, it is clear that while America may take note of Israel, the same does not apply to India to any great extent. After all, from terrorist attacks in Kashmir to the tragic terrorist attack in Mumbai, it is clear that all roads lead back to Pakistan and supporting terrorism directly or covertly or via non-compliance of preventing terrorism, is a reality.


B. Raman (Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi) commented after the leader of India visited Saudi Arabia (Feb 27-Mar 1, 2010) that “Like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia has been following a dual policy on terrorism. It has taken ruthless action against Al Qaeda elements posing a threat to its internal security. At the same time, it has avoided taking action against Wahhabi organizations which have been supporting terrorism in other countries. Many of the so-called charity organizations, which have been funding terrorist organizations in other countries including India and Bangladesh, are of Saudi origin. Despite international pressure on Saudi Arabia to act against such charity organizations and stop the flow of funds to global jihadi terrorism, the action taken by the Saudi authorities has been unsatisfactory.Quotes from Outlook India at http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264502


It would be futile to expect that Saudi Arabia could be of assistance to India in dealing with jihadi terrorism emanating from Pakistan or Bangladesh. There has been a long history of links between jihadi terrorist elements in India and Saudi Arabia ever since the demolition of the Babri Masjid in December, 1992.”


Despite this reality, and the fact that Saudi Arabia is spreading radical Sunni Islam to countless numbers of nations it is more than apparent that America, and a host of other democratic nations, are either turning a blind eye or giving tacit approval or intelligence services are sleepwalking into a future nightmare or indeed a combination of all three.


After all, what are democratic nations getting in return in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia? It appears that the answer is negative because despite vast resources being spent on Afghanistan it is clear that this nation supports killing converts to Christianity from Islam, keeping women in chains, and to maintain the power mechanisms of Islamic Sharia law.


The Taliban and Al-Qaeda are also destabilizing Afghanistan because of the reality of Pakistan and the dangerous game being played by elements within the Pakistan ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence). For democratic India this is a nightmare and a continuing nightmare because Kashmir and terrorist attacks like Mumbai are clear reminders that “terrorism is a tool within the body politic of Pakistan.”


In Saudi Arabia it is much the same and many Sunni Islamic terrorist attacks in Iraq were because of the involvement of Saudi nationals. This applies to direct terrorist attacks, economic funding, supporting radical Sunni Islamic organizations, spreading propaganda, and weakening the role of the central government in Iraq by playing the Sunni-Shia sectarian card.


At the same time not one single non-Muslim place of worship is allowed in Saudi Arabia and women are trampled on and this applies to preventing women from speaking openly, going shopping in mixed shopping malls, driving cars, and dressing how they desire.


More alarming for the international community is that Saudi Arabian organizations and charities are spreading a dangerous Wahhabi ideology to many nations, irrespective if to mainly Muslim nations or non-Muslim nations. Stealth jihad within democratic nations is also a serious issue and it is clear that Saudi Arabia is exporting a two-fold version of Islam and this applies to militant Islam and liberal Islam in order to cause confusion and mayhem, via deceit and ulterior long-term motives.


Therefore, economic support which is being given by Western nations in Afghanistan is merely adding fuel to the fire because it is supporting the implementation of Islamic Sharia law and discrimination against women and non-Muslims. At the same time by supporting Pakistan and Saudi Arabia the end game from an Islamist point of view is that both nations can spread Islam to distant lands and destabilize other nations by using terrorism.


This means that India is facing the brunt of this failed policy towards Pakistan and radical Sunni Islam is growing within parts of India and of course the terrorist threat is never far away. In Iraq the same happened because much of the Sunni Islamic instability is based on the Saudi Arabian angle and this applies to terrorism, spreading hatred towards the Shia, and maintaining instability in order that democracy does not threaten the power base of regional despots.


For the Christian community in Iraq which is under siege it is clear that they were mere fodder. After all, the Christian community was left to face the brunt of radical Islam, and just like the Hindus of Kashmir, they have been abandoned and forsaken in order to appease Islamists and Islamization. How ironic that Iraq was secular, just like Afghanistan under Najibullah, however, both Iraq and Afghanistan would implement Islamic Sharia law after America became entangled and created a “hornets nest.”


Therefore, the three conservative Islamic nations of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, are allowed to trample non-Muslim minorities and to maintain that women stay in the shadows. At the same time, militant Islamic organizations are spreading to other parts of the world because of the role of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and the money and educational supply route is creating mayhem within majority Muslim nations and within the non-Muslim democratic world.


Western governments appear to be at a loss because continuing Islamic immigration, radical Islamic organizations, and the radical Islamic convert conveyor belt keeps on churning out jihad at home and enabling Islamists to spread their hatred far and wide. Meanwhile liberal Muslims jump on the bandwagon and condemn any minor slight against Islam in order to install fear and stealth jihad. Also, Muslim rights appear to be higher for national governments rather than the rights of the majority because appeasement mode is holding sway.


Vojin Joksimovich states that “The most pressing underlying root cause is the Saudi Wahhabi-led petrodollar hegemony over the Islamic world, typically but not exclusively exercised through organizations like the Muslim World League, Organization of Islamic Conference, various Islamic so-called humanitarian organizations, etc.”


Vojin Joksimovich continues by stating that “It is imperative to starve these terrorist organizations of financial resources and recruits. The present generation of Western leaders has been unwilling to take bold steps for two primary reasons: The oil addiction in what could be termed Petrolistan as well as the petrodollars ploughed back into the Western economies and various individual and corporate coffers.” Page 305 – The Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich)


It is clear that when communism collapsed in Eastern Europe that Western powers supported democracy and they did not desire to pro-up communism. However, when it comes to the Islamic world it is apparent that Western powers either pro-up or re-install Islam, Islamic Sharia law, and state control by this indoctrination.


After all, Christians did not fear the role of Islamic Sharia law in the pre-attacked Iraq and irrespective of what people think about Najibullah in Afghanistan it is clear that he at least tried to break the chain. However, both times America re-enforced the Islamic Sharia law chain by overthrowing the leader of Iraq and by supporting Islamists in Afghanistan.


Could it just be that India is expendable in order to appease Pakistan? Could it just be that Christians in Iraq were expendable in order to appease the house of Islam? If so, then are Western societies also expendable with regards to allowing radical Islam to grow and by continuing to allow Muslim immigration which is altering the make-up of many nations in Europe?


Also, why are American troops and allied forces being killed with the tacit approval of so-called allies in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia? It appears somewhat strange to fight wars in Afghanistan and Iraq while supporting Pakistan and Saudi Arabia on the military and economic front.


B. Raman in response to recent support by America towards Pakistan stated that “The Pakistan army uses the Punjabi Taliban against India in an attempt to force a change in the status quo in Jammu and Kashmir. It has been using Al Qaeda, the Pashtun Taliban and their global jihadi allies for extracting money out of the US by dangling the threat of another 9/11 over the US head if it does not pay protection money to the Pakistan army.”


“Despite the blunt words reportedly used by Obama, Mrs. Clinton and Gates in more restricted interactions, more protection money was forthcoming in the form of a five-year commitment (2021-2016) of US $2.29 billion in military aid euphemistically called counter-terrorism assistance. This will be in continuation of the allocation of US $1.5 billion provided by the George Bush Administration in 2005 and of the civilian aid of US $7.5 billion over five-year period already being provided by the Obama Administration since last year under the Kerry Lugar Act.” (http://ramanstrategicanalysis.blogspot.com) (October 24, 2010)


This, and the proposed mega military deal by the Obama Administration with Saudi Arabia, merely shows you that the “war on terror” is being fought by propping up allies who are increasing the “war on terror” and exporting Islamic radicalism and terrorism to nations like India, the United Kingdom, and a host of other nation states.


Therefore, despite knowing that Islamists are spreading their hatred from both so-called allies and in the full knowledge that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are exporting radical Islam; it appears that for Obama, and other Western leaders, that the same record must be played. The hidden danger of this policy and untold carnage which is continuing because of these “two ace of spades (Pakistan and Saudi Arabia)” is alarming many but it appears that it isn’t alarming the people in power in Washington, London, and other nations, who support this policy of “no reward and Islamic appeasement.”


Collectively this means more terrorism and the spread of Islamic militancy and instead of containing Islam it is spreading its power and thought patterns to the democratic world. The situation in blunt terms means that all other faiths are being crushed or persecuted by the allies of America in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. However, in the backyard of America and the democratic world we are witnessing the rise of Islam and stealth jihad. Therefore, it appears that America, India, the United Kingdom, and the free world, must brace itself for either confrontation or to be taken over brick by brick and end up like the graveyard of Buddhists and Hindus in Afghanistan and Pakistan respectively.


Lee Jay Walker


BOOK – The Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich

Original article is here.

Hat tip to Sam Hindu.

Sharia Law for Non-Muslims: The kafir

Posting without commentary due to my hand. From Bill Warner and Political islam.

Sharia Law for Non-Muslims
Chapter 5—The Kafir
By Bill Warner


Until now we have looked at the big picture of Sharia and then the position of women in Sharia. We now come to a new subject--the unbeliever or non-Muslim. The word "non-Muslim" is used in the translation of Sharia law, but the actual Arabic word used is "Kafir". But the word Kafir means far more than non-Muslim. The original meaning of the word was "concealer", one who conceals the truth of Islam.


The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as "unbeliever" but this translation is wrong. The word "unbeliever" is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.


There are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.


Islam devotes a great amount of energy to the Kafir. The majority (64%) of the Koran is devoted to the Kafir, and nearly all of the Sira (81%) deals with Mohammed's struggle with them. The Hadith (Traditions) devotes 32% of the text to Kafirs1. Overall, the Trilogy devotes 60% of its content to the Kafir.

Hadith 37%
Sira 81%
Koran 64%
Total 60%

Amount of Text Devoted to the Kafir


The Sharia does not devote nearly that much to the Kafir since Sharia law is primarily for Muslims. Besides, the Kafir has few rights, so there is little to expound on.


Religious Islam is what Muslims do to go to Paradise and avoid Hell. What Mohammed did to Kafirs was not religious, but political. Political Islam is what is of concern to Kafirs, not the religion. Who cares how a Muslim worships, but every one of us is concerned as to what they do to us and say about us. Political Islam should be of concern to every Kafir.


Here are two Sharia references about Kafirs:


w59.2 [...] And this clarifies the Koranic verses and hadiths about hatred for the sake of Allah and love for the sake of Allah, Al Walaa wa al Baraa, being unyielding towards the Kafirs, hard against them, and detesting them, while accepting the destiny of Allah Most High insofar as it is the decree of Allah Mighty and Majestic.


Hatred for the sake of Allah and love for the sake of Allah is called Al Walaa wa al Baraa, a fundamental principle of Islamic ethics and Sharia. A Muslim is to hate what Allah hates and love what Allah loves. Allah hates the Kafir, therefore, a Muslim is to act accordingly.


40:35 They [Kafirs] who dispute the signs [Koran verses] of Allah without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers [Muslims]. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart.


h8.24 It is not permissible to give zakat [charity] to a Kafir, or to someone whom one is obliged to support such as a wife or family member.


Here are a few of the Koran references: A Kafir can be mocked--


83:34 On that day the faithful will mock the Kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the Kafirs be paid back for what they did?


A Kafir can be beheaded--


47:4 When you encounter the Kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly.


A Kafir can be plotted against--


86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the Kafirs and leave them alone for a while.


A Kafir can be terrorized--


8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!"


A Muslim is not the friend of a Kafir--


3:28 Believers should not take Kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah's protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.


A Kafir is evil--


23:97 And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with You from the suggestions of the evil ones [Kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.


A Kafir is disgraced--


37:18 Tell them, "Yes! And you [Kafirs] will be disgraced."


A Kafir is cursed--


33:60 They [Kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah's same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah's ways.


KAFIRS AND THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK


Muslims tell Christians and Jews that they are special. They are "People of the Book" and are brothers in the Abrahamic faith. But in Islam you are a Christian, if and only if, you believe that Christ was a man who was a prophet of Allah; there is no Trinity; Jesus was not crucified nor resurrected and that He will return to establish Sharia law. To be a true Jew you must believe that Mohammed is the last in the line of Jewish prophets.


This verse is positive:


5:77 Say: Oh, People of the Book, do not step out of the bounds of truth in your religion, and do not follow the desires of those who have gone wrong and led many astray. They have themselves gone astray from the even way.


Islamic doctrine is dualistic, so there is an opposite view as well. Here is the last verse written about the People of the Book (A later verse abrogates or nullifies an earlier verse.). This is the final word. It calls for Muslims to make war on the People of the Book who do not believe in the religion of truth, Islam.


9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya] and they are humiliated.


The sentence "They do not forbid..." means that they do not accept Sharia law; "until they submit" means to submit to Sharia law. Christians and Jews who do not accept Mohammed as the final prophet are Kafirs.


Muslims pray five times a day and the opening prayer always includes:


Koran 1: 7 Not the path of those who anger You [the Jews] nor the path of those who go astray [the Christians].


LANGUAGE


Since the original Arabic word for unbelievers was Kafir and that is the actual word used in the Koran and Sharia law, that is the word used here for accuracy and precision.


It is very simple: if you don't believe Mohammed and his Koran, you are a Kafir.

Original article is here.