India and pakistan: separated and it is a darn good thing.

From Sam Hindu's blog and I have cleaned this up just a bit so it reads a bit easier and I know Sam does not mind. Can we imagine the mess, the bloodshed and carnage that would have plagued India had the two countries not separated? It is bad enough having pakistan as a neighbor.

**********************************************************************************

It was better that Pakistan got seperated from India

By Sam Hindu

SOME TIMES BY; SAM HINDU

Maybe some people call it wrong for Pakistan to have gotten separated. But actually I think it’s the best thing that happened to India. Because now India has freed itself from many Islamists.

If these Islamists had stayed in India, we can’t imagine how horrific things might have been inside India, from internal struggles to international wars caused by so called “Muslims.”

Now because Pakistan is separated, its easy to go on war with this country for the sake of our childrens future. It’s now much easy for all of us to fight Islam.

Hopefully at the end of this century Islam will be destroyed completely. It could not be better if  Pakistan had not separated from India. Islam is destroying itself, in this enlightening age, we can see its downfall.

The only people accepting Islam are either stupid like Zakir Naik who brain washes people using NLP.

These people are afraid to debate with Ali Sina. He is calling Ali out in front of  radical Muslims which will commit suicide bombings if Ali goes there. But we know Muslims are still living in 6th century.

So at the end of this century, our children and hopefully if we live, will see the end of Islam and Islamic ideology. We will see it that it was as bad as Nazis, maybe even worse.

Support spreading Ali Sina's message to save our children from the threats that come from islam and sharia law. 

Original article is here.

The Phenomenon of 'Hindu Terrorism' in India

This is an excellent article on Hindu terrorism. As mentioned, I am
keeping my comments quite brief so I can catch up a bit. I wanted to have a
lot more posts up but we have been having problems with our ISP. Late last
night we lost all Internet which was very upsetting.

Turns out the problem was defective modem and router. I will posting a lot

more over the weekend as I have a fair number of excellent posts in dry dock,

just waiting to be finished up.

Here is a snapshot of the next post:

"Internationally and in India, there is a contentious debate over whether terrorism should be identified by religious affiliation, e.g. as Islamic or Hindu terrorists. However, not all terrorists are described by religious identity, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian. In Pakistan, Muslims fighting for independence of Baluchistan province are known as Baluchi nationalist militants – but the Taliban and Al-Qaeda fighters are described as Islamic terrorists because they are fighting for the enforcement of Islamic Shari'a. In Sri Lanka, fighters of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) are not called Hindu terrorists. In Northern Ireland, Protestant or Catholic groups were not considered to be Christian terrorists, because they were not fighting to establish a Christian state.

In India itself, not all militants are described as Hindu terrorists. For example, leftist rebels are described as Maoist militants, or simply leftist rebels. However, Indian Muslim militants are dubbed Islamic terrorists, as they are fighting for an elusive Islamic victory.

Be all that as it may, the use of the term "Hindu terrorism" has rattled the RSS, BJP and other Hindu organizations in India, as all of them view themselves as true nationalists."

_________________________________________________________________________________

Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur under arrest 

Discussing the Phenomenon of 'Hindu Terrorism' in India

By Tufail Ahmad

On November 10, 2010, Mohan Bhagwat, the chief of the Hindu nationalist group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS, or the National Volunteer Organization), criticized the centrist Indian government for unleashing a campaign alleging the involvement of "Hindu terrorists" in several bomb blasts in predominantly Muslim towns in recent years.[1] He said that neither Hindus nor the RSS had ever been "synonymous with terrorism."[2]

The RSS was established in the 1920s as a patriotic organization, against British rule and Muslim separatism in India. Over the past decades, it has emerged as the mother of almost all Hindu nationalist organizations, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is the country's main right-wing opposition; Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP or World Hindu Council); Bajrang Dal; Shiv Sena; Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) (All India Students Council), which is the student wing of BJP; Hindu Jagran Manch; Shri Ram Sene; etc. These Hindu organizations are collectively known as Sangh Privar, i.e. the RSS family.

India's federal Minister for Women, Renuka Chowdhury, has described an attack on a pub by the Shri Ram Sene as an attempt to "Talibanize" India.[3]

The RSS chief's statement against equating terrorism with Hindus follows the arrests of several RSS-linked individuals for their role in a number of bomb blasts at the holy places of Indian Muslims. Currently, a huge controversy is raging in India over whether these individuals should be called "Hindu terrorists," while the Indian media is using the term "Hindu terrorist" to describe those arrested in connection with attacks on Muslim shrines and mosques, which were initially blamed on Indian Islamic terrorists.

Internationally and in India, there is a contentious debate over whether terrorism should be identified by religious affiliation, e.g. as Islamic or Hindu terrorists. However, not all terrorists are described by religious identity, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian. In Pakistan, Muslims fighting for independence of Baluchistan province are known as Baluchi nationalist militants – but the Taliban and Al-Qaeda fighters are described as Islamic terrorists because they are fighting for the enforcement of Islamic Shari'a. In Sri Lanka, fighters of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) are not called Hindu terrorists. In Northern Ireland, Protestant or Catholic groups were not considered to be Christian terrorists, because they were not fighting to establish a Christian state.

In India itself, not all militants are described as Hindu terrorists. For example, leftist rebels are described as Maoist militants, or simply leftist rebels. However, Indian Muslim militants are dubbed Islamic terrorists, as they are fighting for an elusive Islamic victory.

Be all that as it may, the use of the term "Hindu terrorism" has rattled the RSS, BJP and other Hindu organizations in India, as all of them view themselves as true nationalists.

I. Hindu Terrorism

In recent decades, India has witnessed several types of terrorism: a) Pakistan-backed terrorism in Kashmir and mainland India, carried out by mainly Pakistani and Kashmiri terrorists; b) armed Communist movements led by Naxalites, or the leftist guerrillas fighting against state institutions in several Indian states to enforce socialism; c) Indian Islamic militants, who are connected mainly to the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) – a purely indigenous Indian group which broke away from the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and has developed links internationally and, in recent decades, to Pakistan; d) Pakistani-Indian terrorist groups, a new breed of Indian-sounding groups such as Indian Mujahideen and Deccan Mujahideen, which were created in a bid by Pakistani intelligence and jihadist groups to deflect international criticism against Pakistan for supporting terrorism in India.

A decision by the Indian government to extend a ban on SIMI for an additional two years was confirmed by a Delhi court in August this year.[4] Detailed information about the Indian Mujahideen and Deccan Mujahideen are yet to fully come to light. Some militants arrested in India in recent years have been described as belonging to the Indian Mujahideen and Deccan Mujahideen, with their connections trailing to Pakistan. It seems that Pakistani groups have succeeded in roping in some Indian Muslim youth, who were disaffected by the 2002 anti-Muslim riots in the western state of Gujarat, where the right-wing BJP is in power.

The term Deccan, meaning "south," refers to the "southern" Indian city of Hyderabad, which is described by people in Pakistan as Hyderabad Deccan, as there is another Hyderabad town in Pakistan. An Indian will not call Hyderabad as Hyderabad Deccan, and therefore there is a strong likelihood that the name Deccan Mujahideen was coined by a Pakistani national.

However, recent terrorist attacks that have turned the focus of public debate on "Hindu terrorism" include the February 18, 2007 blast on the Samjhauta Express (a train service between India and Pakistan); the May 18, 2007 blast in the Mecca mosque in the town of Hyderabad in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh; the October 11, 2007 blast at the shrine of 12th century Sufi mystic Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti in the town of Ajmer in the northern Rajasthan state; and the September 29, 2008 blast in the town of Malegaon in Maharashtra state of which Mumbai is the capital. These are the key attacks in which Hindu terrorists are believed to be involved, though a number of militant attacks in India have taken place in recent decades whose trails lead to Pakistan.

 

II. The Role of the Hindu "Abhinav Bharat" Group

The first time Hindu terrorists came under the eyes of Indian counterterrorism investigators was the September 29, 2008 Malegaon blast. A day after the blast, the Indian police, which had prior intelligence information about this attack, ruled out the possibility of the involvement of Indian Mujahideen while noting that they suspected "Hindu radical groups."[5] Additional Director General of Police Sanjeev Dayal told the media that the blast did not have the signature of Indian Mujahideen, adding: "Hindu radical groups are on our radar."[6]

A month later, three individuals – Shyam Lal, Dilip Nahar and Dharmendra Bairagi (none of them Muslims) – were arrested from the town of Indore in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh.[7] Their arrests came because of their role in the theft of a motorbike that was used in the attack. On October 23, the police arrested several people, including Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, a 38-year-old Hindu woman mystic or ascetic, who is the accused and an ABVP member.[8]

Shortly thereafter, police arrested Ramesh Shivji Upadhyay – a 57-year-old retired Indian Army major, and Sameer Sharad Kulkarni, another ABVP member.[9] Major Upadhyay is reported to have imparted military training to Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur. Some text messages sent to retired Major Ramesh Shivji Upadhyay from the mobile phone of serving Indian Army officer Lt.-Col. Shrikant Purohit led to the latter's arrest.[10] The arrest of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and of retired and serving Indian Army officers stunned the people of India, where a vibrant electronic media has trained its eyes on the role of Islamic terrorists worldwide. The arrest of a serving officer has raised questions about extremist elements in the Indian Army.

An Indian media report noted that "the involvement of Hindu groups in terror activities was suspected" following a number of unexplained bombings in mosques in the towns of Parbhani (2003), Jalna (2004) and Purna (2004).[11] Currently, 11 individuals are in police custody in connection with the Malegaon blast case. On July 19, 2010, the Bombay High Court upheld charges against them; among them were Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Indian Army officer Lt.-Col. Shrikant Purohit.[12] According to one report, Purohit is a founding member of Abhinav Bharat or Young India, a radical Hindu organization that has been at the center of attacks on Indian Muslim religious places.[13] Ramesh Shivji Upadhyay, the retired major, was the working president of Abhinav Bharat at the time of his arrest, based in the town of Pune, near Mumbai.[14]

Abhinav Bharat was founded a century ago by Hindu nationalist revolutionary V. D. Savarkar to fight against the British rule, but dissolved in 1952, five years after Indian independence. Following the arrests over the Malegaon blast case, it was revealed that like-minded Hindu groups had revived Abhinav Bharat formally in 2006.[15] Lt.-Col. Shrikant Purohit told a court that Pravin Togadia, secretary-general of VHP or World Hindu Council, was involved in financing and reviving Abhinav Bharat.[16] Himani Savarkar, the current president of Abhinav Bharat and niece of Nathuram Godse (who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi), told the media: "We do not support any kind of terrorism. But at the same time we want to make it clear that Hindus will not tolerate atrocities committed on them."[17]
 

III. Countrywide Attacks

Lt.-Col. Shrikant Purohit was also questioned by the Central Bureau of India (CBI or India's federal investigating agency) in connection with the May 18, 2007 blast at the Mecca mosque in Hyderabad. An Indian newspaper cited CBI documents as noting: "[During interrogation] Purohit claimed to have met Pragya [Singh ThakurOrissa, burnt down two churches in Karnataka, and also carried out the Malegaon blast."[18] The reference is to a series of attacks on Christians in the Kandhamal district of the eastern Indian state of Orissa and on churches in southern state of Karnataka.

There is a pattern to this violence: these attacks on Christian minority in Orissa and Karnataka states and on Muslims in the Gujarat state came at a time when the BJP, the right-wing Hindu opposition, has been in power or has shared power in these states. In other words, these attacks could not have been carried out without some involvement of law-enforcement agencies – or without their turning a blind eye to the attackers.

Lt.-Col. Purohit is also reported to have held a planning meeting at the Bhonsala Military School in the town of Nashik in Maharashtra state.[19] The Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) of Maharashtra also detained Colonel (retired) S. S. Raikar, an official of the military school, for questioning.

A number of Hindu militants have been arrested in connection with the Mecca mosque blast and the Ajmer shrine blast. All these cases are being tried by various courts in India. In June this year, the CBI added one Sunil Joshi, a member of the RSS, to the list of the accused in the 2007 Mecca mosque blast.[20] The accused already include four RSS members in the Mecca mosque blast case: Ramchandra Kalsangra aka Ramji, Sandeep Dange, Devender Gupta and Lokesh Sharma.

In the state of Rajasthan, where the October 11, 2007 Ajmer shrine blast case is under trial, the police have named but not indicted senior RSS leader Indresh Kumar as one of the key conspirators.[21] An 806-page indictment filed by the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) of Rajasthan state also includes five Hindu militants of a radical Hindu group. According to the indictment, Indresh Kumar "took part in a secret meeting of right-wing fundamentalists in October 2005 in [the town of] Jaipur at which plans to carry out bomb blasts" at the Ajmer shrine, Mecca mosque and Malegaon were finalized.[22]

Of all these attacks, the February 18, 2007 Samjhauta Express blast is international in nature, as the train passengers were Pakistani nationals travelling from India to Pakistan. At least 68 people were killed in the blast near Panipat, about 80 kilometers from New Delhi. According to one report, Lt.-Col. Purohit supplied explosives that were used in the Samjhauta Express blast.[23] Although the role of the Hindu militants is suspected in the blast, the Indian investigators have yet to find conclusive evidence. In July 2010, the investigation of the case was handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA), a multi-agency investigator that was established after the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks.[24]

Conclusion

The trail of most of these attacks leads to a single nucleus of terror planning, with the key accused being Lt.-Col. Shrikant Purohit, retired major Ramesh Shivji Upadhyay, and Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur. Almost all investigations and arrests have led to some connections to the RSS, the mother of Hindu nationalist groups and of the country's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party. Even after the cell involving the Hindu terrorists was uncovered by the Indian investigators, some militant attacks have taken place in which the role of Hindu groups is suspected. For example, in October 2009, police arrested four persons with links to extremist Hindu organizations following a bomb blast in the town of Margao, Goa.[25]

P. Chidambaram, the Indian Interior Minister of the ruling Congress party, used the words "saffron terrorism" to describe Hindu terrorism in India, blaming Hindu groups for recent bomb blasts in several Indian cities.[26] Saffron is the color of flags used by Hindu nationalist groups. Urging Indian citizens to be vigilant against extremist Hindu groups, Chidambaram said: "Saffron terrorism is a new phenomenon that has been implicated in many bomb blasts in recent past."[27] In turn, the RSS, BJP and other Hindu groups have accused the ruling party of launching a political campaign against them. Addressing a public meeting in October 2010, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat took strong exception to the use of the terms "saffron terrorism" and "Hindu terrorism," stating: "Terrorism and Hindus are [an] oxymoron and can never be related to each other."[28]

However, Digvijay Singh, secretary-general of the Congress party, recently reminded the RSS of its earlier statement that "all Muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims" and added: "All Hindus arrested for terror activities are linked to the RSS."[29]

Following the arrest of serving army officer Lt.-Col. Purohit in the Malegaon bombing case, a small group of the Indian Army officers came under surveillance. A report noted: "The officers who have been put under surveillance appear to have a lot in common with Purohit. The foremost similarity... was the seething anger among them about nothing being done to protect the 'Hindu Rashtra' [Hindu nation] against jihadi terrorists and other threats, and a strong desire to avenge the serial blasts allegedly carried out by [Pakistan-supported] jehadi bombers."[30]

The phenomenon of Hindu terrorism can be described, to some extent, as a reaction against Islamic militancy in India. On June 18, 2008, over three months before the Malegaon blast, an editorial in Saamna, a paper published by extremist Hindu party Shiv Sena of Maharashtra state in which Malegaon is situated, had warned: "Islamic terrorism is increasing in Hindustan [India] and to confront this Islamic terrorism, Hindu terrorism of equal strength has to be evolved. Like the Islamic extremists, unless there are Hindu suicide bombers to protect the nation..."[31]

© 1998-2010, The Middle East Media Research Institute All Rights Reserved.

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) explores the Middle East through the region's media (both print and television), websites, religious sermons and school books. MEMRI bridges the language gap which exists between the West and the Middle East, providing timely translations of Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, Pashtu, Dari, Hindi, and Turkish media, as well as original analysis of political, ideological, intellectual, social, cultural, and religious trends in the Middle East.

*Tufail Ahmad is Director of MEMRI's South Asia Studies Project.

Original article from Rightside News is here.

Endnotes:

[1] www.timesofindia.com (India), November 11, 2010.

[2] www.timesofindia.com (India), November 11, 2010.

[3] www.expressindia.com (India), February 7, 2009.

[4] The Hindu (India), August 5, 2010.

[5] www.dnaindia.com (India), October 1, 2008.

[6] www.dnaindia.com (India), October 1, 2008.

[7] www.rediff.com (India), October 23, 2008.

[8] www.indianexpress.com (India), November 25, 2008.

[9] www.indianexpress.com (India), October 30, 2008.

[10] www.timesofindia.com (India), November 5, 2008.

[11] Frontline (India), July 31 – August 13, 2010.

[12] Frontline (India), July 31 – August 13, 2010.

[13] www.timesofindia.com (India), November 5, 2008.

[14] www.zeenews.com (India), October 28, 2010.

[15] www.zeenews.com (India), October 30, 2008.

[16] www.indianexpress.com (India), November 24, 2008.

[17] www.zeenews.com (India), October 30, 2008.

[18] www.indianexpress.com (India), November 24, 2008.

[19] The Hindu (India), November 13, 2008.

[20] www.rediff.com (India), June 22, 2010.

[21] www.timesofindia.com (India), October 24, 2010.

[22] www.hindustantimes.com (India), October 23, 2010.

[23] www.expressindia.com (India), November 15, 2008.

[24] www.timesofindia.com (India), July 29, 2010.

[25] www.zeenews.com (India), October 18, 2009.

[26] www.dainikbhaskar.com (India), August 25, 2010.

[27] www.dainikbhaskar.com (India), August 25, 2010.

[28] www.timesofindia.com (India), October 17, 2010.

[29] www.deccanherald.com (India), November 13, 2010.

[30] www.timesofindia.com (India), November 27, 2008.

[31] www.saamna.com (India), June 18, 2008.

 

Exposing islam for what it is

Another very good article from Sam Hindu. Sam is giving a hsitory of his life experience with islam and muslims. I have cleaned it up for easier reading and Sam points come across with purpose and clarity. Not quite sure when he is going to have part two done but it will be posted here.

---

Why I write and Expose Islam ; It’s Lies…Part 1
By Sam Hindu

SOME TIMES BY; SAM HINDU

I was born in a remote village in Western India near the sacred city Ambaji, in a poor non practicing brahmin family. There were qute a few muslims in our village who worked as tailors, barbers and masons, Farmers etc. But in my very early childhood days I never got chance to meet them or mingle with them.


One day I went to a weekly market to buy some vegetables with my younger brother when I would have been of 7 or 8 years old. There I noticed an unusual crowd at some distance from the main bazaar. My younger brother, whom I was accompnying, held my finger .We made our way to the street and I saw a horrible thing, a strong man was butchering a poor lamb which was reeling under pain, and desperately trying to free itself from the grip of butcher.


’Let’s go, said my brother. I thought it would be a snake charmer, but this was a butcher ? What was he doing?  I asked my brother who was clearly looking upset, I unwillingly replied ‘he is a Kasai ( butcher) and it is his profession’. ‘He was whispering some mambo jumbo! Why and what he was mumbling and the horrible smell from meat, bones and blood made both of us feel like we were walking or standing near the public Toilet.

I was bewildered and laughed at The butcher that what a fool he was praying to his God. They call their God Allah’. Why? again I whispered. ‘He is a Moslim and they call their God Allah’ Now keep quiet I said, and my annoyed brother pulled on me to go home.


The second incident we all kids were playing Top, Gilli Danda and Marble in the school compound and inside the confining wall of the school there were some Moslims were living and some ugly-looking man with a beard and no mustache, who was wearing just a LUNGI was praying. ( I came to know NAMAZ ) after some time.


The way he was banging his head on earth made me feel daft and dumbfounded. What the heck was he doing? It made us kids laugh at such stupid rituals and raising his ass up in the air that way. 


This was my first introduction to a muslim’s cruelty and barbaric behaviour, those horrible images are still fresh in my mind. At the age of 8, I came to  live near a big city with my parents in search of a better life.  Here I met people from all walks of life. There were some muslim friendsand a sizeable population of Moslims.


I invariably visited the homes of my classmates whose parents or grand parents migrated to my city during the partition of India. I met my best friend whose parents migrated from Pakistan after the partition.


They used to tell us horrible stories about muslims had raped women, children burned alive, men were cut into pieces. Large populations was forced to convert to Islam under the pain of death. There are thousands of such muslims in Pakistan who are muslims against their wishes. The situation in Bangladesh and Kashmir is no different.


The present phase of Islamic jihad in India started in 1965, when India foaught a war with PAKISTAN in BANGLADESH. In Kashmir, when Muhammad’s SO CALLED hair, which was preserved in a shrine in Kashmir was stolen more trouble and jihad started. NOW HOW THE HECK DID THAT HAIR CAME TO KASHMIR? THAT IS ANOTHER PROPAGANDA STORY BY MUSLIMS AND IS ANOTHER STORY FOR ANOTHER TO WRITE ABOUT.


Some muslim opportunists sparked more rebellions by alleging that the Indian government was guilty of misconduct in electorial process. Trained mullahs from pakistan, incited the hatred among locals, warnings had been issued against Kashmiri pundits to immediately leave Kashmir. They left behind their women and belongings. Pundits in Kashmir were literally hunted down by the jihadists, their homes vandalised,  the women raped, children and men were brutally murdered.


America and Britain were smiling on the Indian helplessness, not realizing that this menace, would one day reach their lands  In 1992 India suffered another setback. Some ultra nationalists demolished the burned out mosque at Ayodhya. This mosque was built by General Mir Banqi by razing the Ram temple in the 15th century. In Mumbai, muslims vandalized several shops and killed several Hindus in retaliation. Hindus also counterattacked and this madness continued for over a month. Obviously muslims were on the receiving end this time.Revenge of the Hindus and rioting inside the Mumbai underworld took place which is muslim dominated. Muslims carried out at large-scale bombings at Mumbai with the help of Pakistan’s ISI.


With these events, rioting became common. Again in 2003, a coach  train was burned up by muslim fanatics, killing 59 pilgrims including children and women. The entire conspiracy was hatched in Pakistan, and the culprits were never captured and fled to Pakistan under the safe patronage of ISI.


As was anticipated, large riots broke out in Gujarat claiming more than 2000 lives, mostly muslims. To revenge the rioting, the student islamic movement of India along with Indian mujahideen in collaboration of Lashkar-e-taiba carried out  large-scale bombings over a period of two or three years. While all these events were happening, I was busy at my studies, and I never bothered to wonder why all these things were happening.


In the last two decades, India has witnessed so much unnecessary bloodshed because of Islamic Jihad. There is no hope of any respite in the near future. It is not only Hindustan ( Bharat ) India which is feeling the heat but Islamic Shit holes countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Ethopia, Uzbekistan, Krygistan etc, which are hostage to Islamic Ideology. Peoplein these countries are killing each other over absolutely nothing, it seems to me.

In November 2008 after Mumbai the carnage, I was compelled to come out of my comfort zone. I was more than willing to help my country come out of this difficult phase. I was considering ‘all’ the options available to me. But fortunately one day in 1999 I landed on the faith freedom international, after reading extensively and I got new perspective about this problem, I learned for first time that it is not the muslims, but the devil ideology of Islam that is the real culprit. I would like to thank Dr Ali Sina for correcting my way of thinking. Today I find myself in a much better position to fight this curse of ‘Islam’.


I was one of the first who started reading Dr. Ali Sina’s views when he started his web site. I read every word he wrote about Islam from His own Experience as Child and student in Pakistan and then the Western world, his understanding of the Cult called Islam and about Muslims. All of this was now very clear in my mind.


Going back down memory lane when I migrated to the western world back in 1986 to England. During my student years there all the Muslims wanted to come to Europe and  leave behind their pathetic life and life style.They seemed to want to make a better future for themselves and theirs loved ones.


But once they started getting having a sizeable population what I witnessed was that instead of a better life, they were thinking like real Muslims and wanted to make that beautiful country a shit hole like their mother land by making their new country islamic and under control of sharia law. That is when I started thinking, questioning muslim's motives, ideology and started questioning their mentality. I was trying to understand their inspiration and what drove their hatred for non-muslims to the point of wanting to kill them if they did not convert to islam. Part two to follow soon.

Original article is here