headerphoto


BDS and Antifa: A Dangerous Combination




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Cornell law  professor William Jacobson of Legal Insurrection calls this the most dangerous development he has seen on campus in many years. The forces of Boycott, Divest and Sanction (against Israel) and Antifa are teaming up to fight the voices of the right when they come to campus. I totally agree with his assessment.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/08/anti-israel-profs-organizing-antifa-campus-network/

What this means is that we can look forward to repetitions of what happened at UC Berkeley recently when Milo Yiannopouls was scheduled to speak.

This comes in the wake of Charlottesville, but we are not talking about these two groups banding together to protect students from the KKK and neo-Nazis. They want to stop voices like Ben Shapiro, Ann Coulter, David Horowitz, and others who espouse the conservative point of view. That ,means also that Antifa will be there to disrupt any pro-Israel speaker. And when Antifa shows up, you can expect violence. They don't debate; they come to fight and disrupt. In short this is, as Professor Jacobson says, a dangerous cocktail.

Since Stanford Professor David Palumbo-Liu is involved in this, I am reminded of when he came to take part in a free speech panel at UC Irvine. This was in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. Palumbo-Liu made a statement to the effect that the US State Department definition of anti-semitism included any criticism of Israel. After the event concluded, a friend and colleague of mine confronted Palumbo-Liu (in my presence) and told him his statement was demonstrably false.. The startled professor, rather than defend his statement, turned tail and scurried away like a frightened rabbit. If his little thugs do initiate violence at an event and he is present, he will be the one hiding under a table.

University  presidents and chancellors need to be on alert. The "campus climate" is about to get stormier. There should be zero tolerance for Antifa on any campus.

A Must Read: Stealth Invasion








Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip Creeping Sharia and Investigative Project on Terrorism




“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.” 
-From The Explanatory Memorandum

The blog, Creeping Sharia, has a piece tonight on an important new book. It is called Stealth Invasion by Leo Hohmann and describes the mass migration of Muslims into the West.

https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2017/08/01/stealth-invasion/



The book argues (and I concur) that this is part of a plan originated by the Muslim Brotherhood. The plan is to implant Islam upon the West through mass migration and demographic change. It is not about assimilating into American society, rather "destroying the Western Civilization from within". This is from a document called the Explanatory Memorandum seized in 2004 by the FBI and used as a government exhibit in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation trial in Dallas, which involved Islamic charities diverting money to Middle East terror groups. The letter, which was addressed to the "North American Brothers" and had an address list that included many US Islamic organizations-including the Muslim Student Association, outlined the duties of the North American Brothers to undermine US civilization and lay the groundwork for Islam to be supplanted upon the West. It was not about blowing up bombs or killing people. It was using our system, institutions, and laws to subvert us while working for demographic change and acceptance of Islam. The Islamization of the US.

Civilizational Jihad


The problem, which is noted in the above link, is that too many of these people arriving have values that are opposed to our own. The leadership of most of the major Islamic organizations in the US, like CAIR, MPAC, ISNA, ICNA and others, have demonstrated that their goals and visions do not coincide with ours. There is an agenda, which is to gradually supplant American  freedoms with Islamic values and sharia law. Yes, it is a long-term project, but the roots have been firmly planted. Look at what is happening in Europe today.

I highly recommend this book, and I will be getting it myself.

the coming virtual reality ...

The Sinister Potential of Virtual Reality

The Addictive Nature of Virtual Reality



Tags: virtual reality, bible prophecy, Antichrist, false prophet, addiction, Jack London, Bukowski, Slayer, Dave Lombardo To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Who "hacked the election"???




Tags: Trunews, Pakistan, hacked the election, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hilary Clinton, destroyed hard drives To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Obama Inc. Planned To Deploy Troops To Polling Places

by Daniel Greenfield: This is the sort of thing you expect from Venezuela. But it almost happened under our last left-wing regime.
President Obama’s White House quietly produced a plan in October to counter a possible Election Day cyber attack that included extraordinary measures like sending armed federal law enforcement agents to polling places, mobilizing components of the military and launching counter-propaganda efforts.

The plan allowed for the deployment of “armed federal law enforcement agents” to polling places if hackers managed to halt voting. It also foresaw the deployment of “Active and Reserve" military forces and members of the National Guard “upon a request from a federal agency and the direction of the Secretary of Defense or the President.”
There is a mention in the plan that it's illegal for armed Federal personnel to set up shop in a polling place. And any talk of deploying troops around an election would be a Weimar signpost and deeply distrubing. There is also no concievable call for it. It's reasonable for the FBI to participate in on-site investigations of hacking incidents. No amount of hacking would require the deployment of the military unless the goal is to reverse the results of an election. With all the expected rioting that would occur.

And that does ring some major alarm bells.

The only reasons you need that kind of deployment is to manage the social dysfunction after a natural disaster or political unrest. This sounds like political unrest was anticipated.
--------------------------
Daniel Greenfield is Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. David Horowitz is a Contributing Author of the ARRA News Service

Tags: Daniel Greenfield, FrontPage Mag, Obama Inc., Planned, deploy troops, polling places, ARRA News Service To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

"He Didn't Say, 'Annihilate the Jews'- He said 'Destroy' the Jews"




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip Vlad Tepes, Holocaust Encyclopedia and Breitbart


An imam in Davis, California is under fire for a sermon he gave that has surfaced. In the sermon last Friday, Ammar Shahin reportedly read from the infamous hadith that talks about killing Jews on the Day of Judgment.

"The Prophet Muhammad said: ‘Judgment Day will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Jews hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and the trees say: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah…’ They will not say: Oh Egyptian, oh Palestinian, oh Jordanian, oh Syrian, oh Afghan, oh Pakistani. The Prophet Muhammad says that they time will come, the Last Hour will not take place until the Muslims fight the Jews. We don’t say if it is in Palestine or another place. Until they fight… When that war breaks out, they will run and hide behind every rock, and house, and wall, and trees. The house, the wall, and the tress will call upon the Muslims. It will say: Oh Muslim… It will not say: Oh Palestinian, oh Egyptian, oh Syrian, oh Afghan, oh Pakistani, oh Indian… No, it will say: Oh Muslim. Muslim. When Muslims come back… ‘Come, there is someone behind me – except for the Gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews. Except for a certain tree that they are growing today in Palestine, in that area, except this form of tree, which they are growing today… That’s the tree that will not speak to the Muslims."

Oh Allah, liberate the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the filth of the Jews.

Oh Allah, count them one by one and annihilate them down to the very last one. Do not spare any of them.

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/07/25/mosque-defends-imam-meant-destroy-jews-not-annihilate/

The words speak for themselves. The explanation by the Islamic Center of Davis is disingenuous to say the least.

He said "destroy" instead of "annihilate"? What's the difference? Maybe he should have used the expression "final solution".

Contrary to what the mosque claims, Shain was not talking about Jesus. He was not talking about the fight between good and evil. He was talking about Muslims and Jews just as that vicious hadith says.

I am reminded of the famous speech Adolf Hitler gave before the Reichstag in 1939. In that speech he threatened that if the Jews caused another world war, it would result in the "destruction of the Jewish race in Europe." (Vernichtung).

https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/media_fi.php?ModuleId=10005175&MediaId=3108

The explanation by the mosque is also self-defeating. They use the violence at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem to justify Shahin's words. Indeed, Shahin is speaking in response to the events of the past week in Jerusalem. He is invoking the infamous hadith of hate, words that supposedly came from the mouth of the Prophet Mohamed to "annihilate/destroy them (the Jews) down to the very last one".

Take your pick.

I hate to say this, but we have come to the point where the authorities need to monitor what is being said in American mosques. In far too many of them, possibly most, hate speech toward non-Muslims and the West is being preached. Often it is being acted upon. These mosques should be shut down. If the preachers are not American citizens, they should be sent packing back to where they came from.

We must not emulate the Europeans who are tolerating this hate in the very name of tolerance.

"Sharia Is Perfectly Compatible With Our Constitution"




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip Gatestone Institute and Creeping Sharia

That's what Muslim propagandists in the US will tell gullible audiences. I have personally heard it from the mouths of Muslim imams and their non-Muslim apologists including certain politicians and high-ranking police officials.

It is untrue. Here is what we can expect if Sharia law ever gains a foothold in America-as it has in the West.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10632/germany-chechens

Now that we have gotten the Berlin situation out of the way, let me back up the statement I made in the first paragraph. In February 2012, I attended a town hall hosted by the Islamic Center of Orange County in Garden Grove, California. The host was none other than Imam Muzammil Siddiqi. Also present as panelists and speakers were Andre Birotte, Jr. then US Attorney for the Southern District of California, Representatives, Judy Chu (D), Maxine Waters (D), Loretta Sanchez (D), LAPD commander of the Counter Terror Unit Michael Downing, then LASD Sheriff Lee Baca and others. They told us that sharia law was compatible with US law.

http://garyfouse.blogspot.com/2012/02/town-hall-at-islamic-center-of-orange.html

As you can see, it was a real all-star cast. The non-Muslim people on that panel were as blind as Angela Merkel is today in the face of the horror that is going on in Germany.

Socialized Medicine? Meet Charlie Gard




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


If you have not read about  it, there is a heartbreaking story out of Britain concerning the fate of a months-old baby named Charlie Gard. He is afflicted with a debilitating illness which the doctors say is fatal. His parents are not willing to give up and have received an offer of free treatment from a US hospital which has doctors ready to try an alternative approach. The family has received millions in donations to cover the expenses. Yet the hospital refuses to release Charlie to his parents so they can bring him to the US. Worse yet, three UK courts have decided in the doctors' favor as well as the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg France. (That's a story in itself.)

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/07/06/charlie-gard-may-leaves-door-open-for-treatment-abroad-as-us-hospital-offers-to-take-him-for-free.html

Here is an article in The Guardian in which the writer supports the decisions of the doctors and the courts and asks who the child actually belongs to.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/06/charlie-gard-heartbreaking-society-cant-shun-experts

To the above writer, I would answer that in the case of the UK, it seems the child belongs not to the parents, not to itself, but to the State. That is the result of socialized medicine in the UK. Remember all the talk about death panels? Here are your death panels. And this "expert" on US health care even has to attack President Trump for having a heart and offering to help by saying he is trying to "demolish publicly funded health care".

This is another example of a Europe that has lost its collective soul. Not only have Europeans had their rights of free speech and right to safety stripped away from them by their globalist governments, they now witness a desperate family having not only three UK courts rule against them and tell them they cannot remove their child from the hospital that wants to remove life support over their objections, but they have to have some European court in France tell them the same thing. Yes, folks, the final word is decided not in the UK but in France. And that decision is that death is what is in Charlie's best interest.

And you wonder why the Brits voted for Brexit?

I'm also not buying the argument about this child being in pain. The photos and the statements of parents refute that.

This is not what I want the US to become; a country where you can't remove your child from a hospital to seek treatment elsewhere, where you have the courts, the foreign secretary, and the prime minister aligned against you to say nothing of some court in France.

Britain makes me sick.





Alcatraz

I took a ride on a boat
from the harbour by the bay
I took a walk on the rock
yes, it still stands today

and I thought of all the men 
that couldn't conform to society
and I saw myself standin' on the rock





Tags: Frankie Miller To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Good News: MPAC Loses DHS Grant




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip Investigative Project on Terrorism and Karen Lugo for passing this on


The Muslim Public Affairs Council is another one of those phony moderate Islamic organizations in the US that poses as moderates. In reality, they are a front for the Muslim Brotherhood. Their CEO, Salam al Marayati, is a phony moderate who once told me there was no death penalty in Islam for apostasy (a lie). Under the Obama administration, this organization participated in a giant ruse with the government called, "Countering Violent Extremism", which relied on mosques and groups like MPAC to root out the "violent extremists" in their own community and train them to be good little citizens. Now the Trump administration has wisely withdrawn funding from MPAC.

https://www.investigativeproject.org/6333/dhs-denies-grant-to-islamic-radicalization

As the article aptly points out, MPAC is one of law enforcement's biggest critics when it comes to catching terrorists in the US. Depending on MPAC and the imams and mosques to identify and cure would be terrorists (as opposed to identifying them and notifying police) is like expecting elephants to pass the peanuts.

This entire Countering Violent Extremism program should be halted and replaced with something more sensible like monitoring extremist mosques.

Today's Shooting in Alexandria, Virginia




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Is this a case of the chickens coming home to roost? Perhaps.

It is always tricky to assign the blame for an act of violence on rhetoric unless the words and violence happen in immediate concert. But we have a 66-year-old man who took a rifle to a park where congressional Republicans were practicing for a traditional baseball game against Democrats. Once he confirmed that the men on the field were Republicans he began shooting and wounded five before being taken out by Capitol Police. As I write, Congressman Steve Scalise (R) is in critical condition.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/14/virginia-gop-baseball-practice-shooting-multiple-people-shot.html

As a side note, this appears to the the second recent case of assault with a deadly weapon by a Bernie Sanders supporter. The other incident was in Portland, Oregon, where a white nationalist stabbed two people to death who intervened when he was berating a couple of Muslim women. Do we condemn all Sanders supporters for this violence or the senator himself? Of course not, but the left needs to take a hard look at itself in their collective mirrors.

We should also take a close look at the rhetoric by Democrats and the media when it comes to President Trump and his supporters. Maxine Waters, in particular, has used rhetoric that-at least last Sunday in Los Angeles- bordered on inciting insurrection, in my view. CNN has surpassed even MSNBC in its daily, non-stop demonization of Trump. Their reporting is reckless and often inaccurate. They have their first amendment right and criticizing the president is a healthy part of American democracy. What is not healthy is throwing objectivity to the wind and painting the president and his team as inherently evil people who must be removed from power. As an example, this issue of Trump team collusion with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton is being beaten to death even though the investigators have publicly stated they have found no evidence of such collusion.

Donald Trump has his share of flaws, but being an evil man is not one of them as he is being portrayed. Many of his subordinates, most notably Steve Bannon, have been unjustly called Nazis and other names.

We are a badly divided nation, and many on the right do not speak or act for me. But this latest act of violence, coupled with the rise of ANTIFA, is very troubling. Would it surprise anyone if President Trump were one day the target of an assassination attempt? I well remember the last one ( I was 18 when Kennedy was assassinated.) In my opinion, this nation has never recovered from the shock. It seems we have been going downhill ever since. Now we face an enemy every bit as evil as Nazism. That is radical Islam, which seeks to destroy us and our freedoms. More than ever we need to come together as a nation and set aside these political and ethnic differences which are being magnified out of all proportion.



Anti-White Fest at Indiana Univ-Purdue

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogpot.com



Hat tip Campus Reform

Image result for crazy professors
A white construct?


"Other conference-goers reportedly called the concept of intellectual diversity "white supremacist bullshit," while another said "research" is a "colonial, white supremacist, elite process."


Many may not know that there is a combined Indiana University-Purdue school, which in turn, has two campuses, one at Indianapolis and another at Ft Wayne. I guess the reason is to accommodate the overflow of idiotic professors the two universities have. There are so many, in fact, that the combo needs two campuses.

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9272


                                                                                          Hoosier (l), Boilermaker (r)



As evidence, I cite the conference they just had in Indianapolis in which supposed educated professors tried to outdo each other in condemning white people.

And to cap it all off, they call it "critical race studies".




Czechs Say "No Mas" (Migrants)




Hat tip Vlad Tepes



Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com




The Czech Republic is refusing to accept any more migrants as mandated by the EU. In response, the bureaucrats in Brussels are threatening sanctions against the Czechs for not taking "their fair share".

How ironic that it is the Eastern Europeans who are showing more common sense than their western counterparts. They suffered enough misery under communism.

Kudos also to the Poles, Slovaks and Hungarians.

The Truth About Terrorism

In the years since 9/11, there have been multiple terrorist attacks. Not only has the terrorist problem not been solved, it has become difficult to even talk about it properly. This has played a major part in making the world a more sinister and dangerous place. The increased level of terrorist attacks around the world since 9/11, particularly in our own countries, have shown anyone who has eyes to see that the terrorists are in fact our secondary enemy. The primary foe – the real enemy - lies within.

The only legitimate reason for the existence of the state is to safeguard the negative freedom of citizens. Our governments have failed to do this, so we must take whatever steps we can to address the situation ourselves. The first thing each of us must do is clear our own minds of the memes that are currently being used to deceive us, so we can begin to understand the truth about the reality we live in. That alone is a victory. However, we must look beyond our own minds and consider the wider world. Each of us can start to counteract the anti-intellectual poison of so-called “political correctness” by openly refuting the false claims of the enemy, and doing what we can to establish a more rational, safer world.

Clearly, not all Muslims are terrorists. Where the subject term is Muslims, and the predicate term is men who have committed acts of violence and terrorism, the A proposition (All S are P) is false.

The A Proposition – FALSE

That A proposition (All S are P) may be false, but it does not follow that the corresponding I proposition (Some S are P) is false. And where the subject term is Muslims, that term is not distributed, and the predicate term is men who have committed acts of violence and terrorism, the I proposition (Some S are P) is true.

The I Proposition – TRUE

On 22nd May 2013, two murderous creatures attacked Lee Rigby, a 25 year old drummer serving with the Second Fusiliers in the British Army. Rigby had served in Cyprus and Afghanistan, where he was part of the Fire Support Group at Patrol Base Woqab.1 The pair took Rigby's life in brutal fashion, right in the middle of London's streets.2

One of the killers, who had converted to Islam and taken the name Mujahid Abu Hamza,3 was caught red-handed by a passer-by who filmed him on their mobile phone at the scene of the crime. Holding a dagger and a meat cleaver, Abu Hamza stated that he was following commands found in the Koran, specifically citing surah-at-taubah, the ninth chapter of Islam's foundational text.4

"But we are forced by the Koran, in surah at-taubah, through many, many ayah throughout the Koran ..."





The “jihadi terrorists” who have just carried out the latest terrorist attack in London were screaming out their motivation to the world as they wielded their ceramic blades: They were committing murder in the name of the false deity of Islam.5 It is also being reported that when the police raided the flat these "jihadi terrorists" were using as a base, they found "a large amount of materials used in the preparation of the attack" along with "a copy of the Koran open at a page on martyrdom."6

We must ignore the lies that are peddled by agents of the state, and acknowledge that some Muslims are terrorists. Say it again, to yourself: Some Muslims are terrorists. And this has nothing whatsoever to do with anyone’s “race”. A terrorist is driven by the same thing that drives everyone else: their beliefs.

This understanding of human nature is as old as the hills. Here is a quote from the Dhammapada, a collection of the sayings of the Buddha, who was born approximately two and a half thousand years ago:

Mind is the forerunner of all actions.
All deeds are led by mind, created by mind.
If one speaks or acts with a corrupt mind,
Suffering follows, as wheels follow the hoof of an ox.7

The Dhammapada predates the invention of Islam by hundreds of years, therefore the understanding of human nature recorded in this religious literature cannot be attributed to “Islamophobia” (whatever that word even means.)

It follows that anyone who argues that the root cause of "jihadi terrorism" can be found in what "jihadi terrorists" believe is not saying that because of "Islamophobia". All they are doing is expressing a view of human nature that has been held to be true by millions of people for thousands of years.

If someone tries to argue that the root cause of someone's behaviour can be found in what they believe (applying this general principle to the specific case of "jihadi terrorists") and a devout multiculturalist responds by saying, "That's Islamophobia!" then one could counter this as follows: "So you're saying that all Buddhists are Islamophobes? In fact you're saying that all the Buddhists who ever lived were Islamophobes, even those Buddhists who died before Islam was even invented? You're actually saying that the Buddha himself was Islamophobic?" It is difficult to see how a devout multiculturalist could defend this position.

The truth of the matter is that human beings are ambulatory hardware. We are directed to act as we do by our beliefs. As lines of code in our minds execute, our bones and blood respond in this three-dimensional reality. So the claim that discussing the motivation of “jihadi terrorists” is somehow about “race”, that is to say, human hardware, could not be more wrong. It’s all about software.

If you do not believe that the foundational claims of Islam are true, then the truth claims made by Islam are not part of your mind’s operating system, so any “jihadi terrorist” apps are incompatible with your consciousness. On the other hand, the fundamental truth claims of Islam are embedded within the operating system of anyone who self-identifies as a Muslim, and apps that drive people to murder in the name of “Allah” will only run on an Islamic operating system. It follows that being a Muslim is a necessary condition of becoming a “jihadi terrorist”.

The time has long passed for all this to be discussed openly and honestly in our countries. Whatever it is our politicians have been doing to protect us since September 2001, it has been a failure: people are dying every week on our streets! We need to realise that the political class are not only failing in their duty to protect us as citizens, they have been using the power of the state to prevent anyone else from addressing this problem. Enough is enough!

The UN Special Rapporteur has stated:

The right to freedom of opinion and expression is guaranteed under article 19 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which affirm that everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference and impart information and ideas of all kinds through any media and regardless of frontiers.

The Special Rapporteur has consistently underlined the importance of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, not only as a right that should be guaranteed to all, including individuals belonging to marginalized groups, but also as a means to claim and enjoy all other rights. Indeed, it is a fundamental right that safeguards the exercise of all other rights and is a critical foundation of democracy, which depends on the free flow of diverse sources of information and ideas. […]

As the Special Rapporteur has previously emphasized, for the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion to be fully realized, robust examination and criticism of religious doctrines and practices – even in a harsh manner – must also be allowed.8

Let us admit to ourselves that the politicians who we have elected to protect us from harm are not only traitors and incompetents, they are our true enemy. This is our country – not theirs. We must openly reject their pointless, fallacious, mealy-mouthed soundbites, and we must hold them accountable for their failures. It has fallen to us to start talking about the real problem that has been imported into our country – Islamic software. If anyone experiences a transient emotion (aka feels “offended”) when they hear some things about Islam they never knew before, then that is utterly irrelevant. We have just witnessed two of the most horrific terrorist attacks imaginable. Let us start to take our country back!




References
1. Ministry of Defence, Drummer Lee Rigby killed in Woolwich incident, gov.uk, 30th May 2013.
2. Mike Sullivan, Jonathan Reilly, Tom Wells and Tom Morgan, We killed this British soldier. It's an eye for an eye, The Sun, 22nd May 2013 (updated 5th April 2016);
Sarah Weng, Drummer Lee Rigby, 25: Victim in Woolwich attack was loving father of two-year-old, Christian Today, 23d May 2013.
3. Harry Haydon and Karen Morrison, Woolwich terror suspect revealed as Muslim convert known to MI5, The Sun, 23d May 2013 (updated 5th April 2016);
Adrian Shaw, Woolwich attack: Murder suspect Michael Adebolajo asks to be known as Mujahid Abu Hamza in bizarre court appearance, Mirror, 3d June 2013 (updated 4th June 2013);
Arthur Martin and Martin Robinson, Posing like Usain Bolt and blowing kisses to his brother, Woolwich suspect now known as 'Abu Hamza', Daily Mail, 4th June, 2013.
4. Aftermath Video of the Woolwich Butchers - FULL, youtube, published 23d May 2013;
Robert Spencer, Full video and transcript of UK jihad murderer: "We are forced by the Qur'an", May 23d, 2013.
5. Robert Mendick, 'They shouted 'this is for Allah', as they stabbed indiscriminately' - How the London terror attack unfolded, Telegraph, 4th June 2017;



Tags: terrorism, jihad, software To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!