More Muslim Lies — "Innocence of Muslims" a False Flag Pretext to Attack Americans

Hat tip: 1389 Blog

The plot thickens - (while 0bama does nothing!)

Just as how (now-deceased, unfortunately due to natural causes) Danish imam, Akhmad Akkari-Laban, conspired to include in his "report" three totally unrelated and highly inflammatory images along with the far less offensive ones originally published by the Danish newspaper, Jyllands-Posten; it now appears that the controversial movie "Innocence of Muslims" was quite possibly produced by Muslims.

Some background on the original Cartoonifada: (From Brussels Journal)

"The Cartoon Hoax":

Denmark is being punished at the instigation of radical imams because twelve cartoonists have depicted Muhammad. However, these imams created their own three Muhammad images. They have even presented a French clown as being Muhammad. Because the twelve JP cartoonists are not Muslims, the Muslim blasphemy laws do not apply to them. But these laws do apply to the imams. Consequently, these imams deserve death. They – and no-one else – depicted the prophet as a pig – the highest imaginable insult in Islam.

"Scandinavian Update: Israeli Boycott, Muslim Cartoons":

…the Danish tabloid Extra Bladet got hold of a 43-page report that Danish Muslim leaders and imams, on a tour of the Islamic world are handing out to their contacts to “explain” how offensive the cartoons are. The report contains 15 pictures instead of 12. The first of the three additional pictures, which are of dismal quality, shows Muhammad as a pedophile deamon [see it here], the second shows the prophet with a pigsnout [here] and the third depicts a praying Muslim being raped by a dog [here]. Apparently, the 12 original pictures were not deemed bad enough to convince other Muslims that Muslims in Denmark are the victims of a campaign of religious hatred.

Akhmad Akkari, spokesman of the 21 Danish Muslim organizations which organized the tour, explained that the three drawings had been added to “give an insight in how hateful the atmosphere in Denmark is towards Muslims.” Akkari claimed he does not know the origin of the three pictures. He said they had been sent anonymously to Danish Muslims. However, when Ekstra Bladet asked if it could talk to these Muslims, Akkari refused to reveal their identity.

Now, on to Islam's latest self-inflicted wound complete with the usual violent pity party:

Walid Shoebat: Innocence of Muslims made by terrorists; false-flag operation and pretext for violence

Walid Shoebat is a counterterrorism expert and a Christian convert from Islam. According to Shoebat, the filmmaker of Innocence of Muslims, who goes by the name Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, is not a Coptic activist at all, but rather, a smuggler and fraudster who has long been a partner-in-crime with Shoebat’s first cousin Eiad.

Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists

By Walid Shoebat

When it comes to the film Innocence of Muslims, our government and the media uses a narrative mired in contradictions and false statements provided by the filmmaker, who himself is an untrustworthy source.

If we stick to what can be proven we might obtain the possibility that terror supporters produced the film. Muhammad Al Dura and Pallywood are two cases in point showing the type of stunts used by Palestinian terrorists.

So lets examine facts instead of the filmmaker’s fiction.

Court documents reveal that Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin.

Eiad is a Muslim terror supporter and is not an Egyptian Copt.

Just more fraud and deceit from Islam's core. Yet another Islamic manufactured pretext to murder Americans and bomb our embassies. Notice how 0bama has yet to vocally object to this abject ruse, much less retaliate militarily for these attacks on our overseas facilities? Had Bush 2.0 remained this inactive in the face of such provocation, he would have been excoriated by the press but 0bama gets a free pass as usual.

On top of everything, 0bama plays the patsy as he shills for this Islamic false-flag operation; meanwhile the MSM grovels at his feet:

Media ignore Obama attack on ‘those who slander the Prophet of Islam’

President Obama spoke to the UN Tuesday, but what he had to say depended on the media outlet reporting it. It was about “optics” according to MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow; “free speech” said CBS’s Nancy Cordes and Iran, explained NBC’s Chuck Todd.

Not that they’re wrong. It was a 4,000-word speech. Obama covered a lot of ground. But the ground the major media covered conveniently left out was the most provocative line of the entire speech.

The president told the UN that the “future must not belong” to a series of people including “corrupt” leaders and those who “bully women.” But one line from that list stood out. “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

That line appeared almost nowhere in the old media where Obama’s supposed defense of free speech dominated. The broadcast networks ignored it and only Jake Tapper noted that Team Obama had also tried to get the video pulled from YouTube for violation of “terms of use.” The New York Times skipped the line, ironically in an article headlined: “Obama Tells U.N. New Democracies Need Free Speech.”

The media grovels while 0bama obligingly osculates Muslim arse. This monstrous fraud has spent so much time kissing Muslim ass that he must blow his nose with toilet paper.