headerphoto


6th grader’s USMC shirt too much for school

This is absolutely a despicable way to treat a boy at school who is wearing a t-shirt given to him by his older brother whom he idolizes.

I am calling this a slap in the face to all branches of our military especially the Marines. 

This unfortunate event took place in Mississippi, of all states. If this was female dog would the genitalia be deemed offensive? They teach kids this age and YOUNGER in some states about homosexuality, lesbianism, being a transvestite, transgendered, gender neutral (WTH is that, can anyone truly explain that to me, umm, on second thought please don't as I do not care!) safe sex, body parts and they have the nerve to bitch about a t-shirt like this one?

This is the politically correct world of academia from kindergarten up through college that we now have entrenched in our country, teaching our children. 

The foxes are in the hen house, brainwashing our kids and killing them of any freedom of thought or actions. This is  a symptom of the malignancy of liberalism and statist agenda gone wild. They believe the government should tell us how to live, where to live, what to eat and drink and what to drive. They, the far left liberal progressive coward children of the 1960-1970's that now are now retiring, their brainwashed then students, are the best ones equipped to teach or children.

*****************************************************************************************************

6th grader’s USMC shirt too much for school

By Gina Harkins - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday May 22, 2012 11:28:47 EDT
A Mississippi sixth-grader whose grunt brother is deployed to Afghanistan was told by his school’s administrators to turn his shirt inside-out because they were offended by its depiction of an anatomically correct USMC bulldog.

Jordan Griffith, 13, of Ellisville, Miss., received the shirt from his older brother, Lance Cpl. Timothy Swann Jr., a member of 2nd Battalion, 9th Marines, out of Camp Lejeune, N.C. Swann gave it to his little brother while on his pre-deployment leave.

“Jordan just idolizes Timothy,” their mother, Sandy Griffith, told Marine Corps Times. “Timothy gave him the shirt and told him, ‘Always remember you’re a leader, not a follower.’
 
The front of the shirt shows the dog’s head and body with the words “If you are not the lead dog.” The back shows the dog’s rear with the words “The view never changes.”

Officials at South Jones Elementary objected to the realistic view of the dogs’ genitals and asked the student to turn his shirt inside-out or have his parents bring him a new shirt.

The school’s superintendent, Tommy Parker, said the decision had nothing to do with it being a Marine Corps shirt.
“We’re very pro-military,” Parker said. “We’re one of the most conservative places in the United States.”

But that may have played a part in upsetting some of the school’s teachers, he said, adding “all the details are there” regarding the dog’s anatomy, and teachers didn’t want to look at it all day or have younger students seeing it.

Sandy Griffith, who rather than bring her son a new shirt instead pulled him from class, said the shirt is no more offensive than the view one has while walking a dog.

“My father made a joke that the woman who told him to turn the shirt inside-out must have been in the Navy,” she said.

The shirt’s message about leadership is one that kids should think about, she said, especially when men and women are still fighting on behalf of the country.

After leaving the school, Griffith called “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” a conservative syndicated radio program. The host seemed surprised to hear this incident had happened in Mississippi.

“Now your kid can’t wear a T-shirt given to him by a member of the U.S. military that espouses a positive character trait, leadership?” Limbaugh asked on his show. “… People are fed up. They’re fed up with being told what they can’t eat, and what they can and can’t do in their own yards and in their own homes. It’s just not America anymore.”

Parker, the superintendent, was dismayed to read the show’s transcript.

“It’s almost absurd that anyone would accuse us here in Mississippi of being anti-military,” he said. “We recite the Pledge of Allegiance every morning. This very school has sent cards and letters to our troops overseas.”

Original source is here.


Tags: school, USMC, Shirt To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Then Came The Last Days of May




Since we have just about reached the last days of May, I thought I'd put up a bootleg of Buck Dharma singing one of his best songs, live in Sacramento in November 1988. Tags: Blue Oyster Cult, Buck Dharma - If you want to share or post to your site, please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Islamophobia ‘Experts’ to be Called in Breivik Case

"What really is an Islamophobe?

An Islamophobe is a person who believes that:

ALL People Must have Human Rights, and ALL People Must have Equality before the Law.

It is these beliefs that cause Muslims and their Leftist supporters to HATE, demonize and condemn us. Muslim supremacists want us ALL to submit to Islam, Sharia law and their NEVER-ENDING supremacist demands."

The above comment comes from one posted in response to the article below at Frontpage Magazine.
----------------------------------------

In the never ending circus of the Breivik trial why would they NOT have an 'expert' on islamophobia?

This latest article by Fjordman does not need much from me. Islamophobia is for real and it does exist and yes, I agree with what is stated in the above introduction.

Taqiyya is mentioned below and taqiyya is not isolated nor is it a rare occurrence. Most infidels, kafirs do not even realize they are being duped and lied to," taqiyyaized" as I call it.

Here is what Fjordman has to say about this perverse form of deception and lying practiced by many muslim countries:

"religious deception or lying to advance the cause of Islam and its triumph over the infidels. Muslim apologists routinely claim that this is a racist, Islamophobic myth, or alternatively that taqiyya is only practiced by Shias, not by Sunnis. Both claims are incorrect. As this story shows – and many similar examples can be cited from multiple countries – lying straight-faced to non-Muslims about Islamic intentions is fully accepted and a widespread Muslim social practice."

islam is out to subdue every last one of us and if that does not bother you then just run down to your local mosque, bend over for the imam and convert to islam. Be expected to turn over your wife to him, romance with goats and camels, hear a lecture on polygamy, that wife beating and rape is just Mohammad's way of getting those uppity muslimas in line. The treatment of infidels is another violent story altogether.
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Islamophobia ‘Experts’ to be Called in Breivik Case 
By Fjordman 

The trial of the mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik in Oslo will feature, in addition to survivors of his terror attacks, a somewhat bizarre list of so-called political expert witnesses. A few of the initial names have already been dropped, as the list keeps being changed. Among the scheduled witnesses, Lars Gule from Norway and Mattias Gardell from Sweden are both alleged academic experts in the field of contemporary Islamophobia.

Lars Gule is, as of 2012, a postdoctoral research fellow at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences. His stated research interests are multiculturalism, the Middle East and especially Arab-Islamic political thought. The Socialist Gule is usually referred to as a respected “expert” on multiculturalism in the national media or even the international press. In The Christian Science Monitor he was labeled a neutral academic terrorism expert” after the Breivik case, although he is in fact an admitted terrorist himself.

In 1977, Gule was arrested in Lebanon for carrying explosives intended for an armed attack in Israel. He has not denied this since, yet his history hasn’t notably impeded his career. He is a prominent national figure on the political Left and was the Secretary General of the Norwegian Humanist Association from 2000 to 2005. Gule was one of seven writers to receive a special scholarship from the Norwegian Non-fiction Writers And Translators Association after the 2011 terror attacks, which he used to write a book focusing on right-wing extremism.

Sadly, the phenomenon of left-wing terrorists who enjoy respectable academic careers afterwards is not limited to Scandinavia. A particularly nasty case in the USA involves the unrepentant Marxist terrorist bomber Bill Ayers. In the late 1960s, Ayers became a leader of the Weather Underground (WU), “an American Red Army.”

Ayers summed up the organization’s ideology as follows: “Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents.” This didn’t prevent him from becoming a well-connected university professor in Chicago a few years later, however. In 2008, journalists such as Stanley Kurtz and Sean Hannity tried to bring more attention to ties between the presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama and various representatives of extreme left-wing organizations and groups, among them Bill Ayers.

One of the alleged experts cited by the mainstream media about Islamic issues is the Swedish historian and Socialist activist Mattias Gardell, author of a book about so-called “Islamophobia” that was hailed by reviewer Per Jönsson in the liberal paper Dagens Nyheter as a gold mine of wisdom about the supposedly irrational Islamophobia of the medieval Crusades as well as the politician Kent Ekeroth of the Sweden Democrats.

In 2010 Mattias Gardell, the Swedish organizer of the Ship to Gaza initiative, said Israelis had committed “premeditated murder” and were guilty of piracy. Gardell, a professor of religious history at Uppsala University, returned to Sweden accompanied by six others who had been held captive after their ship was boarded by Israeli soldiers. The activists were met at Stockholm’s Arlanda Airport by a crowd of journalists and sympathizers. People presented them with flowers and chanted “long live Palestine” and anti-Israeli slogans. Another passionate supporter of the ships to Gaza is the Swedish bestselling crime author Henning Mankell.

When asked directly about this, Mattias Gardell made no attempt to hide the fact that the pro-Palestinian ship which he organized headed for the Gaza strip contained members not just of Fatah and the PFLP, but of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as well as Hamas. He sees nothing wrong with this, and claims that Hamas, responsible for hundreds of individual terror attacks, is not a terror organization but a social movement.

Gardell wants to be taken seriously as an objective scholar when he is not an “activist.” Unfortunately, he often is, whereas “Islamophobes” of all stripes are widely attacked in the press and branded as right-wing extremists.

Mattias Gardell has also criticized the decision to allow artist Lars Vilks to speak at Uppsala University, the oldest university in the Nordic countries. Vilks has received numerous death threats, yet Gardell largely sided with Muslims, arguing that he shouldn’t have been allowed to speak and thereby spread hatred. Due to examples such as this, Mr. Gardell has been accused of being an apologist who idealizes Islam and downplays hatred and violence within the Islamic world.

Lars Vilks warned in the spring of 2012 that “The attacks against me are working.” The strategy of physical intimidation employed by his opponents is unfortunately quite effective. He has seen his lecturing activities dry up over organizers’ fears of riots and of being labeled “racist.” At Karlstad University in Sweden, a lecture was interrupted by a loud group of aggressive young Muslims throwing eggs at Vilks for showing one of his pictures inspired by the Muhammad caricature battle in neighboring Denmark.

In May 2012, a rare (by Swedish standards) critical media investigation using hidden cameras and telephone recording equipment, with two women posing as abused spouses visited ten of Sweden’s largest mosques as part of a report put together by Sveriges Television’s (SVT) investigative news program “Uppdrag granskning.”

The women asked local Islamic leaders for advice about how to address issues such as polygamy, assault and non-consensual sex. They were told by nine out of the ten mosques that men have the right – under certain circumstances – to have more than one wife. The advice, which contradicted Swedish laws, came from imams or family counselors. When the TV host Janne Josefsson approached two of the largest mosques featured in this program to inquire about their official positions, the public answers he received were strikingly different.

The chair of the Islamic Association in Uppsala claimed in the story that people should follow national law. When confronted by what the imam at the Uppsala mosque had told the women, the Islamic leader explained that this imam had merely expressed his personal opinion. The imam with whom the women met at a major mosque in Stockholm defended polygamy and also advised against filing a police report about husbands who beat them. As a matter of fact, a man beating his disobedient wife is in perfect accordance with the Koran 4:34.

Predictably enough, the main preoccupation of many Muslims after these revelations was that talking about this issue might fuel “Islamophobia” and unfounded prejudice. Muslims are always the victims, no matter what.

The technique used in the above-mentioned case is called taqiyya, religious deception or lying to advance the cause of Islam and its triumph over the infidels. Muslim apologists routinely claim that this is a racist, Islamophobic myth, or alternatively that taqiyya is only practiced by Shias, not by Sunnis. Both claims are incorrect. As this story shows – and many similar examples can be cited from multiple countries – lying straight-faced to non-Muslims about Islamic intentions is fully accepted and a widespread Muslim social practice.

In 2009 the Swedish Communist author Jan Myrdal awarded Mattias Gardell with the great humanitarian Lenin award for his work. And no, despite the fact that Vladimir Lenin was the founder of a totalitarian terror regime which cost tens of millions of people their lives, that name was not intended to contain any trace of irony whatsoever. This has been justly mocked by the competent and decent historian and author Peter Englund.

Stefan Adamenko, who lost three brothers to Lenin’s and Stalin’s horror regime, in the newspaper Expressen urged Gardell to reject the award out of respect for Communism’s tens of millions of victims. After all, there is no humanitarian award named after Stalin, Pol Pot or Adolf Hitler. Gardell, however, accepted the Lenin award.

In an article in the left-leaning paper Aftonbladet, Gardell suggested that the notion of there being an Islamic threat to Europe and the Western world is an irrational myth. If you believe Professor Gardell, Islamophobia is entirely without any basis in reality, almost like coulrophobia, the fear of clowns. He fears that it has now become normalized, and warns that “Islamophobia isn’t merely a threat to Muslims. It is a threat to us all.”

Link to post at FrontPage Magazine

Tags: Islamophobia, Experts, Anders Behring Breivik, trial, mass murderer To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

The world is now a darker place: RIP David Littman 1933-2012

On May 20th the world become a little bit darker, a little more frigid, those who live under the oppression of islamic jihad and sharia law, lost a true champion, and most humble hero, David Littman. Mr. Littman passed away after a courageous and noble struggle against acute myelogenous leukemia.

 As always, Littman kept his focus on the war for human rights and freedom rather than his own declining health. Littman could often be found arguing with the UN Human Rights Commission (UN-HRC) especially when it became obvious the arab world was out to make any criticism of islam, the prophet mohammad or sharia law a violation against freedom of speech on a global scale. Of course the nations that make up the UN Human Rights Commission is stacked with mostly pro-islam countries from the arab world and all these countries would be doing all they could to stifle anything positive about Israel and Jews.

It was really only islam the UN-HRC was interested in protecting against slander or insult. Against the west, Israel and the Jews it was to remain open season

 "Ever resilient, David Littman overcame a speech defect (i.e., stuttering), and developed into a truly gifted orator, who made countless presentations to the Orwellian-named UN Human Rights Commission (UN-HRC). These frequently memorable appearances showcased David’s erudition, valor, and wry sense of humor, while he tackled vexing and critically important issues—cynically ignored by all other UN-HRC representatives in there monomaniacal focus on Israel’s putative “abuses”—including: the first public exposures of Hamas’ 1988 charter sanctioning the jihad genocide of Israeli Jews, the related heinous advocacy by Islamic religious clerics of jihad “martyrdom operations,” i.e., homicide bombings, which included the deliberate targeting of non-combatants, and Iran’s nuclear jihad genocidal aspirations toward Israel; highlighting the scourge of female genital mutilation, and its specific sanctioning, for example, by the Shafiite school of Sunni Islamic “jurisprudence,” which helped elucidate, unapologetically, why this misogynistic barbarity was an overwhelming problem in Islamdom; and the repeated exposure of mainstream institutional Islam’s efforts—via the Organization of the Islamic Conference (now Organization of Islamic Cooperation)—to impose Sharia-sanctioned abrogation of freedom of conscience and speech and nullify modern human rights constructs, founded upon the US Bill of Rights and the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights."

Please read the rest below and this is a fine eulogy about David Littman done by Andrew Bostom who is a well known author himslef. If you have not read The Legacy Of Jihad, you owe it to yourself, your sons, daughters.
***********************************************************************************
David and Gisele Littman, with their daughter Diana, at the time of Operation Mural (1961)

David Littman, 1933-2012: He Showed Us The Mettle of His Pasture

By Andrew Bostom 

My friend and generous mentor, the historian and fearless human rights activist, David Gerald Littman, died yesterday, May 20, 2012, succumbing to acute myelogenous leukemia, after a stoic, typically intrepid struggle.

In addition to amassing his own unique and prodigious output, David was a devoted husband and champion of the pioneering scholarship of his wife of 53 years, Gisele Orebi, better known under her nom de plume, Bat Ye’or. Despite stultifying modern taboos, together, the Littmans worked indefatigably to educate humanity—non-Muslim and Muslim, alike—about the genocidal living legacy of jihadism.

David’s remarkable personal biography melded first-rate, original scholarship, with uniquely erudite and brave activism—combined efforts spanning over 50 years.

For example, Littman was the driving force behind the daring 1961 Operation Mural (chronicled in this  55 minute documentary). Mural was Mossad’s code-name for David whose cover was a public-school-educated Anglican gentleman, a cordial tennis partner with the British consul, and also possessing excellent security contacts in Casablanca. David Littman successfully completed the mission: defying the Moroccan ban on Jews wishing to emigrate to Israel, he smuggled 530 Jewish children out of Morocco to what the Moroccan authorities thought was a holiday camp in Switzerland—in reality, a mere way-station to their permanent re-location to Israel.

Ever resilient, David Littman overcame a speech defect (i.e., stuttering), and developed into a truly gifted orator, who made countless presentations to the Orwellian-named UN Human Rights Commission (UN-HRC). These frequently memorable appearances showcased David’s erudition, valor, and wry sense of humor, while he tackled vexing and critically important issues—cynically ignored by all other UN-HRC representatives in there monomaniacal focus on Israel’s putative “abuses”—including: the first public exposures of Hamas’ 1988 charter sanctioning the jihad genocide of Israeli Jews, the related heinous advocacy by Islamic religious clerics of jihad “martyrdom operations,” i.e., homicide bombings, which included the deliberate targeting of non-combatants, and Iran’s nuclear jihad genocidal aspirations toward Israel; highlighting the scourge of female genital mutilation, and its specific sanctioning, for example, by the Shafiite school of Sunni Islamic “jurisprudence,” which helped elucidate, unapologetically, why this misogynistic barbarity was an overwhelming problem in Islamdom;  and the repeated exposure of mainstream institutional Islam’s efforts—via the Organization of the Islamic Conference (now Organization of Islamic Cooperation)—to impose Sharia-sanctioned abrogation of freedom of conscience and speech and nullify modern human rights constructs, founded upon the US Bill of Rights and the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

As a trained historian, and meticulous independent scholar, David was equally bold and original His recently published magnum opus, L’Exil Au Maghreb. La Condition Juive Sous L’Islam 1148-1912. [Presses De L’Université Paris-Sorbonne] Paris, 2010. 792pp.], written in collaboration with Dr. Paul Fenton, will likely remain the definitive sourcebook and analysis of the plight of Jews in North West Africa [Maghreb] under Islam between 1148-1912.

But it is a much less auspicious work by Littman (with assistance  from Professor Yehoshafat Harkabi) that captured his singular ability to quickly digest and disseminate the most urgent ideas of our era, with unmatched prescience. Littman’s updated Preface to the 4th edition (made available online) of this seminal work, “Arab Theologians on Jews and Israel,” describes its origins:

In January 1971, while browsing in the library of St. Anthony’s College, Oxford University, awaiting a friend, I came across the 1970 English edition of the Proceedings of this Al Azhar Conference, published by the ‘Cairo General Organization for Government Printing Offices’. Only a few months earlier, I had met professor Yehoshafat Harkabi in Tel Aviv, author of a seminal work, Arab Attitudes to Israel (1971; Hebrew edition, 1968), who informed me of the contents of the Arab edition which he showed me, particularly the lecture by Kamal Ahmad Own on “The Jews are the Enemies of Human Life as is Evident from their Holy Book”. On discovering the English translation by chance, the article by the ‘Vice-principle of Tanta Institute’ caught my eye, as well as a fascinating trove of vivid ‘explanations’ on Jihad and other theological subjects. I immediately informed Professor Harkabi and suggested that it might be a good idea to publish extracts from the 935 page edition (no official copyright was indicated) which I would prepare, and our joint introduction. It could be published by Editions de l’Avenir in Geneva and would be widely distributed by the Centre d’Information et de la Documentation sur le Moyen Orient (CID) in Geneva, recently founded, with friends, by my wife and I, whose publications we directed then. 

Littman effectively captured the ugly essence of the full 935 pp. Proceedings—a modern doctrinal elaboration of  Islam’s timeless institution of jihad, sacralized Islamic Jew-hatred, and salient aspects of Islamic Law—the Sharia. Most importantly the extracts, and certainly the more extensive full Proceedings which Littman helped bring to world attention, made plain how the entire global umma, including Muslim immigrant communities living outside Islamdom sought to re-establish regional and ultimately global hegemony via jihad, beginning, axiomatically, with the jihad destruction of Israel. Thus four decades before its advent, Littman had uncovered and brought to our awareness what might aptly be described as “The Protocols of The Elders of the Arab Spring.”

Upon receipt of the Mossad Hero of Silence Order, July 1, 2009, a gracious and humble David Littman commented,

Looking back, I can truly say that the best decision I ever made in my life was to marry my wife, Gisele, and the second best was to volunteer to bring out Jewish children from Morocco to Israel, via Switzerland. Our Casablanca mission remains indelible in our minds, as will this unforgettable moment here. In conclusion, I wish to quote those inspiring words of the prophet Jeremiah: “Behold, I will bring them from the north country and gather them from the coasts of the earth, and with them the blind and the lame, the woman with child . . .: a great company shall return thither. They shall come with weeping, and with supplications will I lead them . . . . And there is hope in thine end, saith the Lord; that thy children shall come again to their own border” [31:8-9]. Yes, the children of Israel have returned to “to their own border”— to the Land of Israel—and the long history of Moroccan Jewry is a special part of Israel’s unique saga, achieved with much tears, pain, and suffering, but also with joy and hope, and great expectations over the ages. The Casablanca mission remains indelibly in my mind.

 When I think of those days, let me say from my heart in simple Hebrew: Toda raba la Malam
When the occasion demanded it, David could be edifying, while appropriately firm and blunt. Shortly after I met him and Gisele, they both delivered invited lectures to a group of Jewish and Muslim students at Georgetown University, who were apparently under the corrosive thrall of the University’s notorious apologist for Islam, John Esposito. With sad predictability, the craven Jewish students turned on the Littmans for simply describing the tragic consequences for non-Muslims of Islam’s living institutions of jihad and dhimmitude. Addressing a particularly strident, if cowardly Jewish student, David remonstrated, If you continue to behave like this, you’ll perish.

Finally, David would often, albeit half in jest, exhort colleagues, quoting Shakespeare (Henry V, Act III, Scene 1),
…[S]how us here The mettle of your pasture
David Littman’s rich life example was one of enduring moral, physical, and intellectual mettle.
May his noble soul rest for eternity, in peace.
 

Tags: David Littman, tribute To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

"Gutless" Afghanis kill American troops



Tags: Guardian Angels, friendly fire, American casualties To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

it's flooding in Argentina ...

Update on the Banff bomb alert

A suspect has now been charged in relation to the bomb alert in the NE Scotland town of Banff earlier in the week. Connor Ward, who is reported as being 19 years of age, has been charged at Peterhead Sherriff Court under the Explosive Substances Act

Apparently someone saw what they thought was bomb making materials in the back of a car outside Mr. Ward's residence in Banff and alerted the local police. The local gossip is that Mr. Ward's father had come up to live in the area, and promptly stole Mr. Ward's girlfriend away from him. Naturally this did not go over very well. This would be the "local feud" which was reported in the national press earlier in the week.

 Photos circulating in the press earlier in the week showed that Mr. Ward had an English flag mounted inside the front door of his home, but the facts coming out now make that fact quite irrelevant as to the motives of any criminal offences that may have taken place.

There is still the question of how anyone could find out what materials were necessary, where to obtain such materials, or how to use them. I suppose it is theoretically possible to obtain that kind of information online although I'd like to think that the software engineers at Google and Bing would not allow such information to even be eligible for inclusion in their search algorithms. Alternatively, the suspect may have had personal contacts of some sort. Certainly the police have still had a car parked outside Mr. Ward's address, and it's not clear why they would do that if they believe that the suspect was acting alone. Maybe they're worried about a "backlash" although there are no Muslims living in Banff that I know of, so that's not going to happen.

Maybe it's just nice and handy for them nipping across the road to Tescos for their sandwiches at flycup time.

Sources: Scotsman, STV, BBC


Tags: Banff, bomb alert To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Persecution Update 20 May 2012


Muslims demand investigation of Christians in Mauritania Update: Kuwait parliament approves death penalty for blasphemy Christians harassed in Uzbekistan Hindu extremists attack Christians in India Persecution Update keeps you informed of what is going on in our world concerning persecuted Christians. (Info from Voice of the Martyrs Canada.) Download entire Quicktime movies for showing to your group or church from swordandspirit.com, the Human Rights page.

Tags: Persecution Update, Kuwait, Voice of the Martyrs Canada To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

About banning Native American Mascots in Oregon

This was totally expected and I am surprised it took so long for Oregon, the state which so many think is oh so progressive, oh so uber hip and cool, oh so so far ahead of other states in our country, to pass this mascot ban for all state high schools. What about the vote? The nerve of that one board member who voted against the mascot ban so the vote was 5-1. This lone board member who had the temerity, the nerve, the common sense, to cast a vote which may be seen by some as a vote against the rising tide of sickening political correctness. Shock, horror and shame!

Just for the record, Oregon is actually a pretty CONSERVATIVE state. This is especially true when one escapes the covertly enforced politically correct, multicultural and diversified Willamette valley by crossing over the Cascades. and entering Central and Eastern Oregon. The valley, which stretches from a bit south of Roseburg, north to the hipster infested city of Portland, is overrun by hippies, freaks, fairies, hipsters, posers, progressives and statists who hate any and every cause that may contain even the tiniest bit of Conservative. The largest population centers are in the valley. Portland, Salem, Eugene, Medford will almost always carry the state for the democrats. There are many reasons to avoid living or even visiting the west side of Oregon but no need to start a rant at this time.

The mascot ban is nothing more than a warm and fuzzy moment, at the end of a rainbow created by unicorn farts, with wreckage from decades of liberal government rule and policies that have left most of the residents with a huge burden of increasing taxes and fees.

The image below is from the University of North Dakota. The image of a Sioux warrior is in my opinion, perfect. If this upsets you or ticks you off, so be it. It is long overdue for ALL minorities to quit whining, playing the race card, and demanding reparations.

From the Bend Bulletin

*************************************************************************************
   
This is so horribly offensive??
The good and not-so good of banning Indian mascots

The Oregon Board of Education made a decision Thursday that is easy to quarrel with and easy to forgive: Schools in Oregon must stop using Native American-themed mascots by 2017 or they could lose state funding.

Names such as “Braves,” “Chiefs” and “Indians” must go, according to The Oregonian. “White Buffalo” and “Warriors” can stay.

The argument to get rid of the mascots is they are a vulgarity and lead to racism. Board Vice Chairman Artemio Paz told the paper the wrong sort of mascots lead to “racism and unnecessary bullying. We do not allow that to exist for any of our populations.”

Part of what Paz is saying is not true. The board allows names of nations and peoples to be appropriated and manipulated as mascots. Oregon has the Scots, the Highlanders, the Vikings and the Spartans. They were not banned.

Oregon also has its Crusaders, Pirates, Outlaws and Raiders. Should the state sanction cheering any of those on? Is even use of the Cowboys safe?

We are not calling on the state board to become Lord High Executioner of All That Which Offends in Schools. It has more important things to do than mine for violations of P.C. orthodoxy.

If the state board is going to be a busy body, it should be a busybody about improving the education of Oregon students. Banning mascots is just so much easier.

As for students, do they learn more with the ban? Do they learn more by erasing the last vestiges of Indian-themed mascots?

The lesson students learn from the ban is that even when moralistic arguments are flawed, their elders have decided it’s best just to wave the white flag.

Link to the above editorial is here.

Here is the article that reported about the Oregon Board Of Education voting to ban Indian Native American themed mascots from Oregon high schools.

Tags: Oregon, Board Of Education, voting to ban, Indian, Native American, mascots, Oregon high schools To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Sharia War on Women-must watch video

This is an excellent video that was released on May 10th by Frank Gaffney and the Center For Security Policy. The panelists are all extremely knowledgeable about islam and sharia law. Darwish, Farahat, Lopez and Lugo are all familiar names and well known in the counterjihad and to those who make up the ignorant community of islamosympathizers and islamists.

"Shariah law oppresses women's liberties and human rights, denying them their unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness: 

* Life: Shariah destroys women's lives through honor killings, physical abuse, female genital mutilation, and rape. This occurs not only to Muslim women but also to Christian and secular women through acts of kidnapping, imprisonment and murder. 

 * Liberty: Shariah crushes women's liberty through censoring free speech, freedom of religion and freedom of association. * Pursuit of Happiness: Shariah punishes women's pursuit of happiness by denying equal rights and freedom in marriage, divorce, child custody, education and employment."

**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************


The Shariah War On Women. (http://www.theshariahwaronwomen.org)

A panel discussion, moderated by Center President Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and featuring several prominent civil liberties and human rights activists, will launch the national campaign to end the Shariah War On Women. Panelists will include:

Nonie Darwish: Ms. Darwish is an American human rights activist, writer, public speaker as well as founder and Director of Former Muslims United and founder of Arabs For Israel. She is the author of a new book titled The Devil We Don't Know: The Dark Side of Revolutions in the Middle East. She is also the author of Now they Call Me Infidel; Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel and the War on Terror and Cruel And Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. She speaks frequently at college campuses, religious institutions and civic association meetings. She is currently a Senior Fellow with the Center for Security Policy.

Cynthia Farahat: Ms. Farahat is an Egyptian political activist, writer and researcher. In December 2011, Ms. Farahat testified before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission in the US House of Representatives on the roots of the persecution of the Coptic Christian minority in her native Egypt. In 2008-2009, she was program coordinator and program officer at the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Liberty in Cairo, a multi-national free market think tank. She co-founded the Liberal Egyptian Party (2006-2008) and served as a member of its political committee. She is a fellow at the Middle East Forum and the Center for Security Policy and works with the Coptic Solidarity organization.

Clare Lopez: Ms. Lopez is a strategic policy and intelligence expert with a focus on Middle East, homeland security, national defense, and counterterrorism issues. Lopez began her career as an operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), serving domestically and abroad for 20 years in a variety of assignments, acquiring extensive expertise in counterintelligence, counternarcotics, and counterproliferation issues with a career regional focus on the former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Ms. Lopez is a regular contributor to print and broadcast media on subjects related to Iran and the Middle East and the co-author of two published books on Iran. She is the author of an acclaimed paper for the Center for Security Policy, The Rise of the Iran Lobby, where she serves as a Senior Fellow.

Karen Lugo: Karen Lugo is the founder of The Libertas-West Project and in this capacity she responded to a request from French jurists to submit a brief to the Conseil d'Etat on the legal grounds for banning the burqa. Karen is also Co-Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence. In this role, she directs the Center's litigation in support of constitutional issues. She has submitted amicus briefs to the US Supreme Court on such issues as Healthcare Reform, Arizona's Border Security, Gay Marriage, The Ten Commandments, Christian Clubs on University Campuses, and Material Support to Terrorists. She is a visiting professor at Chapman Law School and co-teaches the advanced Constitutional Law Clinic. Karen is president of the Orange County Federalist Society lawyer chapter and sits on the Federalist Society International Law Executive Committee. She is also on the board of advisors for Trinity Law School in Orange County, CA and an advisor to UK Baroness Caroline Cox's HART US. Karen is a regular guest on the Orange County PBS local issues debate program, Inside OC, and she is a frequent contributor to RedCounty.com, FlashReport, and contributing editor to Family Security Matters. She has been interviewed by dozens of radio hosts on the matter of sharia law. Ms. Lugo is an appointee to the California Advisory Committee to the US Commission on Civil Rights.


Tags: Sharia War, War on Women, video To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!