headerphoto


Showing posts with label North Korea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North Korea. Show all posts

Rising threat: Burma

This is from China Confidential. I will let it speak for itself.

The rogue regime in Burma is reportedly developing nuclear weapons with North Korean help--and Chinese complicity.

Google Burma news. Go here.

When the history of the Axis of Evil is written, it will show that North Korea and Iran drew inspiration from two of America's most notorious foes--Fidel Castro and (ironically, given the Iran-Iraq war) Saddam Hussein. Castro used Soviet-supplied nuclear missiles to put an end to U.S. attempts to overthrow him and his Communist Cuban regime. Saddam used missiles to terrorize Israel and blaze a path for Israel's enemies to be able to one day threaten its existence in spite of the comparative overwhelming superiority of the Israeli Air Force.

North Korea and Iran ... partners in nuclear and missile crime ... a marriage made in hell. Their advances make the whole notion of an international community practically meaningless.





Find original article here

Iran is now America's main threat

Iran has replaced North Korea as the biggest and worst threat to America and Global security. China (15%) and North Korea (10%) come in at a very distant second and third place, respectively.


This marks a significant shift in U.S. public opinion over the last nine months, when the June 2009 APOV Survey found Americans most likely to point to North Korea (44%) as the country posing the greatest threat to global security, doubling those who cited Iran (22%) at that time.


"June 2009 marked the height of North Korea's long-range missile tests, and things seemed to have quieted down after the two American journalists were released from that country in August," said Stewart and Partners president William Stewart. "Since his questionable re-election around the same time period, Ahmadinejad's words and actions have earned Iran the distinction of being public enemy number one in the eyes of the American people."



Iran Replaces N. Korea as Americans' Main Threat

Stewart and Partners today released the latest edition of its America's Point of View (APOV) Survey, which reports 40% of Americans identifying Iran as the country that poses the greatest threat to global security.

China (15%) and North Korea (10%) come in at a very distant second and third place, respectively.

This marks a significant shift in U.S. public opinion over the last nine months, when the June 2009 APOV Survey found Americans most likely to point to North Korea (44%) as the country posing the greatest threat to global security, doubling those who cited Iran (22%) at that time.

"June 2009 marked the height of North Korea's long-range missile tests, and things seemed to have quieted down after the two American journalists were released from that country in August," said Stewart and Partners president William Stewart. "Since his questionable re-election around the same time period, Ahmadinejad's words and actions have earned Iran the distinction of being public enemy number one in the eyes of the American people."


'Islamic Extremism'

The survey also finds that 68% of Americans say global security is unstable, whereas last June this figure stood at 57%.

Separate survey questions reveal similar percentages saying they are "very concerned" about the threat Islamic extremists pose to the United States (67%), and that it is "very likely" that Islamic extremists will successfully carry out a major terrorist attack within the United States during the next 12 months.

When it comes to the job President Obama is doing in handling Islamic extremism, more Americans disapprove (48%) than approve (30%).

Complete survey results, including the question wording, can be found here.

Hat tip: China Confidential

Stewart and Partners is an independent research and consulting firm specializing in communications research and strategy development.

Stolen from China Confidential: End the Iranian Threat Before it Ends the US

By now, most of you should have figured out I really like China Confidential. I always ask before I cross post or 'swipe' from another blogger. I have often thought why have we not done this to Iran yet? Please do not bother me with the usual answers from libtard land. Ever heard of EMP attack or Scud-in-a-bucket? These are not jokes or bad puns. They are very real threats to the United States and other countries.

"Appeasement of Iran has made war with Iran inevitable. The only remaining question: will the war be fought on American or Iranian terms? After Pearl Harbor and 9/11, it would be criminally insane to allow an enemy to prepare a surprise attack on the U.S., to allow Iran to prove the old superstition that things come in threes."




End the Iranian Threat Before it Ends the US



Musing openly about "a world without America and Zionism," Islamist (Islamonazi) Iran is developing nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles.

A great deal of evidence suggests that Iran, with North Korean assistance, has already developed an EMP attack capability. Google EMP attack and scud-in-a-bucket.

An EMP attack--detonation of a nuclear warhead at a sufficiently high altitude above the American Midwest--would wipe out virtually all electronic and communications systems and networks across America and put an end to every modern convenience and device on which we depend, including all modern cars, trucks, trains, and aircraft, and ... electricity. Imagine the biggest blackout in history--and it lasts for years. No lights. No phones. No Internet. No radio or TV. No harvesting equipment on the farms. No way to transport food, medicine, fuel, fertilizer, feed, and seeds. No ATMs or banks.

All passenger jets in the air at the time of the attack would crash. The rest would be grounded. The only vehicles that would run would be pre-electronic ones--until they run out of undeliverable gasoline or diesel oil.

In a flash, the United States would be plunged back into the 19th century--without the resources of the 19th century. Tens of millions of people would die from starvation and disease, lack of heat in the winter, etc. Hospital patients would start dying within one or two days of the attack, which could be anonymously launched--right now, as you read this--from one of thousands of cargo ships or barges in U.S. coastal waters on any given day. Many, if not most, of the freighters fly flags of convenience.

After the hospital patients, others would start dying--in a week or so. Chaos and anarchy would rule. Mob violence and mayhem would be commonplace. In the cities, there would basically be savagery, a mad, cannibalistic competition for survival. In the country, where people can still hunt and fish, find ways to mechanically pump or access clean water (some rural folks are fortunate to have gravity drainage wells), chop and haul wood to heat their homes, build outhouses ... and use their hunting and target rifles and shotguns to protect themselves and their neighbors ... there would be pockets of cooperation and hope.

But pockets do not make a country. After an EMP attack, the U.S. would for all practical purposes cease to exist.

Experts estimate that only 10% of the U.S. population--about 30 million people--would survive an EMP attack.

There is no known defense and no apparent deterrent against an anonymous EMP attack, no reason to safely assume that Iran's Islamonazi leaders won't try to do what Hitler could not do--destroy the United States.

What is to be done?

The answer is obvious: the U.S. should--must--bomb Iran, as soon as possible, massively and mercilessly. Any and all weapons necessary, including tactical nuclear weapons, should be used to swiftly and utterly destroy Iran's military and industrial infrastructure and armed forces--especially, the SS-like Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps--while minimizing potential loss of American and allied lives. Nothing less than total victory is morally acceptable, as a government's first duty is to protect the lives of its people.

Appeasement of Iran has made war with Iran inevitable. The only remaining question: will the war be fought on American or Iranian terms? After Pearl Harbor and 9/11, it would be criminally insane to allow an enemy to prepare a surprise attack on the U.S., to allow Iran to prove the old superstition that things come in threes.

There is no diplomatic solution to the problem of nuclear-arming, Islamonazi Iran. Sanctions won't work. It's too late for that, too late for containment.

The choice is mass death in Iran or mass death in the United States.

Thanks to Confidential reporter at China Confidential!!

North Korea 'talks' will go nowhere, just like Obama.

China will stand by the NorKos and nothing will
change except violent extremists get the green light.
Obama and the other powers will twiddle and twaddle
about, doing nothing.

China vows to stand by North Korea Reuters

Hat tip China Confidential

Sanction will NEVER work. North Korea as an example????

U.S. Is Seeking a Range of Sanctions Against Iran - NYTimes.com

Sanctions against Iran will not work and the West
is just spinning its wheels and giving the mullahs
extra time to acquire nuclear weapons. A joint
strike with Israel would be better than any of the
tom foolery this administration is thinking of.