obama repeats past history instead of learning from the West's failure based on appeasement

Prior to the outbreak of World War Two, Europe was looking to Neville Chamberlain to stop Hitler and Nazi Germany from expanding and attacking other European countries. We all know what the outcome was and Europe plunged head first into a rapidly expanding war that Europe did not want and was ill equipped to fight.

Everyone knows this very important bit of history EXCEPT obama, the first muslim potus, the second coming of a former potus, Jimmy 'the dhimmmi' Carter. In my book Carter, was one of the WORST presidents this country has ever suffered under. obama, I think is as bad if not WORSE than Carter.

obama, like Chamberlain thought he could win over Iran, just as Chamberlain was sure he could sway and stop Hitler. The rest of this sad story is as they like to say, 'history.'

From Foreign Confidential which used to be China Confidential. Same site. Just the name has been changed. Great site for news and financial information.

**********************************************************************************************************************************

Obama's Engagement Policy Made War Inevitable

By Confidential Reporter

Iran has vowed to destroy Israel and is developing the means to achieve its evil aim--nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles, including ICBMs.

Even if Iran, if it is allowed to develop its weapons of mass destruction, can be deterred from a direct strike on the Jewish State, the threat of an indirect Iranian attack on Israel, by proxy or terrorist group, will remain a real and constant possibility.

Iran has also mused openly about a "world without America."

Again, while a direct attack on the United States by Iran would be insane, the threat of an indirect and deniable hit would loom large. Iran and North Korea have developed and tested missile launch systems designed to be concealed and used aboard cargo vessels; and there is no known defense against such an attack, which could be aimed at wiping out either a U.S. coastal city or the entire U.S. power grid (Google EMP attack, or search this blog's archives accordingly).

Given the above, and in light of 9/11, the U.S. should long ago have preemptively attacked Iran from the air--waves of swift and merciless assaults--in order to (a) eliminate its nuclear and missile programs and war-fighting capabilities, and (b) annihilate the Nazi-lke regime itself, including the monstrous mullahs and their Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. The U.S. alone has the power to end the Iranian threat--without use of nuclear weapons. Israel will have to draw on its presumed nuclear arsenal in order to utterly defeat Iran without suffering devastating counterattacks by the turbaned tyranny and Hezbollah, which is bristling with missiles capable of leveling Haifa and Tel Aviv.

So much for logic. The Obama administration has unfortunately done the opposite. Instead of attacking Iran, the administration has appeased and actually attempted to align with it in the hope of entering into a so-called Grand Bargain aimed at pacifying Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Obama's engagement will go down in history alongside Chamberlain's appeasement as a policy that sought to preserve the peace but instead made war inevitable--on the enemy's terms.

Original post is here.