Thhe "moral depravity" of Arab "savages". True words that have offended muslims in England

From the wonderful country now known as Britainistan or Englandistan, one of the muslim groups there has taken offense at how Melanie Phillips accurately described the murdering scum that butchered the Jewish family in their own beds in the settlement village of Itamar.

Hmmm... I see nothing wrong with Ms. Phillips description(s) of these murdering, stone-age savages, do you? After all, islam and muslims have been killing, raping, torturing, persecution, intimidating Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs and any other true religions that get in islam's way.islam has been doing this for how long? Only the last 1400 plus years!

While I am at it I best not forget slavery, female genital mutilation, pedophilia and child bride marriages. islam and muslims are about the only ones left who still practice these SAVAGE and BARBARIC practices and get away with it. So the words that Phillips used are actually quite mild and tame by my standards.

What does not offend muslims these days, or islam?

From the Guardian.

**********************************************************************************

PCC investigates Melanie Phillips' Spectator blog

By John Plunkett

Blogpost on media coverage of murder of Israeli family on West Bank referred to the 'moral depravity' of Arab 'savages'

A Melanie Phillips blogpost on the Spectator website which referred to the "moral depravity" of Arab "savages" is being investigated by the Press Complaints Commission.

The online comment piece, headlined "Armchair barbarism", focused on media coverage of the murder of five members of a Jewish family in the West Bank settlement of Itamar by Palestinian militants earlier this month.

"The moral depravity of the Arabs is finding a grotesque echo in the moral bankruptcy and worse of the British and American 'liberal' media," wrote Phillips.

"Overwhelmingly, the media have either ignored or downplayed the atrocity – or worse, effectively blamed the victims for bringing it on themselves, describing them as 'hard-line settlers' or extremists.

"To the New York Times, it's not the Arab massacre of a Jewish family which has jeopardised 'peace prospects' – because the Israelis will quite rightly never trust any agreement with such savages – but instead Israeli policy on building more homes, on land to which it is legally and morally entitled, which is responsible instead for making peace elusive. Twisted, and sick."

The column, which also referred to coverage of the murders by CNN, the BBC and the Guardian – part of the group that publishes MediaGuardian.co.uk – prompted two complaints to the press watchdog, one of them from Engage, a group promoting Muslim engagement in British society.

Inayat Bunglawala, chair of Muslims4UK, said: "Her words went far beyond just denouncing the killings. It was a far more generalised racist outburst against Arabs as a whole. 

Tough. How often do we see the Jews handing out candy and celebrating the cold blooded murders of innocent muslims? Please answer that, which you will NOT be able to do.

"If you insert the word 'Jew' or 'Jewish' where she has referred to Arabs then I am sure she would have no doubt that those words would be antisemitic. Just as she abhors antisemitism it is important that she maintains the same vigorous anti-racist stance against Arabs. It is just unacceptable to use that kind of language."

No, it is not when one is describing the heinous acts  that muslims under islam commit every week around the globe against innocent victims for just being themselves, believing what they do.

Bunglawala said he had also complained to the police about the column. Of course he did.

In November last year the Spectator and Phillips published an online apology to a prominent British Muslim they falsely accused of antisemitism in an online column.

The Spectator had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.

Original article is here.