You won't be hearing 'black privileges' activists and media endorsed racists like Al Sharpton speak about that, but recently, 29 people have been indicted in a sex trafficking ring, in which Somali gangs in Minneapolis and St. Paul allegedly forced girls under age 14 into prostitution.
"three Minneapolis-based gangs — the Somali Outlaws, the Somali Mafia and the Lady Outlaws ... the sex trafficking ring operated for 10 years, with the defendants recruiting young girls to engage in sex acts.
One girl was just 13 when, in 2005, she was taken from the Minneapolis area to an apartment in Nashville to engage in prostitution.
In another case, a girl was under age 13 when she was first forced to engage in sex acts in November 2006. Two defendants had sex with her the next month at an apartment in St. Paul, and then other males arrived and were charged money to do the same, the indictment said. That scenario happened on many occasions.
One defendant, Haji Osman Salad, nicknamed “Hollywood,” later made Jane Doe Two “his girl”, picking her up from school, engaging in sex acts with her, and then instructing her to engage in sex acts with other men."
Those were African Muslims, but cases like these are also common with Pakistani Muslims (which the media dhimmingly refers to as 'Asians', thus smearing a much larger group of people, who don't threaten them with violence).
In the UK, A gang of Pakistani ‘sexual predators’ were jailed for abusing white girls as young as 12.
"The five men preyed on their victims over several months and threatened them with violence if they refused their advances.
One of the men branded his victim a ‘white bitch’ when she resisted, while a second smirked: ‘I’ve used you and abused you.’
The men, all British-born Pakistanis, attacked the four girls in play areas, parks and in the back of their cars.
The five, Umar Razaq, 24, Razwan Razaq, 30, Zafran Ramzan, 21, Adil Hussain, 20, and Mohsin Khan, 21, were found guilty of a string of sexually related offences against the girls, one aged 12, two aged 13 and one aged 16."
Kudos to the British court that has actually performed its duty in this case. Reports from the UK show that there are countless others who are told to shut up instead.
And the connection to their supremacist ideology, posing as a religion? One need only compare the behavior of these animals, with members of other religions that come from the same regions, to have proof, but let's bring out a few holy verses anyway, for the fun of it:
"The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.
Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) 'And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess'." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
As opposed to that, the Jewish Torah (old testament) has another idea in mind:
"When you go out to war against your enemies and the LORD, your God, delivers them into your hand, so that you take captives, if you see a comely woman among the captives and become so enamored of her that you wish to have her as wife, you may take her home to your house. But before she may live there, she must shave her head and pare her nails and lay aside her captive's garb. After she has mourned her father and mother for a full month, you may have relations with her, and you shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. However, if later on you lose your liking for her, you shall give her her freedom, if she wishes it; but you shall not sell her or enslave her, since she was married to you under compulsion." (Deuteronomy 21:10)
The lesson is exactly opposite that of the Quran: that men should not be animals, and allow their urges cool down, before making a decision concerning a woman.
So much for 'all religions are the same', and the equally vapid 'that was the custom at the time'. Compared to 'the time', the aforementioned Jewish law is as progressive could be.
But times have changed, and you are not very likely to see bands of Jews raiding a Christian, Buddhist, or Muslim village, and taking all the women as spoils of war. You are also less likely to see religious Jews speaking in favor of woman trafficking - much less actively participating in them.
Yet, as far as popular brainwashing would have you think, Jews are the embodiment of all that is evil, and Muslims are simply misunderstood.
Misunderstood indeed, for many of us can't even imagine what their religion truly stands for. More proof? Why, certainly:
"'O Allah's Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?'
The Prophet said, 'Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence'." (Bukhari 34:432)
So, not only are the women to be raped, but they should preferably be impregnated as well.
"I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: 'Give me that girl'." (Sahih Muslim 4345)
But did Muslims use women merely as sex slaves? Heavens, no, that would be barbarian, and as we all know Islam is the religion of tolerance and peace.
"Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." (Ibn Ishaq 693)
Which is why they were also used as a commodity.
These are not obscure, outdated scrolls, slowly disintegrating in caves and museums - but a living text that is being injected into the minds of countless men, all over the world, every single day; and it is not studied in the context of hypothetical, mystical, moralistic fables, but as literal commands, which give any brute justification for his deeds.
It is our duty to speak against such evils, and all who would have them imposed on us, whether in the name of Allah, or Multiculturalism.
0 Comments - Share Yours!:
Post a Comment