Now it is a Kangaroo court in Holland. The Geert Wilders trial that is not a trial. It is a show to have all of Europe bow down to Islam and shariah law.

The trial that is not a trial. This is just a show to show all of Europe that freedom of speech will officially be dead, and Geert Wilders convicted. Islam will be vindicated and empowered all through Europe and beyond to other continents. One real danger no one has mentioned is the increased use of International judicial decisions and rulings under the administration of the mullah Obamaham. As Obama has always wanted to use and have the United States be part of and use more of the International courts. As America's first Muslim-born president(again under Islamic law) do not thin k for one second that his administration will not use a Wilder's conviction and a favorable ruling for Islam in this country. CAIR, MSA, MPAC are all watching how this trial will end. A Muslim president, Islamosympathizers in the swamp are just a bad combination.


_________________________________________________________________________

Brussels Journal

Diana West

How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?

One reading doesn't convey the chilling import of these words.

As Stephen Coughlin has pointed out to me, "we," in the definition at the OIC website, are, of course, "the collective voice of the Islamic world" – the "ummah" as represented by the heads of state and foreign ministers of the 57 Islamic nations of the OIC. In other words, as Coughlin puts it, "real state actors" using "real state power" to further real state objectives.


The objective of the ummah? Always and eternally, the greater and wider and deeper imposition of Islamic law. The ummah indeed sent its message to the West regarding "red lines that should not be crossed" – namely, the Danish cartoons and Wilders' film "Fitna." Official protests, statements, riots, boycotts, murders, death threats, assassination attempts -- a clear Islamic message, all right. And:

As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues.

Yes, and to the craven point where "the official West and its public opinion" are paralyzed and silenced by these same "sensitivities."

They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.

Behold (courtesy Tundra Tabloids) the very image of Dutch "justice." After yesterday's "judicial" proceedings in Amsterdam, Holland itself is forever besmirched, its "judges" having made it clear that no semblance of fairness will enter into their proceeeding against Geert Wilders. As noted below, the "judges" slashed the roster of witnesses the Wilders defense team planned to call to the stand from eighteen to three.

When the OIC speaks about "freedom of expression," it means freedom of expression as governed by the laws of Islam – sharia. When the OIC says we in the West have "started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility," it means we in the West have started to regard expression from the perspective of sharia – from the perspective of the totalitarian Islamic system.

Trying Geert Wilders, a once-valiant Holland is leading the way, forsaking the freedoms of the West for the objectives of the ummah. Continue reading


http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4301