headerphoto


Showing posts with label Islamic terrorism in the United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic terrorism in the United States. Show all posts

Spitting in the the Face of of 9/11 and all the lives lost

I am posting this one without comments. I agree and this is an INSULT to all who lost loved ones from 9/11. An Insult of the worst kind. I find Islam insulting and dangerous. This is STEALTH JIHAD.


Spitting in the Face of Everyone Murdered on 9/11
By Gadi Adelman



Well, it’s official, we have all lost our minds.

Family Security Matters;  I read about this last December, plans for a mosque at Ground Zero, but like a fool, I assumed that New Yorkers would never let this come to pass. A mosque just 600 feet from where the World Trade Center towers once stood. I thought to myself; no way will New York or anyone with a heart or soul, not to mention just plain common sense, ever allow a mosque to be built anywhere near Ground Zero. But, as I said, I am a fool.

The project of a community center /mosque is being proposed by two organizations, the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA) and their sister organization, the Cordoba Initiative. This past Wednesday night they made their presentation to the Community Board of lower Manhattan (CB1). Twelve people sit on the board and would you like to guess what the final vote was? Get ready to grab a barf bag … the 12 members voted unanimously to support the project. Yes, it’s not a typo, it was unanimous, all were in favor and, to give you an idea of how excited the board members were, they applauded during the presentation.

In an article in the New York Daily News on Thursday, retired FDNY Deputy Chief Jim Riches said, "I realize it's not all of them, but I don't want to have to go down to a memorial where my son died on 9/11 and look at a mosque. If you ask me, it's a religion of hate." Deputy Chief Riches lost his son Jim, a firefighter, on 9/11.

Also quoted in the article was Rosemary Cain of Massapequa, L.I., whose son, firefighter George Cain, 35, was killed in the 2001 attacks, she called the project, "a slap in the face. I think it's despicable. That's sacred ground," said Cain, "How could anybody give them permission to build a mosque there? It tarnishes the area."

The mosque would be located in a former Burlington Coat Factory outlet which is just 2 blocks or 600 feet from where the World Trade Towers once stood. I find it ironic that the building has been mostly abandoned since 9/11 because the landing gear of one of the hijacked airplanes crashed through its roof. The leader and co-founder of the project, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, paid $4.85 million dollars for the uilding in December last year.

In a Fox NY channel 5 interview on Thursday, a 9/11 firefighter Tim Brown described the mosque project as, "a Trojan horse being rolled into our most sacred ground". He asked the mosque's imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, where did Rauf get the reported $4.85 million in cash to purchase the building?

Needless to say, that question was never answered in full; Rauf would say only that the cash came from “members of the community.”

Tim Brown is a former NY firefighter and one of the few 9/11 survivors to survive the collapse of both WTC towers. He was also a first responder to the 1993 WTC bombing, also executed by a group of Islamic terrorists. He is the founder of the website thebravest.com.

I spoke with Matt Dunning, the Associate Editor of the Tribeca Trib newspaper on the telephone on Sunday. The Tribeca Trib is a monthly newspaper that covers lower Manhattan. Unlike most publications today, they actually report the news. Mr. Dunning explained to me that they “do not even do editorials for that reason”, they report on facts. He was at the CB1 board meeting Wednesday night. We spoke about his article on the meeting and I must say I was shocked when Dunning told me that “not one person from the community came to the meeting was in opposition. If someone had been, we would have reported it.”

This was a public board meeting, and no one who lives or works in this area even showed up to voice his or her opinion that they opposed the mosque? Have we actually arrived at the point in this country where forgiveness or ignorance overrides sense and responsibility? Back on December 16th, 2009, in an article written shortly after the purchase of the building,

Youssef M. Ibrahim wrote the following in Hudson NY, “As a former New York Times and Wall Street Journal correspondent, and as a New York Sun columnist who covered Islamic fundamentalism extensively overseas and in the USA, I find the facts oddly lacking. The story as reported fails to answer, and avoids asking, so many pertinent questions."

The source of money matters as a significant part of the hundreds of mosques being built and already erected in this country double up as cultural Islamic centers for distributing literature-- Islamist propaganda in fact—from Bay Ridge Brooklyn to Detroit, and for schools growing Muslim minorities. They house Imams of unknown origin and education, many of whom do not speak a word of English but preach in Arabic and Urdu -- radical messages, it often turns out.

As a reporter familiar with the Arab communities of the USA, I doubt the faithful fork out all that money for mega mosques, and if they did, the mayor’s office should prove it, not merely accept someone’s say so. It is an established fact that a significant percentage of the mosques built in the USA in the past two decades are receiving a disproportionate amount of their funds not only from the Saudis, but also the UAE, Qatar and Iran -- all problematic Islamists activist nations. The government just discontinued work on a major Iranian-funded mosque and center in New York City, which had operated under the radar since the days of the good old Shah of Iran under the auspices of the Pahlavi Foundation, and has been owned since 1979 by the Mullahs of Iran.

The context here is that 15 of the 19 perpetrators of the attacks -- on the very site where this new mosque shall rise -- came from Saudi Arabia.” He ended his article with “One would hope for a follow-up story or stories, and that New York City and its citizens at least ask harder questions, rather than submit to being misled in the interest of political correctness.”

The estimated cost for the 13 story building is $100 million dollars. According to page 8 of the ASMA website financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 they have “temporarily restricted net assets” as follows:

UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) $ 53,664

MDG3 Fund (Millennium Development Goals) $481,942

Hunt Alternatives Fund $15,000

Carnegie Corporation of N.Y. $ 144,752

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund $50,000

Qatar government fund $576,312

Interestingly, I had no trouble locating all of the groups as linked above, except for the Qatar government fund, which donated over half a million dollars to ASMA in 2009. The fact that the UN has a hand in this really comes as no surprise given that just last week they embraced the Islamic Republic of Iran by allowing them to become a member of The Commission on the Status of Women, as I wrote about in my article “Even if it were a joke, it wouldn’t be funny”.

Also, according to the same financial statement, on page 10 of the report they list their “Expenditure report for the period October 13, 2008 to June 30, 2009” leaving ASMA with a balance of $988,586.00 when converted from Euros to Dollars using the conversion noted on the same page.

So, assuming this “independent” audit is correct they ended their fiscal year on 6-30-09 with a balance of almost 1 million dollars. I wonder then, where is the money for a 100 million dollar mosque coming from? As Youssef M. Ibrahim wrote in his article “It is an established fact that a significant percentage of the mosques built in the USA in the past two decades are receiving a disproportionate amount of their funds not only from the Saudis, but also the UAE, Qatar and Iran -- all problematic Islamists activist nations.”

Does anyone have the sense to connect the dots and follow the money trail? Is it not enough that the terrorists who were responsible for 9/11 are from the same country that is funding mosques all over our country, that we have to allow them to fund the building of a mosque in the very location where they committed the most heinous act in American history?

Using this analogy, had the bomb last week in Times Square actually exploded, we would be planning a mosque in Times Square right now. Have we lost our minds so much that we have moved to erecting monuments to perpetrators and not victims? Currently, in the U.S. there are over 1200 mosques, with at least one in each state. I don’t see the need to build a new mosque at the same location where nearly 3000 people were murdered by terrorists who followed an Islamic ideology that will be preached inside this new one.

Link to Gadi Adelman's origianl article is here

Family Security Matters

Islamobama and his own Stealth Jihad. It can and will get worse.

I am posting this from China Confidential. There is not much
I could add to this and will let it speak for itself. Every
word is true and Obama is rightly raked over the coals. He is
an Islamosympathizer in the worst way we could have imagined.





On 9/12, who could have imagined Barack Hussein Obama's ascent to the White House?


Since taking office, America's first Muslim-born (according to Islamic law) Third World-American (his Muslim father was a Kenyan socialist) President has made engagement (appeasement and accommodation) of Islamist nations and groups the central feature of his foreign policy. BHO has given Islamist Iran an additional year to develop nuclear weapons, while warning Israel against attacking Iran and relentlessly pressuring the Jewish State to withdraw to indefensible borders in order to make possible the formation of an Islamist-ruled terror state with East Jerusalem as its capital; embraced the Islamist idea of a so-called Muslim world, transcending political boundaries, race, and ethnicity, united by belief in "the holy Koran," which he delights in quoting; bowed to the Saudi King, deeply and submissively, like a Muslim servant; apologized for alleged American sins against Muslim and other Third World nations; reached out to Islamist terrorist and front groups at home and abroad, including the Foreign Terrorist Organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, which initially welcomed his election, and allegedly "reconcilable" elements of the resurgent Taliban; and downgraded the War on Terror to a law enforcement battle with Al Qaeda--the only Islamist group that is for the time being still beyond the pale of engagement--by (a) deciding to bring 9/11 mastermind KSM and other alien enemy combatant war criminals to New York City for a civilian court trial, and (b) referring to terrorists as "extremists" and "suspects" and to Islamist terrorist acts as "manmade disasters."

Obama has also wildly exaggerated the size of the U.S. Muslim population in order to increase its importance; falsely claimed that Islam helped "shape" the nation; crawled to Turkey's crypto-Islamist, Iran-backing government and supported its bid for EU membership, and backed burqa-wearing in France and a menacing European-Mediterranean pact that promises to flood the Continent with 50 million additional Muslims from North Africa.

Most recently, Obama has refused to "connect the dots" between the Fort Hood massacre, the slaughter of CIA employees in Afghanistan, and the attempted Christmas Day bombing of a U.S. airliner bound for (Islamist-friendly) Detroit, and between his administration's insane insistence on differentiating between visa-eligible, alien Islamist "extremists" and visa-ineligible--no-fly--"terrorists" and the equally insane decision to treat the aforementioned airline attacker--a Nigerian Islamist--as a criminal "suspect," entitled to a civilian court trial, a public defender, and a plea arrangement.



It is time for U.S. voters to connect the dots ... between a perfidious, possible plea bargain with an Islamist terrorist and an even more perfidious Grand Bargain that Obama desperately sought with nuclear-arming Iran ... to pacify Pakistan (which Obama pronounces like a Pakistani) and Afghanistan (which he strangely still pronounces like a Midwesterner) ... and face up to the fact that the U.S. has a President who is ideologically, philosophically ... and perhaps also mentally and emotionally ... incapable of defending the world's greatest democracy and last, best hope for civilization.


Thanks to China Confidential

Restart talks without preconditions: Death sentence for Israel. The Jews need to tell Obama to mind his own business.

Many of us were not deluded or fooled one bit by Obama's lies about being
Israel's friend and a friend of the Jews when he was campaiging for office of the POTUS. So here it is, out in the open for all to see: "restart negotiations without preconditions." Got that? No preconditions to restart the very talks that may well lead to the destruction of the Jewish state. Obama and his racist administration should try living in Israel for a few weeks and see how they like it. Surrounded by millions of arab Islamists that want nothing more than Israel wiped off the map, every Jew dead and 'reclaim' the land that was never rightfully theirs in the first place.


In case you have not noticed Obama and friends have made a mess out of life
here in the United States. He has been in office for a year now and the previous administration is still getting blamed for just about everything.
Remember who regained power in D.C. back in 2006?  That's correct, the Demosocialistacrats. How many bills and issues did they stonewall and defeat
that could have made a marked difference in the state we now find
ourselves in? That said, who is Obama, Mitchell(a true anti-semite with a
well known history of dislike for the Jews and Israel) and Clinton to advise
or badger Israel into a possible suicide mission as outlined above? Obama
is a nobody who has accomplished absolutely nothing. As such, he should
right his own ship here at home before advising any country. Let alone one
like Israel that has survived and flourished against insurmountable odds.







Mitchell: Mideast stagnation endangers US aid


On eve of visit to region, American special envoy threatens Israel with sanctions if it fails to advance peace talks, two-state solution. Secretary of State Clinton says working to restart negotiations 'without preconditions'


Ynetnews
Yitzhak Benhorin Published: 01.08.10, 19:58


WASHINGTON – On the eve of his visit to the Middle East, US special envoy George Mitchell threatened that his country would freeze its aid to Israel if the Jewish state failed to advance peace talks with the Palestinians and a two-state solution.

Mitchell clarified in an interview to the PBS network that the United States would use incentives or sanctions against both sides.

George Mitchell says he plans to return to region in next few days, hopes to make progress on political, security and economic tracks of peace process

According to American law, Mitchell said, the US can freeze its support for aid to Israel. He added that all options must remain open and that the sides must be convinced about what their important interests are.

The US envoy noted that some progress had been made and that his country would continue its efforts to resume the negotiations.

The American guarantees allow Israel to raise funds at low interest rates and improve the Jewish state's credit rating. The last time the US threatened to freeze the guarantees was during the term of President George Bush Sr. and former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir.

Ahead of Mitchell's visit, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held talks Friday with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh and Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Egyptian Intelligence Minister Omar Suleiman is also in Washington.

Clinton's aim is to recruit Egypt to host a possible meeting between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, in which a resumption of direct negotiations will be declared.

The secretary of state Hillary Clinton said after meeting with her Jordanian counterpart that she was working to restart peace talks between Palestinians and Israelis "without preconditions."

"We are working with the Israelis, the (Palestinian Authority), and the Arab states to take the steps needed to relaunch the negotiations as soon as possible and without preconditions," she said.

Continue reading here

New report on Fort Hood Jihadist killer. New evidence supports premeditation

Don't expect this report to get traction from
the MSM or the Obama house of Islam.
I have also included a link to the Middle
Research and Media Institute at the end of this
article. Please check out their excellent and
informative website. Hasan is an Islamic
domestic terrorist and deserves nothing
more than a swift trial and execution. Like
that will happen with Islamobama and friends.



The murderer: Nidal Hasan


RubinReports: Dramatic New Evidence On Major Nidal Hasan and the Fort Hood Terror Attack
From Rubin Reports

Dramatic New Evidence On Major Nidal Hasan and the Fort Hood Terror Attack

Posted: 24 Dec 2009 06:18 AM PST

By Barry Rubin

This story seems to blow the lid off the killings at Fort Hood. Anwar al-Awlaki, a Muslim cleric who is a U.S. citizen now living in Yemen, says that the mass murdering major, Khalid Hasan, asked and was given by him a religious ruling authorizing him to shoot the soldiers. This would prove premeditation, a rational decision based on Islamic law, and the Jihadist motivation of the attack beyond any ability to conceal it.

Awlaki’s al-Jazira interview is translated by MEMRI which, it should be noted, does not at all sensationalize the story. While Awlaki could be talking big or “taking credit” for the terrorist operation, he was the imam at Hasan’s mosque in the Washington DC area for some time. His account is credible though it obviously should be investigated closely.

According to the interview, Hasan sent Awlaki an email on December 17, 2008, in which he asked, in Awlaki’s words whether “killing American soldiers and officers…is a religiously legitimate act or not."

After an extensive correspondence, Awlaki complied, blessing the attack three days before it happened:

"Because Nidal's target was a military target inside America, and there is no question about this. Then, also, those members of the military were not regular soldiers; rather they were prepared and preparing themselves to go to battle and to kill downtrodden Muslims and to commit crimes in Afghanistan…."

This information is of the greatest importance. Hasan went to his imam, asked to be assured that shooting his fellow soldiers was a recommended deed under Islamic law, and was told to go ahead. Incidentally, Awlaki has thus become an accessory to the crime and U.S. authorities should ask the Yemeni government to ensure he can be interviewed and extradited.

The ABC network's coverage claims that it was not clear from the transcript whether Awlaki gave Hasan a green light to kill his fellow American soldiers. While Awlaki doesn't say in so many words that he told him to go ahead, it is quite clear from the transcript that this is precisely what he did do.

Some reports of a Yemeni government air attack on an al-Qaida meeting claim that Awlaki was one of the targets.

Once again, MEMRI has done excellent work and you might consider making a donation to them. The full text of the interview can be obtained by writing memri@memri.org or jttmsubs@memri.org. with the words "Al-Awlaki Interview" in the subject line.





Middle East Research and Media Institute
http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/12/dramatic-new-evidence-on-major-nidal.html