headerphoto


John Kerry Shows His Idiocy Once Again




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip CNS News

"The response to Islamist extremism, which “exploits a legitimate and beautiful religion,” must include offering alternatives to young people who lack opportunities and “feel oppressed,” Secretary of State John Kerry said Tuesday."




John Heinz Kerry has once more illustrated that not only is he ignorant of the Middle East, he is also ignorant about Islam.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/kerry-extremism-exploits-beautiful-religion



“We’re also going to win it with better alternatives for a whole bunch of young people who today live in places where they feel oppressed, where they don’t have a lot of opportunity, there’s not enough education, they don’t have jobs,” he said. “But they know what the rest of the world has because they all have smart phones, they all have mobile devices, and they’re all seeing what’s going on and they trade thoughts.”


Old Horse Face forgets about the thousands of ISIS fighters who traveled from Europe, Australia, Canada and the US to join the Islamic jihad. They had education at their fingertips and smart phones in their hands. Kerry is still peddling the line that extremism is born of poverty. He forgets that Usama bin Laden was the heir to a multi-million dollar construction firm in Saudi Arabia. His successor, Aymam al Zawahiri, is an educated man, and the leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, has a PhD in Islamic studies. Rich man, poor man. They have both joined the Islamic jihad, John-John.



And then there was this gem:

“And so we have to push back. We’re not going to win this exclusively through our efforts on the ground in this coalition with kinetic efforts,” he said, referring to the U.S.-led coalition’s military operations against the jihadist group. “We’re going to win this with ideas.”


(Amazing resemblance)

Ideas!??! What ideas? It's not like this administration is brimming over with ideas. And what "kinetic efforts" on the ground is he referring to? He must be referring to the heroic Kurds going it alone in Kobani aided by German and Dutch biker gangs, be jeezus! We ourselves are not doing anything on the ground.

How's this for an idea, John-John? Let's offer refuge to the last remaining Christians in the Middle East, get the hell out of there, become energy self sufficient, start supporting Israel again, and let those Arabs kill each other to their hearts' content?



"That's too simplistic."

The fight against Female Genital Mutilation has lost a great champion

It is rare that you will see me stand up for anything related to or from the United Nations but there are exceptions to everything. This is acknowledging Efua Dorkenoo and all she did to combat Female Genital Mutilation that is a problem in many countries, mostly MUSLIM countries. She passed away on October 18th in London.

FGM is a particularly heinous practice and is most commonly practiced in Muslim countries and by Muslim, Asian immigrants.

Below is the obituary from the our local fish wrapper and note that the tone of the obituary is quite politically correct and ensures that Islam and Muslims are not to be blamed for this disgusting and barbaric practice even tough it has been proven over time that this is practiced in Islam and encouraged under Islamic sharia law. This does not change or dilute the effective works of Efua Dorkenoo in the fight against FGM. PatriotUSA

From the Bend Bulletin:

Waged successful battle against genital cutting

By Douglas Martin

Efua Dorkenoo



 Efua Dorkenoo, who helped lead a successful 30-year campaign against the tradition of genital cutting of girls and women, mainly in Africa and the Middle East, by casting the practice as a human rights violation, died Oct. 18 in London. She was 65.
Equality Now, a London-based women’s rights organization she helped lead, said the cause was cancer.

Dorkenoo started organizations to battle genital cutting and coordinated the effort more broadly as acting director of women’s health at the World Health Organization in the late 1990s.

She wrote articles and an influential book — “Cutting the Rose: Female Genital Mutilation” (1996) — and lobbied the British government and international organizations. She also knocked on doors in London immigrant neighborhoods and African villages to spread her message.

Jane Kramer of The New Yorker, writing on the magazine’s website, called Dorkenoo the “warrior in chief” of the struggle against genital cutting of women. “She inspired a generation of feminists across the world to take up the cause of banning the procedure,” Kramer wrote.

Last year, the U.N. General Assembly voted unanimously to recognize female genital cutting as a human rights violation. This year, the British government prosecuted it as a crime for the first time, another of Dorkenoo’s objectives.

And an African-led organization she helped found, The Girl Generation: Together to End FGM, began work this month. Dorkenoo (Mama Efua to her admirers) was to have led the team, which is based in London and Nairobi.

Even more encouraging for her supporters, the practice is declining in many nations, the U.N. Children’s Fund reported last year. 

In Egypt, where more women have been cut than in any other nation, surveys showed that 81 percent of 15- to 19-year-olds had undergone the practice, compared with 96 percent of women in their late 40s.

Female genital cutting involves pricking, piercing or amputating some or all of the external genitalia. Sometimes the vulva is closed, leaving a small hole for the passage of urine and menstrual blood.

The practice is believed to have originated about 4,000 years ago in Egypt or the Horn of Africa. Today it is prevalent in 27 countries in Africa, as well as in Yemen and Iraqi Kurdistan and to a lesser extent in communities of immigrants around the world. 

The World Health Organization says female genital cutting has no health benefits and can cause severe bleeding, problems urinating and, later in life, cysts, infections and infertility. It is said to be intended to reduce women’s sexual pleasure — and does — and to preserve a woman’s virginity until marriage.

World health authorities say that more than 125 million women living today in the countries where it is concentrated have experienced such cutting.

Efua Dorkenoo was born in Cape Coast, Ghana, on Sept. 6, 1949, one of 11 children. She emigrated to London at 17 and became a nurse. She was aware of female genital cutting, she said, but did not personally experience it. She saw the procedure firsthand in the 1970s, when she attended a birth. The mother was so badly scarred, she said, that she could not deliver her baby through natural childbirth.

Dorkenoo began campaigning against the practice in the early  1980s. After earning a master’s degree from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, she published one of the first reports on the practice.

That helped her secure funds to establish, in 1983, the Foundation for Women’s Health and Development to promote the health of African women and girls, with a focus on abolishing female genital cutting. Britain outlawed it within two years.

Dorkenoo’s work with the foundation led to her joining the World Health Organization in 1995. As acting director of women’s health, a post she held until 2001, she coordinated national action plans against female genital cutting in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Cameroon, Kenya, Somalia and Sudan. She also persuaded the organization to classify it as a human rights violation.


Source is here.


Tags: Islam, Sharia law, Sudan, Yemen, Egypt, England, Female Genital Mutilation, FGM, Female cutting, Female circumcision, 1400 years of persecution against women by Islam, Islamic persecution of womeen and girls. To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Our Feckless State Dept. in Action




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip Washington Free Beacon, Frontpage Magazine and Hastings


Even under good conservative administrations, our State Department is by nature a feckless entity consisting of pseudo intellectuals who think they are a cut above the average American. I know because I spent as total of 8 years with DEA stationed at an embassy and a consulate overseas. In addition, I spent two years with DEA in our International Training section doing training seminars overseas, which were funded by State. I know first hand the arrogance of these folks (not all, mind you).

Having said that, I am constantly amazed by  DOS' two principle spokesholes, Jen Psaki and Marie Harf, both political activists who were rewarded by the Obama administration with the jobs they now occupy. The latest outrage is by Psaki who here insists that a Palestinian youth who was throwing Molotov cocktails at Israeli cars before he was shot dead was not a terrorist.

The Washington Free Beacon and Frontpage Magazine have the story.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/state-dept-throwing-molotov-cocktails-at-jews-not-terrorism/

Would not the prudent course of action (DOS traditionally acts "prudently") have been to not get involved in the issue at all?

"But," you say, "the kid was a US citizen".

So was that 3-month -old baby deliberately run over by a Palestinian driver in Jerusalem last week. The US embassy in Israel referred to that as a "traffic accident".

Rory Gallagher









Tags: Rory Gallagher To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

RIP Jack Bruce

After the sad news today of Jack Bruce's passing, I thought it might be worth putting up this magnificent documentary of Ginger Baker, a man after the Patriot's heart! Jack Bruce is interviewed for the film, and of course there is quite a bit of his music in the film as well. This is a sad day indeed.



And here's another reminder of Jack Bruce's music, from the Cream, 1966.




Tags: Jack Bruce, Ginger Baker, Eric Clapton, Cream To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Nothing To Do With Islam

Nothing To Do With Islam
Source: The Telegraph.


Tags: jihad, Islam, murder, Ottawa, New York To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Fast and Furious: Judicial Watch Receives Vaughn Index of Withheld Documents




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


Hat tip to Squid and a big hat tip to Judicial Watch


After two years of legal struggle, the Justice Department, under a judge's order, has turned over a list of documents withheld from Congress in its investigation of the Operation Fast and Furious scandal to Judicial Watch. This is called a Vaughn index, which lists each document withheld and the reason(s) why they are withheld. There are over 15,000 such documents, which President Obama put under his personal protection by asserting executive privilege. Stunningly, it has been revealed that e-mails between Eric Holder and his wife (who is not a government employee) and even his mother have been protected.

Judicial Watch also suggests that the release of these documents may be tied to Holder's announced resignation.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/10/obama-asserts-fast-furious-executive-privilege-claim-holders-wife-2/


"Fed up with the interminable delay caused Holder’s gamesmanship and stonewalling, JW renewed its request to the Court to allow our transparency lawsuit to continue.  Thankfully, this past July, Judge John D. Bates ended the 16-month delay and ordered the Obama administration to produce a Vaughn index of the alleged “executive privilege” records by October 1. Judge Bates noted that no court has ever “expressly recognized” President Obama’s unprecedented executive privilege claims in the Fast and Furious matter.

Unhappy with having to produce the records prior to the elections, Justice lawyers asked the judge to give them one extra month, until November 3 (the day before Election Day!) to produce the info.  Judge Bates rejected this gambit, suggested that the Holder’s agency did not take court order seriously.  Rather than a month, Judge Bates gave Justice until yesterday to cough up the Vaughn index. Judge Bates issued his smack down on September 23.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced his resignation two days later."


There can be little doubt that if these documents ever see the light of day,  they would reveal:

1 Fast and Furious was cooked up in DOJ Hqs with the involvement of the White House.

2 Eric Holder and his top lieutenants were intimately involved in overseeing the operation.

3 Holder perjured himself before Congress.

4 The Obama White House and top levels of DOJ including Holder have been involved in a massive cover-up.

Now if we only had a Justice Department to investigate it all.

Thoughts on the Week of Terror in Canada




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


As the dust settles in Ottawa after yesterday's terror attack, it appears that Michael Zehaf-Bibeau was the lone gunman. Whether he had links to the previous jihadist killed in Canada two days earlier is still being investigated. A couple of things are becoming clear. First, lone wolf jihadists in the West are hearing the call of ISIS to strike however they can in Western countries. The threat of more attacks is real, indeed certain. Pinhead professors like Juan Cole of the University of Michigan can pooh-pooh it and dismiss warnings as racist and Islamophobic all they want. They will eventually be laughed out of  the public discourse by real events.

As for Islamophobia, I would guess that after this week's events, a few million more Canadians have become Islamophobes. They may be fodder for UC Berkeley professor Hatem Bazian's Islamophobia Research and Documentation Center, but the numbers can only grow rather than diminish.

For everyday brings news of another atrocity, whether it be an attack in the West, a car bomb in Iraq, a beheading in Syria, a stoning in Afghanistan, a kidnapping of schoolgirls in Nigeria, a death sentence for blasphemy in Pakistan, or for apostasy in Sudan; it is a daily occurrence.

Once again I repeat my usual disclaimer: I don't condemn all Muslims and neither should you. God forbid that we in the West begin retaliating against innocent Muslim citizens living in the West. Yet it is becoming very tiring to hear apologists like CAIR and MPAC "condemn" the acts of ISIS and al Qaeda while refusing to condemn the acts of Hamas directed towards Israelis. (Yesterday, a Palestinian in Jerusalem aimed his car at a crowd and killed a three-month-old baby, an act that was applauded, if not ordered, by Hamas.) The story line of the CAIR types is that they "condemn all acts of terror against innocent civilians" (a phrase wide enough to drive a truck through according to their definitions.). Yet CAIR's biggest concern is lashing back against any outcry against terror as being Islamophobic. They and others tell us that these acts have nothing to do with Islam-even though they are being carried out in the name of Islam. They tell us how the Qu'ran forbids the taking of human life-side skipping the caveats and the fact that all the peaceful verses they recite are Abrogated by later contradictory verses that urge the Muslim to kill the unbelievers. (I capitalize abrogate because that is an Islamic scholarly principle of interpreting the Qu'ran.) The final major chapter in the Qu'ran is sura 9 which is also its most hateful and violent. It virtually abrogates any verses recorded earlier in time which are contradictory. (The final sura-110- consists of only a couple of sentences.) Yet we are to believe that Islam is a religion of peace.

The apologists and propagandists also tell us that the Prophet Mohammad was a kind and generous man who forgave his enemies. In truth, Mohammad was a warrior and military leader who spread Islam at the point of a sword and oversaw the executions-by beheadings- of captured prisoners and the sale of their wives and daughters into slavery. This is historical fact not slander. What ISIS is doing today is what Mohammad's armies did 1400 years ago. Muslims themselves know it because it is heralded in Islamic texts themselves. Also well chronicled in the Qu'ran and the hadith (the life and traditions of Mohammad) are constant hateful references to Jews and Christians. Those hateful references continue to this day in thousands of mosques around the world even in the West.

So as we watch the never-ending series of attacks against non-Muslims, the persecution of Christians across the Islamic world and even wars between Sunni and Shia, the apologists ask us to believe that Islam is a religion of peace and that what we are witnessing is not Islam. As much as we may want to believe this, it strains credulity. The "peace" is only meant to be among Muslims themselves-and among the same branches of Islam no less.

If what the CAIR types tell us is true, where are the million man marches-at least in the West if not within the Islamic world itself? As we speak, yesterday was proclaimed by CAIR to be a Day of Action. Action against what-the "hijacking" of Islam by ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram and all the other terror organizations running around the globe? Was it a call for Muslims to engage in some self examination? No, it was a protest against police brutality and incarceration of brown and black people-a cynical attempt to rally other minorities to their own cause.  It will be a cold day in Hell before millions of Muslims take to the streets and demand a cleansing of this evil or a Reformation within Islam that would rid it of its violent and intolerant aspects. In truth, they cannot without rejecting Mohammad and the Qu'ran itself. By their definition, that is apostasy, a "crime" by the way, punishable by death under Sharia law.  No, that is not going to happen.

In addition, CAIR has a long track record of former officials who have been uncovered in terrorist plots or providing other terrorist support. The rest of these activists and so-called Muslim leaders are what we call "stealth jihadists" forsaking violence to work within the system to bring about the same goal as ISIS-a worldwide Islamic caliphate.

As for the rest of us, all we can do is await the next attack on our home soil. The day is going to come when the "Islamophobia" overflows our societies. Hopefully, that will not result in hate and retaliation against innocent people who do live peaceful lives and have no wish to harm us or change our way of life. It should, however, force our heretofore feckless leaders to call a halt to Islamic immigration and to take decisive action against the jihadists-stealth or otherwise- who are walking among us and preparing for that envisioned day when Islam will reign supreme. We cannot afford the luxury of having to rely on our diplomatic, immigration, intelligence and police forces of having to weed out the bad from the good.

As for that Islamophobia Research and Documentation Center at UC Berkeley, I suggest Mr Bazian request additional funding to expand his facility. He's going to need a lot of file space.

Power Comes From Lying



Everyone knows how commendable it is for a prince to keep his word and live by integrity rather than by cunning. And yet our own era has shown that princes who have little regard for their word have achieved great things, being expert at beguiling men's minds.

Machiavelli, Niccolo (2009-01-01). The Prince (Vintage Classics) (p. 64). Random House. Kindle Edition.



The latest atrocity committed in the Islamic State has just been released into the public consciousness. According to reports in the mainstream media, a teenage boy has been crucified after being found guilty of betraying the religion of Islam. The devout Muslims who murdered the boy made sure that his ordeal lasted for three days. [1]

This brings to mind the Islamic forces who invaded Malta in 1565, who after finally defeating the Knights of St. John at St. Elmo, beheaded the corpses then nailed them on to crosses before floating them across Grand Harbour to their brothers at Senglea.

One is struck by the attempts by both groups of Muslims to take possession of the Christian narrative and use it for their own dark purposes.

In the face of the atrocities that are being committed daily by the Muslims of the Islamic State, the Prime Minister of Great Britain, David Cameron, acknowledges that “they (the Muslims of the Islamic State) claim to do this in the name of Islam”, but insists that 'that is nonsense, Islam is a religion of peace'. [2] Cameron has already made his position on the religion of Islam clear, stating after the murder of a British soldier on the streets of London by two 'soldiers of Allah' called Mujahid Abu Hamza and Ismail Ibn Abdullah that 'there is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act'. [3]

In order to evaluate Cameron's position on the religion of Islam, we need to familiarise ourselves with some basic logical concepts. A categorical proposition is a statement which relates members of one group to members of another. It has a subject term and a predicate term, and it can be expressed in the following standard forms: All S are P, No S are P, Some S are P and Some S are not P.

One attribute of categorical propositions is quantity. This refers to whether the proposition makes a claim about every member of the class denoted by the subject term. The propositions 'All S are P' and 'No S are P' both say something about all members of the class denoted by the subject term S, so those propositions are said to be universal. The propositions 'Some S are P' and 'Some S are not P' say something about one or more (but not all) members of the class denoted by the subject term S, so those propositions are said to be particular.

Another attribute of categorical propositions is quality. A categorical proposition claims that some or all the members of the class denoted by the subject term are also members of the class denoted by the predicate term, which is affirmative, or that they are not, which is negative. So the propositions 'All S are P' and 'Some S are P' are affirmative and the propositions 'No S are P' and 'Some S are not P' are negative.

The four standard form categorical propositions have traditionally been referred to using the first four vowels of the Roman alphabet. The universal affirmative proposition (All S are P) is called an A proposition, the universal negative (No S are P) is an E proposition, the particular affirmative (Some S are P) is an I proposition and the particular negative (Some S are not P) is an O proposition.

So where the subject term is Islamic doctrines and the predicate term is doctrines that justify acts of cruelty and barbarism, we can see that Cameron has explained his position on Islam using an E proposition (No S are P). This can be illustrated using a Venn diagram, as follows:




Having laid out David Cameron's position, the first thing we have to remember is that Cameron is a British politician, and as Cameron himself has acknowledged (before a Christian audience, in typically Machiavellian fashion) the United Kingdom is a Christian country, our society is founded on Judeo-Christian values, and the Bible is part of our cultural and political heritage. [4] This then, is the context in which Cameron received his education.

Cameron has acknowledged that he is not an authority on any religion, and admits he has not taken the trouble to educate himself specifically about Islam. So there is nothing to suggest that David Cameron knows the first thing about Islamic doctrines and practices. [5]

If anyone asserts that Islam is 'a religion of peace' simply because David Cameron has uttered those words, then they are obviously making an appeal to inappropriate authority. (This is a fallacy – the argumentum ad verecundiam.)

 On the other hand, there is no legitimate reason for us not take the confessions of murderers seriously. When Mujahid Abu Hamza was filmed red-handed at the scene of his crime, for example, he explicitly cited surah at-taubah, the ninth surah of the Koran but one of the last to be written, as he explained his motives to the world.

Time and again, we see Muslims who have committed acts of barbarism stating that their motives are Islamic. We see respected men like Shashank Joshi acknowledging in the national press that 'the practice of beheading is invoked in the Koran'. And we see Muslims like Professor Ednan Aslan from the University of Vienna, a man who unlike David Cameron, has taken the time to educate himself about the religion of Islam, acknowledging that everything the Islamic State is doing is 'theologically correct' because it comes directly from the foundational texts of Islam. [6]

And here we come to an important logical point. If, where the subject term is Islamic doctrines and the predicate term is doctrines that justify 'dreadful' acts of barbarism and cruelty, the E proposition (No S are P) is false, that does not mean that the corresponding A proposition (All S are P) is true.. It's important to note here that that is not what people in the Counter-jihad are saying when they draw attention to specific Islamic doctrines. (Anyone who says otherwise is attacking a straw man.)

If an E proposition is false, then as a matter of logic, we can only say that the corresponding I proposition (Some S are P) must be true. This proposition can be illustrated by another Venn diagram:




Note that the section where S and P overlap is no longer empty, but has the variable x assigned to it, where the value of that variable is undetermined.

So David Cameron's E proposition (No S are P) is false, the British government's position is untenable, taking anything Cameron says about Islam seriously is not rational behaviour, and the people involved in the Counter-jihad are telling the truth. Where the subject terms is Islamic doctrines and the predicate term is doctrines that justify cruelty and brutality, the particular affirmative proposition (Some S are P) is true.




You might think that the nonsense that we hear from the likes of David Cameron should just be ignored, and we can start discussing the real issues behind the ever-growing menace of Islamic terrorism in the Western world any time we like. But we've been waiting for just over 13 years for that to happen, and if we don't do something about it shortly, then it looks like it never will.

As Peter Hitchens says, the views of anyone who wants to discuss problems with Islamic doctrines and practices should be taken on board by their opponents and addressed using reason, facts and logic. Unfortunately, that doesn't happen in this country of ours.

We are going to have to force the issue. We need to use David Cameron's own words against him whenever he makes unsupported assertions about the doctrines and practices of Islam.


“In making this speech I claim no religious authority whatsoever.” - David Cameron, 16th December 2011.

“I'm not a scholar of any religion.” - David Cameron, 8th October 2014.


And whenever any member of the political elite repeats the assertion that Islam is a religion of peace, we need to remind people of what John Stuart Mill wrote in On Liberty:

“They have no authority to decide the question for all mankind, and exclude every other person from the means of judging. To refuse a hearing to an opinion, because they are sure that it is false, is to assume that their certainty is the same thing as absolute certainty. All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility. Its condemnation may be allowed to rest on this common argument, not the worse for being common.”

Mill, John Stuart (2006-08-31). On Liberty and the Subjection of Women (Penguin Classics) (p. 24). Penguin UK. Kindle Edition.


We need to remind people of the archetypal politician Senator Roark in Sin City, who told the Machiavellian truth about politics: 'Power comes from lying – lying big and getting the whole damn world to play along with you.' And we need to ask them if they really want to give that power to a nobody like David Cameron.












References

1. Joshi, P. Isis Terror Group Release Images of Teenager Crucified for Apostasy, Yahoo News, 18th October 2014 (accessed 20/10/2014).

2. Cameron Says 'Islam is a Religion of Peace... We Will Destroy ISIL With an Iron Determination', Breibart London, 14th September 2014 (accessed 20/10/2014).

3. Morris, N. Murder of soldier in Woolwich was a 'betrayal of Islam' says Cameron as he insists Britain will stand resolute against terror, The Independent, 23d May 2013 (accessed 20/10/2014.

4. Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister's King James Bible Speech, November 16th 2011 (accessed 22/10/2014).

5. Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street, David Cameron's 2014 Eid al-Adha reception speech, 9th October 2014 (accessed 22/10/2014);
Spencer, R. David Cameron on Eid Al-Adha: “Islamic State has nothing to do with the great religion of Islam, a religion of peace.”, jihadwatch, 12th October 2014 (accessed 22/10/2014);
Surah 60:4, Koran (accessed 22/10/2014).

6. Joshi, S. Shashank Joshi: Royal United Services Institute, Harvard University (accessed 23/10/2014;
Joshi, S. Where does the Islamic State's fetish with beheading come from?, The Telegraph, 14th September 2014 (accessed 22/10/2014);
An Antiquated Theory Shaped by Revenge, War and Violence, Gates of Vienna, 21st October 2014 (accessed 22/10/2014);
Revelation: The Fuel Project Guide (Appendix Video 1 - Violent Islamic Verses), youtube, 24th February 2014 (accessed 22/10/2014).

Juan Cole Condemns David Cameron for Alerting UK Public to ISIS Fighters From Britain




Calls it Racist and Islamophobic at Speech at Cal State Long Beach 


University of Michigan history professor Juan Cole spoke at CSU Long Beach on Thursday, October 16.  I attended and videotaped the event which was organized by the Middle Eastern Studies Program with assistance from the Department of History and History Students’ Association, and is sponsored by the Office of the Provost and College of Liberal Arts. The auditorium was standing room only, so I am guessing there was around 300 students and professors in attendance. The topic was ISIS. Cole spoke on the historical events mostly in Iraq from the end of the Ottoman Empire to the present and spoke very briefly on Syria. He spoke for about an hour before taking questions. As expected, he spoke very derisively of the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq in 2003. Much of his talk focused on the displacement of the Sunnis/Baath party with the fall of Saddam Hussein and how they became fighters against the Shi'ite regime eventually morphing into ISIS.

One of the more noteworthy things Cole said, however, came during the q and a (Tape 119 at 4:15 mark) when a young man asked him about the Westerners who have joined ISIS, particularly the Brit known as Jihadi John who carried out the notorious beheadings. This led Cole into a denunciation of British Prime Minister David Cameron, who Cole said was using the issue to cause fear among the British public. Cameron, said Cole, was playing to his Conservative Party constituency, which he calls racist. He called the release of the news Islamophobic, a way to beat up on British Muslims,  and said that Cameron should be ashamed. Cole added that there are almost 4 million Muslims in Britain and that the quoted number of 400 who have reportedly gone to join ISIS is an infinitesimal number. He briefly referred to the FBI claiming that some 100 Americans have joined up but said nothing about all the other Western nations whose passport-holders have joined. In responding to another young female questioner, Cole condemned Islamophobia and stereotyping of Muslims.

 I had to leave just as the last two audience members were lined up at the microphone so I missed their questions and Cole's answers.














Comment: While Cole has probably forgotten more about the Middle East than I will ever know, I do take exception with his comments about the release of news that some 400 British Muslims have gone off to join ISIS. While it may be an infinitesimal number compared to the overall Muslim population of the UK, and may not represent majority Muslim thought, it is a cause for concern.  Four hundred ISIS fighters returning to Britain can do a lot of damage to a country that has already experienced the slaughter of a British soldier on a London street and the recent beheading of a woman by a Muslim convert. In addition, the killer who attacked the Brussels Jewish center was a French citizen who had returned from fighting in Syria-to say nothing about the pernicious influence of Anjem Choudary and his followers in the UK. Finally, such Western fighters have originated in other European countries as well as Canada, Australia and the US. This is nothing for Cole to pooh-pooh. But, let's face it: Cole has his agenda.

Worse than Eric Holder-it is possible.

I know of this racist and NONE of it is good.

He could be the worst pick possible to replace Eric Holder. This man is a pure and complete racist and makes any KKK member look like an angel.

If you are not aware of Tom Perez, you must educate yourself and fast. If you thinking of sitting out the elections this year, I urge you not to do so. I also am asking you to vote conservative and punch the democrats ticket out of Mordor on the Potomac.

Post is stolen from the treehouse and thanks to sundance and all there. Just a fine, fine site, maybe the best one there is.

This man is not good for me, you, or our children. He is not safe nor is he good for these United States of America. PatriotUSA

Steer in: The Last Refuge

********************

Top Of The List To Replace Eric Holder Is Left-Wing Radical Tom Perez – A Governmental Racist and Liberal Of The Highest Magnitude…

Inside the beltway conversation has all but announced the nomination of current labor secretary Tom Perez to replace Eric Holder. If you were inclined to think of Eric Holder as an activist Attorney General, you can multiply that by infinite magnitudes with Tom Perez. We have researched him for several years as his job before Labor Secretary was the head of the CRS.

Tom perez and Eric Holder

However there are two serious issues which could disqualify Perez from contention to the job, IF they are reviewed by the Senate.

The first was his attachment to an illegal quid-pro-quo scheme.

Back in 2013 a St. Paul, Minnesota community activist, Frederick Newell, appeared before a senate committee to expose (discuss) a $200 million whistleblower lawsuit that Tom Perez, the head of the Department of Justice’s civil rights enforcement, allegedly dismissed as part of a quid pro quo deal with the city of St. Paul.

The city withdrew a petition that was headed to the Supreme Court in a case that would have easily overturned the concept of disparate impact, a racial discrimination doctrine that Perez supports.

The concept of disparate impact is the lynch pin to the entire construct of the DOJ’s approaches toward activist engineering and policy – a supreme court ruling against the application of disparate impact would have destroyed years of social engineering work done by the DOJ.

In exchange for St. Paul dropping the Supreme Court case, the DOJ dropped their support for a whistleblower lawsuit against the city citing the lawsuit having no merit.

In addition to the race-based controversy surrounding the Minnesota, St Paul, quid-pro-quo, we have previously outlined some other perhaps more alarming issues:
To call Perez a radical is to do an injustice to the term itself. Tom Perez is a racial radical, a specific and intentional race based politico of the highest order.

Much of the information you will read about Perez will outline his warm affection to Islam in general, and to Sharia Law specifically. That alone should be alarming to the casually interested. But his ideological perspectives and his previous institutional activity within the Dept Of Justice should raise alarm levels to infinity.

Tom Perez was head of the “Civil Rights Division” within the DOJ. In that position he is in charge of the Community Relations Service, the super-secret race-based sub agency affectionately, and ironically, called “The Peacekeepers”.

Both Eric Holder and Tom Perez use the Dept of Justice to deliver their perspectives of social justice to the larger population. It is the ideology of considering race first, and behavior second, which has led to numerous alarming proclamations from various elements within the larger Federal apparatus.

A four year investigation concluded with a scathing 250 page report outlining the horrific nature of the Civil Rights division within the DOJ and the application of law based on race. (pdf here)



In order for Perez to get through the confirmation process the GOP will have to ignore the report above.   It is really devastating in its directly calling out the unlawful application of justice based purely on the race of the individuals or group.

[I would urge everyone to print and read that pdf above - it will blow your mind] 

Under any normal circumstance the substance within that report would disqualify ANYONE from holding such an important office.  But this is Obama’s America, so anything is possible now.

Consider these social engineering examples:

- In an effort to address what they view as “wrongs” school discipline is now being considered based on race and not behavior.

- In an effort to address black employment, movement is now underway to stop criminal background checks from being allowed as a qualifier for hiring.

These and other manipulative efforts on behalf of the DOJ, and various entities who look to the DOJ for process enforcement (example EEOC), are leading to a very alarming application of law; One that first looks at race, then after review of racial context looks at the behavior of the person, to determine unlawful considerations.

This ‘race as a defining prism’ approach should alarm everyone. Yet there is a strong possibility Tom Perez will be the next nominee for U.S. attorney general…. to continue the Eric Holder legacy.

Perez comes from Maryland – to understand how far he would push the limits of social engineering look at examples of his ideological perspectives/policies as they are executed – and their actual engagements HERE.

Source is here.




Tags: Black Grievance Industry, CRS, Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness, Diversity, Multiculturalism, Racism, Regressive progressive behavior, Obama, Holder, Perez, Commies, Socialists, Tyranny, Enslavement To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Michael Gene Vinassa (1946-1966-Vietnam)




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com



For the past few years, I have been marking Memorial Day with re-postings on two of my high school friends who died in Vietnam. One of them was Michael Gene Vinassa, who died before he was twenty one.

This past weekend I was in the North Hollywood area and decided to swing by Forest Lawn Cemetery before heading back to Orange County. I wanted to visit Mike's grave because on the one previous occasion I was there, I had only found it after great effort and in a driving rainstorm which drove me back to my car after only a few seconds. I wanted to pay a proper visit where I could spend a few minutes and meditate. I also wanted to find my great-aunt's grave, which I had been unable to do the previous time. (Even with the marker numbers, it's still like finding a needle in the haystack at Forest Lawn. For the second time, I failed to locate her grave.)

When Mike was killed, I was just arriving in Germany after finishing Military Police School at Ft. Gordon, Georgia. It's one of the things you think about when you visit the grave of a vet killed in Vietnam. How is it that fate sent me to Germany and Mike to Vietnam and an early death? How is it that I am still alive standing at Mike's grave all these decades later? I am now 69 and Mike is forever 20.

The circumstances of Mike's heroic death are found in this article by a survivor of the battle in which Mike lost his life. As I reported before, Mike was due to finish his tour in Vietnam within days and had to beg his commanding officer into letting him go on the mission.

http://www.jumpingmustangs.com/bravo6571/bravocrazyhorse.html

Mike's mother, Glenadine, survived him by 8 years and is buried next to him. I don't think Mike had any siblings, and it was my recollection that his father was deceased when Mike was young. Mike was all she had.

Gary Fouse's photo.

May you both rest in peace.

Sweden - Ship of fools

Pat Condell's latest video and he takes up the stupidity of Sweden which is so politically correct it has truly touched and ruined everything.




Tags: Pat Condell, Sweden, Political correctness, Dhimmi stooges of the left, Liberals, Progressives, Taqiyya, Islam and sharia law, Muslim, or Asian immigration, Europe To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Pakistan Comes to UK




Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com

Hat tip Gates of Vienna


Here is one Englishman's account of the change in his UK community thanks to the unrestricted immigration of Pakistanis to the UK and their refusal to accept English values.

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/10/bradistan-importing-a-culture-gap/#comment-406471

And who represents Bradford in Parliament?

That would be your friend and mine, punch drunk George Galloway.





"I think you're a liar."

"Fed Up, Furious and Disgusted"

Awesome.

Killer, stone awesome and the  some. Fine rant and superbly done.

I read this and immediately knew I had to share this here. I requested permission to re-post and was granted permission to do so. The author has requested that their name be omitted from the post and I have honored their request. Passionate, to the point and what you will read is all true. EVERY word of this is true. What the author states is true for EVERY country that has to deal with Islam and radical Muslims.

There is no peace with Islam and with Islam, there can NEVER be peace. PatriotUSA

********************

"Fed Up, Furious and Disgusted"



 I'm damned bloody FED UP of Islam! This is not a horror movie, nor is this a bad nightmare, this is REAL life and REAL lives.

I'm FED UP that every single minute of every single day there are the most evil, barbaric, violent, inhumane atrocities occurring all around the world all in the name of "Allah".
I'm FED UP that nobody seemingly has the guts or spine to step up and stop this - yes to STOP IT, once and for all! You oh so politically correct waste of space and oxygen thieves United Nations, YOU world leaders with no guts!

I'm FED UP of the rest of the world bowing down to these mongrels and being too afraid to speak out and take a solid stand for fear of "offending" these bastards. Tippy toeing around this major problem on egg shells! Believe it or not, it is no longer becoming a VERY serious problem, it is NOW an extremely serious problem, right here and right now, and all around the world.

I'm FURIOUS with the bleeding hearts who are so blind and who have their heads so far up their arses blatantly ignoring issues such as FGM, honour killings, child marriages to filthy rotten maggots, rapes and other heinous crimes that are occurring RIGHT NOW in our own backyards. Oh yes, the bleeding hearts' barkings and howlings over these issues are never heard and their silence speaks volumes.

I’m FURIOUS that both the Labor Government, the Greens and all of those imbecile bleeding hearts that voted for them, have allowed this to happen and still continue to whinge and whine and howl about allowing more and more in. I've said it before and I'll say it again, their hearts only ever bleed when it suits their own political agendas.
I’m FURIOUS with the continuous blatant ignorance, the denial and the crocodile tears of the socialist left who welcome with open arms, this dangerous and evil cult, these people filled with such hatred and such rage towards everything we, in the western world, hold dear and precious.

They are conveniently delusional towards the psychopathic mindset, rage and hatred filled within. Now, I'm no rocket scientist, however even I can see what is happening, and what has indeed already happened throughout America, Europe and Great Britain.... Joining the dots isn't too difficult between Islam and horrendous violence, crime and terrorism.
How did these once beautiful Countries become so blind, so delusional, so welcoming, so accepting and so tolerant, yet now so incredibly afraid and living in fear?

Has anyone ever heard the socialist left agree with any factors of the downside of immigration by these people, or indeed has anyone ever heard them speak negatively of Islam or ever agreed that they simply refuse to assimilate?

Nooooooooooooo! They bury those inconvenient truths oh so very deep and their selective hearing - Hear no evil, see no evil!

The only upside of these crimmigrants is that their presence has created more jobs, particularly for those who work within the Middle Eastern Crime Units!

I'm FURIOUS with the increased crime rates, the drive by shootings, stabbings and many other violent crimes happening here every day because violence is inbred in them, it's the only way the majority of them know! Violence is their culture, it is in their DNA.
I'm FED UP of these bastards disrespecting our way of life, disrespecting our freedom, disrespecting our laws and basically spitting all over our beautiful Country and its people and all that our forefathers sacrificed and fought for.

I’m FURIOUS with our justice system continuously making allowances for, and delivering lenient sentences based on defences of cultural and religious differences - helllooooooo? Can you see my "pinkie wave"?

Cultural and religious differences? Here’s my view –

DON'T come here, DON'T let the bastards in until they are EDUCATED on OUR culture, on OUR what's right and wrong and on OUR laws! Oh and by the way, what's the excuse for the ones that were born and bred here? Huh?

They are a law unto themselves and their arrogance and sheer total lack of respect for any common decency, they truly believe they are above the law.

I'm FURIOUS that these mongrels get everything handed to them on a silver platter, come here for a nice cosy free lifestyle, and yet bring their violence and their hatred and loathing towards us with them. They never ever give, all they ever do is take and take and take, with a sniggering and smug smile to disguise the hatred and loathing they hide deep within their dark and sinister eyes, of those they greedily take from.

Still, the socialist left support them with open arms!

Oh and here’s a charming thought - who in the hell gave them, and when exactly did they begin to receive, more damned rights and special privileges and treatment than the rest of us? Because they sure as hell are receiving them every single day.

I'm FURIOUS with social networking constantly closing down or blocking many forms of any anti Islamic supposed "free speech", yet still allowing Islamic threats, beheadings, heinous crimes and the most graphic, vile, inhumane images to be circulated with pride all in the name of "Islam".

I’m FURIOUS that for years and years, so many people of Australia have had their eyes closed and have lacked the insight and have refused to acknowledge the danger of the infiltration of Islam, that they have shown nothing other than sheer ignorance and denial as to the evils which now surround us in our own home.

I’m FURIOUS, and there is no doubt whatsoever in my mind, that before we know it, we will wake up one day and find ourselves the MINORITY in our own beautiful country.
We have remained complacent for far, far too long and I fear that it is far too late.
I'm DISGUSTED of what our beautiful Country, no longer is simply becoming, but has already NOW become.

Wake up Australia, you have been asleep for far too long and you now have every reason to be very, very afraid for, not only Australia's future, but Australia's present.
This is not about immigration, this is not about diversity nor is this about multiculturalism, this is infiltration, Islam is Islam - it has never, nor will ever assimilate, nor will it ever accept or respect anything other than Islam.
Nor is this fear mongering, it is the TRUTH!

Our country has been built on harmonious immigration, we have welcomed immigration and multiculturalism from all corners of the globe, and from those corners people have adapted and embraced the Australian way of life, all except for these bastards who do not even know, nor are they willing to even attempt to try to understand, the meaning of "harmony", "acceptance" and "tolerance".

There are so many words to describe Islam: dark, sinister, evil, treacherous, barbaric, cruel, and our worst enemy in every western society. A "peaceful religion"? Oh give me a break! It is not peaceful nor is it a religion, it is a sick, twisted, violent, brainwashed political, totalitarian, militaristic, cult and ideology, hiding within a so called “religion”.
Do you honestly believe these grubs love our beautiful Australia with their heart and soul like the rest of us? Do you honestly believe, should a war break out, they would raise their hands to defend our beautiful Nation?

Nope! Not for a second! Sure, there may be a few, but I guarantee that "few" would struggle to fill a mosque or a kebab shop!

Australia needs to be cleansed back to its former glory, because we are in for one hell of a ride with Islam over the next few years

This vicious battle has only just begun, the enemy now lives amongst us and this is not a matter of keeping our enemies close. They are way too close and gaining far too much power.

This is now Islam –V- A Free Civil World.

Oh and yes, political correctness and Allah can kiss my %$#!


Tags: Islam Jihad, Stealth Jihad, Global jihad to establish a global Islamic caliphate, Sharia law, ISIS, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Israel, The Levant, Muslim terrorism, Obama, Political correctness, Liberals, Progressives, Feminazis, Mohammad, Allah is a puke, FGM, Slavery, Persecution, Subjugation, Jizya, Muslim taqiyya  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

Rightful Liberty-Focus and Pitfalls


This is an outstanding article that was linked up over at Western Rifle Shooters Association. The title speaks for itself and where do you stand in this? I have no questions about where I stand, how I feel about our Constitution, our Bill of Rights. I have often stated that I believe the Founding Fathers had it right back then as best they could. Our Constitution is not perfect, I am not and neither are you. There is nothing that has come along since that is better in any way shape or form. Anything that was previously tried in comparison is again, in my opinion, inferior and fails to measure up to the U.S. Constitution.

"Because here is the thing – the cause of Rightful Liberty and the USC and BoR and all that were drawn up in a certain time by men of a certain culture., They were Anglo-Saxon and culturally Christian, although many of them were somewhat secular in their views – they certainly understood the separation of church and State. The point is that they had the Anglo-Saxon cultural values of morals and ethics. However, there was even debate among them about how much power government should have, and how trusted people could be to actually bear the responsibility of Rightful Liberty. If people are generally low curs and will cut your throat at any opportunity, then they will not form a civil society. This is the philosophical debate that raged across the philosophers from Hobbes to Locke and onward. The nature of man, and how to govern. However, low curs is  what many have become, largely engineered by the radical left. They have cleverly engineered a situation where the majority of the population cannot function in a situation of self-determination and Rightful Liberty. They need the nanny state. However, I don’t give a fig, because you and I are able to function and self-determine, and I am a free man. Why should we all be brought to the level of the low-information voter?"

Read the rest and let the tempest within your soul stand with those of us who agree. PatriotUSA
 
Steer in: WRSA

********************


 Rightful Liberty: Focus & Pitfalls
Max Velocity

There is an interesting comment by Kerodin on my previous Rightful Liberty post: Rightful Liberty: Continental Congress which highlights the problems we face in the liberty community. It is a problem borne of the inherent strength of that community, but also its weakness. What is that problem? Well: everyone has an opinion!
Kerodin’s comment:
As I write this there are about 40 comments. How many have remained focused on the fundamental point of the essay series – Rightful Liberty.

When we stray from that fundamental First Principle and begin arguing AoC versus USC versus Magna Carta Versus Skittles and Unicorns, we begin to separate as a group.

Aim small, miss small.

Stay focused on the premise (Rightful Liberty) and we actually have a chance of victory. If we permit ourselves to be distracted this easily among generally like-minded people, we’ll never build real cohesion when serious Enemies of Liberty focus their efforts on us.

Rightful Liberty.

That is the mission. It is morally, ethically and intellectually sound.
Keep it simple.

Well said. People are already disappearing down rabbit holes of USC vs. AoC vs Anarchy vs. etc. etc. Focus! Cohesion. The radical left are very good at that. Being ‘on message.’
And that is not even to mention that many are suffering failures of reading comprehension and mistaking my call for a Continental Congress with that of a Constitutional Convention. I think some of that is tram-line thinking in peoples minds, where they just keep on trotting out the old adages without pausing to think outside the box.

Focus on Rightful Liberty. That is the message and the goal. Given the chance of getting anywhere near that goal, then perhaps we can worry about the fine print of the actual law.

Here is another one from BattlefieldUSA on the same post over at WRSA. This one is in reference to the call of the Paranoid Radical Individualist (PRI) who wishes for no government at all, and calls the Constitution collectivism-light:
Face reality. You will have government whether you like it or not. Whether it is one nation of 50 tribes, or… a hodgepodge of a zillion tribes. You WILL have government in one form or another. And even then, no matter what type of government falls over your head, there are going to those who bitch about whatever government they find themselves under.

No, I don’t think our current constitution is PERFECT. But mankind is not PERFECT. You are not PERFECT. The debate of the constitution as it was being formed was hot and contentious. And we ended up with what we have after much debate. Personally, in our current state of education of feelings and Sophism, I don’t think there is anyone on this planet with the reason, logic, and virtue, to come up with something better… that will speak for ITSELF and be SELF-ENFORCING.

It is frikkin LAZINESS and lack of COURAGE that keeps ALL OF US from undergoing the fatigue of supporting the one we do have. And as things are, it with be laziness and lack of courage that will keep us from undergoing the fatigue of supporting the one YOU WANT… what ever IT is.

And… as it IS… even Patrick Henry KNEW that there would be a time, if they DID NOT act… there would be no chance of turning the tide. You, we, us… can NOT even keep the one we have.

Of course, you may say the one we have is not worthy of keeping. Of which I will tell, give us something that YOU believe is worth keeping… make it happen… then keep it.
And seriously, without unity, without some form of collectivism, it will never happen. (Cue the Sophism).

So, my point is that we must focus on the prize, which is Rightful Liberty. It is both the prize and the guiding principle.

But I think the place where many of both the left and the right fall down is the principle of Rightful Liberty itself. Rightful Liberty means what it says. Here is the definition:
“Liberty then I would say that, in the whole plenitude of it’s extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will: but rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will, within the limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’; because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual.” Thomas Jefferson.

And as such Rightful Liberty is not carte blanche for you to impose your will on other people. Whatever flavor your collectivist will is: Leftist statism, or perhaps theocratic religious despotism. This is where many fall down, because they don’t realize that Rightful Liberty prevents the imposition of your will on others if they don’t want it. Our greatest threat is from the radical left, but I am almost as equally frustrated by the right wing politico/religious zealotry out there. Not the mention the tin-foil hattery. I mean, as an example, a reader commented (I declined to publish), that he was A MAN OF GOD and thus he could not agree with my post on rationalism. What? Was he therefore saying that his position as a man of god was fundamentally irrational? Please be religious by all means, but be rational also.

The USC and the BoR are not perfect documents. But they were the best that could be come up with at the time, and they are the foundation of the law of the land. That the law has been perverted by Leviathan is not the fault of those documents, but a human failing, a failing of guardianship. Because after all, what is the true purpose of the law, and what was the purpose of the USC and the BoR? It was simply to codify and protect Rightful Liberty while at the same time providing a guide as to the “limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.” And as such, that is what the law is for – it is to provide common law by which individuals can be protected from crimes committed by both other individuals and the government, such as may affect their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

As Jefferson said:
“The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” Thomas Jefferson.

Government should not be involved in most of the ‘big’ social issues that are such electoral tinder boxes nowadays. Whether you like it or not, if it does no harm to others, then it is the Rightful Liberty of those involved to do it. Get over it. Live your own life. If you think about the history of the USA, many of the emigrants came here for religious reasons. Many others did not – mainly economic ones. However, this continent can be likened to a large sieve – if you landed on the east coast, and didn’t see it as a place for your community, then you kept going west. Perhaps people on the east coast don’t go for polygamy – keep going west! Mormons in Utah etc. That is probably why California is crazy, because all the crazy people kept not fitting in and kept going west!

Because here is the thing – the cause of Rightful Liberty and the USC and BoR and all that were drawn up in a certain time by men of a certain culture., They were Anglo-Saxon and culturally Christian, although many of them were somewhat secular in their views – they certainly understood the separation of church and State. The point is that they had the Anglo-Saxon cultural values of morals and ethics. However, there was even debate among them about how much power government should have, and how trusted people could be to actually bear the responsibility of Rightful Liberty. If people are generally low curs and will cut your throat at any opportunity, then they will not form a civil society. This is the philosophical debate that raged across the philosophers from Hobbes to Locke and onward. The nature of man, and how to govern. However, low curs is  what many have become, largely engineered by the radical left. They have cleverly engineered a situation where the majority of the population cannot function in a situation of self-determination and Rightful Liberty. They need the nanny state.

However, I don’t give a fig, because you and I are able to function and self-determine, and I am a free man. Why should we all be brought to the level of the low-information voter?

But this is the problem – we have the ideal of Rightful Liberty, but we have the problem  of implementation among a population of varied and often dubious ethics and moral standing. The founders understood that the Constitution was designed for a moral society, not one of savages. Certain standards  of behavior were expected, and transgressions were not socially acceptable. Is that why the radical left hates it so? But that is what the law is for. The law is there to act on the second part of Rightful Liberty, the “within the limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others” part. We have law in civil society. I am not talking about onerous administrative law (unconstitutional power) but common law. This is where we decide what is right and wrong and where we have penalties for transgressions. This goes all the way back to pre-Christian Anglo-Saxon and Nordic culture. (Northern European). It persisted in English common law.

The law is what protects us from those ‘rabbit hole’ situations. Like what if person A was doing such and such to person B etc. Well, we should have an elected Sheriff, charged with keeping the peace. That sheriff needs a limited amount of deputies assisted by the posse as necessary. There needs to be elected magistrates who are assisted by a jury of the accused’s peers when necessary. All accountable to the people and not held over the people. Equality in the eyes of the law. You see how this is all suited to small, not large communities? Thus, if person A was accused of an unlawful act, the the posse will collect him and bring him in front of the court. Simple.

But here is my warning, and the danger of Rightful Liberty as defined. It is the “within the limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others” part which is a strength but also, in the face of the madness of current times and the radical left, a danger. In law, the concept of the ‘reasonable man’ is often used. That relies on there being a standard of what a reasonable man is. If the radical left tears down society, then how can we use that as standard of measure. You are supposed to apply common sense in the spirit of the law as a reasonable man would see it. It is supposed to be about justice over the letter of the law, because the law is an ass. However, if I can demonstrate that what you do infringes on the “within the limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others” part, then I have an entry for radical left madness. If I can argue that having guns in the house is child abuse, then I can say you are committing harm and send ‘the posse’ to get your kids. If I can say that your wood stove is polluting the air I breathe, then you are harming me and I will ban your wood stove. Etc.

So how do we prevent that? I can only say that if someone wants to bring in a law, or accuse you in front of a jury, then that law would have been voted in, or that jury would need to vote on it. Well, make sure you live in a society/community where you can be sure that the standard of ‘reasonable man’ applies. Because those people would not agree to take your children, or your wood stove. This is how you avoid the madness of the radical left, or a radical right theocracy or whatever – simply by living in a community where the ‘reasonable man’ standard applies. If you are an asshole, go live in NYC or LA. There are plenty of places in this country where there are still Constitutional Sheriffs who will not infringe your Rightful Liberty. We need more of that. We need to get back to it, as the standard.

However, if the whole nation cannot be persuaded, and if leviathan cannot be persuaded to let go its grip on our throats, then we will have to act and secede into redoubts of our own, and live our lives as Constitutional Americans, as the law of this land allows us to. Live in our communities separate from the collectivist hell holes.

Why?

BFTTW.
 
Max

Source is here.



Tags: America at war with itself, WTSHTF, Tyranny, Nanny state, Slavery, Statism, Globalism, Communism, Socialism, Shiny shovels for everyone, Obama, 2nd American Revolution. US Constitution, Bill of rights, Founding Fathers To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

BARACK "HUSSEIN"-OBAMA.-THE MYTH....THE MYSTERY

This is from a good friend on Facebook. I Tried to clean it up a bit but the formatting will still be off. I am NOT an expert by any means with formatting and such things.

Thanks to Joey Scioli Sr.

PatriotUSA

******************


 ISIS IS ISLAMIC AND ARE BORDERS ARE WIDE~A$$" OPEN!!!
By Joey Scioli Sr.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA....THE MYTH....THE MYSTERY!!!

THE TRUTH....THE WHOLE TRUTH....NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH!!!

No Wonder All Of His Records Are Sealed....Obama Paid Washington D.C. Law/Attorney Firm PERKINS COIE LLP $1.8 MILLION DOLLARS To Have ALL Of His Birth....Background....AND School Records Sealed!!

A Very Clear Statement On The Questions Of The Creation Of Barrack H. Obama. The word "Creation" is used because none of us, with the exception of Valerie Jarrett, Bill Ayers, and Michelle, know who this man is and where he came from (And do not tell me Hawaii!). Yes, this is long, but if you care about your country, you should read it and SHARE

I think this has been in the back of many peoples' minds for a long time.It's actually very disturbing, wondering when the mask is going to be removed and what will be revealed.
Why??

This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't vote for Obama. Very, very interesting perspective that I never thought of in this light. It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Presidential Library" about his early years when he is out of office.

In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't seem odd that there's so little we know about our current president, Barack Obama. For example, we know that Andrew Jackson 's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president. We are all aware of the lack of uncontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful. There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue. One other interesting thing... There are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found.

It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself. We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess Joe Biden's aneurisms are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we all know about their heart problems.. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known. That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soooo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check groomsmen. Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele,, and how? Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library, etc. What has he released? Doesn't this make you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc?? Not one person has ever come forward from his past. It certainly is very, very strange...

This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. He questions why no one has acknowledged the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him.

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records? Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University ... Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia , ever."

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York , 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia , provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia ..

Some other interesting questions..

Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002? It is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam. Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order? We understand that was forced to avoid fraud charges.

It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 alias connected to him. The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived. And was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there. As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not reused'

No Wonder All Of His Records Are Sealed....Obama Paid Washington D.C. Law/Attorney Firm PERKINS COIE LLP $1.8 MILLION DOLLARS To Have ""ALL"" Of His Birth....Background....AND School Records Sealed!!!

Please Continue Sending This Out To Everyone You Know.... Somewhere...Someone Had To Know Him In School....Before He ""Reorganized"" Chicago And Burst Upon The Scene At The 2004 Democratic Convention.

""H~E~L~L~O""....WAKING~UP YET....""KENYA"" HEAR ME!!
TALIBAN ~ AL-QAEDA ~ ISIS ~ ISIL...IT'S ""ALL"" THE SAME S**T!!
A ""RADICAL"" Muslim Wants To Behead You AND A ""MODERATE"" Muslim Wants A ""RADICAL"" Muslim To Behead You!!!""YEPPERS""....HERE IT IS GUYS!!

 (Updated 9-23-14)
HERE IT IS....WHY OBAMA REFERS TO ""ISIS"" AS ""ISIL""!!!
HIS HATRED FOR ISRAEL: And In Plain English....I keep hearing people
repeat what Barack Obama started in his news conferences. When Obama
calls the terrorists sweeping across Iraq the "ISIL" instead of the
"ISIS" he is intentionally identifying to the Arab/Islamic community
that he does not recognize the Jewish state of Israel. When he calls
them ISIL it stands for the "Islamic State of Iraq and Levant"!!!
The Levant is the land bridge from Turkey to Egypt!!!
So what he is doing is recognizing an Islamic State extending from Iran
to Egypt--and denying that the State of Israel even exists. Keep that
in mind when you hear Obama and his administration call these terrorists
"ISIL"!!!

He is positioning the United States of America as an Enemy of Israel....AND MUSLIM OBAMA HATES ISRAEL!!!
The Group Has Had A Number Of Different Names Since It Was Formed,
Including Some Names That Other Groups Use For It [10]
Index Of Names:
Links Are To Names In ""History Of Names"".
al-Dawlah ("the State")
al-Dawlat al-Islāmīyah ("the Islamic State")
AQI: Al-Qaeda in Iraq: Tanẓīm Qāʻidat al-Jihād fī Bilād al-Rāfidayn
DAʿESH/Daʿesh (variously transliterated: DAISH/Daish, DAASH/Daash,
DAESH/Daesh, DA'ASH/Da'ash, DAAS/Daas, DA'ISH/Da'ish, DĀ'ASH/Dā'ash,
DAIISH/Daiish, based on the acronym: داعش)
IS: Islamic State
ISI: Islamic State of Iraq: Dawlat al-'Iraq al-Islāmīyah
ISIL: Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Isis: Islamic State in Iraq and Syria
ISIS: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham
Islamic State (name since June 2014)
JTJ: Jamāʻat al-Tawḥīd wa-al-Jihād: Organization of Monotheism and Jihad
Mujahideen Shura Council

By: Joey Scioli Sr. (Joey The Patriot Scioli)

WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAM:

ISLAM Is A Religion/CULT Of Violence And Is Incompatible With Our U.S.
Constitution....Christianity....And Judaism......Christians & Jews
Do Not Fly Jetliners In To Buildings In GOD'S Name......Nor Do They
Strap Explosives To Their Family's...Siblings...Or Friend's Bodies To
Kill Innocent Men...Women...And Children.

PLEASE READ Your U.S. Constitution....The Declaration of Independence....And The Bill of Rights........
The United States Of America Was Founded On Judeo~Christian
Principles...Values...And Beliefs.......And Since The Koran Of The
Muslim Cult (religion) Dictates That All Non-Believers Must Be Tortured
& Murdered According To Sura 4:56...4:89...8:12...And 9:5......It
Has ""NO PLACE"" In The United States Of America.

And Their ""FALSE"" God/Prophet Muhammad Was A Womanizer And A Child Molester Too......And Their Shariah Muslim Religion Of Islam Is Nothing Short Of A Totalitarian Political...Economic...Military....And Legal System Of
Primitive And Oppressive Regulations For Women......Where Murder And
Honor Killings Is Just A Life Style....AND Children Are Often Molested.
Our Culture Is A Culture Of Judeo~Christian Principles....And
Multiculturalism Has No Place In Any Country.....You Either Accept That
Countries Culture Or Leave.....As Evidenced By The Wholesale Murder Of
Christians And Coptic Christians In The Middle East. We Need To Be Aware
That The Muslims Are Waging A War Against The West....And Calling For
An Islamic Caliphate World Wide......And America ""IS"" The Worlds Last
Bastion Of Hope!

RONALD REAGAN Was A Great President And A Godly 'WISE' Man Who Warned Us About The MUSLIMS....And Barack ""HUSSEIN"" Obama Is A Back~Stabbing Lying~Ass Kenyan Born Piece Of Muslim Sh-t.

By: Joey Scioli Sr. (Joey The Patriot Scioli)
ISLAM....CLEARLY AND CONCISELY EVIL AND VIOLENT!

The Quran:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive
them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of
Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]... but if desist,
then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until persecution
is no more, and religion is for Allah."

There is a good case to be made that the textual context of this particular passage
is defensive war, even if the historical context was not. However,
there are also two worrisome pieces to this verse. The first is that the
killing of others is authorized in the event of "persecution" (a
qualification that is ambiguous at best). The second is that fighting
may persist until "religion is for Allah." The example set by Muhammad
is not reassuring.

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But
it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that
ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know
not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous,
but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in
self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the
time. From the Hadith, we know that Muhammad was actually trying to
motivate his people into raiding caravans with this verse.

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible
agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to
help."

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts
of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for
which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists,
yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie.
what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life
of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he
slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The
martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, led meekly to the
slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle, as they attempt to
inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. Here is the
theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do,
and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from
their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is
forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them
wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from
their ranks."

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who
sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the
cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a
grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons
than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah
promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished
above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-" This passage
criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting
them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes
the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but
rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is the Arabic word used in this
passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since
the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the
context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that
he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other
translations of the verse).

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain,
then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and
retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger
and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should
be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off
on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a
disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a
grievous chastisement"

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve.
Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) -  "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless
maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath
incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless
journey's end."

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah" From the historical context we know that the "persecution" spoken of here was simply the refusal by the Meccans to allow Muhammad to enter their city
and perform the Haj. Other Muslims were able to travel there, just not
as an armed group, since Muhammad declared war on Mecca prior to his
eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion,
since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish
Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this
verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah." According to Ibn
Ishaq (324), Muhammad justified the violence further by explaining that "Allah must have no rivals."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip
(Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou
canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may
dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay
the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege
them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and
keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."
According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim
violence is to convert to Islam. Prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat)
are among the religions Five Pillars.

Quran (9:14) - "Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace..."

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and
striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much
greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The
"striving" spoken of here is Jihad.

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the
religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until
they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. This was
one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the
tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to
conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in just the next 100 years.
Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians
say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their
mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may
Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye
prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the
comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go
forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in
your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they
will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the
journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the
distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth
that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording
implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another
country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the
historians).

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that they are merely firewood for
Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's
devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him,
strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all)
good things: and it is they who will prosper."

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods;
for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for
honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they
brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral
indiscretion. The story, which is not found in any Jewish or Christian
source, tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who
does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then
justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a
youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains
that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by
"disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could
provide them a 'better' son.

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their
control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive
against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad
- obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point
out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then
they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they
will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This
passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible
murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims
who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act
as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and
Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those
who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.
It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims,
which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to
apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in
Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) "Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow
the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their
lessons by similtudes. Therefore when you meet in battle those who
disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then
make (them) prisoners," Those who reject Allah are to be subdued in
battle. The verse goes on to say the only reason Allah doesn't do the
dirty work himself is in order to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.
Those who kill pass the test. "But if it had been Allah's Will, He could
certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets
you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are
slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost."

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when
ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is
with you," This very important verse asserts that the Religion of Peace
is not to grant peace to the broader society until Islamic rule has been
established.

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso
turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary
apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so,
then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard
(ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam
is not about treating everyone equally. There are two very distinct
standards that are applied based on religious status.

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of
Peace, indeed! This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His
Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to
make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may
resist."

Quran (61:10-12) - "O ye who believe! Shall I lead you
to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye
believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in
the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be
best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit
you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in
Gardens of Eternity." This verse was given in battle. It uses the Arabic
word, Jihad.

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence
is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims
but do not act as such.

From the Hadith:

Bukhari (52:177)
- Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you
fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding
will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible
to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing
their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e.
women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)." In this command,
Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in
the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification
for the many Islamic terror bombings.

Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'
Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three
things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who
utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever
whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his
any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day
Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community
will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious Muslim
(1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight
against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that
Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah
Muslim (1:149) -
"Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is
the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in
His cause..."

Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah)
did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a
man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation
between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven
from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad
in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!"

Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One
who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any
desire (or determination) for Jihid died the death of a hypocrite.'"
Muslim (19:4321-4323) - Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs
over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men
against unbelievers. His response: "They are of them (meaning the
enemy)."

Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the
Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power." Ashraf was a
poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam. Here,
Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish
businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being
non-Muslim.

Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us" The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

Ibn Ishaq: 327 - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before
collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land.
Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom
captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the
religion.’”

Ibn Ishaq: 990 - Lest anyone think that cutting off
someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern custom, here
is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to
approve.

Ibn Ishaq: 992 - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and
kill those who disbelieve in Allah." Muhammad's instructions to his men
prior to a military raid.

REMEMBER: A ""RADICAL"" Muslim Wants To Behead You.....AND A ""MODERATE"" Muslim Wants A ""RADICAL"" Muslim To Behead You!

Source is here


Tags: Islam, Muslims, Jihad, Sharia law, Qur'an, Hadith, Levant, ISIS, Islamic jihad, Stealth jihad, Islamic persecution, subjugation, Iraq, Syria, Iran, USA, Muslim terrorism , Muslim acts of terror To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!